101 Semi-automated volume-strain loops: a new tool in TTE to assess diastolic dysfunction
Abstract AIM This work aims to evaluate a novel semi-automatic tool for the assessment of volume-strain loops by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHOD 17 patients with proved cardiac amyloidosis and 18 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) were compared to 19 controls, from a local database. All TTE were performed using Vivid E95 ultrasound system (General Electrics Healthcare, Horten, Norway). The complete method includes several steps: 1) extraction of LV strain full traces from apical 4 and 2 cavities views, 2) estimation of LV volume from these two traces by spline interpolations, 3) resampling of LV strain curves, determined for the same cardiac beat, (in apical 4-, 2- and 3- cavities views) as a function of pre-defined percentage increments of LV-volume and 4) calculation of the LV volume-strain loop area. (Figure 1, panel A) RESULTS (Table 1): LVEF was similar between all groups whereas global longitudinal strain was significantly lower in amyloidosis group than controls (-14.4 vs -20.5%; p < 0.001). HFpEF and amyloidosis groups had a worse diastolic function than controls with a greater left atrial volume index , a faster tricuspid regurgitation, a greater E/e’ ratio with a p < 0.001 for all these indices. Simultaneously, the global area of volume-strain loop was significantly lower in HFpEF and amyloidosis group than controls (72 vs 36 vs 120.0 %.mL, respectively, p < 0.0001) with an intermediate profile of HFpEF(Figure 1, panel B, HFpEF in green). This area was better correlated with mean e’ (r = 0.650, p < 0.001) than all other indices. CONCLUSION LV volume-strain loop area appears a very promising new tool to assess semi-automatically diastolic function. Main echocardiographic results Controls n = 19 HFpEF n = 18 Amyloidosis n = 17 p-value LVEDV (mL) 105 ± 15 103 ± 30 95 ± 93 0.476 LVEF (%) 65 ± 5 62 ± 7 62 ± 7 0.196 GLS (%) -20.5 ± 1.8 -18.4 ± 4.3 -14.4 ± 3.8 <0.0001 LAVi (ml.m-2) 22 ± 5 51 ± 14 51 ± 22 <0.0001 E/A ratio 2.1 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 1.0 0.005 Mitral E/Ea average 5.9 ± 1.4 13.7 ± 5.8 17.3 ± 5.4 <0.0001 Vmax TR (m/s) 2.0 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.5 <0.0001 V-S loop area (ml.%) 120 ± 54 72 ± 45 37 ± 21 <0.0001 Abstract 101 Figure 1