scholarly journals Regulation of the Cell Division Cycle in Trypanosoma brucei

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1180-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyin Li
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Motor ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

ABSTRACT The cell division cycle is tightly regulated by the activation and inactivation of a series of proteins that control the replication and segregation of organelles to the daughter cells. During the past decade, we have witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the cell cycle in Trypanosoma brucei and how the cycle is regulated by various regulatory proteins. However, many other regulators, especially those unique to trypanosomes, remain to be identified, and we are just beginning to delineate the signaling pathways that drive the transitions through different cell cycle stages, such as the G 1 /S transition, G 2 /M transition, and mitosis-cytokinesis transition. Trypanosomes appear to employ both evolutionarily conserved and trypanosome-specific molecules to regulate the various stages of its cell cycle, including DNA replication initiation, spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, and cytokinesis initiation and completion. Strikingly, trypanosomes lack some crucial regulators that are well conserved across evolution, such as Cdc6 and Cdt1, which are involved in DNA replication licensing, the spindle motor kinesin-5, which is required for spindle assembly, the central spindlin complex, which has been implicated in cytokinesis initiation, and the actomyosin contractile ring, which is located at the cleavage furrow. Conversely, trypanosomes possess certain regulators, such as cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and mitotic centromere-associated kinesins, that are greatly expanded and likely play diverse cellular functions. Overall, trypanosomes apparently have integrated unique regulators into the evolutionarily conserved pathways to compensate for the absence of those conserved molecules and, additionally, have evolved certain cell cycle regulatory pathways that are either different from its human host or distinct between its own life cycle forms.

The cell division cycle of Trypanosoma brucei brucei : timing of event markers and cytoskeletal modulations

1989 ◽  
Vol 323 (1218) ◽  
pp. 573-588 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Basal Body ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Basal Bodies ◽  
Division Plane ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Single Nucleus

We have analysed the timing and order of events occurring within the cell division cycle of Trypanosoma brucei . Cells in the earliest stages of the cell cycle possess a single copy of three major organelles: the nucleus, the kinetoplast and the flagellum. The first indication of progress through the cell cycle is the elongation of the pro-basal body lying adjacent to the mature basal body subtending the flagellum. This newly elongated basal body occupies a posterior position within the cell when it initiates growth of the new daughter flagellum. Genesis of two new pro-basal bodies occurs only after growth of the new daughter flagellum has been initiated. Extension of the new flagellum, together with the paraflagellar rod, then continues throughout a major portion of the cell cycle. During this period of flagellum elongation, kinetoplast division occurs and the two kinetoplasts, together with the two flagellar basal bodies, then move apart within the cell. Mitosis is then initiated and a complex pattern of organelle positions is achieved whereby a division plane runs longitudinally through the cell such that each daughter ultimately receives a single nucleus, kinetoplast and flagellum. These events have been described from observations of whole cytoskeletons by transmission electron microscopy together with detection of particular organelles by fluorescence microscopy. The order and timing of events within the cell cycle has been derived from analyses of the proportion of a given cell type occurring within an exponentially growing culture.

scholarly journals Instructive simulation of the bacterial cell division cycle

Microbiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1876-1885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arieh Zaritsky ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Norbert O. E. Vischer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Bacterial Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Simulation ◽  
New Ideas

The coupling between chromosome replication and cell division includes temporal and spatial elements. In bacteria, these have globally been resolved during the last 40 years, but their full details and action mechanisms are still under intensive study. The physiology of growth and the cell cycle are reviewed in the light of an established dogma that has formed a framework for development of new ideas, as exemplified here, using the Cell Cycle Simulation (CCSim) program. CCSim, described here in detail for the first time, employs four parameters related to time (replication, division and inter-division) and size (cell mass at replication initiation) that together are sufficient to describe bacterial cells under various conditions and states, which can be manipulated environmentally and genetically. Testing the predictions of CCSim by analysis of time-lapse micrographs of Escherichia coli during designed manipulations of the rate of DNA replication identified aspects of both coupling elements. Enhanced frequencies of cell division were observed following an interval of reduced DNA replication rate, consistent with the prediction of a minimum possible distance between successive replisomes (an eclipse). As a corollary, the notion that cell poles are not always inert was confirmed by observed placement of division planes at perpendicular planes in monstrous and cuboidal cells containing multiple, segregating nucleoids.

scholarly journals Dynamics of pre-replication complex proteins during the cell division cycle

2004 ◽  
Vol 359 (1441) ◽  
pp. 7-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya G. Prasanth ◽  
Juan Méndez ◽  
Kannanganattu V. Prasanth ◽  
Bruce Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Origin Recognition Complex ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Vital Functions ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Bona Fide ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Key Participants

Replication of the human genome every time a cell divides is a highly coordinated process that ensures accurate and efficient inheritance of the genetic information. The molecular mechanism that guarantees that many origins of replication fire only once per cell–cycle has been the area of intense research. The origin recognition complex (ORC) marks the position of replication origins in the genome and serves as the landing pad for the assembly of a multiprotein, pre–replicative complex (pre–RC) at the origins, consisting of ORC, cell division cycle 6 (Cdc6), Cdc10–dependent transcript (Cdt1) and mini–chromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins. The MCM proteins serve as key participants in the mechanism that limits eukaryotic DNA replication to once–per–cell–cycle and its binding to the chromatin marks the final step of pre–RC formation, a process referred to as ‘replication licensing’. We present data demonstrating how the MCM proteins associate with the chromatin during the G1 phase, probably defining pre–RCs and then anticipate replication fork movement in a precisely coordinated manner during the S phase of the cell cycle. The process of DNA replication must also be carefully coordinated with other cell–cycle processes including mitosis and cytokinesis. Some of the proteins that control initiation of DNA replication are likely to interact with the pathways that control these important cell–cycle transitions. Herein, we discuss the participation of human ORC proteins in other vital functions, in addition to their bona fide roles in replication.

scholarly journals A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Lew ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Morphogenesis ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
In Cells

Checkpoint controls are regulatory pathways that inhibit cell cycle progression in cells that have not faithfully completed a prior step in the cell cycle. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication and spindle assembly are monitored by checkpoint controls that prevent nuclear division in cells that have failed to complete these processes. During the normal cell cycle, bud formation is temporally coincident with DNA replication and spindle assembly, and the nucleus divides along the mother-bud axis in mitosis. In this report, we show that inhibition of bud formation also causes a dramatic delay in nuclear division. This allows cells to recover from a transient disruption of cell polarity without becoming binucleate. The delay occurs after DNA replication and spindle assembly, and results from delayed activation of the master cell cycle regulatory kinase, Cdc28. Cdc28 activation is inhibited by phosphorylation of Cdc28 on tyrosine 19, and by delayed accumulation of the B-type cyclins Clb1 and Clb2. These results suggest the existence of a novel checkpoint that monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Activation of a signaling pathway by the physical translocation of a chromosome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Guzzo ◽  
Allen G. Sanderlin ◽  
Lennice K. Castro ◽  
Michael T. Laub
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Caulobacter Crescentus ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

AbstractIn every organism, the cell cycle requires the execution of multiple cellular processes in a strictly defined order. However, the mechanisms used to ensure such order remain poorly understood, particularly in bacteria. Here, we show that the activation of the essential CtrA signaling pathway that triggers cell division in Caulobacter crescentus is intrinsically coupled to the successful initiation of DNA replication via the physical translocation of a newly-replicated chromosome, powered by the ParABS system. We demonstrate that ParA accumulation at the new cell pole during chromosome segregation recruits ChpT, an intermediate component of the CtrA signaling pathway. ChpT is normally restricted from accessing the selective PopZ polar microdomain until the new chromosome and ParA arrive. Consequently, any disruption to DNA replication initiation prevents the recruitment of ChpT and, in turn, cell division. Collectively, our findings reveal how major cell-cycle events are coordinated in Caulobacter and, importantly, how the physical translocation of a chromosome triggers an essential signaling pathway.

Efficiency and equity in origin licensing to ensure complete DNA replication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Mei ◽  
Jeanette Gowen Cook
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Origin Licensing ◽  
Dna Replication Origins

The cell division cycle must be strictly regulated during both development and adult maintenance, and efficient and well-controlled DNA replication is a key event in the cell cycle. DNA replication origins are prepared in G1 phase of the cell cycle in a process known as origin licensing which is essential for DNA replication initiation in the subsequent S phase. Appropriate origin licensing includes: (1) Licensing enough origins at adequate origin licensing speed to complete licensing before G1 phase ends; (2) Licensing origins such that they are well-distributed on all chromosomes. Both aspects of licensing are critical for replication efficiency and accuracy. In this minireview, we will discuss recent advances in defining how origin licensing speed and distribution are critical to ensure DNA replication completion and genome stability.

scholarly journals Distinct and sequential re-replication barriers ensure precise genome duplication

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhuo Zhou ◽  
Pedro N. Pozo ◽  
Seeun Oh ◽  
Haley M. Stone ◽  
Jeanette Gowen Cook
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Genome Duplication ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase

AbstractAchieving complete and precise genome duplication requires that each genomic segment be replicated only once per cell division cycle. Protecting large eukaryotic genomes from re-replication requires an overlapping set of molecular mechanisms that prevent the first DNA replication step, the DNA loading of MCM helicase complexes to license replication origins. Previous reports have defined many such origin licensing inhibition mechanisms, but the temporal relationships among them are not clear, particularly with respect to preventing re-replication in G2 and M phases. Using a combination of mutagenesis, biochemistry, and single cell analyses in human cells, we define a new mechanism that prevents re-replication through hyperphosphorylation of the essential MCM loading protein, Cdt1. We demonstrate that Cyclin A/CDK1 hyperphosphorylates Cdt1 to inhibit MCM re-loading in G2 phase. The mechanism of inhibition is to block Cdt1 binding to MCM independently of other known Cdt1 inactivation mechanisms such as Cdt1 degradation during S phase or Geminin binding. Moreover, we provide evidence that protein phosphatase 1-dependent Cdt1 dephosphorylation at the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition re-activates Cdt1. We propose that multiple distinct, non-redundant licensing inhibition mechanisms act in a series of sequential relays through each cell cycle phase to ensure precise genome duplication.Author SummaryThe initial step of DNA replication is loading the DNA helicase, MCM, onto DNA during the first phase of the cell division cycle. If MCM loading occurs inappropriately onto DNA that has already been replicated, then cells risk DNA re-replication, a source of endogenous DNA damage and genome instability. How mammalian cells prevent any sections of their very large genomes from re-replicating is still not fully understood. We found that the Cdt1 protein, one of the critical MCM loading factors, is inhibited specifically in late cell cycle stages through a mechanism involving protein phosphorylation. This phosphorylation prevents Cdt1 from binding MCM; when Cdt1 can’t be phosphorylated MCM is inappropriately re-loaded onto DNA and cells are prone to re-replication. When cells divide and transition into G1 phase, Cdt1 is then dephosphorylated to re-activate it for MCM loading. Based on these findings we assert that the different mechanisms that cooperate to avoid re-replication are not redundant, but rather distinct mechanisms are dominant in different cell cycle phases. These findings have implications for understanding how genomes are duplicated precisely once per cell cycle and shed light on how that process is perturbed by changes in Cdt1 levels or phosphorylation activity.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5195
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
Ubiquitin E3 Ligase

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication licensing is precisely regulated to ensure that the initiation of genomic DNA replication in S phase occurs once and only once for each mitotic cell division. A key regulatory mechanism by which DNA re-replication is suppressed is the S phase-dependent proteolysis of Cdt1, an essential replication protein for licensing DNA replication origins by loading the Mcm2-7 replication helicase for DNA duplication in S phase. Cdt1 degradation is mediated by CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase, which further requires Cdt1 binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through a PIP box domain in Cdt1 during DNA synthesis. Recent studies found that Cdt2, the specific subunit of CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets Cdt1 for degradation, also contains an evolutionarily conserved PIP box-like domain that mediates the interaction with PCNA. These findings suggest that the initiation and elongation of DNA replication or DNA damage-induced repair synthesis provide a novel mechanism by which Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2 are both recruited onto the trimeric PCNA clamp encircling the replicating DNA strands to promote the interaction between Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2. The proximity of PCNA-bound Cdt1 to CRL4Cdt2 facilitates the destruction of Cdt1 in response to DNA damage or after DNA replication initiation to prevent DNA re-replication in the cell cycle. CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase may also regulate the degradation of other PIP box-containing proteins, such as CDK inhibitor p21 and histone methylase Set8, to regulate DNA replication licensing, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and genome stability by directly interacting with PCNA during DNA replication and repair synthesis.

Histone H3 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by multiple cell cycle activation sites and a constitutive negative regulatory element

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 5455-5463 ◽  
Author(s):  
K B Freeman ◽  
L R Karns ◽  
K A Lutz ◽  
M M Smith
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Activation ◽  
Multiple Cell

The promoters of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H3 and H4 genes were examined for cis-acting DNA sequence elements regulating transcription and cell division cycle control. Deletion and linker disruption mutations identified two classes of regulatory elements: multiple cell cycle activation (CCA) sites and a negative regulatory site (NRS). Duplicate 19-bp CCA sites are present in both the copy I and copy II histone H3-H4 promoters arranged as inverted repeats separated by 45 and 68 bp. The CCA sites are both necessary and sufficient to activate transcription under cell division cycle control. A single CCA site provides cell cycle control but is a weak transcriptional activator, while an inverted repeat comprising two CCA sites provides both strong transcriptional activation and cell division cycle control. The NRS was identified in the copy I histone H3-H4 promoter. Deletion or disruption of the NRS increased the level of the histone H3 promoter activity but did not alter the cell division cycle periodicity of transcription. When the CCA sites were deleted from the histone promoter, the NRS element was unable to confer cell division cycle control on the remaining basal level of transcription. When the NRS element was inserted into the promoter of a foreign reporter gene, transcription was constitutively repressed and did not acquire cell cycle regulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document