scholarly journals The CcmC–CcmE interaction during cytochrome c maturation by System I is driven by protein–protein and not protein–heme contacts

2018 ◽  
Vol 293 (43) ◽  
pp. 16778-16790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shevket H. Shevket ◽  
Diego Gonzalez ◽  
Jared L. Cartwright ◽  
Colin Kleanthous ◽  
Stuart J. Ferguson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Plant Mitochondria ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Covalent Attachment ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cytochrome C Maturation ◽  
Heme Cofactor

Cytochromes c are ubiquitous proteins, essential for life in most organisms. Their distinctive characteristic is the covalent attachment of heme to their polypeptide chain. This post-translational modification is performed by a dedicated protein system, which in many Gram-negative bacteria and plant mitochondria is a nine-protein apparatus (CcmA–I) called System I. Despite decades of study, mechanistic understanding of the protein–protein interactions in this highly complex maturation machinery is still lacking. Here, we focused on the interaction of CcmC, the protein that sources the heme cofactor, with CcmE, the pivotal component of System I responsible for the transfer of the heme to the apocytochrome. Using in silico analyses, we identified a putative interaction site between these two proteins (residues Asp47, Gln50, and Arg55 on CcmC; Arg73, Asp101, and Glu105 on CcmE), and we validated our findings by in vivo experiments in Escherichia coli. Moreover, employing NMR spectroscopy, we examined whether a heme-binding site on CcmE contributes to this interaction and found that CcmC and CcmE associate via protein–protein rather than protein–heme contacts. The combination of in vivo site-directed mutagenesis studies and high-resolution structural techniques enabled us to determine at the residue level the mechanism for the formation of one of the key protein complexes for cytochrome c maturation by System I.

scholarly journals Interfacial Peptides as Affinity Modulating Agents of Protein-Protein Interactions

Biomolecules ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Pavel V. Ershov ◽  
Yuri V. Mezentsev ◽  
Alexis S. Ivanov
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Targeted Delivery ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Good Efficiency ◽  
Cellular Targets ◽  
Proteolytic Stability ◽  
Clinically Significant

The identification of disease-related protein-protein interactions (PPIs) creates objective conditions for their pharmacological modulation. The contact area (interfaces) of the vast majority of PPIs has some features, such as geometrical and biochemical complementarities, “hot spots”, as well as an extremely low mutation rate that give us key knowledge to influence these PPIs. Exogenous regulation of PPIs is aimed at both inhibiting the assembly and/or destabilization of protein complexes. Often, the design of such modulators is associated with some specific problems in targeted delivery, cell penetration and proteolytic stability, as well as selective binding to cellular targets. Recent progress in interfacial peptide design has been achieved in solving all these difficulties and has provided a good efficiency in preclinical models (in vitro and in vivo). The most promising peptide-containing therapeutic formulations are under investigation in clinical trials. In this review, we update the current state-of-the-art in the field of interfacial peptides as potent modulators of a number of disease-related PPIs. Over the past years, the scientific interest has been focused on following clinically significant heterodimeric PPIs MDM2/p53, PD-1/PD-L1, HIF/HIF, NRF2/KEAP1, RbAp48/MTA1, HSP90/CDC37, BIRC5/CRM1, BIRC5/XIAP, YAP/TAZ–TEAD, TWEAK/FN14, Bcl-2/Bax, YY1/AKT, CD40/CD40L and MINT2/APP.

scholarly journals SET7/9-dependent methylation of ARTD1 at K508 stimulates poly-ADP-ribose formation after oxidative stress

Open Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 120173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Kassner ◽  
Anneli Andersson ◽  
Monika Fey ◽  
Martin Tomas ◽  
Elisa Ferrando-May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Target Proteins ◽  
Protein Methyltransferase

ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like 1 (ARTD1, formerly PARP1) is localized in the nucleus, where it ADP-ribosylates specific target proteins. The post-translational modification (PTM) with a single ADP-ribose unit or with polymeric ADP-ribose (PAR) chains regulates protein function as well as protein–protein interactions and is implicated in many biological processes and diseases. SET7/9 (Setd7, KMT7) is a protein methyltransferase that catalyses lysine monomethylation of histones, but also methylates many non-histone target proteins such as p53 or DNMT1. Here, we identify ARTD1 as a new SET7/9 target protein that is methylated at K508 in vitro and in vivo . ARTD1 auto-modification inhibits its methylation by SET7/9, while auto-poly-ADP-ribosylation is not impaired by prior methylation of ARTD1. Moreover, ARTD1 methylation by SET7/9 enhances the synthesis of PAR upon oxidative stress in vivo . Furthermore, laser irradiation-induced PAR formation and ARTD1 recruitment to sites of DNA damage in a SET7/9-dependent manner. Together, these results reveal a novel mechanism for the regulation of cellular ARTD1 activity by SET7/9 to assure efficient PAR formation upon cellular stress.

scholarly journals Evolutionary diversification of protein–protein interactions by interface add-ons

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (40) ◽  
pp. E8333-E8342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian G. Plach ◽  
Florian Semmelmann ◽  
Florian Busch ◽  
Markus Busch ◽  
Leonhard Heizinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Evolutionary Strategy ◽  
Structural Level ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Evolutionary Diversification

Cells contain a multitude of protein complexes whose subunits interact with high specificity. However, the number of different protein folds and interface geometries found in nature is limited. This raises the question of how protein–protein interaction specificity is achieved on the structural level and how the formation of nonphysiological complexes is avoided. Here, we describe structural elements called interface add-ons that fulfill this function and elucidate their role for the diversification of protein–protein interactions during evolution. We identified interface add-ons in 10% of a representative set of bacterial, heteromeric protein complexes. The importance of interface add-ons for protein–protein interaction specificity is demonstrated by an exemplary experimental characterization of over 30 cognate and hybrid glutamine amidotransferase complexes in combination with comprehensive genetic profiling and protein design. Moreover, growth experiments showed that the lack of interface add-ons can lead to physiologically harmful cross-talk between essential biosynthetic pathways. In sum, our complementary in silico, in vitro, and in vivo analysis argues that interface add-ons are a practical and widespread evolutionary strategy to prevent the formation of nonphysiological complexes by specializing protein–protein interactions.

scholarly journals Modeling of Protein–Protein Interactions in Cytokinin Signal Transduction

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry V. Arkhipov ◽  
Sergey N. Lomin ◽  
Yulia A. Myakushina ◽  
Ekaterina M. Savelieva ◽  
Dmitry I. Osolodkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Hot Spots ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
In Planta ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Response Regulators ◽  
Protein Surfaces

The signaling of cytokinins (CKs), classical plant hormones, is based on the interaction of proteins that constitute the multistep phosphorelay system (MSP): catalytic receptors—sensor histidine kinases (HKs), phosphotransmitters (HPts), and transcription factors—response regulators (RRs). Any CK receptor was shown to interact in vivo with any of the studied HPts and vice versa. In addition, both of these proteins tend to form a homodimer or a heterodimeric complex with protein-paralog. Our study was aimed at explaining by molecular modeling the observed features of in planta protein–protein interactions, accompanying CK signaling. For this purpose, models of CK-signaling proteins’ structure from Arabidopsis and potato were built. The modeled interaction interfaces were formed by rather conserved areas of protein surfaces, complementary in hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential. Hot spots amino acids, determining specificity and strength of the interaction, were identified. Virtual phosphorylation of conserved Asp or His residues affected this complementation, increasing (Asp-P in HK) or decreasing (His-P in HPt) the affinity of interacting proteins. The HK–HPt and HPt–HPt interfaces overlapped, sharing some of the hot spots. MSP proteins from Arabidopsis and potato exhibited similar properties. The structural features of the modeled protein complexes were consistent with the experimental data.

scholarly journals The cAMP pathway regulates mRNA decay through phosphorylation of the RNA-binding protein TIS11b/BRF1

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (24) ◽  
pp. 3841-3854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicitas Rataj ◽  
Séverine Planel ◽  
Agnès Desroches-Castan ◽  
Juliette Le Douce ◽  
Khadija Lamribet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Mrna Decay ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
P38 Map Kinase ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions

TPA-inducible sequence 11b/butyrate response factor 1 (TIS11b/BRF1) belongs to the tristetraprolin (TTP) family of zinc-finger proteins, which bind to mRNAs containing AU-rich elements in their 3′-untranslated region and target them for degradation. Regulation of TTP family function through phosphorylation by p38 MAP kinase and Akt/protein kinase B signaling pathways has been extensively studied. In contrast, the role of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in the control of TTP family activity in mRNA decay remains largely unknown. Here we show that PKA activation induces TIS11b gene expression and protein phosphorylation. Site-directed mutagenesis combined with kinase assays and specific phosphosite immunodetection identified Ser-54 (S54) and Ser-334 (S334) as PKA target amino acids in vitro and in vivo. Phosphomimetic mutation of the C-terminal S334 markedly increased TIS11b half-life and, unexpectedly, enhanced TIS11b activity on mRNA decay. Examination of protein–protein interactions between TIS11b and components of the mRNA decay machinery revealed that mimicking phosphorylation at S334 enhances TIS11b interaction with the decapping coactivator Dcp1a, while preventing phosphorylation at S334 potentiates its interaction with the Ccr4-Not deadenylase complex subunit Cnot1. Collectively our findings establish for the first time that cAMP-elicited phosphorylation of TIS11b plays a key regulatory role in its mRNA decay-promoting function.

scholarly journals The loop region of the helix-loop-helix protein Id1 is critical for its dominant negative activity.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7874-7880 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Pesce ◽  
R Benezra
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Loop Region ◽  
Dominant Negative Activity

Id1, a helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein which lacks a DNA binding domain, has been shown to negatively regulate other members of the HLH family by direct protein-protein interactions, both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we report the results of site-directed mutagenesis experiments aimed at defining the regions of Id1 which are important for its activity. We have found that the HLH domain of Id1 is necessary and nearly sufficient for its activity. In addition, we show that two amino acid residues at the amino terminus of the Id1 loop are critical for its activity, perhaps by specifying the correct dimerization partners. In this regard, replacing the first four amino acids of the loops of the basic HLH proteins E12 and E47 with the corresponding amino acids of Id1 confers Id1 dimerization specificity. These studies point to the loop region as an important structural and functional element of the Id subfamily of HLH proteins.

scholarly journals p53 Forms Redox-Dependent Protein–Protein Interactions through Cysteine 277

Antioxidants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1578
Author(s):  
Tao Shi ◽  
Paulien E. Polderman ◽  
Marc Pagès-Gallego ◽  
Robert M. van Es ◽  
Harmjan R. Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cysteine Oxidation ◽  
Interaction Partners ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
And Function

Reversible cysteine oxidation plays an essential role in redox signaling by reversibly altering protein structure and function. Cysteine oxidation may lead to intra- and intermolecular disulfide formation, and the latter can drastically stabilize protein–protein interactions in a more oxidizing milieu. The activity of the tumor suppressor p53 is regulated at multiple levels, including various post-translational modification (PTM) and protein–protein interactions. In the past few decades, p53 has been shown to be a redox-sensitive protein, and undergoes reversible cysteine oxidation both in vitro and in vivo. It is not clear, however, whether p53 also forms intermolecular disulfides with interacting proteins and whether these redox-dependent interactions contribute to the regulation of p53. In the present study, by combining (co-)immunoprecipitation, quantitative mass spectrometry and Western blot we found that p53 forms disulfide-dependent interactions with several proteins under oxidizing conditions. Cysteine 277 is required for most of the disulfide-dependent interactions of p53, including those with 14-3-3q and 53BP1. These interaction partners may play a role in fine-tuning p53 activity under oxidizing conditions.

The loop region of the helix-loop-helix protein Id1 is critical for its dominant negative activity

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7874-7880
Author(s):  
S Pesce ◽  
R Benezra
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Loop Region ◽  
Dominant Negative Activity

Id1, a helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein which lacks a DNA binding domain, has been shown to negatively regulate other members of the HLH family by direct protein-protein interactions, both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we report the results of site-directed mutagenesis experiments aimed at defining the regions of Id1 which are important for its activity. We have found that the HLH domain of Id1 is necessary and nearly sufficient for its activity. In addition, we show that two amino acid residues at the amino terminus of the Id1 loop are critical for its activity, perhaps by specifying the correct dimerization partners. In this regard, replacing the first four amino acids of the loops of the basic HLH proteins E12 and E47 with the corresponding amino acids of Id1 confers Id1 dimerization specificity. These studies point to the loop region as an important structural and functional element of the Id subfamily of HLH proteins.

scholarly journals Development of a compact alkynyl-enrichable crosslinker for in-depth in-vivo crosslinking analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Gao ◽  
Li Li Zhao ◽  
Qun Zhao ◽  
Hua Li Zhang ◽  
Feng Bao Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
First Time

Chemical crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry (CXMS) has emerged as a powerful technique to capture the dynamic information of protein complexes with high sensitivity, throughput and sample universality. To advance the study of in-vivo protein structures and protein-protein interactions on the large scale, a new alkynyl-enrichable crosslinker was developed with high efficiency of membrane penetration, reactivity and enrichment. The crosslinker was successfully used for in-vivo crosslinking of intact human cells, resulting in 6820 non-redundant crosslinks identified at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1% using pLink 2.0, which 4898 (71.8%) of the cross-links were assigned as intraprotein and 1922 (28.2%) were interprotein links. To our knowledge, this is also the first time to realize the in-vivo crosslinking with a non-cleavable cross-linker for homo species cells.

scholarly journals Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions

1999 ◽  
Vol 342 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien d'AMOURS ◽  
Serge DESNOYERS ◽  
Icy d'SILVA ◽  
Guy G. POIRIER
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Polymer Chains ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Dna Strand

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a post-translational modification of proteins. During this process, molecules of ADP-ribose are added successively on to acceptor proteins to form branched polymers. This modification is transient but very extensive in vivo, as polymer chains can reach more than 200 units on protein acceptors. The existence of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymer was first reported nearly 40 years ago. Since then, the importance of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis has been established in many cellular processes. However, a clear and unified picture of the physiological role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation still remains to be established. The total dependence of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis on DNA strand breaks strongly suggests that this post-translational modification is involved in the metabolism of nucleic acids. This view is also supported by the identification of direct protein-protein interactions involving poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (113 kDa PARP), an enzyme catalysing the formation of poly(ADP-ribose), and key effectors of DNA repair, replication and transcription reactions. The presence of PARP in these multiprotein complexes, in addition to the actual poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of some components of these complexes, clearly supports an important role for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reactions in DNA transactions. Accordingly, inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis by any of several approaches and the analysis of PARP-deficient cells has revealed that the absence of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation strongly affects DNA metabolism, most notably DNA repair. The recent identification of new poly(ADP-ribosyl)ating enzymes with distinct (non-standard) structures in eukaryotes and archaea has revealed a novel level of complexity in the regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document