scholarly journals Decision support system analysis for selecting a baby cream product with Preference Selection Index (PSI) Baby Sensitive Skin Under 3 Year

2021 ◽  
Vol 1933 (1) ◽  
pp. 012035
Author(s):  
Muhammad Amin ◽  
Novica Irawati ◽  
Hommy Dorthy Ellyany Sinaga ◽  
Dwi Retnosari ◽  
Jauhari Maulani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Sensitive Skin

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN GURU BERPRESTASI KOTA MEDAN MENERAPKAN METODE PREFERENCES SELECTION INDEX (STUDI KASUS : DINAS PENDIDIKAN KOTA MEDAN)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajar Syahputra ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Ikhwan Lubis ◽  
Agus Perdana Windarto
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Basic Education ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Selection Of

The teacher is a major milestone in the world of education, the ability and achievement of students cannot be separated from the role of a teacher in teaching and guiding students. Based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers, in Article 1 explained that teachers are professional educators with the main task of educating, teaching, guiding, directing, training, evaluating, and evaluating students in early childhood education through formal education, basic education and education medium. Whereas in Article 4 of the Act, it is explained that the position of teachers as professionals serves to enhance the dignity and role of teachers as learning agents to function to improve the quality of national education.Decision making is an election process, among various alternatives that aim to meet one or several targets. The decision-making system has 4 phases, namely intelligence, design, choice and implementation. These phases are the basis for decision making, which ends with a recommendation.The Preferences Selection Index (PSI) method is a rarely used decision support system method. This method is a method developed by stevanie and Bhatt (2010) to solve the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). With the right consideration, this method can be one of the tools to determine policies in decision-making systems, especially the selection of outstanding teachers. Determination of policies taken as a basis for decision making, must use criteria that can be defined clearly and objectively.Keywords: Decision Support System, PSI, Selection of Achieving Teachers

scholarly journals Decision Support System on Selection of Lecturer Research Grant Proposals using Preferences Selection Index

2019 ◽  
Vol 1255 ◽  
pp. 012006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Sundari ◽  
Karmila ◽  
Masduki Nizam Fadli ◽  
Dedy Hartama ◽  
Agus Perdana Windarto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Grant Proposals ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Research Grant

scholarly journals Implementation of Preference Selection Index Method in Decision Support System for Selecting School Inventory Users

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-339
Author(s):  
Doris Yolanda Saragih ◽  
Kalvin Sinaga
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Instructional Media ◽  
Index Method ◽  
The Third ◽  
Service Behavior ◽  
Final Score ◽  
Psi Method

This study aims to solve the problem of using a limited inventory of supporting media for learning at SD 096782 Tumorang Huta Dua Tumorang school, Gunung Maligas District, Simalungun Regency. The limitations of school inventories in the use of instructional media must be distributed to teachers so that they can be used in teaching. Therefore, the difficulty of distributing school inventory was overcome by implementing a decision support system using the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method. This method uses 6 criteria consisting of: years of service, behavior, performance, attendance, responsibility, and last education. The results of the application of the DSS with the PSI method obtained alternatives that are priority recommendations for school inventory users. The recommendation results obtained from the application of the DSS with the PSI method are Teacher_3 alternative with a final value of 0.8506. The second alternative is Teacher_01 with a final score of 0.8190 and the third alternative is Teacher_07 with a final score of 0.7846.

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN PRIORITAS PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH MENERAPKAN METODE PREFERENCE SELECTION INDEX (PSI)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Klarasia Siahaan ◽  
Mesran Mesran ◽  
Sumiaty Adelina Hutabarat ◽  
Joli Afriany
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Development ◽  
Selection Index ◽  
Fund Allocation ◽  
Collection Data ◽  
Psi Method

This study aims to determine development priorities in 2018 Kota Medan District covering planning, use and evaluation of village development. This study uses qualitative research, with a case study strategy. The technique of collecting data is done by interviews, observation and documentation. Test the validity of data by triangulating data sources and data collection techniques. Data analysis uses determination techniques through data collection, data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. Evaluations for the Village Fund for 2017 include constraints faced during the implementation of development and allocation of village funds such as a lack of sense of responsibility between village officials in managing village funds, people who care about development are still few, and there is a lack of meetings to deliver information on village fund allocation to the community. The decision support system for determining village development priorities has stages, starting from selecting criteria, aspects to assessments that have been set, decision making difficulties in determining priorities and calculating weights. Related to this, the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method can be used to solve the problem. The results of the process are in the form of village rankings as a recommendation for decision making to choose as suitable occupies the designated fields. The results of the system supplementation, it was concluded that the use of this method can help the process of making prioritization of development, can be studied, quite easy to use, and produce information used.Keywords: Decision Support System, Development Priority, PSI

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN DOSEN BERPRESTASI MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
Niska Ramadani ◽  
Nofri Heltiani
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
System Development ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Design System ◽  
Actual System ◽  
Computer Based

The concept of a computer-based decision-making support system (Computer Based Decision Support System) is currently developing very rapidly. Many methods are used to assist in the decision making process. Decision making is carried out with a systematic approach to the problem through the process of collecting data into information and coupled with factors that need to be considered in decision making. To make a decision support system for the selection of outstanding teachers in Akkes Sapta Bakti Bengkulu by computer. The research method that the author uses in making this application is from a manual or conventional system into a system development (electronic system) using the waterfall model. Waterfall system development method is a sequence of activities or activities carried out in system development starting from problem determination, actual system analysis, new system analysis, design, system implementation and testing. The software used in making this application is to use the Visua Basic 2010. application and is supported with a Microsoft Access 2007 database and Crystal Report as a report.

scholarly journals Decision support system analysis with the graph model on non-cooperative generic water resource conflicts

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Aljuaidi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Stable Solution ◽  
Graph Model ◽  
Water Conflict ◽  
Robust Solution ◽  
Gap Technique ◽  
Stability Concepts

This paper aims to resolve four non-cooperative generic water disputes using the Graph Model approach for conflict resolution. Therefore, a Decision Support System (DSS) has been utilized integrating multiple-criteria decision analysis, stability analysis, and uncertainty analysis using the info-gap technique. The DSS has been applied to four different non-cooperative water conflict including: (1) groundwater common pool; (2) environmental problem between two countries; (3) river conflict dispute between two countries; and (4) sustainable development game. The DSS demonstrates four stability concepts, including Nash Stability (R), General Metarationality (GMR), Symmetric Metarationality (SMR), Sequential stability (SEQ) to illustrate how results differ with regard to the stability concepts. After classifying the preferences of stakeholders, the DSS recognized the most stable solution, considering the potential actions and counteractions of all stakeholders. Consequently, solution robustness was tested under the uncertainty related to stakeholders’ perspective, under non-cooperative attitudes. When there are no sufficient details about the conflict and what decision to be prepared, the DSS proved to be useful in modeling complex disputes, determining most robust solution, and examining the effect of uncertainty.

scholarly journals Group Decision Support System for Job Promotion Using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Muhar Dizani ◽  
Sumiati Sumiati ◽  
Suherman Suherman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Group Decision Support ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Group Decision Support System ◽  
Speed Up ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting

The Group Decision Support System is a tool used to help group decision makers become faster and more objective. A case study at Serang Raya University is the selection of employees for promotion. The problem is the difficulty in determining which employees will be promoted to fill a certain position and spend a lot of time and how to do the calculation? The research methodology used is system analysis, and calculation of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The criteria chosen are based on staffing policies. The decision makers involved were the dean of the faculty, the head of the staffing department and the university's rector. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) can determine the weight value for each attribute, then proceed with the ranking process that will select the best alternative from a number of alternatives. The results are used to make it easier for users to choose the employees to choose for promotion. This system is expected to help speed up employee decision making to be promoted.

The Design of Data Structure and Interface for Nuclear Emergency Assessment and Decision Support System

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yapeng ◽  
Wei Hong ◽  
Feng Zongyang ◽  
Jia Linsheng ◽  
Xu Xiaoxiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Data Structure ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Source Term ◽  
Emergency Workers ◽  
On Line ◽  
Nuclear Emergency

Emergency Assessment and Decision Support System has become an important tool to effectively respond to a nuclear emergency in nuclear power plant, the system mainly used to on-line assessment the real-time reactor conditions, calculate the source term released to the environment, and suggest the protection actions taken to protect the public and emergency workers. This paper describe the development of the system, analysis the business flow chart of nuclear assessment, introduce details of several functional modules, such as core damage assessment, source term calculation and radiological consequence assessment. The system’s data structure and data interface also be describe in detail.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document