scholarly journals Cadherin puncta are interdigitated dynamic actin protrusions necessary for stable cadherin adhesion

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (24) ◽  
pp. e2023510118
Author(s):  
John Xiao He Li ◽  
Vivian W. Tang ◽  
Kingsley A. Boateng ◽  
William M. Brieher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Bond Formation ◽  
Adhesive Bond ◽  
Lateral Membrane ◽  
Strong Adhesion ◽  
Membrane Adhesion ◽  
Actin Protrusions

Cadherins harness the actin cytoskeleton to build cohesive sheets of cells using paradoxically weak bonds, but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In one popular model, actin organizes cadherins into large, micrometer-sized clusters known as puncta. Myosin is thought to pull on these puncta to generate strong adhesion. Here, however, we show that cadherin puncta are actually interdigitated actin microspikes generated by actin polymerization mediated by three factors (Arp2/3, EVL, and CRMP-1). The convoluted membranes in these regions give the impression of cadherin clustering by fluorescence microscopy, but the ratio of cadherin to membrane is constant. Nevertheless, these interlocking fingers of membrane are important for adhesion because perturbing their formation disrupts cell adhesion. In contrast, blocking myosin-dependent contractility does not disrupt either the interdigitated microspikes or lateral membrane adhesion. “Puncta” are zones of strong cell–cell adhesion not due to cadherin clustering but that occur because the interdigitated microspikes expand the surface area available for adhesive bond formation and increase the asperity of the cell surface to promote friction between cells.

scholarly journals Actin protrusions push on E-cadherin to maintain epithelial cell-cell adhesion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Xiao He Li ◽  
Vivian W. Tang ◽  
William M. Brieher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Mdck Cells ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Cell Junctions ◽  
Apical Junctions ◽  
Actin Protrusions ◽  
Adhesive Contacts ◽  
E Cadherin ◽  
Cell Cell

AbstractCadherin mediated cell-cell adhesion is actin dependent, but the precise role of actin in maintaining cell-cell adhesion is not fully understood. Actin polymerization-dependent protrusive activity is required to push distally separated cells close enough together to initiate contact. Whether protrusive activity is required to maintain adhesion in confluent sheets of epithelial cells is not known. By electron microscopy as well as live cell imaging, we have identified a population of protruding actin microspikes that operate continuously near apical junctions of polarized MDCK cells. Live imaging shows that microspikes containing E-cadherin extend into gaps between E-cadherin clusters on neighboring cells while reformation of cadherin clusters across the cell-cell boundary triggers microspike withdrawal. We identify Arp2/3, EVL, and CRMP-1 as three actin assembly factors necessary for microspike formation. Depleting these factors from cells using RNAi results in myosin II-dependent unzipping of cadherin adhesive bonds. Therefore, actin polymerization-dependent protrusive activity operates continuously at cadherin cell-cell junctions to keep them shut and to prevent myosin II-dependent contractility from tearing cadherin adhesive contacts apart.

scholarly journals Interdigitated dynamic actin protrusions maintain stable cadherin adhesion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Xiao He Li ◽  
Vivian W. Tang ◽  
William M. Brieher
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Weak Binding ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Strong Adhesion ◽  
Membrane Protrusions ◽  
Actin Protrusions

AbstractCadherins build stable, cohesive sheets of cells using paradoxically weak bonds. Actin is thought to convert weak binding into strong adhesion either by transmitting myosin dependent pulling forces to adhesive junctions or by clustering cadherins in the plane of the membrane. Here, however, we show that continuous actin polymerization stabilizes cadherin adhesion by directly driving membrane protrusions, not by promoting contractility or cadherin clustering. Lateral membranes of epithelial cells are continuously pushed against each another by protrusions. Micrometer sized cadherin puncta, long thought to be clusters of cadherins, turn out to be patches of microspikes interlocked by cadherin homophilic bonds to hold neighboring cells together. When actin polymerization is blocked, protrusions cease, puncta disappear, and lateral membranes detach from one another. In contrast, inhibiting myosin II contractility has no effect on adhesion.One Sentence SummaryStronger together: membrane interdigitations keep cells attached.

scholarly journals Analysis of C-cadherin Regulation during Tissue Morphogenesis with an Activating Antibody

1999 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhong ◽  
William M. Brieher ◽  
Barry M. Gumbiner
Keyword(s):  
Cell Surface ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Convergent Extension ◽  
Homophilic Binding ◽  
Animal Pole ◽  
Cell Components ◽  
Strong Adhesion ◽  
Adhesion Activity ◽  
Soluble C

The regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion at the cell surface underlies several morphogenetic processes. To investigate the role of cadherin regulation in morphogenesis and to begin to analyze the molecular mechanisms of cadherin regulation, we have screened for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that allow us to manipulate the adhesive state of the cadherin molecule. Xenopus C-cadherin is regulated during convergent extension movements of gastrulation. Treatment of animal pole tissue explants (animal caps) with the mesoderm-inducing factor activin induces tissue elongation and decreases the strength of C-cadherin–mediated adhesion between blastomeres (Brieher, W.M., and B.M. Gumbiner. 1994. J. Cell Biol. 126:519–527). We have generated a mAb to C-cadherin, AA5, that restores strong adhesion to activin-treated blastomeres. This C-cadherin activating antibody strongly inhibits the elongation of animal caps in response to activin without affecting mesodermal gene expression. Thus, the activin-induced decrease in C-cadherin adhesive activity appears to be required for animal cap elongation. Regulation of C-cadherin and its activation by mAb AA5 involve changes in the state of C-cadherin that encompass more than changes in its homophilic binding site. Although mAb AA5 elicited a small enhancement in the functional activity of the soluble C-cadherin ectodomain (CEC1-5), it was not able to restore cell adhesion activity to mutant C-cadherin lacking its cytoplasmic tail. Furthermore, activin treatment regulates the adhesion of Xenopus blastomeres to surfaces coated with two other anti–C-cadherin mAbs, even though these antibodies probably do not mediate adhesion through a normal homophilic binding mechanism. Moreover, mAb AA5 restores strong adhesion to these antibodies. mAb AA5 only activates adhesion of blastomeres to immobilized CEC1-5 when it binds to C-cadherin on the cell surface. It does not work when added to CEC1-5 on the substrate. Together these findings suggest that the regulation of C-cadherin by activin and its activation by mAb AA5 involve changes in its cellular organization or interactions with other cell components that are not intrinsic to the isolated protein.

scholarly journals Functionally distinct laminin receptors mediate cell adhesion and spreading: the requirement for surface galactosyltransferase in cell spreading.

1988 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1863-1871 ◽  
Author(s):  
R B Runyan ◽  
J Versalovic ◽  
B D Shur
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Cell Attachment ◽  
Cell Spreading ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Initial Cell ◽  
Laminin Receptors ◽  
Mediate Cell ◽  
A Chain

The molecular mechanisms underlying cell attachment and subsequent cell spreading on laminin are shown to be distinct form one another. Cell spreading is dependent upon the binding of cell surface galactosyltransferase (GalTase) to laminin oligosaccharides, while initial cell attachment to laminin occurs independent of GalTase activity. Anti-GalTase IgG, as well as the GalTase modifier protein, alpha-lactalbumin, both block GalTase activity and inhibited B16-F10 melanoma cell spreading on laminin, but not initial attachment. On the other hand, the addition of UDP galactose, which increases the catalytic turnover of GalTase, slightly increased cell spreading. None of these reagents had any effect on cell spreading on fibronectin. When GalTase substrates within laminin were either blocked by affinity-purified GalTase or eliminated by prior galactosylation, cell attachment appeared normal, but subsequent cell spreading was totally inhibited. The laminin substrate for GalTase was identified as N-linked oligosaccharides primarily on the A chain, and to a lesser extent on B chains. That N-linked oligosaccharides are necessary for cell spreading was shown by the inability of cells to spread on laminin surfaces pretreated with N-glycanase, even though cell attachment was normal. Cell surface GalTase was distinguished from other reported laminin binding proteins, most notably the 68-kD receptor, since they were differentially eluted from laminin affinity columns. These data show that surface GalTase does not participate during initial cell adhesion to laminin, but mediates subsequent cell spreading by binding to its appropriate N-linked oligosaccharide substrate. These results also emphasize that some of laminin's biological properties can be attributed to its oligosaccharide residues.

scholarly journals Actin protrusions push at apical junctions to maintain E-cadherin adhesion

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Xiao He Li ◽  
Vivian W. Tang ◽  
William M. Brieher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Mdck Cells ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Cell Junctions ◽  
Apical Junctions ◽  
Actin Protrusions ◽  
Adhesive Contacts ◽  
E Cadherin ◽  
Cell Cell

Cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion is actin-dependent, but the precise role of actin in maintaining cell–cell adhesion is not fully understood. Actin polymerization-dependent protrusive activity is required to push distally separated cells close enough to initiate contact. Whether protrusive activity is required to maintain adhesion in confluent sheets of epithelial cells is not known. By electron microscopy as well as live cell imaging, we have identified a population of protruding actin microspikes that operate continuously near apical junctions of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Live imaging shows that microspikes containing E-cadherin extend into gaps between E-cadherin clusters on neighboring cells, while reformation of cadherin clusters across the cell–cell boundary correlates with microspike withdrawal. We identify Arp2/3, EVL, and CRMP-1 as 3 actin assembly factors necessary for microspike formation. Depleting these factors from cells using RNA interference (RNAi) results in myosin II-dependent unzipping of cadherin adhesive bonds. Therefore, actin polymerization-dependent protrusive activity operates continuously at cadherin cell–cell junctions to keep them shut and to prevent myosin II-dependent contractility from tearing cadherin adhesive contacts apart.

scholarly journals Comparative neurotranscriptomics reveal widespread species differences associated with bonding

BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Tripp ◽  
Alejandro Berrio ◽  
Lisa A. McGraw ◽  
Mikhail V. Matz ◽  
Jamie K. Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Brain Region ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Species Differences ◽  
Cell Structure ◽  
Bond Formation ◽  
Pair Bonding ◽  
Prairie Voles ◽  
Meadow Voles ◽  
Time Points

Abstract Background Pair bonding with a reproductive partner is rare among mammals but is an important feature of human social behavior. Decades of research on monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), along with comparative studies using the related non-bonding meadow vole (M. pennsylvanicus), have revealed many of the neural and molecular mechanisms necessary for pair-bond formation in that species. However, these studies have largely focused on just a few neuromodulatory systems. To test the hypothesis that neural gene expression differences underlie differential capacities to bond, we performed RNA-sequencing on tissue from three brain regions important for bonding and other social behaviors across bond-forming prairie voles and non-bonding meadow voles. We examined gene expression in the amygdala, hypothalamus, and combined ventral pallidum/nucleus accumbens in virgins and at three time points after mating to understand species differences in gene expression at baseline, in response to mating, and during bond formation. Results We first identified species and brain region as the factors most strongly associated with gene expression in our samples. Next, we found gene categories related to cell structure, translation, and metabolism that differed in expression across species in virgins, as well as categories associated with cell structure, synaptic and neuroendocrine signaling, and transcription and translation that varied among the focal regions in our study. Additionally, we identified genes that were differentially expressed across species after mating in each of our regions of interest. These include genes involved in regulating transcription, neuron structure, and synaptic plasticity. Finally, we identified modules of co-regulated genes that were strongly correlated with brain region in both species, and modules that were correlated with post-mating time points in prairie voles but not meadow voles. Conclusions These results reinforce the importance of pre-mating differences that confer the ability to form pair bonds in prairie voles but not promiscuous species such as meadow voles. Gene ontology analysis supports the hypothesis that pair-bond formation involves transcriptional regulation, and changes in neuronal structure. Together, our results expand knowledge of the genes involved in the pair bonding process and open new avenues of research in the molecular mechanisms of bond formation.

scholarly journals Keratin 19 maintains E-cadherin localization at the cell surface and stabilizes cell-cell adhesion of MCF7 cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Sarah Alsharif ◽  
Pooja Sharma ◽  
Karina Bursch ◽  
Rachel Milliken ◽  
Van Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Mcf7 Cells ◽  
Keratin 19 ◽  
E Cadherin ◽  
Cell Cell

scholarly journals Cell surface anchorage and ligand-binding domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell adhesion protein alpha-agglutinin, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2554-2563 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Wojciechowicz ◽  
C F Lu ◽  
J Kurjan ◽  
P N Lipke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Immunoglobulin Superfamily ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Adhesion Proteins

alpha-Agglutinin is a cell adhesion glycoprotein expressed on the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha cells. Binding of alpha-agglutinin to its ligand a-agglutinin, expressed by a cells, mediates cell-cell contact during mating. Analysis of truncations of the 650-amino-acid alpha-agglutinin structural gene AG alpha 1 delineated functional domains of alpha-agglutinin. Removal of the C-terminal hydrophobic sequence allowed efficient secretion of the protein and loss of cell surface attachment. This cell surface anchorage domain was necessary for linkage to a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor. A construct expressing the N-terminal 350 amino acid residues retained full a-agglutinin-binding activity, localizing the binding domain to the N-terminal portion of alpha-agglutinin. A 278-residue N-terminal peptide was inactive; therefore, the binding domain includes residues between 278 and 350. The segment of alpha-agglutinin between amino acid residues 217 and 308 showed significant structural and sequence similarity to a consensus sequence for immunoglobulin superfamily variable-type domains. The similarity of the alpha-agglutinin-binding domain to mammalian cell adhesion proteins suggests that this structure is a highly conserved feature of adhesion proteins in diverse eukaryotes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document