Intra-aortic balloon pump as a bridge therapy to heart transplant in refractory heart failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A.B Boros ◽  
V.S.C Bellini ◽  
D Fatori ◽  
C Bernoche ◽  
M.F Macatrao-Costa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The role of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in advanced heart failure (HF) treatment is still under debate. Some heart transplant (HTx) candidates on the waiting list require mechanical support, and IABP may be the simple and most available device. Purpose Describe the impact of IABP treatment in advanced HF patients who underwent HTx. Methods We retrospectively analysis patients who underwent HTx from a single center intensive care unit (ICU), between 2009 and 2018, to evaluate the use of IABP as bridge therapy. Selection included decompensated chronic HF patients that required intensive care with optimized intravenous drugs before IABP placement. Exclusion criteria were acute myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery 90 days prior to admission, and implant of ventricular assist device before HTx. Results We included 134 HF patients with IABP therapy before HTx. Insertion site was exclusively femoral. Mean time of IABP onset to HTx were 26±21 days, and hospital admission to HTx 65±45 days. The main cardiomyopathy etiology was Chagas Disease (46%) and mean LVEF was 23±6% (TABLE 1). Clinical and laboratory data were compared before and 96 hours after IABP therapy. Mean central venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) increased from 49.7±14.6% to 67.4±11.3% (p<0.001), creatinine decreased from 1.77±0.9 mg/dL to 1.40±0.6 mg/dL (p<0.001), and urine output increased from 1552±886 mL/24h to 2189±1029 mL/24h (p<0.001). These differences were sustained or improved until the day before HTx (FIGURE 1). After 96 hours dobutamine was maintained in 98% of patients, nitroprusside increased from 56% to 67%, milrinone decreased from 26% to 20%, and norepinephrine decreased from 18% to 3%. Significant IABP complications were few (5.2%; n=7: 3 infections, 2 major bleeding, 2 arterial injury). Conclusion In this single center ICU sample, IABP improved hemodynamic status and renal function in refractory HF patients waiting for HTx. IABP can be a reasonable, available and effective bridging therapy. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Author(s):  
Hidefumi Nishida ◽  
Takeyoshi Ota ◽  
David Onsager ◽  
Jonathan Grinstein ◽  
Valluvan Jeevanandam ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1399-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Vincenzo Lenti ◽  
◽  
Federica Borrelli de Andreis ◽  
Ivan Pellegrino ◽  
Catherine Klersy ◽  
...  

Abstract Little is known regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clinical spectrum in non-Asian populations. We herein describe the impact of COVID-19 on liver function in 100 COVID-19 consecutive patients (median age 70 years, range 25–97; 79 males) who were admitted to our internal medicine unit in March 2020. We retrospectively assessed liver function tests, taking into account demographic characteristics and clinical outcome. A patient was considered as having liver injury when alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was > 50 mU/ml, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) > 50 mU/ml, or total bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dl. Spearman correlation coefficient for laboratory data and bivariable analysis for mortality and/or need for intensive care were assessed. A minority of patients (18.6%) were obese, and most patients were non- or moderate-drinkers (88.5%). Liver function tests were altered in 62.4% of patients, and improved during follow-up. None of the seven patients with known chronic liver disease had liver decompensation. Only one patient developed acute liver failure. In patients with altered liver function tests, PaO2/FiO2 < 200 was associated with greater mortality and need for intensive care (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.07–5.11, p = 0.033). To conclude, a high prevalence of altered liver function tests was noticed in Italian patients with COVID-19, and this was associated with worse outcomes when developing severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 381-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Atkinson ◽  
Sarathi Kalra ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
Eric Jonasch

381 Background: Sunitinib is a front-line therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Recommended dose is 50 mg daily; 28 days (d) on/14 d off (traditional schedule; TS). Sunitinib is associated with several adverse events (AEs). An ideal treatment modification algorithm is not known. We sought to identify (1) common AEs, (2) alternative schedules (AS) that maintained dose intensity while decreasing AEs, and (3) the impact of AS on outcomes. Methods: Single-center retrospective review of mRCC pts performed from January 26, 2006 to March 1, 2011. Pts > 18 years of age with mRCC who received first-line antiangiogenic therapy with sunitinib were eligible. A subset of pts were switched at first intolerable AE from TS to a 14 d/7 d, or further adjusted to 7 d /3 d, or other AS. Control group underwent standard dose reduction. Pt characteristics including demographics, disease status, laboratory data, AEs, AS, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Results: 186 eligible pts were identified. At baseline, 87% received sunitinib 50 mg and 88% were on TS. 99 pts (53%) continued TS and 87 pts (47%) were switched to AS. Baseline characteristics were similar. Median age was 61 yrs; by MSKCC criteria 5% were good, 50% intermediate, and 45% poor prognosis. Pts had median 2 visceral mets and 42% had primary tumor in place. AEs included fatigue (47%), diarrhea (24%), and hand-foot syndrome (26%). Median time to AS was 126 d with 14 d/7 d the most common (82%). Median time on treatment was 14.9 months (mo) (95% CI:10.2 – 17.0 mo) in AS pts vs. 4.2 mo (95% CI: 3.6 – 5.7 mo), respectively (p < 0.0001). Median OS was 32.9 mo (95% CI:28.3-54.1 mo) vs. 18.5 mo (95% CI: 10.3-21.5 mo), respectively (p = 0.0001). ECOG PS > 2 (HR 3.9), elevated LDH (HR 2.04), and > 2 mets (HR 1.79) were associated with decreased OS. MSKCC intermediate vs. poor (HR 0.57) and AS (HR 0.54) were associated with improved OS by multivariate regression analysis (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In our cohort study, AS sunitinib significantly prolonged outcomes and was predictive of OS. Prospective investigations of alternate dosing schemas are warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick R. Macapagal ◽  
Emma McClellan ◽  
Rosario O. Macapagal ◽  
Lisa Green ◽  
Nena Bonuel

Transplant cardiologists in our hospital have performed the percutaneously placed axillary-subclavian intra-aortic balloon pump procedure since 2007. This procedure allows patients to mobilize and walk while they wait for a heart transplant, rather than remaining on bed rest as they would with a traditional femoral intra-aortic balloon pump. This procedure has presented challenges to the nursing staff. A 2007 literature search revealed no precedent or published nursing articles on this subject. This article reviews heart failure, medical treatments, complications of bed rest associated with the femoral intra-aortic balloon pump, the nursing challenges and unique problems of caring for patients with percutaneously placed axillary-subclavian intra-aortic balloon pumps, and our solutions for those challenges.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. S295-S296
Author(s):  
A.M. Bertolotti ◽  
M. Peradejordi ◽  
L. Favaloro ◽  
D.O. Absi ◽  
F. Renedo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-438
Author(s):  
Naser Safaie ◽  
Hanieh Azizi ◽  
Sajad Khiali ◽  
Taher Entezari-Maleki

Background: Medication errors (MEs) frequently occur in intensive care unit (ICU) admittedpatients. The present study aimed to evaluate the frequency and types of MEs in an open heartsurgery heart ICU and clinical pharmacists’ role in the management of them. Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was performed from October 2016 toMarch 2017 in the Shahid Madani Heart Center. A clinical pharmacist reviewed patients’ files,laboratory data, and physician orders during morning hours. All of the MEs and the clinicalpharmacies’ recommendations for the management of them were analyzed. Results: A total of 311 MEs were observed in the medical files of 152 patients. The rate of MEswas 2.04 errors per patient and 0.19 errors per ordered medication. The acceptance rate of MEswas 72.6%. The most type of MEs was ‘forgot to order’ (75 cases, 24.1%) followed by "wrongfrequency" and "adding a drug" in 56 (18%) and 49 (15.8) patients, respectively. Most MEs wereinsignificant. Conclusion: MEs occur at different stages of the therapeutic process in the postoperative cardiacintensive care unit, and clinical pharmacists play an essential role in detecting and managingMEs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document