Deepening the concept of ‘compelling arguments’
Keyword(s):
Abstract This study examines the effects of both the substantive and affective dimensions of issue attributes in the news coverage of climate change on the public’s perception of the importance of this environmental issue. Results from our analysis show that the four affective dimensions (e.g., positive and negative emotions, anger, and sadness) of the three attributes (e.g., existence, effects, and solutions) exerted strong influence on public issue priority. This study extends the concept of compelling arguments in agenda setting research by suggesting that compelling arguments effects are not solely dependent on substantive attributes. Their affective dimensions are influential, as well.
1994 ◽
Vol 3
(3)
◽
pp. 259-275
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):