scholarly journals A Monitor for Bud Emergence in the Yeast Morphogenesis Checkpoint

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 3280-3291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra L. Theesfeld ◽  
Trevin R. Zyla ◽  
Elaine G.S. Bardes ◽  
Daniel J. Lew
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
External Signals ◽  
Biochemical Signals

Cell cycle transitions are subject to regulation by both external signals and internal checkpoints that monitor satisfactory progression of key cell cycle events. In budding yeast, the morphogenesis checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in response to perturbations that affect the actin cytoskeleton and bud formation. Herein, we identify a step in this checkpoint pathway that seems to be directly responsive to bud emergence. Activation of the kinase Hsl1p is dependent upon its recruitment to a cortical domain organized by the septins, a family of conserved filament-forming proteins. Under conditions that delayed or blocked bud emergence, Hsl1p recruitment to the septin cortex still took place, but hyperphosphorylation of Hsl1p and recruitment of the Hsl1p-binding protein Hsl7p to the septin cortex only occurred after bud emergence. At this time, the septin cortex spread to form a collar between mother and bud, and Hsl1p and Hsl7p were restricted to the bud side of the septin collar. We discuss models for translating cellular geometry (in this case, the emergence of a bud) into biochemical signals regulating cell proliferation.

scholarly journals BED1, a gene encoding a galactosyltransferase homologue, is required for polarized growth and efficient bud emergence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1996 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Mondésert ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Polarized Growth ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Ellipsoidal Shape ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint

The ellipsoidal shape of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the result of successive isotropic/apical growth switches that are regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. It is thought that growth polarity is governed by the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton that is itself under the control of the cell cycle machinery. The cell cycle and the morphogenesis cycle are tightly coupled and it has been recently suggested that a morphogenesis/polarity checkpoint control monitors bud emergence in order to maintain the coupling of these two events (Lew, D. J., and S. I. Reed. 1995. J. Cell Biol. 129:739-749). During a screen based on the inability of cells impaired in the budding process to survive when the morphogenesis checkpoint control is abolished, we identified and characterized BED1, a new gene that is required for efficient budding. Cells carrying a disrupted allele of BED1 no longer have the wild-type ellipsoidal shape characteristic of S. cerevisiae, are larger than wild-type cells, are deficient in bud emergence, and depend upon an intact morphogenesis checkpoint control to survive. These cells show defects in polarized growth despite the fact that the actin cytoskeleton appears normal. Our results suggest that Bed1 is a type II membrane protein localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. BED1 is significantly homologous to gma12+, a S. pombe gene coding for an alpha-1,2,-galactosyltransferase, suggesting that glycosylation of specific proteins or lipids could be important for signaling in the switch to polarized growth and in bud emergence.

scholarly journals A Morphogenesis Checkpoint Monitors the Actin Cytoskeleton in Yeast

1998 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
pp. 1487-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
John N. McMillan ◽  
Rey A.L. Sia ◽  
Daniel J. Lew
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Actin Organization ◽  
Cell Cycle Delay ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
Polarity Establishment ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint

A morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast delays cell cycle progression in response to perturbations of cell polarity that prevent bud formation (Lew, D.J., and S.I. Reed. 1995. J. Cell Biol. 129:739– 749). The cell cycle delay depends upon the tyrosine kinase Swe1p, which phosphorylates and inhibits the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28p (Sia, R.A.L., H.A. Herald, and D.J. Lew. 1996. Mol. Biol. Cell. 7:1657– 1666). In this report, we have investigated the nature of the defect(s) that trigger this checkpoint. A Swe1p- dependent cell cycle delay was triggered by direct perturbations of the actin cytoskeleton, even when polarity establishment functions remained intact. Furthermore, actin perturbation could trigger the checkpoint even in cells that had already formed a bud, suggesting that the checkpoint directly monitors actin organization, rather than (or in addition to) polarity establishment or bud formation. In addition, we show that the checkpoint could detect actin perturbations through most of the cell cycle. However, the ability to respond to such perturbations by delaying cell cycle progression was restricted to a narrow window of the cell cycle, delimited by the periodic accumulation of the checkpoint effector, Swe1p.

scholarly journals Mathematical model of the morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 1243-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ciliberto ◽  
Bela Novak ◽  
John J. Tyson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Control Signals ◽  
Potent Inhibition ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
Size Threshold

The morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast delays progression through the cell cycle in response to stimuli that prevent bud formation. Central to the checkpoint mechanism is Swe1 kinase: normally inactive, its activation halts cell cycle progression in G2. We propose a molecular network for Swe1 control, based on published observations of budding yeast and analogous control signals in fission yeast. The proposed Swe1 network is merged with a model of cyclin-dependent kinase regulation, converted into a set of differential equations and studied by numerical simulation. The simulations accurately reproduce the phenotypes of a dozen checkpoint mutants. Among other predictions, the model attributes a new role to Hsl1, a kinase known to play a role in Swe1 degradation: Hsl1 must also be indirectly responsible for potent inhibition of Swe1 activity. The model supports the idea that the morphogenesis checkpoint, like other checkpoints, raises the cell size threshold for progression from one phase of the cell cycle to the next.

scholarly journals Specific Inhibition of Elm1 Kinase Activity Reveals Functions Required for Early G1 Events

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 6327-6337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aparna Sreenivasan ◽  
Anthony C. Bishop ◽  
Kevan M. Shokat ◽  
Douglas R. Kellogg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Specific Inhibition ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Wee1 Kinase ◽  
Yeast Homolog

ABSTRACT In budding yeast, the Elm1 kinase is required for coordination of cell growth and cell division at G2/M. Elm1 is also required for efficient cytokinesis and for regulation of Swe1, the budding yeast homolog of the Wee1 kinase. To further characterize Elm1 function, we engineered an ELM1 allele that can be rapidly and selectively inhibited in vivo. We found that inhibition of Elm1 kinase activity during G2 results in a phenotype similar to the phenotype caused by deletion of the ELM1 gene, as expected. However, inhibition of Elm1 kinase activity earlier in the cell cycle results in a prolonged G1 delay. The G1 requirement for Elm1 kinase activity occurs before bud emergence, polarization of the septins, and synthesis of G1 cyclins. Inhibition of Elm1 kinase activity during early G1 also causes defects in the organization of septins, and inhibition of Elm1 kinase activity in a strain lacking the redundant G1 cyclins CLN1 and CLN2 is lethal. These results demonstrate that the Elm1 kinase plays an important role in G1 events required for bud emergence and septin organization.

scholarly journals Budding yeast Dma1 and Dma2 participate in regulation of Swe1 levels and localization

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2185-2197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Raspelli ◽  
Corinne Cassani ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Roberta Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Dna Replication Stress ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
The One

Timely down-regulation of the evolutionarily conserved protein kinase Swe1 plays an important role in cell cycle control, as Swe1 can block nuclear division through inhibitory phosphorylation of the catalytic subunit of cyclin-dependent kinase. In particular, Swe1 degradation is important for budding yeast cell survival in case of DNA replication stress, whereas it is inhibited by the morphogenesis checkpoint in response to alterations in actin cytoskeleton or septin structure. We show that the lack of the Dma1 and Dma2 ubiquitin ligases, which moderately affects Swe1 localization and degradation during an unperturbed cell cycle with no apparent phenotypic effects, is toxic for cells that are partially defective in Swe1 down-regulation. Moreover, Swe1 is stabilized, restrained at the bud neck, and hyperphosphorylated in dma1Δ dma2Δ cells subjected to DNA replication stress, indicating that the mechanism stabilizing Swe1 under these conditions is different from the one triggered by the morphogenesis checkpoint. Finally, the Dma proteins are required for proper Swe1 ubiquitylation. Taken together, the data highlight a previously unknown role of these proteins in the complex regulation of Swe1 and suggest that they might contribute to control, directly or indirectly, Swe1 ubiquitylation.

scholarly journals The budding yeast protein Chl1p is required for delaying progression through G1/S phase after DNA damage

Cell Division ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhseena N. Katheeja ◽  
Shankar Prasad Das ◽  
Suparna Laha
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Protein ◽  
Repair Gene ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Abstract Background The budding yeast protein Chl1p is a nuclear protein required for sister-chromatid cohesion, transcriptional silencing, rDNA recombination, ageing and plays an instrumental role in chromatin remodeling. This helicase is known to preserve genome integrity and spindle length in S-phase. Here we show additional roles of Chl1p at G1/S phase of the cell cycle following DNA damage. Results G1 arrested cells when exposed to DNA damage are more sensitive and show bud emergence with faster kinetics in chl1 mutants compared to wild-type cells. Also, more damage to DNA is observed in chl1 cells. The viability falls synergistically in rad24chl1 cells. The regulation of Chl1p on budding kinetics in G1 phase falls in line with Rad9p/Chk1p and shows a synergistic effect with Rad24p/Rad53p. rad9chl1 and chk1chl1 shows similar bud emergence as the single mutants chl1, rad9 and chk1. Whereas rad24chl1 and rad53chl1 shows faster bud emergence compared to the single mutants rad24, rad53 and chl1. In presence of MMS induced damage, synergistic with Rad24p indicates Chl1p’s role as a checkpoint at G1/S acting parallel to damage checkpoint pathway. The faster movement of DNA content through G1/S phase and difference in phosphorylation profile of Rad53p in wild type and chl1 cells confirms the checkpoint defect in chl1 mutant cells. Further, we have also confirmed that the checkpoint defect functions in parallel to the damage checkpoint pathway of Rad24p. Conclusion Chl1p shows Rad53p independent bud emergence and Rad53p dependent checkpoint activity in presence of damage. This confirms its requirement in two different pathways to maintain the G1/S arrest when cells are exposed to damaging agents. The bud emergence kinetics and DNA segregation were similar to wild type when given the same damage in nocodazole treated chl1 cells which establishes the absence of any role of Chl1p at the G2/M phase. The novelty of this paper lies in revealing the versatile role of Chl1p in checkpoints as well as repair towards regulating G1/S transition. Chl1p thus regulates the G1/S phase by affecting the G1 replication checkpoint pathway and shows an additive effect with Rad24p for Rad53p activation when damaging agents perturb the DNA. Apart from checkpoint activation, it also regulates the budding kinetics as a repair gene.

scholarly journals The budding yeast protein Chl1p is required for delaying progression through G1/S phase after DNA damage.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katheeja Muhseena N. ◽  
Shankar Prasad Das ◽  
Suparna Laha
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Protein ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
M Phase

Abstract Background: The helicase Chl1p is a nuclear protein required for sister-chromatid cohesion, transcriptional silencing, rDNA recombination, ageing and plays an instrumental role in chromatin remodeling. This budding yeast protein is known to preserve genome integrity and spindle length in S-phase. Here we show additional roles of Chl1p at G1/S phase of the cell cycle following DNA damage. Results: G1 arrested cells when exposed to DNA damage are more sensitive and show bud emergence with a faster kinetics in chl1 mutants compared to wild-type cells. This role of Chl1p in G1 phase is Rad9p dependent and independent of Rad24 and Rad53. rad9chl1 shows similar bud emergence as the single mutants chl1 and rad9 whereas rad24chl1 and rad53chl1 shows faster bud emergence compared to the single mutants rad24 , rad53 and chl1 . In case of damage induced by genotoxic agent like hydroxyurea, Chl1p acts as a checkpoint at G1/S. The faster movement of DNA content through G1/S phase and difference in phosphorylation profile of Rad53p in wild type and chl1 cells confirms the checkpoint defect in chl1 mutant cells. Further we have observed that the checkpoint defect is synergistic with the replication checkpoint Sgs1p and functions in prallel to the checkpoint pathway of Rad24p. Conclusion: Chl1p shows Rad53p independent bud emergence and Rad53p dependent checkpoint, confirms its requirement in two different pathways to maintain the G1/S arrest when cells are exposed to damaging agents. The bud emergence kinetics and DNA segregation were similar to wild type when given the same damage in nocodazole treated chl1 cells which establishes the absence of any role of Chl1p at the G2/M phase. The novelty of this paper lies in revealing the versatile role of Chl1p in checkpoints as well as repair towards regulating G1/S transition. Chl1 thus regulates the G1/S phase by affecting the G1 replication checkpoint pathway and shows an additive effect with Rad24p as well as Rad53p activation when damaging agents perturbs the DNA.

Rvs167p, the budding yeast homolog of amphiphysin, colocalizes with actin patches

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (15) ◽  
pp. 2529-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Balguerie ◽  
P. Sivadon ◽  
M. Bonneu ◽  
M. Aigle
Keyword(s):  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Vegetative Growth ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Bar Domain ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Latrunculin A ◽  
Complete Disruption ◽  
Yeast Homolog ◽  
Mutant Cells

In this report, we have shown that the yeast amphiphysin-like protein Rvs167p was localized mainly in small cortical patches throughout the cell in unbudding cells. During budding, the patches were polarized at bud emergence site. During mating, Rvs167p was concentrated at the tip of the shmoo. Rvs167p colocalized with actin patches during yeast vegetative growth and mating. Complete disruption of the actin cytoskeleton using Latrunculin-A did not affect Rvs167p localization in patches throughout the cell. In rvs167 mutant cells, actin patches are mislocalized and in rvs161 or abp1 mutant cells, Rvs167p localization is not affected. These observations suggest that Rvs167p may localize the actin cortical complex properly. Finally, the amphiphysin-conserved N-terminal domain of Rvs167p, called the BAR domain, was required but not sufficient for the correct localization of the protein.

scholarly journals A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Lew ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Morphogenesis ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
In Cells

Checkpoint controls are regulatory pathways that inhibit cell cycle progression in cells that have not faithfully completed a prior step in the cell cycle. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication and spindle assembly are monitored by checkpoint controls that prevent nuclear division in cells that have failed to complete these processes. During the normal cell cycle, bud formation is temporally coincident with DNA replication and spindle assembly, and the nucleus divides along the mother-bud axis in mitosis. In this report, we show that inhibition of bud formation also causes a dramatic delay in nuclear division. This allows cells to recover from a transient disruption of cell polarity without becoming binucleate. The delay occurs after DNA replication and spindle assembly, and results from delayed activation of the master cell cycle regulatory kinase, Cdc28. Cdc28 activation is inhibited by phosphorylation of Cdc28 on tyrosine 19, and by delayed accumulation of the B-type cyclins Clb1 and Clb2. These results suggest the existence of a novel checkpoint that monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.

scholarly journals IBD2 Encodes a Novel Component of the Bub2p-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-609
Author(s):  
Hyung-Seo Hwang ◽  
Kiwon Song
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Arrest ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Abstract During mitosis, genomic integrity is maintained by the proper coordination of mitotic events through the spindle checkpoint. The bifurcated spindle checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression at metaphase by monitoring unattached kinetochores and inhibits mitotic exit in response to the incorrect orientation of the mitotic spindle. Bfa1p is a spindle checkpoint regulator of budding yeast in the Bub2p checkpoint pathway for proper mitotic exit. We have isolated a novel Bfa1p interacting protein named Ibd2p in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that IBD2 (Inhibition of Bud Division 2) is not an essential gene but its deletion mutant proceeded through the cell cycle in the presence of microtubule-destabilizing drugs, thereby inducing a sharp decrease in viability. In addition, overexpression of Mps1p caused partial mitotic arrest in ibd2Δ as well as in bub2Δ, suggesting that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint downstream of MPS1. Overexpression of Ibd2p induced mitotic arrest with increased levels of Clb2p in wild type and mad2Δ, but not in deletion mutants of BUB2 and BFA1. Pds1p was also stabilized by the overexpression of Ibd2p in wild-type cells. The mitotic arrest defects observed in ibd2Δ in the presence of nocodazole were restored by additional copies of BUB2, BFA1, and CDC5, whereas an extra copy of IBD2 could not rescue the mitotic arrest defects of bub2Δ and bfa1Δ. The mitotic arrest defects of ibd2Δ were not recovered by MAD2, or vice versa. Analysis of the double mutant combinations ibd2Δmad2Δ, ibd2Δbub2Δ, and ibd2Δdyn1Δ showed that IBD2 belongs to the BUB2 epistasis group. Taken together, these data demonstrate that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the BUB2-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway that functions upstream of BUB2 and BFA1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document