Left atrial filling index in prediction of exercise induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with asymptomatic primary mitral regurgitation
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction. In patients with chronic mitral regurgitation (MR), left atrium (LA) is one of the first cardiac structures, that are affected by progressive volume overload. Previous studies have shown that higher LA filling index (FI) could be a potential negative prognostic marker and it may provide additional information in cases where surgical valve correction is considered. Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the connection between the LA FI and exercise–induced pulmonary hypertension (EIPH) in patients with asymptomatic primary moderate to severe MR. Methods. The study sample consisted of 50 patients (age 61.88 ± 12.88 years) with asymptomatic primary moderate to severe MR and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (>60%). All of the patients underwent resting and stress (bicycle–ergometry as per protocol 25 + 25W every 3 minutes) echocardiography. The ratio of the early–diastolic mitral inflow peak velocity (E) and LA reservoir strain was calculated as the LA FI. EIPH was considered as systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) ≥60 mmHg during peak stress. Results. EIPH was identified in 13 (26%) patients with primary asymptomatic MR. LA FI at rest, during initial and peak stress was higher in patients with EIPH (p = 0.041, p = 0.023 and p = 0.036, respectively). LA FI at rest (r = 0.334; p = 0.044), during initial (25W) stress (r = 0.371; p = 0.037) and during recovery phase (r = 0.408; p = 0.023), weakly correlated with SPAP during maximal achieved workload. In univariate logistic regression analysis, LA FI during initial and peak stress was significantly related to EIPH (Table 1). According to ROC analysis, LA FI >6.46 during initial stress could predict EIPH with 70.0% sensitivity and 75.0% specificity (p = 0.023). LA FI >9.59 during peak stress could distinguish the possibility of underlying EIPH with 60.0% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity (p = 0.036). Conclusions. Resting and exercise LA FI was higher in subjects with EIPH. LA FI during stress could be the potential predictor of EIPH in patients with asymptomatic primary MR and preserved LV EF. Table 1 Parameter β Chi-Square Odds ratio Standard error 95% CI p value LA FI at rest 1.21 3.549 3.271 0.106 0.984 - 1.489 0.071 LA FI during initial (25 W) stress 1.535 6.056 4.812 0.195 1.047 - 2.250 0.028 LA FI during peak stress 1.662 7.364 4.646 0.236 1.047 - 2.638 0.031 LA FI during recovery phase 1.257 3.998 3.139 0.129 0.976 - 1.619 0.076 LA - left atrium FI - filling index Abstract Figure. Picture 1