scholarly journals A bibliometric analysis of permeable reactive barrier enhanced electrokinetic treatment for sustainable polluted soil remediation

2021 ◽  
Vol 894 (1) ◽  
pp. 012034
Author(s):  
M A Budihardjo ◽  
R P Safitri ◽  
B S Ramadan ◽  
A J Effendi ◽  
S Hidayat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metal ◽  
Soil Remediation ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barriers ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Bibliographic Analysis ◽  
Barrier Materials ◽  
Reactive Barrier ◽  
Pollutants Removal

Abstract Research on soil remediation continues to develop, one of which is electrokinetic remediation combined with a permeable reactive barrier as a medium to prevent the migration of metals removed from the anode and cathode spaces. Thus, it is hoped that there is no need for reprocessing the residue resulting from electrokinetic remediation. This study aims to conduct a bibliographical analysis related to electrokinetic remediation coupled by permeable reactive barriers for heavy metal contaminated soil and to examine the effect of using various types of reactive barrier materials and their placement on the pollutants removal in the soil. Based on the results of bibliographic analysis, 26 relevant scientific articles were obtained, and the most publications in 2020 with 27% additional article publications are found. China and Environmental Science and Pollutant Research are the countries and journals that contribute the most to publications related to EK-PRB on heavy metal polluted soils.

scholarly journals Remediation of Multiply Contaminated Ground via Permeable Reactive Barrier and Electrokinetic Using Recyclable Food Scrap Ash (FSA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1194
Author(s):  
Dongchan Kim ◽  
Junggeun Han
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metal ◽  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Organic Contaminants ◽  
Contaminated Soils ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barriers ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Contaminant Removal ◽  
Copper Adsorption ◽  
Reactive Barrier

A study of the application of electrokinetic (EK) remediation and Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB) using recyclable Foods Scrap Ash (FSA) in multiple contaminated soils was carried out. An FSA was chosen as a PRB fill material due to its highly efficient capacity for contaminant removal. Acetic acid and Brij30 were used as enhancers on copper and phenanthrene, respectively, to improve EK remediation performance in removing the heavy metal and organic contaminants. Copper adsorption in PRB was so substantial that the confirmed removal efficiency was 83.86–90.17% and the remaining amount was 105–212 mg. While a high removal efficiency of acetic acid was observed on copper in multiple contamination soils; the removal of phenanthrene was hardly detected and the recovery rate of the contaminant was low during pretreatment. Therefore; an additional study of pretreatment on the phenanthrene-contaminated kaolinite needs to be performed.

Lead (II) Removal from Contaminated Soils by Electrokinetic Remediation Coupled with Modified Eggshell Waste

2018 ◽  
Vol 777 ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Ribeiro ◽  
André Mota ◽  
Margarida Soares ◽  
Carlos Castro ◽  
Jorge Araújo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contaminated Soil ◽  
Contaminated Soils ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Inorganic Contaminants ◽  
Reactive Barrier ◽  
Eggshell Waste ◽  
Inorganic Fraction ◽  
Maximum Removal

Electrokinetic remediation deserves particular attention in soil treatment due to its peculiar advantages, including the capability of treating fine and low permeability materials, and achieving consolidation, dewatering and removal of salts and inorganic contaminants like heavy metals in a single stage. In this study, the remediation of artificially lead (II) contaminated soil by electrokinetic process, coupled with Eggshell Inorganic Fraction Powder (EGGIF) permeable reactive barrier (PRB), was investigated. An electric field of 2 V cm-1was applied and was used an EGGIF/soil ratio of 30 g kg-1 of contaminated soil for the preparation of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) in each test. It was obtained high removal rates of lead in both experiments, especially near the cathode. In the normalized distance to cathode of 0.2 it was achieved a maximum removal rate of lead (II) of 68, 78 and 83% in initial lead (II) concentration of 500 mg-1, 200 mg-1 and 100 mg-1, respectively. EGGIF (Eggshell Inorganic Fraction) proved that can be used as permeable reactive barrier (PRB) since in all the performed tests were achieved adsorptions yields higher than 90%.

Decontamination of Heavy Metals From Municipal Sewage Sludge (MSS) by Electrokinetic Remediation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ribeiro ◽  
J. Araújo ◽  
A. Mota ◽  
R. Campos ◽  
C. Vilarinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Sewage Sludge ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Municipal Sewage ◽  
Municipal Sewage Sludge ◽  
Reactive Barrier

Abstract A large quantity of sludges resulting from the treatment of MWWTP (Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant) effluent is generated annually following the increase of population density and acceleration of urbanization. Sludge production in Europe has been predicted by around 12 million tons in 2020. As a solid waste, appropriate disposal of Municipal Sewage Sludge (MSS) has been taken seriously due to its larger volume and toxic substances such as heavy metals. Electrokinetic remediation has more advantages in heavy metals uptake compared to other technologies, due to the ability to treat soils in-situ and to remove heavy metals from soils. In this work, it was studied the remediation of MSS by the electrokinetic remediation coupled with activated carbon (AC) as a permeable reactive barrier (PRB). It was applied an electric current of 3 V cm−1 and it was used an AC/sludge ratio of 30 g kg−1 of contaminated sludge for the preparation of the PRB. In each trial, the evolution of cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni) and zinc (Zn) removal from the sludge were evaluated. Results proved that this process is perfectly suited for the removal of chromium, nickel and zinc metals from the sludge. At the end of the operation time, it was achieved a maximum removal rate of 56% for chromium, 73% for nickel and 99% for zinc, with initial concentrations of 2790 mg kg−1, 2840 mg kg−1, and 94200 mg kg−1, respectively. Based on these results, it was proved the technical viability of the proposed technology (electrokinetic with AC as a permeable reactive barrier) to treat municipal sewage sludges.

Development of Permeable Reactive Barrier for Phosphorus Removal

2010 ◽  
Vol 636-637 ◽  
pp. 1365-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Oliveira ◽  
Ana Vera Machado ◽  
Regina Nogueira
Keyword(s):  
Hybrid Material ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Sol Gel ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barriers ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Aluminium Isopropoxide ◽  
Reactive Barrier ◽  
Ft Ir ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Ft Ir Spectroscopy

Permeable reactive barriers were developed for phosphorus removal. The barrier consists in an organic-inorganic hybrid material, which allows water and others species to flow through it, while selectively removes the contaminants. Polyethylene oxide (POE) and aluminium oxide (Al2O3) were used as the organic and the inorganic parts, respectively. The hybrid material was obtained by sol-gel reaction, using aluminium isopropoxide as inorganic percursor in order to attain Al2O3. The hybrid material produced was characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy and thermogravimetry. The previous tests for phosphorus removal have shown the effectiveness capacity of the developed material to remove it.

scholarly journals Role of Microorganisms in Permeable Reactive Bio-Barriers (PRBBs) for Environmental Clean-Up: A Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-280 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Remediation ◽  
Gradient Flow ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barriers ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Innovative Technology ◽  
Reactive Barrier ◽  
Reactive Barriers ◽  
Long Term Performance ◽  
Term Performance ◽  
Reactive Media

It is an indisputable fact that any environmental clean-up technology generating certain kind of effective result would be easily supported. One of them includes Permeable reactive bio-barrier which is an innovative technology started from 90’s to treat a variety of contaminants along the natural gradient flow of groundwater through immobilization or transformation of pollutants into less toxic and harmful form. Despite of any broad acknowledgement, there are lesser known knowledge about use of microorganisms in permeable reactive barriers, mingling of microorganisms with other reactive media and their effect on each other’s reactivity. The current review deals with an overview of the types of reactive media used in Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) as well as different bio-barriers (PRBBs) utilized for the treatment of various contaminants, long–term performance of permeable reactive barrier and combination of microorganism and reactive media to look forward for their symbiotic relationship in permeable reactive barrier for environmental remediation.

Effect of Mussel Shells as a Permeable Reactive Barrier in Municipal Sewage Sludge Treatment by Electrokinetic Remediation

2020 ◽  
Vol 1013 ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
André Ribeiro ◽  
André Mota ◽  
Jorge Araújo ◽  
Cândida Vilarinho ◽  
Joana Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Sewage Sludge ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Municipal Sewage ◽  
Municipal Sewage Sludge ◽  
Reactive Barrier ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Mussel Shells

IIn this work, it was evaluate the utilization of mussel shells (raw and calcinated) as a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) for the treatment of municipal sewage sludge (MSS) contaminated with heavy metals, creating a novel combined system, which integrates two technologies: electrokinetic remediation technology, and adsorption by the utilization of mussel shells adsorbents. Regarding the adsorption process into the mussel shells adsorbents, it was also aimed to study the influence of aragonite and calcite on the adsorption of lead (Pb), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), and zinc (Zn). For the preparation of the PRB, it was used three adsorbents: MEXMT (raw mussel shells); MEXMT 600 (mussel shells calcinated at 600°C) and finally, a commercial calcium carbonate (CCCom). It was applied an electric current of 1 V cm-1 and it was used an adsorbent/sludge ratio of 30 g kg-1 of contaminated sludge for the preparation of the PRB. Results proved that this process is perfectly suited for the removal of the heavy metals understudy from the sludge, especially with MEXMT (raw mussel shells) adsorbent. With this adsorbent, at the end of the 92 hours of operation time, it was obtained high removal rates for each metal in study. Results demonstrate that higher removals rates were achieved in lead (92%), followed by zinc (82%), copper (76%), and finally chromium with 72%. Based on these results, it was proved the technical viability of the proposed technology (electrokinetic remediation with raw mussel shells as a permeable reactive barrier) to treat municipal sewage sludges.

In‐Situ Treatment of Landfill Leachate with Permeable Reactive Barriers

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Boyes
Keyword(s):  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barriers ◽  
Permeable Reactive Barrier ◽  
Hazardous Wastes ◽  
Food Wastes ◽  
Reactive Barrier ◽  
Viable Solution ◽  
Reactive Barriers

As precipitation percolates through a landfill, it comes in contact with decomposing waste ranging from food wastes to factory wastes even to hazardous wastes. That water can then leach elements from the wastes and become contaminated forming what is typically called landfill leachate. Leachate has the potential to cause many health problems if allowed to reach the groundwater and every effort is made to slow and minimize its effect. The most common way of dealing with leachate is to pump it out of the base of the landfill with a series of pipes and pumps, but what about the treatment of the leachate in‐situ through the use of a permeable reactive barrier? Is it a viable solution?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document