Relations between voltage mapping and diagnosis and genetics in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Delasnerie ◽  
F Mandel ◽  
G Domain ◽  
Q Voglimacci ◽  
P Mondoly ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Relations between voltage mapping and diagnosis or genetic background in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) have not been investigated so far. Objective We investigate if diagnosis or genetic background were linked to voltage mapping in ARVC. Method 70 patients with proved or suspected ARVC undergoing 3D endocardial mapping and genetic testing have been retrospectively included. Localisation and extension of bipolar low voltage areas were correlated to ARVC diagnosis and presence of a culprit mutation. Results 44/70 fulfilled ARVC Task Force criteria and 25/70 had culprit mutations. Endocardial (38/44 vs 16/26, p=0.02) and especially infero-lateral scars (31/44 vs 9/26, p=0.003) were more often present in patients fulfilling Task force criteria vs suspected ARVC, with larger scars (area 23±27 vs 8±11 cm2, p=0.04, perimeter 17±10 vs 11±7 cm, p=0.03) (sensitivity 86%). Mutated patients had more infero-lateral (19/25 vs 21/45, p=0.01), multiple (12/20 vs 11/34, p=0.04) and larger scars (perimeter 21±10 vs 12±7 cm, p=0.01) vs non mutated patients. In patients with ARVC diagnosed according to the Task Force criteria, there was a trend toward more infero-lateral (p=0.09) and larger scars (p=0.08) in mutated cases. PKP2-mutated cases tended to have less ourflow tract (p=0.08) and less multiple scars (p=0.09) vs other mutations. Conclusion 3D endocardial mapping could have an important role for ARVC diagnosis and may be able to detect minor forms with otherwise insufficiant criteria for diagnosis. More frequent and larger infero-lateral scars are present in mutated patients with bordeline differences according to the mutated genes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Casella ◽  
Alessio Gasperetti ◽  
Rita Sicuso ◽  
Edoardo Conte ◽  
Valentina Catto ◽  
...  

Background: Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC) is an under-characterized phenotype of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy involving the LV ab initio. ALVC was not included in the 2010 International Task Force Criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy diagnosis and data regarding this phenotype are scarce. Methods: Clinical characteristics were reported from all consecutive patients diagnosed with ALVC, defined as a LV isolated late gadolinium enhancement and fibro-fatty replacement at cardiac magnetic resonance plus genetic variants associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and of an endomyocardial biopsy showing fibro-fatty replacement complying with the 2010 International Task Force Criteria in the LV. Results: Twenty-five patients ALVC (53 [48–59] years, 60% male) were enrolled. T wave inversion in infero-lateral and left precordial leads were the most common ECG abnormalities. Overall arrhythmic burden at study inclusion was 56%. Cardiac magnetic resonance showed LV late gadolinium enhancement in the LV lateral and posterior basal segments in all patients. In 72% of the patients an invasive evaluation was performed, in which electroanatomical voltage mapping and electroanatomical voltage mapping-guided endomyocardial biopsy showed low endocardial voltages and fibro-fatty replacement in areas of late gadolinium enhancement presence. Genetic variants in desmosomal genes (desmoplakin and desmoglein-2) were identified in 12/25 of the cohort presenting pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. A definite/borderline 2010 International Task Force Criteria arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy diagnosis was reached only in 11/25 patients. Conclusions: ALVC presents with a preferential involvement of the lateral and postero-lateral basal LV and is associated mostly with variants in desmoplakin and desmoglein-2 genes. An amendment to the current International Task Force Criteria is reasonable to better diagnose patients with ALVC.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Santangeli ◽  
Ioan Liuba ◽  
Cory Tschabrunn ◽  
Michael Riley ◽  
Fermin Garcia ◽  
...  

Introduction: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is believed to result in progressive fibrofatty replacement of the RV myocardium with development of multiple ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits. Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping has been shown to reliably identify epicardial and endocardial (epi-endo) scar in ARVC. Hypothesis: We studied the prevalence and mechanisms of disease progression in patients with ARVC and VT through longitudinal unipolar voltage mapping studies. Methods: Eighteen consecutive patients (age 38±14 years) who fulfilled the revised Task Force criteria for ARVC underwent two detailed sinus rhythm endocardial unipolar voltage maps (mean 348±118 points) performed a median of 36 months apart (interquartile range 21 to 36 months, minimum 9 months) as part of VT ablation procedures. Epi-endo scar was defined using established unipolar voltage cutoff (5.5 mV). The extent of RV scar and total RV volume was measured by a dedicated software. A >5% increase in RV scar area or volume over follow-up was considered significant. Results: At baseline, all patients had evidence of epi-endo RV scar (mean 141±82 cm 2 ; 56±27% of the RV surface area). After a mean follow-up of 49±36 months, no significant progression of unipolar voltage scar was observed (mean 159±83 cm 2 , P=0.14; 63±27% of the RV surface area, P=0.07). Specifically, only 3 (17%) patients presented with progression of the RV scar >5%. The RV volumes increased during follow-up (from 206±74 mL to 258±77 mL, P=0.0003), with the majority of patients (15/18, 83%) having a significant increase in the RV volume (mean increase = 38.9%). Only 3 (17%) patients had no change in both RV scar size and volume over time. Conclusions: In patients with ARVC and VT, progressive RV dilatation is almost uniformly observed, while rapid epi-endo scar progression is rare. These findings suggest that aggressive epi-endocardial substrate ablation should provide long-term VT control, and further research is needed to identify the mechanism(s) for and to prevent ongoing RV dilatation in these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Rujirachun ◽  
P Wattanachayakul ◽  
N Charoenngam ◽  
A Winijkul ◽  
P Ungprasert

Abstract Background and objectives Little is known about atrial involvement in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Recent studies have suggested that atrial arrhythmia (AA), including atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and atrial tachycardia (AT), was common among these patients although the reported prevalence varied considerably across the studies. Methods We searched for published articles indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception through Sep 22, 2019 to identify cohort studies of patients with ARVC that described the prevalence of atrial arrhythmia among the participants. The pooled prevalence across studies was calculated. Results A total of 16 cohort studies with 1,986 patients with ARVC were included into this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of overall AA among patients with ARVC was 17.9% (95% CI, 13.0%–24.0%; I2 88%), the pooled prevalence of AF of 12.9% (95% CI, 9.6%–17.0%; I2 78%), the pooled prevalence of AFL of 5.9% (95% CI, 3.7%–9.2%; I2 70%), and the pooled prevalence of AT of 7.1% (95% CI, 3.7%–13.0%; I2 49%). Conclusions AA is common among patient with ARVC with the pooled prevalence of approximately 18%, which is substantially higher than the reported prevalence of AA in general population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweena Chungsomprasong ◽  
Robert Hamilton ◽  
Wietske Luining ◽  
Shi-Joon Yoo ◽  
Meena Fatah ◽  
...  

Background: Involvement of the left ventricle (LV) is increasingly recognized in adults with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) but it is unclear whether LV function is compromised in children with this condition. The aim of this study was examine myocardial contractility in pediatric patients with suspected ARVC. Methods: For this retrospective study, patients with a work-up for ARVC were classified into ‘no’, ‘possible’, ‘borderline’ or ‘definite’ ARVC according to the revised Task Force Criteria (rTFC). Ventricular size and function as well as LV myocardial strain and torsion were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Results: A total of 142 patients were enrolled, of whom 58 (41%) had no, 32 (23%) possible, 29 (20%) borderline and 23 (16%) definite ARVC. The groups were similar in age at CMR. With higher rTFC score, z scores (Z) of right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) were lower (p<0.001) while z-RV end diastolic volume (EDV) and z-LV EDV were larger (p=0.002 and 0.013, respectively). LV EF did not differ between rTFC categories. Global circumferential strain (GCS) of the LV was lower in patients in higher rTFC categories (p=0.018). Z-LVEDV correlated with z-RVEDV (r2 = 0.69, p<0.001) and z- LVEF correlated with z-RVEF (r2 = 0.55, p <0.001). Z-LVEF and z-RVEF correlated with LV GCS (r2 = 0.48, p<0.001 and r2 = 0.46, p<0.001, respectively) and torsion (r2 = 0.21, p=0.032 for both). Forty-two patients had a follow-up CMR, after a median interval of 2.6 years (0.4- 8.4). The rate of deterioration of LV or RV EF or EDV did not differ between rTFC categories. A more rapid increase of z-RVEDV was associated with a faster decline in z-RVEF (r2 = -0.383, p=0.004) and z-LVEF (r2 = -0.45, p=0.001). A decline of z-LVEF over time correlated with that of z-RVEF (r2 = 0.60, p<0.001) and z-LVEDV increase correlated with z-RVEDV increase (r2 = 0.84, p<0.001). Conclusion: LV myocardial dysfunction is present in young patients with suspected or confirmed ARVC. Quantification of myocardial mechanics with CMR may be a useful tool to detect early LV involvement in ARVC. Progressive LV dysfunction and enlargement appear to parallel those of the RV.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M K Christiansen ◽  
K Haugaa ◽  
A Svensson ◽  
T Gilljam ◽  
T Madsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter ablation may reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients. However, little is known about factors predicting need for ablation and various outcomes have been reported. Purpose We sought to investigate predictors and use of VT ablation and to evaluate the post-procedural outcome in ARVC patients. Methods We studied 435 patients from the Nordic ARVC registry including 220 probands with definite ARVC according to the 2010 task force criteria and 215 mutation-carrying relatives identified through cascade screening. Patients were followed until first-time VT ablation, death, heart transplantation, or January 1st 2018. Additionally, patients undergoing VT ablation were further followed from the time of ablation for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. Results Cumulative use of VT ablation was 4% (95% CI 3%-6%) and 11% (95% CI 8%-15%) after 1 and 10 years. All procedures were performed in probands in whom the cumulative use was 8% (95% CI 5%-12%) and 20% (95% CI 15%-26%). In adjusted analyses restricted to probands, only young age predicted need for ablation. In patients undergoing ablation, risk of recurrent arrhythmias was 59% (95% CI 44%-71%) and 74% (95% CI 59%-84%) 1 and 5 years after the procedure. Despite high recurrence rates, the burden of ventricular arrhythmias was reduced after ablation (p=0.0042). Young age, use of several antiarrhythmic drugs and inducibility to VT immediately after ablation were associated with an unfavorable outcome. Conclusions Twenty percent of ARVC probands developed a clinical indication for VT ablation within 10 years after diagnosis whereas mutation-carrying relatives were without such need. Although the burden of ventricular arrhythmias decreased after ablation, risk of recurrence was substantial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document