scholarly journals Cancer incidence during follow-up in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs and its impact on bleeding risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Angeli ◽  
L Bartoli ◽  
M Fabrizio ◽  
L Bergamaschi ◽  
I Magnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Cancer is increasingly recognized as strictly related to atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with AF, the relationship between cancer and cardioembolic or bleeding risk during oral anticoagulant therapy is unknown. Purpose To assess the bleeding and ischaemic burden of a baseline or newly diagnosed cancer in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods All consecutive patients treated with DOACs were enrolled among those with new-onset atrial fibrillation and indication for oral anticoagulant between January 2017 and March 2019. During follow-up, bleeding events, newly diagnosed primitive or metastatic malignancy and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were evaluated. At baseline, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and ORBIT scores were used to assess the hemorrhagic and ischaemic risk. Major bleedings (MB) were defined according to the ISTH definition. Anemia was defined as haemoglobin levels below 11 g/dL in women and 12 mg/dL in men. Results 1258 patients constituted the study population and followed for a mean time of 21.6±9.5 months. Overall, 66 patients (5.2%) were affected by malignant neoplasia at baseline, whereas 59 (4.7%) were diagnosed with a malignancy during follow-up. Among baseline characteristics, anemia was associated with cancer at enrolment (43.9% vs 22.5%, p<0.001) but not at follow up (29.3% vs 23.4%, p=0.341). MACEs were not associated with cancer at baseline (5.3% vs 5.2%, p=1.0) and at follow up (5% vs 4.9%, p=1.0). No association was observed between major ischaemic events and cancer at enrolment or follow up (5.3% vs 4.4%, p=0.83 and 4.4% vs 5%, p=0.82). Despite no statistically significant differences in haemorrhagic risk at baseline, the overall bleeding events and MB were associated with newly diagnosed cancer (9.2% vs 3.9%, p=0.001 and 13.8% vs 4.5%, p=0.001, respectively) but not at baseline (5.2% vs 5.5%, p=0.82 and 9.2% vs 5.2%, p=0.162). At multivariate analysis adjusted for age, hypertension and renal function, anemia and a newly diagnosed cancer during follow up remained independent predictors of MB (respectively, HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.52–1.06, p=0.009 and HR 3.53, 95% CI 7.71–1.62, p=0.001). Conclusion Bleeding risk assessment is an ongoing challenge in patients with NVAF on DOACs. During follow-up, newly diagnosed primitive or metastatic cancer is a strong predictor of bleeding regardless of baseline haemorrhagic risk assessment. In contrast, such association is not observed with malignancy at baseline. A proper diagnosis and treatment could therefore decrease cancer-related bleeding risk. On the contrary, our study shows that cancer is not an ischaemic risk modifier, either diagnosed at baseline or follow-up. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals 258 Cancer incidence during follow-up in patients with new onset atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs and its impact on bleeding risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Angeli ◽  
Lorenzo Bartoli ◽  
Michele Fabrizio ◽  
Matteo Armillotta ◽  
Angelo Sansonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Aims Cancer is increasingly recognized as strictly related to atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with AF, the relationship between cancer and cardioembolic or bleeding risk during oral anticoagulant therapy is unknown. To assess the bleeding and ischaemic burden of a baseline or newly diagnosed cancer in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for non-valvular AF (NVAF). Methods and results All consecutive patients treated with DOACs were enrolled among those with new-onset AF and indication for oral anticoagulant between January 2017 and March 2019. During follow-up, bleeding events, newly diagnosed primitive or metastatic malignancy and major cardiovascular events (MACEs) were evaluated. At baseline, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and ORBIT scores were used to assess the haemorrhagic and ischaemic risk. Major bleedings (MBs) were defined according to the ISTH definition. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin levels below 11 g/dl in women and 12 mg/dl in men. 1258 patients constituted the study population and followed for a mean time of 21.6 ± 9.5 months. Overall, 66 patients (5.2%) were affected by malignant neoplasia at baseline, whereas 59 (4.7%) were diagnosed with a malignancy during follow-up. Among baseline characteristics, anaemia was associated with cancer at enrolment (43.9% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001) but not at follow-up (29.3% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.341). MACEs were not associated with cancer at baseline (5.3% vs. 5.2%, P = 1.0) and at follow-up (5% vs. 4.9%, P = 1.0). No association was observed between major ischaemic events and cancer at enrolment or follow-up (5.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.83 and 4.4% vs. 5%, P = 0.82). Despite no statistically significant differences in haemorrhagic risk at baseline, the overall bleeding events and MB were associated with newly diagnosed cancer (9.2% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.001 and 13.8% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.001, respectively) but not at baseline (5.2% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.82 and 9.2% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.162). At multivariate analysis adjusted for age, hypertension and renal function, anaemia, and a newly diagnosed cancer during follow-up remained independent predictor of MB [respectively, HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.52–1.06, P = 0.009 and HR: 3.53, 95% CI: 7.71–1.62, P = 0.001]. Conclusions Bleeding risk assessment is an ongoing challenge in patients with NVAF on DOACs. During follow-up, newly diagnosed primitive or metastatic cancer is a strong predictor of bleeding regardless of baseline haemorrhagic risk assessment. In contrast, such association is not observed with malignancy at baseline. A proper diagnosis and treatment could therefore decrease cancer-related bleeding risk. On the contrary, our study shows that cancer is not an ischaemic risk modifier, either diagnosed at baseline or follow-up.

P4742Evaluation of the HAS-BLED, ATRIA and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Bergamaschi ◽  
A Stefanizzi ◽  
M Coriano ◽  
P Paolisso ◽  
I Magnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background Several risk scores have been proposed to assess the bleeding risk in patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Purpose To compare the efficacy of HAS-BLED, ATRIA and ORBIT scores to predict major bleedings in newly diagnosed non-valvular AF (NV-AF) treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods We analyzed all consecutive patients with AF at our outpatient clinic from January to December 2017. Only those with new diagnosed NV-AF starting new anticoagulant therapy were enrolled. Major hemorrhagic events were defined according to the ISTH definition in non-surgical patients. Results Out of the 820 patients admitted with AF, 305 were newly diagnosed with NV-AF starting oral anticoagulation. Overall, 51.3% were male with a mean age of 72.6±13.7 years. Thirty-six patients (11.8%) started VKAs whereas 269 (88.2%) patients were treated with NOACs. The median follow-up time was 10.4±3.4 months. During follow-up, 123 (32.2%) bleeding events were recorded, 21 (17,1%) in the VKA group and 102 (82,9%) in the NOAC group. Eleven (2.9%) major bleeding events occurred: 5 (45.5%) in the VKA group and 6 (54.5%) in the NOAC group. Overall, patients with major hemorrhagic events showed a mean value of the scores significantly higher when compared to patients without such bleeding complications (HASBLED 3.4 vs 2.4 p=0.007; ATRIA 5.6 vs 2.4 p<0.001; ORBIT 3.6 vs 1.8 p<0,001). Conversely, when analyzing the VKA subgroup, only the ATRIA score was significantly higher in patients with major adverse events (7.4 vs 3.5 p<0.001; HAS-BLED: 4.4 vs 3.6 p=0.27; ORBIT 4.4 vs 2.9 p=0.13). An ATRIA score ≥4 identified patients at high risk of bleeding (29.4% vs. 0% events. respectively, p=0.04). In the NOAC group, patients with major bleeding events had higher mean values of ATRIA (4.0 vs 2.3 p=0.02) and ORBIT (2.8 vs 1.6 p=0,04) but not the HAS-BLED (2.5 vs 2.3 p=0.57) scores. Similarly, patients on NOACs with an ATRIA score ≥4 had higher rates of major bleedings (8.1% vs. 1.6% p=0,02). Comparing the single elements of the ATRIA score, only glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 mq was associated with major bleedings in the VKA group (p<0.001) whereas, in the NOAC group, anemia was strongly associated with bleeding events (p=0,02). In fact, multivariate analysis in the NOAC group showed that hemoglobin level at admission was an independent predictor for major bleeding events (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23–0.75, P=0.003). Conversely, in the VKA group, baseline creatinine level was an independent predictor for these events (OR 12.76, 95% CI 1.6–101.7, P=0.016). Conclusions The ATRIA score showed the best efficacy in predicting major bleeding events. Hemoglobin and creatinine levels at admission were independent predictors for major hemorrhagic events in the NOAC and in the VKA groups, respectively. The latter finding might be helpful in stratifying the hemorrhagic risk at the beginning of treatment.

P3776Blood pressure variability and incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E.-K Choi ◽  
S R Lee ◽  
K D Han ◽  
S Oh
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
High Variability ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Korean National Health Insurance ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability is a known risk factor for stroke, but the association between BP variability and atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence is uncertain. We sought to evaluate the association between BP variability and incident AF. Methods We identified 8,063,922 subjects (mean age 48 years; 59% men) who had ≥3 health checkups provided by the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation between 2004 and 2010. Systolic and diastolic BP variability was defined as variability independence of the mean (VIM). VIM was divided into four groups and high variability of BP was defined as the highest quartile values. The primary end point was new-onset atrial fibrillation. Results During a mean 7 years of follow-up, 140,086 subjects were newly diagnosed with AF (2.53 per 1000 person-years). High variation in BP was associated with an increase in the risk of AF (SBP: hazard ratio [HR], 1.060; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.044–1.075, DBP: HR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.050–1.082) compared with subjects with lowest quartile of BP. Among subjects with high variation both in SBP and DBP, the risk of AF was 7.6% higher than subjects without high variation in SBP and DBP. The risk of high BP variation on new-onset AF was more obvious in high-risk patients. The association of high BP variability with AF was being stronger for high-risk subjects who were older (≥65 years), with diabetes, or with CKD compared with subjects who were younger, without diabetes, or without CKD. Conclusions Fluctuation in SBP and DBP was associated with higher incidence of AF, especially in high-risk subjects, independent of traditional AF risk factors.

scholarly journals Acute Dental Periapical Abscess and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2927
Author(s):  
Amaar Obaid Hassan ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip ◽  
Arnaud Bisson ◽  
Julien Herbert ◽  
Alexandre Bodin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
National Database ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Periapical Abscess ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

There are limited data on the relationship of acute dental infections with hospitalisation and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the relationship between acute periapical abscess and incident AF. This was a retrospective cohort study from a French national database of patients hospitalized in 2013 (3.4 million patients) with at least five years of follow up. In total, 3,056,291 adults (55.1% female) required hospital admission in French hospitals in 2013 while not having a history of AF. Of 4693 patients classified as having dental periapical abscess, 435 (9.27%) developed AF, compared to 326,241 (10.69%) without dental periapical abscess that developed AF over a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 1.7 years. Multivariable analysis indicated that dental periapical abscess acted as an independent predictor for new onset AF (p < 0.01). The CHA2DS2VASc score in patients with acute dental periapical abscess had moderate predictive value for development of AF, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71–0.76). An increased risk of new onset AF was identified for individuals hospitalized with dental periapical abscess. Careful follow up of patients with severe, acute dental periapical infections is needed for incident AF, as well as investigations of possible mechanisms linking these conditions.

Long-term impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction on heart failure: insights from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L Xu ◽  
J Luo ◽  
H.Q Li ◽  
Z.Q Li ◽  
B.X Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with poor survival, but the clinical implication of NOAF on subsequent heart failure (HF) is still not well studied. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NOAF following AMI and HF hospitalization. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2014 and March 2018, using data from the New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in ShangHai registry, where all participants did not have a documented AF history. Patients with AMI who discharged alive and had complete echocardiography and follow-up data were analyzed. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization, which was defined as a minimum of an overnight hospital stay of a participant who presented with symptoms and signs of HF or received intravenous diuretics. Results A total of 2075 patients were included, of whom 228 developed NOAF during the index AMI hospitalization. During up to 5 years of follow-up (median: 2.7 years), 205 patients (9.9%) experienced HF hospitalization and 220 patients (10.6%) died. The incidence rate of HF hospitalization among patients with NOAF was 18.4% per year compared with 2.8% per year for those with sinus rhythm. After adjustment for confounders, NOAF was significantly associated with HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.30–4.28; p&lt;0.001). Consistent result was observed after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause death (subdistribution HR: 3.06, 95% CI: 2.18–4.30; p&lt;0.001) or performing a propensity score adjusted multivariable model (HR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.39–4.50; p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, the risk of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with persistent NOAF (HR: 5.81; 95% CI: 3.59–9.41) compared with that in those with transient NOAF (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.84–3.70; p interaction = 0.008). Conclusion NOAF complicating AMI is strongly associated with an increased long-term risk of heart. Cumulative incidence of outcome Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): 1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

New-onset atrial fibrillation and warfarin initiation: High risk periods and implications for new antithrombotic drugs

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 1099-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato D. Lopes ◽  
Elaine M. Hylek ◽  
David A. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Antithrombotic Drugs ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Disproportionate Number ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Risk For Bleeding ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Medication ◽  
New Onset

SummaryAtrial fibrillation is a common condition that increases the risk of stroke in many patients. Although warfarin has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke, many patients who might benefit from anticoagulation do not receive this therapy. Fear of bleeding is the most often cited reason. Several new anticoagulant medications are being studied to determine their efficacy and safety relative to warfarin. Unlike earlier trials that established the superiority of warfarin over placebo, recent trials in atrial fibrillation have enrolled a disproportionate number of patients already taking warfarin. This review suggests that the risk of both haemorrhage and stroke are highest when atrial fibrillation is newly diagnosed and during the initiation of anticoagulant medication. Randomised controlled trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new anti-thrombotic agents should include substantial numbers of patients without prior exposure to anticoagulation since these individuals are at the highest risk for bleeding and thromboembolism.

4037Nurse counseling of patients with atrial fibrillation to improve compliance to oral anticoagulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chilian-Hof ◽  
S Schnupp ◽  
C Mahnkopf ◽  
J Brachmann ◽  
C Kleinecke
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Telephone Counseling ◽  
Bleeding Events

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia with a prevalence of 1%–2% in the general population. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is state-of-the art for preventions of thromboembolic events, in particular ischemic stroke, in patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite its proven benefit, numerous studies have documented under use of OAC for a variety of reasons. Purpose To establish a program of nurse counseling in patient with atrial fibrillation and treatment with oral anticoagulation. The program is designed to improve patients satisfaction, compliance to OAC, prevention of medication errors, ischemic and bleeding events. Methods Patients with atrial fibrillation and treatment with oral anticoagulation were prospectively identified at the department of cardiology of our clinic. They received a 30 minutes nurse counseling about oral anticoagulation during the hospital stay and another 30 minutes telephone counseling 3 months after inclusion. Furthermore, they received a brochure to inform about atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation and methods to improve medication compliance. Demographic characteristics with stroke and bleeding risk (CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores), as well as procedural data were systematically assessed in a predefined standardized way and captured in a dedicated database. Results Between June 2017 and January 2018, a total of 617 patients (female gender: 43.1%) with atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulation received nurse counseling. Demographic and follow-up data of 204 patients (female gender: 85/204 (41.7%); mean age 69.7±17.3, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.2±1.7, HAS-BLED score 2.8±0.37) were assessed in a dedicated database. Indication for OAC was paroxysmal and persistent/permanent AF in 110/204 (53.9%), 93/204 (45.6%) and others 17 (8.3%), respectively. 33/2014 (16.2%) were treated with vitamin K antagonists, and 172/204 (84.3%) with non-vitamin K antagonists. After a follow-up of 0.46±2.9 years and 187 patients-years the rates of cardiovascular death, major bleeding events and all-cause stroke and TIA were 1.07%, 2.14% and 1.61% per 100 patient-years. Conclusion Nurse counseling in patients with atrial fibrillation and treatment with oral anticoagulation has been established at the REGIOMED clinics, Germany. Its effectiveness in terms of quality of live, medication complications and cardiovascular events has to be proven in a randomised trial. Acknowledgement/Funding Daichi-Sankyo

scholarly journals P1724Advanced interatrial block on electrocardiogram predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation during long term follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Baturova ◽  
A. Lindgren ◽  
J. Carlson ◽  
Y. Shubik ◽  
S.B. Olsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Interatrial Block ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

P675Current status of anticoagulation in patients with breast cancer and atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Pardo Sanz ◽  
L M Rincon ◽  
P Guedes Ramallo ◽  
L Belarte ◽  
G De Lara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Oncologic Patients

Abstract Aims Balance between embolic and bleeding risk is challenging in patients with cancer. There is a lack of specific recommendations for the use of antithrombotic therapy in oncologic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the embolic and bleeding risk, the preventive management and the incidence of events between patients with and without cancer. We further evaluated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) within patients with cancer. Methods The AMBER-AF registry is an observational multicentre study that analysed patients with non-valvular AF treated in Oncology and Cardiology Departments in Spain. 1237 female patients with AF were enrolled: 637 with breast cancer and 599 without cancer. Mean follow-up was 3.1 years. Results Both groups were similar in age, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASB-LED scores. Lack of guidelines recommended therapies was more frequent among patients with cancer. Compared with patients without cancer, adjusted rates of stroke (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in cancer patients were higher (1.56 [1.04–2.35]), whereas bleeding rates remained similar (1.25 [0.95–1.64]). Within the group of patients with cancer, the use of DOACs vs VKAs did not entail differences in the adjusted rates of stroke (0.91 [0.42–1.99]) or severe bleedings (1.53 [0.93–2.53]). Follow-up events Conclusions Antithrombotic management of AF frequently differs in patients with breast cancer. While breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of incident stroke, bleeding events remained similar. Patients with cancer treated with DOACs experienced similar rates of stroke and bleeding as those with VKAs.

scholarly journals Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapio Hellman ◽  
Markus Hakamäki ◽  
Roosa Lankinen ◽  
Niina Koivuviita ◽  
Jussi Pärkkä ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Ckd Stage ◽  
Severe Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background The prevalence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) and fragmented QRS (fQRS) diagnosed using ECG criteria in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Furthermore, there is limited data on predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) with LAE or fQRS in this patient group. Methods We enrolled 165 consecutive non-dialysis patients with CKD stage 4–5 without prior AF diagnosis between 2013 and 2017 in a prospective follow-up cohort study. LAE was defined as total P-wave duration ≥120 ms in lead II ± > 1 biphasic P-waves in leads II, III or aVF; or duration of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 40 ms or depth of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 1 mm in lead V1 from a baseline ECG, respectively. fQRS was defined as the presence of a notched R or S wave or the presence of ≥1 additional R waves (R’) or; in the presence of a wide QRS complex (> 120 ms), > 2 notches in R or S waves in two contiguous leads corresponding to a myocardial region, respectively. Results Mean age of the patients was 59 (SD 14) years, 56/165 (33.9%) were female and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12.8 ml/min/1.73m2. Altogether 29/165 (17.6%) patients were observed with new-onset AF within median follow-up of 3 [IQR 3, range 2–6] years. At baseline, 137/165 (83.0%) and 144/165 (87.3%) patients were observed with LAE and fQRS, respectively. Furthermore, LAE and fQRS co-existed in 121/165 (73.3%) patients. Neither findings were associated with the risk of new-onset AF within follow-up. Conclusion The prevalence of LAE and fQRS at baseline in this study on CKD stage 4–5 patients not on dialysis was very high. However, LAE or fQRS failed to predict occurrence of new-onset AF in these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document