The PrEP response in England: enabling collective action through public health and PrEP commodity activism

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Alvaro Martinez-Lacabe
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-278
Author(s):  
Laura French Bourgeois ◽  
Allison Harell ◽  
Laura B. Stephenson

The outbreak of COVID-19 has put substantial pressure on individuals to adapt and change their behaviours. As the hope of a vaccine remains at least a year away, everyone is urged to take action to slow the spread of the virus. Thus, “flattening the curve” has become vital in preventing medical systems from being overrun, and it relies on massive collective action by citizens to follow specific public health measures such as physical distancing, hand washing, and physical isolation for vulnerable individuals. Despite the recommendations, the public has often been confronted with the reality that some individuals are not respecting them, including elected officials (Aguilar, 2020).


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Hoffman ◽  
Kevin Outterson

Of the many global health challenges facing the world today, only a small number require global collective action. Most health challenges can be fully addressed through action at local, regional or national levels.What kind of actions must be taken to address the global threat of antibiotic resistance (ABR)? What legal, political and economic tools might be needed to achieve this level of action?In March 2015 the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation convened a workshop in Uppsala, Sweden to address these questions in partnership with the Global Strategy Lab, the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME), the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, and ReAct — Action on Antibiotic Resistance. Eleven concise articles were commissioned to explore whether ABR depended on global collective action, and if so, what tools could help states and non-state actors to achieve it.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-70
Author(s):  
Rajendra Karkee

Public Health is the collective action for sustained population-wide health improvement. There are various factors that can affect the health of a population. These factors are often summarised as social, economic, political, cultural, and environmental factors. Along with these classical factors, there is another emerging factor in 21st century; that is globalisation. Globalisation and ‘Global Health’ has become an important aspect of public health to be known by a public health graduates Not only transmissions of diseases across borders are threat but also economic policies, politics, trade treaties, expansion of multination companies and consumption of foods affect health worldwide.


2021 ◽  
pp. 009539972098544
Author(s):  
Ismail Soujaa ◽  
Julius A. Nukpezah ◽  
Abraham David Benavides

This article draws on the institutional collective action (ICA) framework and data from a survey of senior public health and emergency management professionals in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex following the Ebola outbreak to investigate coordination effectiveness during public health emergencies. Based on the study findings, the article recommends that having an identifiable lead agency, official statements from local authorities, a conducive environment for informal conversations, and communication activities that inform, connect, and involve professionals is essential for an effective coordination. Practical implications of the study extend to how to mitigate collective action dilemmas with regard to coordinating COVID-19 pandemic responses.


Author(s):  
Ruth R. Faden ◽  
Sirine Shebaya

Public health policies sometimes make demands on individuals who do not stand to benefit from the policies, and they sometimes interfere with liberty even when they do benefit the individuals in question. In such instances, a moral justification for a public health intervention is required. This chapter sets forth five justifications for public health interventions: (1) overall benefit, (2) collective action and efficiency, (3) fairness in the distribution of burdens, (4) prevention of harm (the harm principle), and (5) paternalism. The chapter discusses each justification in turn, posits that often more than one justification applies to a given policy, and argues against frameworks that place disproportionate attention on conflicts between liberty and health.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Jennifer Severance ◽  
Susanna Luk-Jones ◽  
Griffin Melissa ◽  
Glenda Redeemer

Abstract Addressing increasing rates of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) requires public health approaches including prevention, early detection and diagnosis, and outreach to low-income and minority communities facing higher risk and adverse health and economic outcomes. Communities are seeking ways to enhance cross-sector collaboration and overcome underdeveloped relationships and fragmentation that are barriers to effective public health responses. In this exploratory study, we evaluated outcomes of a community-wide effort to mobilize systems-level changes, build public awareness, and increase access to early detection services. A community-based organization, public health department, and academic institution in North Texas partnered to expand ADRD education programs and outreach for underserved communities. Nineteen community health workers were trained to provide brain health and ADRD education programs and refer to financial, legal, and social resources. Through collective action, 371 participants attended 26 education sessions delivered in English and Spanish. Forty-five percent of participants identified as non-white and 61% reported low educational attainment. Participants (n=314) completed post-surveys. As a result of training, 89% of trainees could recognize common warning signs of Alzheimer’s disease, 86% understood the importance of early detection and diagnosis, and 96% knew activities promoting cognitive health. Findings revealed strategies to increase collective action such as sharing data, establishing referral methods, and adopting dementia-friendly and age-friendly frameworks. Results show that collective action has the potential to build a community’s capacity for targeted ADRD education and improve access to early detection and brain health education for at-risk populations.


Author(s):  
Qaunfeng Shu ◽  
Yahua Wang

In the face of a public health crisis full of uncertainty, how should the community respond in order to effectively reduce the negative impact of the epidemic on public health? This article takes a Chinese rural community located near Wuhan City as an example to explore the mechanism of how collaborative leadership enhanced collective action in community governance against the COVID-19 pandemic. Early blockading to prevent transmission into the community, strict maintenance of social distance to prevent internal diffusion, timely elimination of public panic, and efficient guarantees of household supplies have proven effective in preventing the spread of the epidemic. Our research shows that collaborative leadership can achieve these goals mainly by effectively integrated local knowledge, modern information technology, and social self-organization, and then promoting the realization of collective action of community epidemic prevention and control. The lessons and implications for public health are discussed.


The Lancet ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 363 (9426) ◽  
pp. 2084-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Beaglehole ◽  
Ruth Bonita ◽  
Richard Horton ◽  
Orvill Adams ◽  
Martin McKee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document