scholarly journals Complete reconstitution of bypass and blocking functions in a minimal artificial Fab-7 insulator from Drosophila bithorax complex

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (27) ◽  
pp. 13462-13467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Kyrchanova ◽  
Marat Sabirov ◽  
Vladic Mogila ◽  
Amina Kurbidaeva ◽  
Nikolay Postika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Talk ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Multiprotein Complex ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Artificial Boundary ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Architectural Proteins ◽  
Distance Communication

Boundaries in the bithorax complex (BX-C) delimit autonomous regulatory domains that drive parasegment-specific expression of the Hox genes Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B. The Fab-7 boundary is located between the iab-6 and iab-7 domains and has two key functions: blocking cross-talk between these domains and at the same time promoting communication (boundary bypass) between iab-6 and the Abd-B promoter. Using a replacement strategy, we found that multimerized binding sites for the architectural proteins Pita, Su(Hw), and dCTCF function as conventional insulators and block cross-talk between the iab-6 and iab-7 domains; however, they lack bypass activity, and iab-6 is unable to regulate Abd-B. Here we show that an ∼200-bp sequence of dHS1 from the Fab-7 boundary rescues the bypass defects of these multimerized binding sites. The dHS1 sequence is bound in embryos by a large multiprotein complex, Late Boundary Complex (LBC), that contains the zinc finger proteins CLAMP and GAF. Using deletions and mutations in critical GAGAG motifs, we show that bypass activity correlates with the efficiency of recruitment of LBC components CLAMP and GAF to the artificial boundary. These results indicate that LBC orchestrates long-distance communication between the iab-6 regulatory domain and the Abd-B gene, while the Pita, Su(Hw), and dCTCF proteins function to block local cross-talk between the neighboring regulatory domains iab-6 and iab-7.

scholarly journals Mechanism and functional role of the interaction between CP190 and the architectural protein Pita in Drosophila melanogaster

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marat Sabirov ◽  
Olga Kyrchanova ◽  
Galina V. Pokholkova ◽  
Artem Bonchuk ◽  
Natalia Klimenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Architectural Proteins ◽  
Cp190 Protein ◽  
Architectural Protein

AbstractThe architectural protein Pita is critical for Drosophila embryogenesis and predominantly binds to gene promoters and insulators. In particular, Pita is involved in the organization of boundaries between regulatory domains that controlled the expression of three hox genes in the Bithorax complex (BX-C). The best-characterized partner for Pita is the BTB/POZ-domain containing protein CP190. Using in vitro pull-down analysis, we precisely mapped two unstructured regions of Pita that interact with the BTB domain of CP190. Then we constructed transgenic lines expressing the Pita protein of the wild-type and mutant variants lacking CP190-interacting regions. The expression of the mutant protein completely complemented the null pita mutation. ChIP-seq experiments with wild-type and mutant embryos showed that the deletion of the CP190-interacting regions did not significantly affect the binding of the mutant Pita protein to most chromatin sites. However, the mutant Pita protein does not support the ability of multimerized Pita sites to prevent cross-talk between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains that activate the expression of Abdominal-B (Abd-B), one of the genes in the BX-C. The recruitment of a chimeric protein consisting of the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 and CP190-interacting region of the Pita to the GAL4 binding sites on the polytene chromosomes of larvae induces the formation of a new interband, which is a consequence of the formation of open chromatin in this region. These results suggested that the interaction with CP190 is required for the primary Pita activities, but other architectural proteins may also recruit CP190 in flies expressing only the mutant Pita protein.Author SummaryPita is required for Drosophila development and binds specifically to a long motif in active promoters and insulators. Pita belongs to the Drosophila family of zinc-finger architectural proteins, which also includes Su(Hw) and the conserved among higher eukaryotes CTCF. The architectural proteins maintain the active state of regulatory elements and the long-distance interactions between them. The CP190 protein is recruited to chromatin through interaction with the architectural proteins. Here we mapped two regions in Pita that are required for interaction with the CP190 protein. We have demonstrated that CP190-interacting region of the Pita can maintain nucleosome-free open chromatin and is critical for Pita-mediated enhancer blocking activity. At the same time, interaction with CP190 is not required for the in vivo function of the mutant Pita protein, which binds to the same regions of the genome as the wild-type protein. Unexpectedly, we found that CP190 was still associated with the most of genome regions bound by the mutant Pita protein, which suggested that other architectural proteins were continuing to recruit CP190 to these regions. These results support a model in which the regulatory elements are composed of combinations of binding sites that interact with several architectural proteins with similar functions.

scholarly journals Mechanism and functional role of the interaction between CP190 and the architectural protein Pita in Drosophila melanogaster

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marat Sabirov ◽  
Olga Kyrchanova ◽  
Galina V. Pokholkova ◽  
Artem Bonchuk ◽  
Natalia Klimenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Time Interaction ◽  
Architectural Proteins

AbstractBackgroundPita is required for Drosophila development and binds specifically to a long motif in active promoters and insulators. Pita belongs to the Drosophila family of zinc-finger architectural proteins, which also includes Su(Hw) and the conserved among higher eukaryotes CTCF. The architectural proteins maintain the active state of regulatory elements and the long-distance interactions between them. In particular, Pita is involved in the formation of several boundaries between regulatory domains that controlled the expression of threehoxgenes in the Bithorax complex (BX-C). The CP190 protein is recruited to chromatin through interaction with the architectural proteins.ResultsUsing in vitro pull-down analysis, we precisely mapped two unstructured regions of Pita that interact with the BTB domain of CP190. Then we constructed transgenic lines expressing the Pita protein of thewild-typeand mutant variants lacking CP190-interacting regions. We have demonstrated that CP190-interacting region of the Pita can maintain nucleosome-free open chromatin and is critical for Pita-mediated enhancer blocking activity in BX-C. At the same time, interaction with CP190 is not required for the in vivo function of the mutant Pita protein, which binds to the same regions of the genome as the wild-type protein. Unexpectedly, we found that CP190 was still associated with the most of genome regions bound by the mutant Pita protein, which suggested that other architectural proteins were continuing to recruit CP190 to these regions.ConclusionsThe results directly demonstrate role of CP190 in insulation and support a model in which the regulatory elements are composed of combinations of binding sites that interact with several architectural proteins with similar functions.

scholarly journals Boundaries support specific long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters in Drosophila Bithorax complex

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay Postika ◽  
Mario Metzler ◽  
Markus Affolter ◽  
Martin Müller ◽  
Paul Schedl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Gene Target ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Insulator Elements

AbstractDrosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is one of the best model systems for studying the role of boundaries (insulators) in gene regulation. Expression of three homeotic genes, Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B, is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. These domains are flanked by boundary elements, which function to block crosstalk between adjacent domains, ensuring that they can act autonomously. Paradoxically, seven of the BX-C regulatory domains are separated from their gene target by at least one boundary, and must “jump over” the intervening boundaries. To understand the jumping mechanism, the Mcp boundary was replaced with Fab-7 and Fab-8. Mcp is located between the iab-4 and iab-5 domains, and defines the border between the set of regulatory domains controlling abd-A and Abd-B. When Mcp is replaced by Fab-7 or Fab-8, they direct the iab-4 domain (which regulates abd-A) to inappropriately activate Abd-B in abdominal segment A4. For the Fab-8 replacement, ectopic induction was only observed when it was inserted in the same orientation as the endogenous Fab-8 boundary. A similar orientation dependence for bypass activity was observed when Fab-7 was replaced by Fab-8. Thus, boundaries perform two opposite functions in the context of BX-C – they block crosstalk between neighboring regulatory domains, but at the same time actively facilitate long distance communication between the regulatory domains and their respective target genes.Author SummaryDrosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is one of a few examples demonstrating in vivo role of boundary/insulator elements in organization of independent chromatin domains. BX-C contains three HOX genes, whose parasegment-specific pattern is controlled by cis-regulatory domains flanked by boundary/insulator elements. Since the boundaries ensure autonomy of adjacent domains, the presence of these elements poses a paradox: how do the domains bypass the intervening boundaries and contact their proper regulatory targets? According to the textbook model, BX-C regulatory domains are able to bypass boundaries because they harbor special promoter targeting sequences. However, contrary to this model, we show here that the boundaries themselves play an active role in directing regulatory domains to their appropriate HOX gene promoter.

scholarly journals In situ dissection of the Fab-7 region of the bithorax complex into a chromatin domain boundary and a Polycomb-response element

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1809-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mihaly ◽  
I. Hogga ◽  
J. Gausz ◽  
H. Gyurkovics ◽  
F. Karch
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Element ◽  
Domain Boundary ◽  
P Element ◽  
Chromatin Domain ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Polycomb Response Element

Parasegmental (PS)-specific expression of the homeotic genes of the bithorax-complex (BX-C) appears to depend upon the subdivision of the complex into a series of functionally independent cis-regulatory domains. Fab-7 is a regulatory element that lies between iab-6 and iab-7 (the PS11- and PS12-specific cis-regulatory domains, respectively). Deletion of Fab-7 causes ectopic expression of iab-7 in PS11 (where normally only iab-6 is active). Two models have been proposed to account for the dominant Fab-7 phenotype. The first considers that Fab-7 functions as a boundary element that insulates iab-6 and iab-7. The second model envisages that Fab-7 contains a silencer element that keeps iab-7 repressed in parasegments anterior to PS12. Using a P-element inserted in the middle of the Fab-7 region (the bit transposon), we have generated an extensive collection of new Fab-7 mutations that allow us to subdivide Fab-7 into a boundary element and a Polycomb-respond element (PRE). The boundary lies within 1 kb of DNA on the proximal side of the bit transposon (towards iab-6). Deletions removing this element alone cause a complex gain- and loss-of-function phenotype in PS11; in some groups of cells, both iab-6 and iab-7 are active, while in others both iab-6 and iab-7 are inactive. Thus, deletion of the boundary allows activating as well as repressing activities to travel between iab-6 and iab-7. We also provide evidences that the boundary region contains an enhancer blocker element. The Polycomb-response element lies within 0.5 kb of DNA immediately distal to the boundary (towards iab-7). Deletions removing the PRE alone do not typically cause any visible phenotype as homozygotes. Interestingly, weak ectopic activation of iab-7 is observed in hemizygous PRE deletions, suggesting that the mechanisms that keep iab-7 repressed in the absence of this element may depend upon chromosome pairing. These results help to reconcile the previously contradictory models on Fab-7 function and to shed light on how a chromatin domain boundary and a nearby PRE concur in the setting up of the appropriate PS-specific expression of the Abd-B gene of the BX-C.

scholarly journals The bithorax complex iab-7 Polycomb Response Element has a novel role in the functioning of the Fab-7 chromatin boundary

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Kyrchanova ◽  
Amina Kurbidaeva ◽  
Marat Sabirov ◽  
Nikolay Postika ◽  
Daniel Wolle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Boundary Function ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Polycomb Response Element ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

AbstractExpression of the three Bithorax complex homeotic genes is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. Autonomy of each domain is conferred by boundary elements (insulators). Here, we have used an in situ replacement strategy to reanalyze the sequences required for the functioning of one of the best-characterized fly boundaries, Fab-7. It was initially identified by a deletion, Fab-71, that transformed parasegment (PS) 11 into a duplicate copy of PS12. Fab-71 deleted four nuclease hypersensitive sites, HS*, HS1, HS2, and HS3, located in between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains. Transgene and P-element excision experiments mapped the boundary to HS*+HS1+HS2, while HS3 was shown to be the iab-7 Polycomb response element (PRE). Recent replacement experiments showed that HS1 is both necessary and sufficient for boundary activity when HS3 is also presented in the replacement construct. Surprisingly, while HS1+HS3 combination has full boundary activity, we discovered that HS1 alone has only minimal function. Moreover, when combined with HS3, only the distal half of HS1, dHS1, is needed. A ∼1,000 kD multiprotein complex containing the GAF protein, called the LBC, binds to the dHS1 sequence and we show that mutations in dHS1 that disrupt LBC binding in nuclear extracts eliminate boundary activity and GAF binding in vivo. HS3 has binding sites for GAF and Pho proteins that are required for PRE silencing. In contrast, HS3 boundary activity only requires the GAF binding sites. LBC binding with HS3 in nuclear extracts, and GAF association in vivo depend upon the HS3 GAF sites, but not the Pho sites. Consistent with a role for the LBC in HS3 boundary activity, the boundary function of the dHS1+HS3mPho combination is lost when the flies are heterozygous for a mutation in the GAF gene. Taken together, these results reveal a novel function for the iab-7 PREs in chromosome architecture.Author SummaryPolycomb group proteins (PcG) are important epigenetic regulators of developmental genes in all higher eukaryotes. In Drosophila, these proteins are bound to specific regulatory DNA elements called Polycomb group Response Elements (PREs). PcG support proper patterns of homeotic gene expression throughout development. Drosophila PREs are made up of binding sites for a complex array of DNA binding proteins, including GAF and Pho. In the regulatory region of the bithorax complex (BX-C), the boundary/insulator elements organize the autonomous regulatory domains, and their active or repressed states are regulated by PREs. Here, we studied the domain organization of the Fab-7 boundary and the neighboring PRE, which separate the iab-6 and iab-7 domains involved in transcription of the Abd-B gene. It was previously thought that PRE recruits PcG proteins that inhibit activation of the iab-7 enhancers in the inappropriate domains. However, here we found that PRE contributes to boundary activity and in combination with a key 242 bp Fab-7 region (dHS1) can form a completely functional boundary. Late Boundary Complex (LBC) binds not only to dHS1 but also to PRE and is required for the boundary activity of both elements. At the same time, mutations of Pho binding sites strongly diminish recruiting of PcG but do not considerably affect boundary function, suggesting that these activities can be separated in PRE.

scholarly journals A Long-Distance Communication Architecture for Medical Devices Based on LoRaWAN Protocol

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 940
Author(s):  
Nicoleta Cristina Gaitan
Keyword(s):  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Area Network ◽  
Wide Area Network ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Communication Architecture ◽  
Low Energy Consumption ◽  
Distance Communication

Recent market studies show that the market for remote monitoring devices of different medical parameters will grow exponentially. Globally, more than 4 million individuals will be monitored remotely from the perspective of different health parameters by 2023. Of particular importance is the way of remote transmission of the information acquired from the medical sensors. At this time, there are several methods such as Bluetooth, WI-FI, or other wireless communication interfaces. Recently, the communication based on LoRa (Long Range) technology has had an explosive development that allows the transmission of information over long distances with low energy consumption. The implementation of the IoT (Internet of Things) applications using LoRa devices based on open Long Range Wide-Area Network (LoRaWAN) protocol for long distances with low energy consumption can also be used in the medical field. Therefore, in this paper, we proposed and developed a long-distance communication architecture for medical devices based on the LoRaWAN protocol that allows data communications over a distance of more than 10 km.

scholarly journals Quantum repeaters based on concatenated bosonic and discrete-variable quantum codes

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Rozpędek ◽  
Kyungjoo Noh ◽  
Qian Xu ◽  
Saikat Guha ◽  
Liang Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Quantum Codes ◽  
Discrete Variable ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Concatenated Code ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Optical Modes ◽  
Distance Communication ◽  
Quantum Repeaters ◽  
Quantum Error

AbstractWe propose an architecture of quantum-error-correction-based quantum repeaters that combines techniques used in discrete- and continuous-variable quantum information. Specifically, we propose to encode the transmitted qubits in a concatenated code consisting of two levels. On the first level we use a continuous-variable GKP code encoding the qubit in a single bosonic mode. On the second level we use a small discrete-variable code. Such an architecture has two important features. Firstly, errors on each of the two levels are corrected in repeaters of two different types. This enables for achieving performance needed in practical scenarios with a reduced cost with respect to an architecture for which all repeaters are the same. Secondly, the use of continuous-variable GKP code on the lower level generates additional analog information which enhances the error-correcting capabilities of the second-level code such that long-distance communication becomes possible with encodings consisting of only four or seven optical modes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document