Evaluating Australian unconventional gas: use and misuse of North American analogues
Evaluation of Australia’s emerging unconventional gas sector (particularly shale gas, basin centered and tight gas) relies heavily on the use of North American analogues because of the lack of production history in Australian plays. While the use of analogues can be useful, no two shale or tight gas plays are identical so the use of analogues can also lead to significant pitfalls that need to be understood to be avoided. Production performance and recoverable hydrocarbons are strongly coupled to completion technology (far more than a conventional oil or gas project), and the successful implementation of technology requires an intimate knowledge of both reservoir petrophysics and geomechanics, not to mention a well-developed topside supply chain. This paper discusses the application of analogues to major Australian unconventional plays in the Cooper, Canning, and Perth basins, presents a case history from the Canning Basin, and provides guidance on the adjustments needed to ensure realistic predictions of recovery and well performance.