5106A pattern-discovery-based outcome predictive tool integrated with clinical data repository: design and a case study on contrast related acute kidney injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y X Li ◽  
J Jiang ◽  
Y Zhang ◽  
J P Li ◽  
Y Huo

Abstract Introduction Clinical data repositories (CDR) including electronic health record (EHR) data have great potential for outcome prediction and risk modeling. However, most CDRs were only used for data displaying, and using data from CDR for outcome prediction often requires careful study design and sophisticated modeling techniques before a hypothesis can be tested. Purpose We built a prediction tool integrated with CDR based on pattern discovery aiming to bridge the above gap and demonstrated a case study on contrast related acute kidney injury (AKI) with the system. Methods A cardiovascular CDR integrated with multiple hospital informatics systems was established. For the case study on AKI, we included patients undergoing cardiac catheterization from January 13, 2015 to April 27, 2017, excluding those with dialysis, end-stage renal disease, renal transplant, and missing pre- or post-procedural creatinine. To handle missing data, a prior-history-note composer was designed to fill in structured data of 14 diseases related to cardiovascular problem. Crucial data such as ejective fraction was extracted from the structured reports. AKI was defined according to Acute Kidney Injury Network by increase of serum creatinine from most recent baseline to the post-procedure 7-day peak. To build predictive modeling, we selected 17 variables covered in existing AKI models. Pattern discovery was recently developed as an interpretable predictive model which works on incomplete noisy data. In this study, we developed a pattern discovery based visual analytics tool, and trained it on 70% data up to August 2016 with three interactive knowledge incorporation modes to develop 3 models: 1) pure data-driven, 2) domain knowledge, and 3) clinician-interactive. In last two modes, a physician using the visual analytics could change the variables and further refine the model, respectively. We tested and compared it with other models on the 30% consecutive patients dated afterwards, which is shown in Figure 1. Results Among 2,560 patients in the final dataset with 17 pre-procedure variables derived from CDR data, 169 (7.3%) had AKI. We measured 4 existing models, whose areas under curves (AUCs) of receiver operating characteristics curve for the test set were 0.70 (Mehran's), 0.72 (Chen's), 0.67 (Gao's) and 0.62 (AGEF), respectively. A pure data-driven machine learning method achieves AUC of 0.72 (Easy Ensemble). The AUCs of our 3 models are 0.77, 0.80, 0.82, respectively, with the last being top where physician knowledge is incorporated. Demo and demonstration Conclusions We developed a novel pattern-discovery-based outcome prediction tool integrated with CDR and purely using EHR data. On the case of predicting contrast related AKI, the tool showed user-friendliness by physicians, and demonstrated a competitive performance in comparison with the state-of-the-art models.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Mohamadlou ◽  
Anna Lynn-Palevsky ◽  
Christopher Barton ◽  
Uli Chettipally ◽  
Lisa Shieh ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundA major problem in treating acute kidney injury (AKI) is that clinical criteria for recognition are markers of established kidney damage or impaired function; treatment before such damage manifests is desirable. Clinicians could intervene during what may be a crucial stage for preventing permanent kidney injury if patients with incipient AKI and those at high risk of developing AKI could be identified.MethodsWe used a machine learning technique, boosted ensembles of decision trees, to train an AKI prediction tool on retrospective data from inpatients at Stanford Medical Center and intensive care unit patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. We tested the algorithm’s ability to detect AKI at onset, and to predict AKI 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours before onset, and compared its 3-fold cross-validation performance to the SOFA score for AKI identification in terms of Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC).ResultsThe prediction algorithm achieves AUROC of 0.872 (95% CI 0.867, 0.878) for AKI onset detection, superior to the SOFA score AUROC of 0.815 (P < 0.01). At 72 hours before onset, the algorithm achieves AUROC of 0.728 (95% CI 0.719, 0.737), compared to the SOFA score AUROC of 0.720 (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThe results of these experiments suggest that a machine-learning-based AKI prediction tool may offer important prognostic capabilities for determining which patients are likely to suffer AKI, potentially allowing clinicians to intervene before kidney damage manifests.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S49-S50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanu Rhee ◽  
Maximilian Jentzsch ◽  
Sameer S Kadri ◽  
Christopher Seymour ◽  
Derek Angus ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Administrative claims data are commonly used for sepsis surveillance, research, and quality improvement. However, variations in diagnosis, documentation, and coding practices may confound efforts to benchmark hospital sepsis outcomes using claims data. Methods We evaluated the sensitivity of claims data for sepsis and organ dysfunction relative to clinical data from the electronic health records of 193 US hospitals. Sepsis was defined clinically using markers of presumed infection (blood cultures and antibiotic administrations) and concurrent organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction was measured using laboratory data (acute kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, hepatic injury), vasopressor administrations (shock), or mechanical ventilation (respiratory failure). Correlations between hospitals’ sepsis incidence and mortality rates by claims (using “explicit” ICD-9-CM codes for severe sepsis or septic shock) versus clinical data were measured by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and relative hospital rankings using either data source were compared. All estimates were reliability-adjusted to account for random variation using hierarchical logistic regression modeling. Results The study cohort included 4.3 million adult hospitalizations in 2013 or 2014. The sensitivity of hospitals’ claims data for sepsis and organ dysfunction was low and variable: median sensitivity 30% (range 5–54%) for sepsis, 66% (range 26–84%) for acute kidney injury, 39% (range 16–60%) for thrombocytopenia, 36% (range 29–44%) for hepatic injury, and 66% (range 29–84%) for shock (Figure 1). There was only moderate correlation between claims and clinical data for hospitals’ sepsis incidence (r = 0.64) and mortality rates (r = 0.61), and relative hospital rankings for sepsis mortality differed substantially using either method (Figure 2). Of 48 (46%) hospitals, 22 ranked in the lowest sepsis mortality quartile by claims shifted to higher mortality quartiles using clinical data. Conclusion Variation in the completeness and accuracy of claims data for identifying sepsis and organ dysfunction limits their use for comparing hospital sepsis rates and outcomes. Sepsis surveillance using objective clinical data may facilitate more meaningful hospital comparisons. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenyu Li ◽  
Long Zhao ◽  
Lingyu Xu ◽  
Xiaosu Zhang ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100345
Author(s):  
Clair Ka Tze Chew ◽  
Helen Hogan ◽  
Yogini Jani

ObjectivesDigital systems have long been used to improve the quality and safety of care when managing acute kidney injury (AKI). The availability of digitised clinical data can also turn organisations and their networks into learning healthcare systems (LHSs) if used across all levels of health and care. This review explores the impact of digital systems i.e. on patients with AKI care, to gauge progress towards establishing LHSs and to identify existing gaps in the research.MethodsEmbase, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies of real-time or near real-time digital AKI management systems which reported process and outcome measures were included.ResultsThematic analysis of 43 studies showed that most interventions used real-time serum creatinine levels to trigger responses to enable risk prediction, early recognition of AKI or harm prevention by individual clinicians (micro level) or specialist teams (meso level). Interventions at system (macro level) were rare. There was limited evidence of change in outcomes.DiscussionWhile the benefits of real-time digital clinical data at micro level for AKI management have been evident for some time, their application at meso and macro levels is emergent therefore limiting progress towards establishing LHSs. Lack of progress is due to digital maturity, system design, human factors and policy levers.ConclusionFuture approaches need to harness the potential of interoperability, data analytical advances and include multiple stakeholder perspectives to develop effective digital LHSs in order to gain benefits across the system.


Author(s):  
Tiago Duarte ◽  
◽  
Fernando Caeiro ◽  
Mário Góis ◽  
António Matos ◽  
...  

SARS-Cov2 infection is a highly transmissible disease associated with serious pulmonary disease. Renal involvement is frequent and associated with poor prognosis; however, mechanisms of kidney injury are not well established. We present a SARS-Cov2 patient with severe acute kidney injury. Kidney biopsy findings revealed a pattern of acute tubular necrosis with isometric vacuolization of the proximal tubule. The interstitium and glomeruli were normal. Electronic microscopy showed multiple viral-like particles in both the glomeruli and proximal tubule. This case study shows how SARS-Cov 2 infection can result in different kinds of kidney lesion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document