Facelift With Power-Assisted Dissection: A Preliminary Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R Cohen ◽  
Sierra Hewett ◽  
Patrick Baraf ◽  
Sarah Jiwon Crowley ◽  
Michael Atlan
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Report ◽  
Skin Aging ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Volume Loss ◽  
Skin Flaps ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Soft Tissue Laxity

Abstract Background Subcutaneous elevation of the skin has remained a key component in all facelift techniques. Objectives The aim of this preliminary report was to introduce the ABC facelift as a 3-step method addressing photodamage, soft tissue laxity, and areas of bone and volume loss. Methods The procedure consists of: (A) anatomic and regenerative adipose grafting prior to skin elevation; (B) the use of a Baraf elevator for takedown of perpendicular subcutaneous fibers following hydrodissection of the skin flaps with tumescent solution; and (C) cautery dissection of the superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) and platysma in the neck. Results Thirty-four patients (31 females; 3 male), aged 50 to 77 years at the date of procedure, underwent an ABC facelift. Dissection of the skin flaps and SMAS elevation were faster than with traditional methods, averaging 10 to 15 minutes per hemiface. Bleeding was reduced (average estimated blood loss, 12 mL) and the skin flaps appeared better perfused with less venous engorgement and ecchymosis than achieved with sharp scissor dissection. In general, patients appeared to have shorter postoperative recovery courses and less social downtime secondary to bruising and edema. Conclusions The ABC facelift addresses facial laxity, volume loss, and skin aging with 3 simple steps: anatomic and regenerative fat grafting, combined with power-assisted dissection of the skin and cautery elevation of the SMAS. The use of more advanced hydrodissection tools to achieve further improvements in layer separation is currently being investigated. Level of Evidence: 4

Fat Grafting to Improve Results of Facelift: Systematic Review of Safety and Effectiveness of Current Treatment Paradigms

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Molina-Burbano ◽  
J Michael Smith ◽  
Michael J Ingargiola ◽  
Saba Motakef ◽  
Paymon Sanati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Fat Graft ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Volume Loss ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System ◽  
Age Related

Abstract Background Autologous fat grafting is a helpful supplement to facelift surgery that helps to combat age-related volume loss of facial structures. Despite the widespread prevalence of combined facelift and fat-grafting, significant procedural variation exists between providers. Objectives The primary purpose of this systematic review was to study the efficacy and complication rates of facelift with lipofilling compared with facelift alone. Methods A systematic review of the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases as completed was undertaken to identify all clinical reports of fat grafting combined with facelift surgery based on the following key terms: (“fat grafting” OR “lipotransfer” OR “lipofilling” OR “fat transfer”) AND (“facelift” OR “rhytidectomy” OR “SMASectomy” OR “facial rejuvenation”). Data on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected. Results The systematic review was performed in April 2017. In total, 248 articles were identified for review. After application of exclusion criteria, 15 primary studies were included in this review. Various facelift techniques were reported, including deep-plane or sub–superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) facelift, SMAS facelift, modified minimal access cranial suspension lift, component facelift, midface lift, SMAS plication, SMAS-stacking/SMASectomy, and SMASectomy. The most common locations of fat graft injection included the nasolabial folds, tear troughs, temporal regions, midface/cheek/malar eminence, marionette groove, lips, and ear lobes. The addition of fat grafting to facelift surgery resulted in significant improvements in facial volume and aesthetic assessments. Conclusions Combined facelift and fat grafting is a safe and efficacious means to simultaneously address age-related ptosis and volume loss. Further research is required to validate and improve existing treatment modalities. Level of Evidence: 3

scholarly journals Facial Rejuvenation With Fat Grafting and Fillers

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S31-S38
Author(s):  
J Sarah Crowley ◽  
Elizabeth Kream ◽  
Sabrina Fabi ◽  
Steven R Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Facial Rejuvenation ◽  
Volume Loss ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Tissue Replacement ◽  
Dermal Thickness ◽  
The Face ◽  
Modality Approach ◽  
A New Technique

Abstract Facial rejuvenation requires a multi-modality approach to address the sun damage, volume loss, and thinning of skin that occurs with aging. With age, the collagen fibrils that provide strength become fragmented and fibroblasts connections become weak, leading to skin laxity and loss of youthful skin. Fillers can lead to a more youthful appearance by providing volumetric support. Synthetic fillers such as hyaluronic acid products, calcium hydroxyapatite, polylactic acid, and polymethylmethacralate have bio-stimulatory affects, ranging from small effects on fibroblast production to prolonged stimulatory effects on dermal thickness and blood supply. Fat grafting is also an ideal technique for facial rejuvenation because it is readily available, natural, and has regenerative effects. This review describes a new technique of fat grafting for the face called Injectable Tissue Replacement and Regeneration that specifically addresses the different anatomic compartments of the face with volume loss. With this brief review, we aim to evaluate the currents trends of fat grafting and fillers in the management of facial rejuvenation, including the cellular changes that occur with facial aging, the bio-stimulatory effects of fillers, and the anatomic replacement of tissue with fat grafting. >Level of Evidence: 4

A Comparison of Colectomy Outcomes Utilizing Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Techniques

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482097338
Author(s):  
Elizabeth McCarthy ◽  
Benjamin L. Gough ◽  
Michael S. Johns ◽  
Alexandra Hanlon ◽  
Sachin Vaid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Community Institution ◽  
Physical Status Classification ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Comparative Review ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American Society ◽  
The Individual ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Introduction Robotic colectomy could reduce morbidity and postoperative recovery over laparoscopic and open procedures. This comparative review evaluates colectomy outcomes based on surgical approach at a single community institution. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent colectomy by a fellowship-trained colon and rectal surgeon at a single institution from 2015 through 2019 was performed, and a cohort developed for each approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). 30-day outcomes were evaluated. For dichotomous outcomes, univariate logistic regression models were used to quantify the individual effect of each predictor of interest on the odds of each outcome. Continuous outcomes received a similar approach; however, linear and Poisson regression modeling were used, as appropriate. Results 115 patients were evaluated: 14% (n = 16) open, 44% (n = 51) laparoscopic, and 42% (n = 48) robotic. Among the cohorts, there was no statistically significant difference in operative time, rate of reoperation, readmission, or major complications. Robotic colectomies resulted in the shortest length of stay (LOS) (Kruskal-Wallis P < .0001) and decreased estimated blood loss (EBL) (Kruskal-Wallis P = .0012). Median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53-72). 54% (n = 62) were female. Median American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification was 3 (IQR 2-3). Median body mass index was 28.67 (IQR 25.03-33.47). A malignant diagnosis was noted on final pathology in 44% (n = 51). Conclusion Among the 3 approaches, there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day morbidity or mortality. There was a statistically significant decreased LOS and EBL for robotic colectomies.

Composite Breast Remodeling After Implant Removal by Tissue Recruitment and Loops Fixation With Power-Assisted Liposuction and Lipofilling (PALLL)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan H Abboud ◽  
Ayush K Kapila ◽  
Svetlana Bogaert ◽  
Nicolas M Abboud
Keyword(s):  
Breast Implant ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
And Migration ◽  
The Aesthetic

Abstract Background An increasing number of women wish breast implant removal whilst maintaining an acceptable projection and form were possible. Objectives The authors propose a technique to remodel the breast after implant removal utilizing internal suture loops to project the breast, recruit abdominal and axillary tissue cranially and medially, and provide a matrix for lipofilling. Methods A prospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients undergoing implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling. Patient characteristics were measured. The aesthetic results were evaluated by 2 independent raters. Patient-reported satisfaction was measured by standardized questionnaires. Results Implants in 52 patients with an average age of 55 and body mass index of 23.7 were extracted followed by breast remodeling. A total of 73% of patients had implants for aesthetic reasons, 41% were smokers, and 43% of the reconstruction cases received radiotherapy. A total of 28% had implant extraction for rupture, 58% for capsular contracture, and 14% due to pain and migration. The average volume of the implants removed was 292 cc, followed by an average lipofilling of 223 cc, yielding a ratio of 0.76 to 1. The average tissue recruited by loops was 82.5 cc. Independent raters measured 79% of results as good, 13% as acceptable, and 8% as requiring improvement; 80% of patients were satisfied to very satisfied. Conclusions The authors propose implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling can provide footprint definition, sustained projection, and high patient satisfaction. Moreover, the recruitment of a vascularized adipo-cutaneous flap by loops allows a reduced ratio of fat grafting to implant volume. Level of Evidence: 4

Citation Analysis in Breast Reconstruction Publications Between 2000 and 2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110499
Author(s):  
Rebecca Miller ◽  
Sheina Macadam ◽  
Daniel Demsey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Fat Graft ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Introduction and Purpose: Breast reconstruction is an active area of plastic surgery research. Citation analysis allows for quantitative analysis of publications, with more citations presumed to indicate greater influence. We performed citation analysis to evaluate the most cited papers on breast reconstruction between 2000 to 2010 to identify contemporary research trends. Methods: The SCI-EXPANDED database was used to identify the 50 most cited papers. Data points included authorship, publication year, publication journal, study design, level of evidence, number of surgeons/institutions, center of surgery, primary outcome assessed, implant/flap/acellular dermal matrix/fat graft, acellular dermal matrix brand and use with implants/flaps, fat graft use with implants/flaps, unilateral/bilateral, one-/two-stage, immediate/delayed, number of patients/procedures, complications. Descriptive analysis of trends was performed based on results. Results: 20% of papers were published in 2006, 16% in 2007 and 12% in both 2004/2009. 66% were published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The majority were retrospective or case series, and of Level III or IV evidence. The one Level I study was a prospective multicenter trial. 21 and 7 papers discussed procedures by single/multiple surgeons, respectively. Results from single/multiple centers were discussed in 18 and 6 papers, respectively. 30 papers discussed implant-based reconstruction, 22 papers flap-based (19 microsurgical), 15 papers acellular dermal matrix, and five papers fat grafting. The primary focus in the majority was complications or outcomes. Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates continually evolving techniques in breast reconstruction. However, there is notable lack of high quality evidence to guide surgical decision-making in the face of increasing surgical options.

scholarly journals Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps and Immediate Implant Augmentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie K Chu ◽  
Michael DeFazio ◽  
Rene D Largo ◽  
Merrick Ross
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Silicone Implants ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Artery Perforator

Abstract The smaller volume of the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap relative to that of abdominal flaps limits the size of breast reconstruction that may be achieved. Immediate implant augmentation of abdominal free flaps has been performed, but immediate implant augmentation of PAP flaps has never been described. A 54-year-old woman with BRCA2 mutation, submuscular implants, and previous abdominoplasty presented for nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM). Autologous tissue volume was inadequate to support reconstruction to the desired size. She wished to avoid serial expansion. Skin quality was unsuitable for direct-to-implant reconstruction. The patient underwent bilateral NSM. The previous implants were removed with capsule preservation. Bilateral PAP flaps were harvested and anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. Moderate classic profile 170-mL smooth round silicone implants were placed into the existing capsule pockets with lateral capsulorraphy. There were no flap, implant, or infectious complications. Initial mastectomy skin and nipple ischemia completely resolved without necrosis. Donor site healing was uneventful. At 8 months, the reconstruction is supple and the implants remain well-positioned without rippling. One minor revision was performed for fat grafting and to correct lateral nipple deviation. PAP flap breast reconstruction with immediate implant augmentation is technically feasible. Advantages include improved prosthetic coverage, allowing for immediate reconstruction to a larger size with reduced concern regarding mastectomy skin necrosis and threat to the device, optimal implant camouflage, and improved substrate for secondary fat grafting if necessary. Level of Evidence: 5

scholarly journals Multiple polyurethane implant punctures during fat grafting: case report and review of the literature

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Batiukov ◽  
V. Podgaiski ◽  
D. Mikulich ◽  
S. Kalinin
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Augmentation ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Tissue Ingrowth ◽  
First Case

Abstract Background Breast augmentation with implants continues to be the most popular aesthetic surgical procedure performed worldwide. Fat grafting may improve the results of breast augmentation and breast reconstruction with implants. However, fat grafting to the breast with implants carries the risk of implant puncture. To our best knowledge this is the first case in which polyurethane implant puncture during fat grafting is described. Case presentation We report multiple bilateral implant punctures with the cannula during fat grafting in a patient who previously underwent breast reconstruction with polyurethane implants. Conclusions Implants that promote tissue ingrowth may be more prone to puncture with the cannula during fat grafting. Specific planning and surgical maneuvers decrease the risk of implant puncture. Level of evidence Level V, case report.

Halos and Asymmetric Triangles: Designing the Eyelids with Volume Using Fillers and/or Fat

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 173-177
Author(s):  
Samuel Lam
Keyword(s):  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Volume Loss ◽  
Lower Face ◽  
New Models ◽  
The Face ◽  
Principal Method

AbstractPeriorbital aging is mainly a product of volume loss, which can be addressed with fillers and/or fat grafting. This stands in contrast to the lower face where a lifting procedure can be the principal method to improve moderate-to-significant aging. New models to explain these concepts of periorbital rejuvenation to both the surgeon and the prospective patient are outlined herein, namely, three facial halos (around the eyes, around the perimeter of the face, and around the mouth) and asymmetric triangles around the eyes. Specific techniques for fillers and fat grafting are also covered separately in detail in this article.

Single Staged Mastopexy With Autologous Fat Grafting: An Alternative to Augmentation Mastopexy With Implants

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules Walters ◽  
Lynn Bourn ◽  
Oren Tessler ◽  
Charles Patterson ◽  
Kamran Khoobehi
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Breast Ptosis ◽  
Autologous Fat ◽  
Ptotic Breast ◽  
The Mean ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Augmentation Mastopexy

Abstract Background Improving the ptotic breast with mastopexy and restoring upper pole fullness with augmentation continues to be a challenging issue for plastic surgeons. Autologous fat grating (AFG) for shaping and contouring of implant augmented breasts has shown positive outcomes with few complications. Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate our experience with combined mastopexy and fat grafting for women with existing breast ptosis who prefer not to receive prosthetic breast implants but do desire volume enhancement. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing a single staged mastopexy with AFG, from 2006 to 2017, was performed. Inclusion criteria were women with breast ptosis or tuberous breasts desiring improved breast shape and volume. Patients were excluded if they were undergoing implant removal before the procedure. Clinical aesthetic outcomes were assessed by fellow plastic surgeons according to the Telemark Breast Scoring system. Results A total of 284 breasts, in 140 women, underwent a single staged mastopexy with AFG. The mean amount of fat grafted per breast was 299.4 mL (range, 50-710 mL). There were no surgical site infections, hematomas, or seromas. There were 3 major and 8 minor (0.06%) postoperative breast complications. A total of 13 plastic surgeons, of the 183 invited (7.1%), completed the breast outcomes survey. Regarding each category, there was significant improvement (P ≤ 0.0001) in upper pole fullness, ptosis, overall aesthetics, and symmetry postoperatively. Conclusion AFG combined with mastopexy is not associated with significant postoperative complications and results in excellent breast aesthetic outcomes. Level of Evidence: 4

The Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Radiofrequency After Liposuction: A New Application for Face and Neck Skin Tightening

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefeng Han ◽  
Mingxia Yang ◽  
Bo Yin ◽  
Lei Cai ◽  
Shaodong Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Skin Tightening ◽  
Surgical Incision ◽  
Lower Face ◽  
Noninvasive Surgery ◽  
Neck Rejuvenation ◽  
Safety Guidelines

Abstract Background Minimally invasive or noninvasive skin-tightening procedures have become trends in facial and neck rejuvenation. Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) is a new choice for the treatment of skin relaxation that is more effective than noninvasive surgery without surgical incision. Objectives The authors recommend a 2-step method in which radiofrequency is applied after appropriate liposuction is performed. This approach is safer and more effective than traditional RFAL, and the authors detail the safety guidelines, operative techniques, postoperative satisfaction results, and complications. Methods A total of 227 patients with lower face and neck skin laxity underwent RFAL between April 2012 and June 2019. The following data were collected: age, body mass index, operative duration, volume of fat aspirated, amount of energy delivered, and number and type of complications. Patient satisfaction was surveyed postoperatively and assessed by third-party surgeons at 3 and 6 months. Results At 6 months after operation, 78.8% of patients considered the results moderate to excellent, whereas 21.2% of the patients considered the results to be poor or thought there was no change. The photograph evaluation performed by independent plastic surgeons showed moderate to excellent results in 89.1% of patients. There were no major complications that required further medical or surgical intervention. Conclusions This 2-step method is a safe and effective improvement in the application of radiofrequency for face and neck skin tightening. Patients can achieve significant contour correction via minimally invasive surgery with a lower risk of side effects. Level of Evidence: 4

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document