scholarly journals Use of machine-learning for monitoring solar thermal plants

2021 ◽  
Vol 2042 (1) ◽  
pp. 012007
Author(s):  
Joachim Werner Hofmann ◽  
Bernd Sitzmann ◽  
John Dickinson ◽  
Dominique Kunz ◽  
Ralph Eismann

Abstract A machine-learning algorithm (MLA) was developed to assess the operational state of solar thermal plants, based on the data of only one temperature sensor, and the irradiance and ambient temperature data from the nearest weather station. A detailed requirements analysis of the situation results in the classification of a multivariate time series problem. Neural networks used in the field of data science are ideally suited for problems of this type. Data from the operational monitoring system, which runs a rule-based algorithm, were used to train the neural network using the software framework TensorFlow. It was shown that the chosen MLA can detect malfunctions such as heat loss due to gravity-driven circulation during night. However, further development towards a practical tool requires not only far more data for training and validation. It became clear that corresponding pressure data are needed to classify temperature transients and to attribute these classes to certain malfunctions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel A. Colozza-Gama ◽  
Fabiano Callegari ◽  
Nikola Bešič ◽  
Ana C. de J. Paviza ◽  
Janete M. Cerutti

AbstractSomatic mutations in cancer driver genes can help diagnosis, prognosis and treatment decisions. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen is the main source of DNA for somatic mutation detection. To overcome constraints of DNA isolated from FFPE, we compared pyrosequencing and ddPCR analysis for absolute quantification of BRAF V600E mutation in the DNA extracted from FFPE specimens and compared the results to the qualitative detection information obtained by Sanger Sequencing. Sanger sequencing was able to detect BRAF V600E mutation only when it was present in more than 15% total alleles. Although the sensitivity of ddPCR is higher than that observed for Sanger, it was less consistent than pyrosequencing, likely due to droplet classification bias of FFPE-derived DNA. To address the droplet allocation bias in ddPCR analysis, we have compared different algorithms for automated droplet classification and next correlated these findings with those obtained from pyrosequencing. By examining the addition of non-classifiable droplets (rain) in ddPCR, it was possible to obtain better qualitative classification of droplets and better quantitative classification compared to no rain droplets, when considering pyrosequencing results. Notable, only the Machine learning k-NN algorithm was able to automatically classify the samples, surpassing manual classification based on no-template controls, which shows promise in clinical practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Mehdi Berriri ◽  
Sofiane Djema ◽  
Gaëtan Rey ◽  
Christel Dartigues-Pallez

Today, many students are moving towards higher education courses that do not suit them and end up failing. The purpose of this study is to help provide counselors with better knowledge so that they can offer future students courses corresponding to their profile. The second objective is to allow the teaching staff to propose training courses adapted to students by anticipating their possible difficulties. This is possible thanks to a machine learning algorithm called Random Forest, allowing for the classification of the students depending on their results. We had to process data, generate models using our algorithm, and cross the results obtained to have a better final prediction. We tested our method on different use cases, from two classes to five classes. These sets of classes represent the different intervals with an average ranging from 0 to 20. Thus, an accuracy of 75% was achieved with a set of five classes and up to 85% for sets of two and three classes.


Author(s):  
Katherine Darveau ◽  
Daniel Hannon ◽  
Chad Foster

There is growing interest in the study and practice of applying data science (DS) and machine learning (ML) to automate decision making in safety-critical industries. As an alternative or augmentation to human review, there are opportunities to explore these methods for classifying aviation operational events by root cause. This study seeks to apply a thoughtful approach to design, compare, and combine rule-based and ML techniques to classify events caused by human error in aircraft/engine assembly, maintenance or operation. Event reports contain a combination of continuous parameters, unstructured text entries, and categorical selections. A Human Factors approach to classifier development prioritizes the evaluation of distinct data features and entry methods to improve modeling. Findings, including the performance of tested models, led to recommendations for the design of textual data collection systems and classification approaches.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1700-1704

Classification of target from a mixture of multiple target information is quite challenging. In This paper we have used supervised Machine learning algorithm namely Linear Regression to classify the received data which is a mixture of target-return with the noise and clutter. Target state is estimated from the classified data using Kalman filter. Linear Kalman filter with constant velocity model is used in this paper. Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) analysis is used to measure the performance of the estimated track at various Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) levels. The results state that the error is high for Low SNR, for High SNR the error is Low


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-110
Author(s):  
Tianyi Wang ◽  

Differential equations are widely used to model systems that change over time, some of which exhibit chaotic behaviors. This paper proposes two new methods to classify these behaviors that are utilized by a supervised machine learning algorithm. Dissipative chaotic systems, in contrast to conservative chaotic systems, seem to follow a certain visual pattern. Also, the machine learning program written in the Wolfram Language is utilized to classify chaotic behavior with an accuracy around 99.1±1.1%.


2021 ◽  
pp. 399-408
Author(s):  
Aditi Sakalle ◽  
Pradeep Tomar ◽  
Harshit Bhardwaj ◽  
Divya Acharya ◽  
Arpit Bhardwaj

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document