scholarly journals Program and Caseload Implications of Adopting the Global MUAC Criteria for Community Management of Acute Malnutrition in Children Under 5 Years Old in Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 157-157
Author(s):  
Yosef Asefaw ◽  
Seifu Hagose ◽  
Girmay Ayana ◽  
Solomon Hailu ◽  
Tadess Kebebe ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Ethiopia has been hesitant to shift to the global MUAC-based definitions for acute malnutrition given the two to four times potential increase in caseload suggested by several cross-sectional surveys. Thus, the objective of this study was to provide specific evidence on the caseload implications for Ethiopia of aligning with the WHO recommended criteria. Methods A cluster-randomized control study was conducted in four districts of Amhara and Oromia regions of Ethiopia in a total of 36 health posts (HPs). Districts and HPs were selected based on previous high case report. In each district, an equal numbers of HPs were randomly assigned to use either the global MUAC criteria of <11.5 cm for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and the moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) criteria of ≥11.5cm to <12.5 cm (intervention) or the current Ethiopian criteria of <11 cm for SAM and ≥11 cm to <12 cm for MAM (control). All 6–59 mo children were screened regularly for 16 wks. Malnourished children were admitted to the study according to the criteria assigned to their HP. Results A total of 349 SAM and 986 MAM new cases were admitted during the 16 wk recruitment. Of the new SAM cases, 225 were in intervention and 124 were in control HPs. The ratio of SAM in intervention compared to control HPs was 1.78 (1.14–2.42, 95%CI), which indicates an increase in admissions of 78% (P = 0.019). The mean (±SD) monthly SAM admissions per HPs were 1.71 (0.53) in control and 2.97 (3.31) in intervention (P = 0.191). For MAM, 592 cases were in intervention and 394 were in control for a ratio of 1.50 (1.11–1.89). The global MUAC criteria increased caseload by 50% (P = 0.015) compared to control. The mean monthly new MAM admissions per HPs were 5.47 (4.02) in control and 8.22 (3.28) in intervention (P = 0.045). The mean number of children served during biweekly combined sessions for SAM and MAM was 19.67 (9.28) in intervention and 13.08 (8.28) in control (P = 0.026). For sessions restricted to SAM, a mean of 4.26 (4.11) was served in intervention and 1.92 (1.88) in control (P = 0.028). Conclusions The increases in cases and workload resulting from shifting from Ethiopia's current national SAM and MAM admission and discharge criteria to the WHO criteria are likely to be on a smaller scale than is usually claimed based on various cross-sectional surveys. Most HPs were not overwhelmed due to the shift. Funding Sources Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 189 (12) ◽  
pp. 1623-1627
Author(s):  
Francisco M Barba ◽  
Lieven Huybregts ◽  
Jef L Leroy

Abstract Child acute malnutrition (AM) is an important cause of child mortality. Accurately estimating its burden requires cumulative incidence data from longitudinal studies, which are rarely available in low-income settings. In the absence of such data, the AM burden is approximated using prevalence estimates from cross-sectional surveys and the incidence correction factor $K$, obtained from the few available cohorts that measured AM. We estimated $K$ factors for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) from AM incidence and prevalence using representative cross-sectional baseline and longitudinal data from 2 cluster-randomized controlled trials (Innovative Approaches for the Prevention of Childhood Malnutrition—PROMIS) conducted between 2014 and 2017 in Burkina Faso and Mali. We compared K estimates using complete (weight-for-length z score, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and edema) and partial (MUAC, edema) definitions of SAM and MAM. $K$ estimates for SAM were 9.4 and 5.7 in Burkina Faso and in Mali, respectively; K estimates for MAM were 4.7 in Burkina Faso and 5.1 in Mali. The MUAC and edema–based definition of AM did not lead to different $K$ estimates. Our results suggest that $K$ can be reliably estimated when only MUAC and edema-based data are available. Additional studies, however, are required to confirm this finding in different settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Mohd Zakir Mohiuddin Owais ◽  
N.L Sridhar

Background: Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is one of the most common health problems. SAM children are more prone to serious infections that culminate in different co-morbid conditions and result in electrolyte disturbances. Objective: To study the electrolyte profile in severely malnourished children. Subjects and Methods:This was Hospital based cross sectional study. Duration: 1 year from June 2018 to May 2019. Setting: Department of Pediatrics. Participants: 50 Children.Detailed history and physical examination were made. Anthropometric measurements, such as weight and height, were recorded. On admission, electrolytes were performed and children were classified as either hypo / hypernatramic or hypo / hyperkalemic, which depend on the levels of the electrolytes.Result:The Hyponatremia was high with 72% on the day 1, and hypernatremia was 6%, on day 3 hyponatremia was 60% and hypernatremia was 4% and on day 8 Normal sodium was seen in around 68% of the children. The mean sodium significantly improved from day 1 to day 8 with a mean of 135.8±9.9 on the day 8th. The Hypokalemia was highest with 38% on the day 1, Hyperkalemia was seen in 28% of the patients on day 3 and normal potassium was seen in 80% of the children on the day 8th. The mean potassium significantly improved from day 1 to 8 with a mean of 5.5±1.24 on the day 8th. Conclusion:Most of the children with SAM and electrolyte derangements also had diarrhoea. Therefore determination of the electrolyte profile of all patients with SAM immediately on admission and proceeding days after admission is vital as it helps the clinician to decide on the most appropriate fluids to give to help reduce on the morbidity and mortality associated with life threatening electrolyte derangements.


BMC Nutrition ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Guesdon ◽  
Alexia Couture ◽  
Elise Lesieur ◽  
Oleg Bilukha

Abstract Background One newly proposed approach to determining eligibility of children aged 6–59 months for therapeutic feeding programs (TFPs) is to use mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 115 mm, bilateral oedema or Weight-for-Age Z-score (WAZ) < − 3 as admission criteria (MUAC+SWAZ). We explored potential consequences of this approach on the eligibility for treatment, as compared with the existing WHO normative guidance. We also compared sensitivity and specificity parameters of this approach for detecting wasted children to the previously described “Expanded MUAC” approach. Methods We analyzed data from 558 population representative cross-sectional cluster surveys conducted since 2007. We retrieved all children classified as severe acute malnutrition (SAM), moderate acute malnutrition (MAM), and those who are both wasted and stunted (WA + ST), and calculated proportions of previously eligible children who would now be excluded from treatment, as well as proportions of non-malnourished children among those who would become eligible. We also analyzed the expected changes in the number and demographics (sex, age) of the selected populations of children according to the different admission approaches. Results Both MUAC+SWAZ and Expanded MUAC case detection approaches substantially increase the sensitivity in detecting SAM, as compared to an approach which restricts detection of SAM cases to MUAC< 115 mm and oedema. Improved sensitivity however is attained at the expense of specificity and would require a very large increase of the size of TFPs, while still missing a non-negligible proportion (20–25%) of the SAM caseload. While our results confirm the sensitivity of the MUAC+SWAZ case detection approach in detecting WA + ST (over 80%), they show, on the other hand, that about half of the additional target detected by using SWAZ criterion will be neither SAM nor WA + ST. Conclusions These results suggest that recently promoted approaches to case detection inflate TFPs’ targets through the allocation of treatment to large numbers of children who have not been shown to require this type of support, including a significant proportion of non-acutely malnourished children in the MUAC+SWAZ approach. Considering the scarcity of resources for the implementation of TFPs, the rationale of abandoning the use of WHZ and of these alternative case detection strategies need to be critically reviewed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1410
Author(s):  
Dhara Patel ◽  
Nisha Upadhyay

Background: It is very difficult to recognize the cases with mild-to-moderate malnutrition because clinical criteria for their diagnosis are imprecise and are difficult to interpret accurately. The objective of the study was daily weight gain in gram/kg/day in severely malnourished children.Methods: This was a hospital based cross sectional study in which total of 114 consecutive patients of SAM less than 5 years treated for complications of severe acute malnutrition using WHO protocol. The study design included 114 children from the NRC and then followed up the period of 6 months to assess the nutritional status during the period of initial stage and the entire follow up period using available record of anthropometry indicators of the admitted children recruited in the study at the NRC.Results: Mean weight at admission was 6.4 Kg, 6.5 Kg and 6.2 Kg of overall, boys and girls respectively. Mean weight at discharge was 6.8 Kg, 6.7 Kg and 6.6 Kg of overall, boys and girls respectively. Mean MUAC at admission was 10.7 cm, 10.9 cm and 10.6 cm of overall, boys and girls respectively. Mean MUAC at discharge was 10.9 cm, 10.9 cm and 10.8 cm of overall, boys and girls respectively.Conclusions: For treatment of severe acute malnutrition, systematic guidelines required, thus this study indicates that following WHO guidelines, it has become easier to manage SAM in hospital settings, with least possible stay at hospital. The objective of the study was to know the effect of nutritional intervention measures on selected anthropometric indicators of severe acute malnourished children.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Abha Kumari ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Choudhary* ◽  
Sanjay Kumar

Background: In the rst three years of life, good nutrition plays an important role in forming a good foundation that has impact on child's future physical and mental development. In this study we are focussing on the nutritional and immunization status in children 6months to 3 years attending immunization clinic,UHTC,IGIMS,PATNA with special emphasis to identify moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM) cases. Methods : It is an observational study carried out immunization clinic at UHTC,I.G.I.M.S. Patna included 400 cases age between 6 months to 3 years This study was conducted from January 2019 to June 2019 in immunization clinic UHTC, IGIMS Patna. Results:Incidence of SAM and MAM is 7.5% and 30.75 % respectively. Female predominance was seen in SAM and MAM i.e. 53.4% and 54.6% respectively. Signicant association of under-nutrition was found with LBW (p<0.05), not giving exclusive breast feeding up to 6 months of life (p<0.05) and, Low socioeconomic status (p<0.001). Higher numbers of females were unvaccinated. Conclusions: Despite our great effort for improving maternal and child health, signicant number of children are malnourished and unimmunized. So, for their better health we need to start from birth, institutional delivery, exclusive breast feeding, immunization, and timely introduction of complementary feeds, marriages at appropriate age, proper antenatal visits and birth spacing.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e034738
Author(s):  
Marzia Lazzerini ◽  
Humphrey Wanzira ◽  
Peter Lochoro ◽  
Amos Ndunguste ◽  
Jerry Ictho ◽  
...  

Objectives5.0 million annual deaths in low-income and middle-income countries are due to poor quality of care (QOC). We evaluated the QOC provided to malnourished children in West Nile Region in Uganda.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingWest Nile Region, an area hosting over one million refugees.ParticipantsAmong 148 facilities providing nutritional services, 30 randomly selected facilities (20%) and the records of 1467 children with severe acute malnutrition (100% of those attending the 30 facilities during last year) were assessed.OutcomesThe national Nutrition Service Delivery Assessment (NSDA) tool was used to assess capacity areas related to QOC. Case management, data quality and health outcomes were assessed from official health records. Multivariate analysis was performed to explore factors significantly associated with better cure rates.ResultsOf 305 NSDA scores allocated to 30 participating centres, 201 (65.9%) were ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. However, 20 (66.7%) facilities had ‘poor’ ‘quality improvement mechanisms’ and 13 (43.3%) had ‘poor’ ‘human resources’. Overall data quality in official records was poor, while recorded quality of case management was overall fair. Average cure rate was significantly lower than international Sphere standards (50.4% vs 75% p<0.001) with a higher default rate (23.2% vs 15% p<0.001). Large heterogeneity among facilities was detected for all indicators. Refugee-hosting and non-refugee-hosting facilities had a similar cure rate (47.1% vs 52.1%) though transfer rates were higher for those hosting refugees (21.5% vs 1.9%, p<0.001) despite better ‘equipment and supplies’. ‘Good/excellent’ ‘equipment’ and ‘store management’ were significantly associated with better cure rates in outpatient therapeutic centres (+55.9, p<0.001; +65.4, p=0.041, respectively) in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThough most NSDA capacity areas were rated good or excellent, health outcomes of malnourished children in West Nile Region, both in refugee-hosting and non-refugee-hosting facilities, are significantly below international standards. Effective and sustainable approaches to improve malnourished child health outcomes are needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 3181-3186
Author(s):  
Chabungbam Smilie ◽  
Dheeraj Shah ◽  
Prerna Batra ◽  
Rafat S Ahmed ◽  
Piyush Gupta

AbstractObjective:To determine the prevalence and predictors of hypocalcaemia in under-five children (1–59 months) hospitalised with severe acute malnutrition (SAM).Design:A cross-sectional study was designed to determine the prevalence of hypocalcaemia among children hospitalised with SAM. Serum Ca and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-(OH)D) were estimated. Hypocalcaemia was defined as serum Ca (albumin-adjusted) <2·12 mmol/l. To identify the clinical predictors of hypocalcaemia, a logistic regression model was constructed taking hypocalcaemia as a dependent variable, and sociodemographic and clinical variables as independent variables.Setting:A tertiary care hospital in Delhi, between November 2017 and April 2019.Participants:One-hundred and fifty children (1–59 months) hospitalised with SAM were enrolled.Results:Hypocalcaemia was documented in thirty-nine (26 %) children hospitalised with SAM, the prevalence being comparable between children aged <6 months (11/41, 26·8 %) and those between 6 and 59 months (28/109, 25·7 %) (P = 0·887). Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-(OH)D <30 nmol/l) and clinical rickets were observed in ninety-eight (65·3 %) and sixty-three (42 %) children, respectively. Hypocalcaemia occurred more frequently in severely malnourished children with clinical rickets (OR 6·6, 95 % CI 2·54, 17·15, P < 0·001), abdominal distension (OR 4·5, 95 % CI 1·39, 14·54, P = 0·012) and sepsis (OR 2·6, 95 % CI 1·00, 6·57, P = 0·050).Conclusion:Rickets and hypocalcaemia are common in children with SAM. Routine supplementation of vitamin D should be considered for severely malnourished children. Ca may be empirically prescribed to severely malnourished children with clinical rickets, abdominal distension and/or sepsis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1362-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M Dale ◽  
Mark Myatt ◽  
Claudine Prudhon ◽  
André Briend

AbstractObjectiveWhen planning severe acute malnutrition (SAM) treatment services, estimates of the number of children requiring treatment are needed. Prevalence surveys, used with population estimates, can directly estimate the number of prevalent cases but not the number of subsequent incident cases. Health managers often use a prevalence-to-incidence conversion factor (J) derived from two African cohort studies to estimate incidence and add the expected number of incident cases to prevalent cases to estimate expected SAM caseload for a given period. The present study aimed to estimate J empirically in different contexts.DesignObservational study, with J estimated by correlating expected numbers of children to be treated, based on prevalence surveys, population estimates and assumed coverage, with the observed numbers of SAM patients treated.SettingSurvey and programme data from six African and Asian countries.SubjectsTwenty-four data sets including prevalence surveys and programme admissions data for 5 months following the survey.ResultsA statistically significant relationship between the number of SAM cases admitted to SAM treatment services and the estimated burden of SAM from prevalence surveys was found. Estimate for the slope (intercept forced to be zero) was 2·17 (95 % CI 1·33, 3·79). Estimates for the prevalence-to-incidence conversion factor J varied from 2·81 to 11·21, assuming programme coverage of 100 % and 38 %, respectively.ConclusionsEstimation of expected caseload from prevalence may require revision of the currently used prevalence-to-incidence conversion factor J of 1·6. Appropriate values for J may vary between different locations.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Guesdon ◽  
Alexia Couture ◽  
Danka Pantchova ◽  
Oleg Bilukha

Abstract Background: Some of the recently piloted innovative approaches for the management of acute malnutrition in children use the “expanded MUAC-only” approach, with Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) <125mm as the sole anthropometric criterion for screening and admission, classification of cases as severe using the 115mm cut-off, and use Ready-to-Use-Therapeutic-Food (RUTF) for the management of both moderate (MAM) and severe (SAM) cases of acute malnutrition. Our study aimed at exploring the potential consequences of this “expanded MUAC-only” program scenario on the eligibility for treatment and RUTF allocation, as compared with the existing WHO normative guidance. Methods: We analyzed data from 550 population representative cross-sectional cluster surveys conducted since 2007. We retrieved all children classified as SAM and MAM according to currently used case definitions, and calculated the proportions of SAM children who would be excluded from treatment, misclassified as MAM, or whose specific risks (because of having both MUAC and weight-for height deficits) would be ignored. We also analyzed the expected changes in the number and demographics (sex, age) of children meant to receive RUTF according to the new approach. Results: We found that approximately one quarter of SAM children would not be detected and eligible for treatment under the “expanded MUAC-only” scenario, and another 20% would be classified as MAM. A further 17% of the total SAM children would be admitted and followed only according to their MUAC or oedema status, while they also present with a severe weight-for height deficit on admission. Considering MAM targeting, about half of the MAM children would be left undetected. This scenario also shows a 2.5 time increase in the number of children targeted with RUTF, with approximately 70% of MAM and 30% of SAM cases among this new RUTF target. Conclusions: This empirical evidence suggests that adoption of “expanded MUAC-only” programs would likely lead to a priori exclusion from treatment or misclassifying as MAM a large proportion of SAM cases, while redirecting programmatic costs in favor of those less in need. It underscores the need to explore other options for improving the impact of programs addressing the needs of acutely malnourished children.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Griswold ◽  
Breanne Langlois ◽  
Devika Suri ◽  
Ye Shen ◽  
Shelley Walton ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Fortified blended flours (FBFs) require preparation with boiling water, sometimes with fortified vegetable oil (FVO), using prescribed quantities and ratios. Lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) are ready-to-eat, individually packaged, and prescribed for consumption without adding other ingredients/foods. This study assessed compliance with recipe and ration instructions and whether this influenced treatment effectiveness for moderate acute malnutrition (MAM). Methods A cluster-randomized clinical-effectiveness trial in Sierra Leone compared four isocaloric foods in treating children 6–59 mos with uncomplicated MAM: Corn-Soy Blend Plus with FVO (CSB +), Corn-Soy Whey Blend with FVO (CSWB), Super Cereal Plus with amylase (SC + A), or ready-to-use-supplementary food (RUSF). Caregivers were advised bi-weekly by trained nurses on ingredients, quantities, and daily rations. A random sub-sample participated in in-depth interviews on ingredients used at the last preparation. Respondents were categorized in two ways: (for FBFs) using too little, the correct amount or too much or (for RUSF) correct if eaten without other food; or using the recommended ratios of ingredients. Unadjusted logistic regression evaluated the relationship between compliance and graduation from treatment. Results Graduation rates among 958 respondents: 70% CSB + , 67% CSWB, 66% SC + , and 66% RUSF. Reported use of correct ingredients was: 99% of CSB +, 97% of CSWB, and 99% of SC + A and 86% RUSF reported eating without mixing. Reported use of correct amount of flour: 34% in CSB + , 27% in CSWB, and 43% in SC + A of those, 95% in CSB + and 96% in CSWB also used the correct amount of oil. Among all caregivers, 86% in CSB + and 92% in CSWB used the correct amount of oil. In unadjusted models, the relationships between compliance behaviors and graduation were not statistically significant. Conclusions Reported use of correct ingredients was high for all study foods; among FBFs, amount of flour was often different from the recommendation while amount of oil was often correct. Further research may explain apparent low importance of emphasizing ration guidance when designing information, education, and communication for MAM treatment programs. Funding Sources Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance, U.S. Agency for International Development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document