scholarly journals Prevalence and Duration of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Before Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Predictors of Timely Specialist Review: A Population-Based Study

Author(s):  
J Blackwell ◽  
S Saxena ◽  
N Jayasooriya ◽  
A Bottle ◽  
I Petersen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Lack of timely referral and significant waits for specialist review amongst individuals with unresolved gastrointestinal [GI] symptoms can result in delayed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Aims To determine the frequency and duration of GI symptoms and predictors of timely specialist review before the diagnosis of both Crohn’s disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]. Methods This is a case control study of IBD matched 1:4 for age and sex to controls without IBD using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from 1998 to 2016. Results We identified 19 555 cases of IBD and 78 114 controls. One in four cases of IBD reported GI symptoms to their primary care physician more than 6 months before receiving a diagnosis. There was a significant excess prevalence of GI symptoms in each of the 10 years before IBD diagnosis. GI symptoms were reported by 9.6% and 10.4% at 5 years before CD and UC diagnosis respectively compared to 5.8% of controls. Amongst patients later diagnosed with IBD, <50% received specialist review within 18 months from presenting with chronic GI symptoms. Patients with a previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome [IBS] or depression were less likely to receive timely specialist review (IBS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.99, depression: HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60–0.98). Conclusions There is an excess of GI symptoms 5 years before diagnosis of IBD compared to the background population, probably attributable to undiagnosed disease. Previous diagnoses of IBS and depression are associated with delays in specialist review. Enhanced pathways are needed to accelerate specialist referral and timely IBD diagnosis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1004-1006
Author(s):  
Rachel Elizabeth Harris ◽  
Rachel Tayler ◽  
Richard K Russell

We describe the case of a patient with ongoing weight loss, low mood and previously undisclosed gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms initially diagnosed with an eating disorder and subsequently diagnosed with ulcerative colitis over a year following initial presentation. This patient exhibited disordered eating secondary to the worsening symptoms of undiagnosed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and had altered her eating habits to reduce the diarrhoea and rectal bleeding she was experiencing, contributing to significant weight loss.The implications of a delayed diagnosis of IBD or incorrect diagnosis of eating disorder are severe both physically and psychologically. We discuss factors in the assessment of patients which may raise suspicion of organic GI disease such as IBD—an important differential diagnosis in those with non-specific GI symptoms and suspected eating disorder—and highlight baseline investigations which should be performed to ensure a diagnosis of IBD is not missed in these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S610-S610
Author(s):  
J Blackwell ◽  
S Saxena ◽  
N Jayasooriya ◽  
I Petersen ◽  
M Hotopf ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) may go undiagnosed resulting in diagnostic delay. Aims: To determine the frequency and duration of GI symptoms in the decade before the diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and risk factors for delayed specialist review. Methods We used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a nationally representative research database, to identify incident cases of CD and UC diagnosed from 1998 to 2016. Comparison cohorts without IBD were matched 4:1 for age and sex and assigned the IBD diagnosis date of their matched IBD patient as a pseudo-diagnosis date. We compared the prevalence of GI symptoms between the IBD and comparison cohorts in the 10 years before IBD diagnosis. We identified individuals with chronic GI symptoms lasting more than 6 weeks and measured their time to receiving a specialist review with a gastroenterologist, paediatric gastroenterologist or colorectal surgeon. We identified risk factors for receiving specialist review after presenting with chronic GI symptoms. Results We identified 5874 incident cases of CD, 13,681 incident cases of UC and comparison cohorts of 78,114 individuals. 10% of the CD and UC cohorts reported GI symptoms to their primary care physician 5 years before diagnosis. Fewer than 50% of patients were reviewed by a specialist within 18 months of presenting to their primary care physician with chronic GI symptoms. Patients with a previous diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) or depression were less likely to receive timely specialist review (IBS: HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.60–0.99, depression: HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.60–0.98). Conclusion A substantial number of individuals experience GI symptoms many years before receiving a diagnosis of IBD. IBS and depression are risk factors for delayed specialist review. Rapid diagnostic pathways should be established to reduce the burden of diagnostic delay in IBD.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
Sern Wei Yeoh

Chronic diarrhoeal illnesses with nausea and weight loss are a common indication for gastroenterology review. While many such cases have intra-luminal aetiologies, such as inflammatory bowel disease, coeliac disease or other malabsorptive conditions, with many other cases due to functional gut disorders or systemic malignancy, clinicians must also keep vascular disorders in mind. Here we report a patient with a delayed diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischaemia after 6 months of gastrointestinal symptoms strongly mimicking an alternative diagnosis such as inflammatory bowel disease due an atypical predominance of nausea and diarrhoea rather than pain. We briefly review the literature on treatment of this condition but also discuss with particular attention the sequence of cognitive errors made by clinicians that led to a diagnostic delay, inviting readers to thus reflect on how such errors can be minimised in their practice.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 643
Author(s):  
Angela Saviano ◽  
Mattia Brigida ◽  
Alessio Migneco ◽  
Gayani Gunawardena ◽  
Christian Zanza ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (L. reuteri) is a probiotic that can colonize different human body sites, including primarily the gastrointestinal tract, but also the urinary tract, the skin, and breast milk. Literature data showed that the administration of L. reuteri can be beneficial to human health. The aim of this review was to summarize current knowledge on the role of L. reuteri in the management of gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal pain, diarrhea and constipation, both in adults and children, which are frequent reasons for admission to the emergency department (ED), in order to promote the best selection of probiotic type in the treatment of these uncomfortable and common symptoms. Materials and Methods: We searched articles on PubMed® from January 2011 to January 2021. Results: Numerous clinical studies suggested that L. reuteri may be helpful in modulating gut microbiota, eliminating infections, and attenuating the gastrointestinal symptoms of enteric colitis, antibiotic-associated diarrhea (also related to the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection), irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic constipation. In both children and in adults, L. reuteri shortens the duration of acute infectious diarrhea and improves abdominal pain in patients with colitis or inflammatory bowel disease. It can ameliorate dyspepsia and symptoms of gastritis in patients with HP infection. Moreover, it improves gut motility and chronic constipation. Conclusion: Currently, probiotics are widely used to prevent and treat numerous gastrointestinal disorders. In our opinion, L. reuteri meets all the requirements to be considered a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious probiotic that is able to contribute to the beneficial effects on gut-human health, preventing and treating many gastrointestinal symptoms, and speeding up the recovery and discharge of patients accessing the emergency department.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000786
Author(s):  
Abbie Maclean ◽  
James J Ashton ◽  
Vikki Garrick ◽  
R Mark Beattie ◽  
Richard Hansen

The assessment and management of patients with known, or suspected, paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) has been hugely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although current evidence of the impact of COVID-19 infection in children with PIBD has provided a degree of reassurance, there continues to be the potential for significant secondary harm caused by the changes to normal working practices and reorganisation of services.Disruption to the normal running of diagnostic and assessment procedures, such as endoscopy, has resulted in the potential for secondary harm to patients including delayed diagnosis and delay in treatment. Difficult management decisions have been made in order to minimise COVID-19 risk for this patient group while avoiding harm. Initiating and continuing immunosuppressive and biological therapies in the absence of normal surveillance and diagnostic procedures have posed many challenges.Despite this, changes to working practices, including virtual clinic appointments, home faecal calprotectin testing kits and continued intensive support from clinical nurse specialists and other members of the multidisciplinary team, have resulted in patients still receiving a high standard of care, with those who require face-to-face intervention being highlighted.These changes have the potential to revolutionise the way in which patients receive routine care in the future, with the inclusion of telemedicine increasingly attractive for stable patients. There is also the need to use lessons learnt from this pandemic to plan for a possible second wave, or future pandemics as well as implementing some permanent changes to normal working practices.In this review, we describe the diagnosis, management and direct impact of COVID-19 in paediatric patients with IBD. We summarise the guidance and describe the implemented changes, evolving evidence and the implications of this virus on paediatric patients with IBD and working practices.


2020 ◽  
pp. 91-101
Author(s):  
Sumona Bhattacharya Sumona Bhattacharya ◽  
Raymond K. Cross Raymond K. Cross

Inflammatory bowel disease, consisting of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, causes chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and can lead to morbidity and mortality if uncontrolled or untreated. However, for patients with moderate-to-severe disease, currently available therapies do not induce or maintain remission in >50% of patients. This underscores the need for additional therapies. In this review, the authors detail the novel therapies vedolizumab, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab and delve into therapies which may come onto the market within the next 10 years, including JAK-1 inhibitors (filgotinib and upadacitinib), IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, mirikizumab, and risankizumab), the anti-β4β7 and anti-βEβ7 integrin monoclonal antibody etrolizumab, the sphingosine-1-phosphate subtypes 1 and 5 modulator ozanimod, and mesenchymal stem cells. Further studies are required before these emerging therapies gain approval.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Huan Wang ◽  
Lei Tu ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Tao Bai ◽  
Kaifang Zou ◽  
...  

Objectives. The COVID-19 epidemic triggered by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is rapidly spreading around the globe. This study is aimed at finding out the suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Hubei province, China. We also investigated symptoms, medications, life quality, and psychological issues of IBD patients under the ongoing pandemic. Methods. We conducted a self-reported questionnaire survey via an online survey platform. SARS-CoV-2 infection-related data was collected from IBD patients. The status quo of medications and symptoms of the subjects were investigated. Life quality, depression, and anxiety were measured by clinical questionnaires and rated on scoring systems. Results. A total of 204 IBD patients from Hubei province were included in this study. No suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection case was found in this study. As a result of city shutdown, two-thirds of the patients (138/204) in our series reported difficulty in accessing medicines and nearly half of them (73/138) had to discontinue medications. Apart from gastrointestinal symptoms, systemic symptoms were common while respiratory symptoms were rare in the cohort. Though their quality of life was not significantly lowered, depression and anxiety were problems that seriously affected them during the COVID-19 epidemic. Conclusions. Inaccessibility to medications is a serious problem for IBD patients after city shutdown. Efforts have to be made to address the problems of drug withdrawal and psychological issues that IBD patients suffer from during the COVID-19 outbreak.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document