scholarly journals Specifics of Educational Process in Architectural Space of Russian and Chinese Universities

Author(s):  
Ekaterina Beliaeva
Author(s):  
Marina Y. Antropova ◽  
Andrei A. Vlasov ◽  
Elena F. Kasyanenko

Mobile training facilitates communication and information exchange without reference to stationary equipment. The purpose of the study is to find effective resources and mobile programs for use by Chinese undergraduate students in the study of Russian and English as foreign languages. The study was conducted in the Chinese universities of Guangzhou, Zhuhai and Wuhan. Observation, survey, survey and problem-oriented search showed that 95% of respondents prefer to use the mobile communication system WeChat (Weixin). Mobile programs and applications based on it—Xiumi, dictionaries Youdao and Qianyi, mini-program Ruclub, ‘Russian centre’—are widely used in the classroom and outside the classroom, in various forms of student and teaching activities. The results of the study showed that WeChat (Weixin) is the leading mobile platform for learning foreign languages in China. It is important to create a methodological classification of mobile applications used for teaching purposes on the WeChat platform. Keywords: Mobile learning, mobile programs, mobile app, WeChat, Chinese students.


Author(s):  
B. B. Budazhapova ◽  
◽  
F. Shixuan ◽  
L. Tingting ◽  
◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Vej Yao

The article is devoted to the idea of a «divided audience» which was proposed by a Chinese scientist, Professor Chang Xuexin. The author outlines that at the moment, it is used as a new educational model in Chinese universities and it is considered reform of the educational process. The author comes to the conclusion that this model has changed the traditional Chinese pedagogical thought – the role of students has become dominant in teaching. It is practically confirmed by improvements in the quality of education in Chinese universities and is acute topic of discussion among teachers and scientists in China.


2020 ◽  
pp. 182-190
Author(s):  
Yue Wang ◽  
Yiru Liu

The article analyzes the peculiarities of practical use of TRIZ-pedagogical methods in the process of teaching Russian as a foreign language in Chinese universities. At the present stage of its development the methodology of teaching Russian as a foreign language encounters a number of challenges including gap between goals and learning outcomes, focus of the educational process on knowledge paradigm etc. The teacher of Russian as a foreign language in Chinese universities is additionally faced with a number of problems caused by the established practice of teaching in the country. In this situation the need to rethink educational content, forms and methods of teaching Russian as a foreign language is obvious. TRIZ pedagogy technologies can provide a new impetus, which allows organizing work not only on mastering the Russian as a foreign language system by students, but also contributing to the development of flexibility, innovative thinking, and the production of innovative solutions. The article deals with a detailed study of the features of using TRIZ-technologies in the process of teaching Chinese students, the advantages and features of their implementation in universities are considered.


Author(s):  
Wang Jingyi ◽  
Liu Chang

The specific aspects of the education system of Ukraine and China are considered and analyzed. It is noted that the growing intellectualization of the economy is one of the important modern criteria, which is reflected in the requirements to increase the quality of education. From this point of view, the study of China’s experience in the educational sector is relevant as it promotes the search for improvement of the existing educational model in Ukraine. A comparative description of the age criterion of the stages of the educational process in Ukraine and China is presented. From this point of view, there are the following links in the education system in two countries: pre-school education, elementary education, secondary education, higher education, adult education. Mechanisms for obtaining each level of education in two countries are revealed. The forms of educational institutions ownership and fees for educational services, terms of education, types of educational institutions of each level, statistics on the coverage of pre-school education, the number of children, educators and assistant educators in groups of kindergartens, pupils and teachers in classes, school regimen, grading scale, the lesson duration, the only state examination for admission to higher education, the conditions for admitting university entrants to institutions of higher education are revealed. It is also noted that there is an acute problem with the provision of teaching staff with higher education in China preschool institutions and this issue is systematically and purposefully solved by the state. The article analyzes the three top rankings of the best institutions of higher education in the world educational market in the context of the quantitative component of Ukrainian and Chinese universities representatives. The indexes for which the universities were evaluated and the world top universities’ rating was created. The authors made a conclusion that only six institutions of higher education of Ukraine have world-class recognition, and two of them meet international standards of preparation of skilled workers. The authors based the position that China is one of the leaders in providing quality educational services, and therefore it is expedient to study the organization, content, forms and methods in the Chinese universities for the purpose of implantation of constructive experience in the educational system of Ukraine.


Author(s):  
Е. Belyaeva ◽  
E. Grunt

The article provides a comparative analysis of digital educational platforms used in the practice of Russian and Chinese universities. Our conclusions are based on the comparative data on Russia and China published in the reports of UNESCO, International Labour Organization, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Council of Europe and European Economic Community (EEC), Asia-Pacific Programme of Innovation in Education for Development (APEID). In addition, the article provides data from two sociological studies carried out by the authors themselves. The first study was conducted between January and February 2020. The study was conducted by means of a survey, personal interview (N = 600). Students from Moscow, Ekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk and Tyumen took part in the survey. The quantitative research data were supplemented by in-depth interviews with Chinese graduates of Russian universities (postgraduates, master’s students) in the amount of 50 pieces (N = 50). Also in March — May 2020, we conducted a sociological survey in the universities of Ekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk, and Moscow. In the course of the research we interviewed 500 students who had gained experience in distance learning during the pandemic. Qualitative research — in-depth interview method (N = 20), average duration of the interview is 90 minutes. Informants were the faculty of higher educational institutions of Yekaterinburg, Moscow and St. Petersburg. Frame analysis of cases was also conducted (N = 42). The analysis of these cases made it possible to identify the most popular digital technologies in the educational process, as well as their main advantages and disadvantages.


1996 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 778-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Hjorting-Hansen ◽  
D Dent

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document