scholarly journals A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Lew ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Morphogenesis ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
In Cells

Checkpoint controls are regulatory pathways that inhibit cell cycle progression in cells that have not faithfully completed a prior step in the cell cycle. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication and spindle assembly are monitored by checkpoint controls that prevent nuclear division in cells that have failed to complete these processes. During the normal cell cycle, bud formation is temporally coincident with DNA replication and spindle assembly, and the nucleus divides along the mother-bud axis in mitosis. In this report, we show that inhibition of bud formation also causes a dramatic delay in nuclear division. This allows cells to recover from a transient disruption of cell polarity without becoming binucleate. The delay occurs after DNA replication and spindle assembly, and results from delayed activation of the master cell cycle regulatory kinase, Cdc28. Cdc28 activation is inhibited by phosphorylation of Cdc28 on tyrosine 19, and by delayed accumulation of the B-type cyclins Clb1 and Clb2. These results suggest the existence of a novel checkpoint that monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Cell Division Cycle in Trypanosoma brucei

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1180-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyin Li
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Motor ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

ABSTRACT The cell division cycle is tightly regulated by the activation and inactivation of a series of proteins that control the replication and segregation of organelles to the daughter cells. During the past decade, we have witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the cell cycle in Trypanosoma brucei and how the cycle is regulated by various regulatory proteins. However, many other regulators, especially those unique to trypanosomes, remain to be identified, and we are just beginning to delineate the signaling pathways that drive the transitions through different cell cycle stages, such as the G 1 /S transition, G 2 /M transition, and mitosis-cytokinesis transition. Trypanosomes appear to employ both evolutionarily conserved and trypanosome-specific molecules to regulate the various stages of its cell cycle, including DNA replication initiation, spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, and cytokinesis initiation and completion. Strikingly, trypanosomes lack some crucial regulators that are well conserved across evolution, such as Cdc6 and Cdt1, which are involved in DNA replication licensing, the spindle motor kinesin-5, which is required for spindle assembly, the central spindlin complex, which has been implicated in cytokinesis initiation, and the actomyosin contractile ring, which is located at the cleavage furrow. Conversely, trypanosomes possess certain regulators, such as cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and mitotic centromere-associated kinesins, that are greatly expanded and likely play diverse cellular functions. Overall, trypanosomes apparently have integrated unique regulators into the evolutionarily conserved pathways to compensate for the absence of those conserved molecules and, additionally, have evolved certain cell cycle regulatory pathways that are either different from its human host or distinct between its own life cycle forms.

scholarly journals Cdc28 tyrosine phosphorylation and the morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast.

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
R A Sia ◽  
H A Herald ◽  
D J Lew
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Translational Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
In Cells

A morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast delays nuclear division (and subsequent cell cycle progression) in cells that have failed to make a bud. We show that the ability of this checkpoint to delay nuclear division requires the SWE1 gene, encoding a protein kinase that inhibits the master cell cycle regulatory kinase Cdc28. The timing of nuclear division in cells that cannot make a bud is exquisitely sensitive to the dosage of SWE1 and MIH1 genes, which control phosphorylation of Cdc28 at tyrosine 19. In contrast, the timing of nuclear division in budded cells does not rely on Cdc28 phosphorylation, suggesting that the morphogenesis checkpoint somehow turns on this regulatory pathway. We show that SWE1 mRNA levels fluctuate during the cell cycle and are elevated in cells that cannot make a bud. However, regulation of SWE1 mRNA levels by the checkpoint is indirect, acting through a feedback loop requiring Swe1 activity. Further, the checkpoint is capable of delaying nuclear division even when SWE1 transcription is deregulated. We propose that the checkpoint delays nuclear division through post-translational regulation of Swe1 and that transcriptional feedback loops enhance the efficacy of the checkpoint.

scholarly journals Global Replication-Independent Histone H4 Exchange in Budding Yeast

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 1780-1787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Linger ◽  
Jessica K. Tyler
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Eukaryotic Genome ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Histone Proteins ◽  
Dynamic Exchange ◽  
Histone Exchange

ABSTRACT The eukaryotic genome is packaged together with histone proteins into chromatin following DNA replication. Recent studies have shown that histones can also be assembled into chromatin independently of DNA replication and that this dynamic exchange of histones may be biased toward sites undergoing transcription. Here we show that epitope-tagged histone H4 can be incorporated into nucleosomes throughout the budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) genome regardless of the phase of the cell cycle, the transcriptional status, or silencing of the region. Direct comparisons reveal that the amount of histone incorporation that occurs in G1-arrested cells is similar to that occurring in cells undergoing DNA replication. Additionally, we show that this histone incorporation is not dependent on the histone H3/H4 chaperones CAF-1, Asf1, and Hir1 individually. This study demonstrates that DNA replication and transcription are not necessary prerequisites for histone exchange in budding yeast, indicating that chromatin is more dynamic than previously thought.

scholarly journals Plasma membrane/cell wall perturbation activates a novel cell cycle checkpoint during G1 inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (25) ◽  
pp. 6910-6915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Kono ◽  
Amr Al-Zain ◽  
Lea Schroeder ◽  
Makoto Nakanishi ◽  
Amy E. Ikui
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Wound Healing ◽  
Cell Wall ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Membrane Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Plasma Membrane Damage ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Membrane Cell

Cellular wound healing or the repair of plasma membrane/cell wall damage (plasma membrane damage) occurs frequently in nature. Although various cellular perturbations, such as DNA damage, spindle misalignment, and impaired daughter cell formation, are monitored by cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast, whether plasma membrane damage is monitored by any of these checkpoints remains to be addressed. Here, we define the mechanism by which cells sense membrane damage and inhibit DNA replication. We found that the inhibition of DNA replication upon plasma membrane damage requires GSK3/Mck1-dependent degradation of Cdc6, a component of the prereplicative complex. Furthermore, the CDK inhibitor Sic1 is stabilized in response to plasma membrane damage, leading to cell integrity maintenance in parallel with the Mck1-Cdc6 pathway. Cells defective in both Cdc6 degradation and Sic1 stabilization failed to grow in the presence of plasma membrane damage. Taking these data together, we propose that plasma membrane damage triggers G1 arrest via Cdc6 degradation and Sic1 stabilization to promote the cellular wound healing process.

scholarly journals Identification of an Arginine-Rich Motif in Human Papillomavirus Type 1 E1^E4 Protein Necessary for E4-Mediated Inhibition of Cellular DNA Synthesis In Vitro and in Cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (18) ◽  
pp. 9056-9064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Roberts ◽  
Sarah R. Kingsbury ◽  
Kai Stoeber ◽  
Gillian L. Knight ◽  
Phillip H. Gallimore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Cellular Dna ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Productive infections by human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are restricted to nondividing, differentiated keratinocytes. HPV early proteins E6 and E7 deregulate cell cycle progression and activate the host cell DNA replication machinery in these cells, changes essential for virus synthesis. Productive virus replication is accompanied by abundant expression of the HPV E4 protein. Expression of HPV1 E4 in cells is known to activate cell cycle checkpoints, inhibiting G2-to-M transition of the cell cycle and also suppressing entry of cells into S phase. We report here that the HPV1 E4 protein, in the presence of a soluble form of the replication-licensing factor (RLF) Cdc6, inhibits initiation of cellular DNA replication in a mammalian cell-free DNA replication system. Chromatin-binding studies show that E4 blocks replication initiation in vitro by preventing loading of the RLFs Mcm2 and Mcm7 onto chromatin. HPV1 E4-mediated replication inhibition in vitro and suppression of entry of HPV1 E4-expressing cells into S phase are both abrogated upon alanine replacement of arginine 45 in the full-length E4 protein (E1^E4), implying that these two HPV1 E4 functions are linked. We hypothesize that HPV1 E4 inhibits competing host cell DNA synthesis in replication-activated suprabasal keratinocytes by suppressing licensing of cellular replication origins, thus modifying the phenotype of the infected cell in favor of viral genome amplification.

scholarly journals Budding yeast Dma1 and Dma2 participate in regulation of Swe1 levels and localization

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2185-2197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Raspelli ◽  
Corinne Cassani ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Roberta Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
The One

Timely down-regulation of the evolutionarily conserved protein kinase Swe1 plays an important role in cell cycle control, as Swe1 can block nuclear division through inhibitory phosphorylation of the catalytic subunit of cyclin-dependent kinase. In particular, Swe1 degradation is important for budding yeast cell survival in case of DNA replication stress, whereas it is inhibited by the morphogenesis checkpoint in response to alterations in actin cytoskeleton or septin structure. We show that the lack of the Dma1 and Dma2 ubiquitin ligases, which moderately affects Swe1 localization and degradation during an unperturbed cell cycle with no apparent phenotypic effects, is toxic for cells that are partially defective in Swe1 down-regulation. Moreover, Swe1 is stabilized, restrained at the bud neck, and hyperphosphorylated in dma1Δ dma2Δ cells subjected to DNA replication stress, indicating that the mechanism stabilizing Swe1 under these conditions is different from the one triggered by the morphogenesis checkpoint. Finally, the Dma proteins are required for proper Swe1 ubiquitylation. Taken together, the data highlight a previously unknown role of these proteins in the complex regulation of Swe1 and suggest that they might contribute to control, directly or indirectly, Swe1 ubiquitylation.

scholarly journals The Maize Homologue of the Cell Cycle Checkpoint Protein MAD2 Reveals Kinetochore Substructure and Contrasting Mitotic and Meiotic Localization Patterns

1999 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Guo Yu ◽  
Michael G. Muszynski ◽  
R. Kelly Dawe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Outer Domain ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis ◽  
Meiosis I

We have identified a maize homologue of yeast MAD2, an essential component in the spindle checkpoint pathway that ensures metaphase is complete before anaphase begins. Combined immunolocalization of MAD2 and a recently cloned maize CENPC homologue indicates that MAD2 localizes to an outer domain of the prometaphase kinetochore. MAD2 staining was primarily observed on mitotic kinetochores that lacked attached microtubules; i.e., at prometaphase or when the microtubules were depolymerized with oryzalin. In contrast, the loss of MAD2 staining in meiosis was not correlated with initial microtubule attachment but was correlated with a measure of tension: the distance between homologous or sister kinetochores (in meiosis I and II, respectively). Further, the tension-sensitive 3F3/2 phosphoepitope colocalized, and was lost concomitantly, with MAD2 staining at the meiotic kinetochore. The mechanism of spindle assembly (discussed here with respect to maize mitosis and meiosis) is likely to affect the relative contributions of attachment and tension. We support the idea that MAD2 is attachment-sensitive and that tension stabilizes microtubule attachments.

scholarly journals A Monitor for Bud Emergence in the Yeast Morphogenesis Checkpoint

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 3280-3291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra L. Theesfeld ◽  
Trevin R. Zyla ◽  
Elaine G.S. Bardes ◽  
Daniel J. Lew
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
External Signals ◽  
Biochemical Signals

Cell cycle transitions are subject to regulation by both external signals and internal checkpoints that monitor satisfactory progression of key cell cycle events. In budding yeast, the morphogenesis checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in response to perturbations that affect the actin cytoskeleton and bud formation. Herein, we identify a step in this checkpoint pathway that seems to be directly responsive to bud emergence. Activation of the kinase Hsl1p is dependent upon its recruitment to a cortical domain organized by the septins, a family of conserved filament-forming proteins. Under conditions that delayed or blocked bud emergence, Hsl1p recruitment to the septin cortex still took place, but hyperphosphorylation of Hsl1p and recruitment of the Hsl1p-binding protein Hsl7p to the septin cortex only occurred after bud emergence. At this time, the septin cortex spread to form a collar between mother and bud, and Hsl1p and Hsl7p were restricted to the bud side of the septin collar. We discuss models for translating cellular geometry (in this case, the emergence of a bud) into biochemical signals regulating cell proliferation.

scholarly journals Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) promotes anaphase entry after DNA replication stress in budding yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory Haluska ◽  
Fengzhi Jin ◽  
Yanchang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Viability Loss ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

DNA replication stress activates the S-phase checkpoint that arrests the cell cycle, but it is poorly understood how cells recover from this arrest. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) are key cell cycle regulators, and Cdc55 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A in budding yeast. We found that yeast cells lacking functional PP2ACdc55 showed slow growth in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), a DNA synthesis inhibitor, without obvious viability loss. Moreover, PP2A mutants exhibited delayed anaphase entry and sustained levels of anaphase inhibitor Pds1 after HU treatment. A DNA damage checkpoint Chk1 phosphorylates and stabilizes Pds1. We showed that chk1Δ and mutation of the Chk1 phosphorylation sites in Pds1 largely restored efficient anaphase entry in PP2A mutants after HU treatment. In addition, deletion of SWE1 that encodes the inhibitory kinase for CDK or mutation of the Swe1 phosphorylation site in CDK ( cdc28F19) also suppressed the anaphase entry delay in PP2A mutants after HU treatment. Our genetic data suggest that Swe1/CDK acts upstream of Pds1. Surprisingly, cdc55Δ showed significant suppression to the viability loss of S-phase checkpoint mutants during DNA synthesis block. Together, our results uncover a PP2A-Swe1-CDK-Chk1-Pds1 axis that promotes recovery from DNA replication stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document