P5976Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias with mechanical dispersion assessed by strain echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Kawakami ◽  
N Nerlekar ◽  
K H Haugaa ◽  
T Edvardsen ◽  
T H Marwick
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Speckle Tracking ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Mechanical Dispersion

Abstract Background Recent studies have demonstrated that left ventricular mechanical dispersion (LVMD) assessed by speckle tracking might be a powerful marker in risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias (VA). We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to i) assess the prognostic value of this parameter (previous studies were predominantly single-center), ii) define the value relative to other parameters, iii) identify the most appropriate cutoff for designating risk. Purpose To assess the association between LVMD and the incidence of VA. Methods A systemic review of studies reporting the predictive value of LVMD for VA was undertaken from a search of Medline and Embase. LVMD was defined as the standard deviation of time from Q/R on ECG to peak negative strain from each LV segment. VA events were defined as sudden cardiac death, cardiac arrest, documented ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from univariable and multivariable models reporting on the association of LVMD and VA and described as pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In a meta-analysis, the predictive value of LVMD was compared to that of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Results Among 3198 patients (weighted mean, 63 years, 30% female; 82% ischemic heart disease) in 12 published articles, 387 (12%) had VA events over a follow-up (17–70 months). Patients with VA events had a significantly greater mechanical dispersion compared with those without VA events (weighted mean difference, −20.3 ms; 95% CI, −27.3 to −13.2; p<0.01); 60 ms was found to be the optimal cutoff LVMD value for predicting VA events. Each 10 ms increment of LVMD was significantly and independently associated with VA events (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.29; p<0.01). The predictive value of LVMD was superior to that of LVEF or GLS (Figure). Figure 1 Conclusion LVMD assessed by speckle tracking provides important predictive value for VA in patients with a number of cardiac diseases and appears to have superior predictive value to LVEF and GLS for risk stratification.

scholarly journals Statins to mitigate cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Obasi ◽  
Arielle Abovich ◽  
Jacqueline B. Vo ◽  
Yawen Gao ◽  
Stefania I. Papatheodorou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Purpose Cardiotoxicity affects 5–16% of cancer patients who receive anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Limited research has examined interventions to mitigate cardiotoxicity. We examined the role of statins in mitigating cardiotoxicity by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central. A random-effect model was used to assess summary relative risks (RR), weighted mean differences (WMD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Testing for heterogeneity between the studies was performed using Cochran’s Q test and the I2 test. Results Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 117 patients and four observational cohort studies with a total of 813 patients contributed to the analysis. Pooled results indicate significant mitigation of cardiotoxicity after anthracycline and/or trastuzumab exposure among statin users in cohort studies [RR = 0.46, 95% CI (0.27–0.78), p = 0.004, $${ }I^{2}$$ I 2  = 0.0%] and a non-significant decrease in cardiotoxicity risk among statin users in RCTs [RR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.17–1.45), p = 0.20, $$I^{2}$$ I 2  = 5.6%]. Those who used statins were also significantly more likely to maintain left ventricular ejection fraction compared to baseline after anthracycline and/or trastuzumab therapy in both cohort studies [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 6.14%, 95% CI (2.75–9.52), p < 0.001, $$I^{2}$$ I 2  = 74.7%] and RCTs [WMD = 6.25%, 95% CI (0.82–11.68, p = 0.024, $$I^{2}$$ I 2  = 80.9%]. We were unable to explore publication bias due to the small number of studies. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that there is an association between statin use and decreased risk of cardiotoxicity after anthracycline and/or trastuzumab exposure. Larger well-conducted RCTs are needed to determine whether statins decrease risk of cardiotoxicity from anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Trial Registration Number and Date of Registration PROSPERO: CRD42020140352 on 7/6/2020.

scholarly journals Effects of Exercise on Cardiac Function Outcomes in Women Receiving Anthracycline or Trastuzumab Treatment for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 8336
Author(s):  
Pedro Antunes ◽  
Dulce Esteves ◽  
Célia Nunes ◽  
Anabela Amarelo ◽  
José Fonseca-Moutinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Function ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circulating Biomarkers ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Background: we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of exercise training on cardiac function and circulating biomarkers outcomes among women with breast cancer (BC) receiving anthracycline or trastuzumab-containing therapy. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus were searched. The primary outcome was change on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary outcomes included diastolic function, strain imaging and circulating biomarkers. Results: Four RCTs were included, of those three were conducted during anthracycline and one during trastuzumab, involving 161 patients. All trials provided absolute change in LVEF (%) after a short to medium-term of treatment exposure (≤6 months). Pooled data revealed no differences in LVEF in the exercise group versus control [mean difference (MD): 2.07%; 95% CI: −0.17 to 4.34]. Similar results were observed by pooling data from the three RCTs conducted during anthracycline. Data from trials that implemented interventions with ≥36 exercise sessions (n = 3) showed a significant effect in preventing LVEF decline favoring the exercise (MD: 3.25%; 95% CI: 1.20 to 5.31). No significant changes were observed on secondary outcomes. Conclusions: exercise appears to have a beneficial effect in mitigating LVEF decline and this effect was significant for interventions with ≥36 exercise sessions.

scholarly journals Melatonin and Cardioprotection in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Domínguez-Rodríguez ◽  
Pedro Abreu-González ◽  
Néstor Báez-Ferrer ◽  
Russel J. Reiter ◽  
Pablo Avanzas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Favorable Effect ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Mean Differences

Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury represents a critical problem associated with interventional approaches for coronary reperfusion. Pharmacological cardioprotective interventions are advocated to ameliorate IR injury. Melatonin is an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent with a wide range of therapeutic properties that may contribute to its cardioprotective effects. No systematic review or meta-analysis has compared melatonin vs. placebo as a cardioprotective agent in humans. The present study, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, was carried out to assess melatonin's efficacy as a cardioprotective treatment. We performed a systematic review of the available literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and information was extracted using predefined data extraction forms. The primary outcomes were (a) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and (b) blood troponin levels in patients who underwent myocardial revascularization and were randomized to melatonin or placebo. The inverse-variance random-effects method was used to pool the estimates. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Weighted mean differences or standardized mean differences were calculated. A total of 283 records were screened and seven RCTs met all the inclusion criteria. After the pooled analysis, the results on LVEF were consistent across all studies, and a significant heterogeneity was found in the results on troponin levels. The melatonin-treated patients had on average higher LVEF than the placebo-treated individuals with a weighted mean difference = 3.1% (95% CI 0.6–5.5, p = 0.01). Five works compared the levels of troponin after melatonin or placebo treatment. The melatonin-treated patients had lower levels of troponin with a standardized mean difference = −1.76 (95% CI −2.85 to −0.67, p = 0.002). The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that melatonin administration in humans as a cardioprotective agent attenuated heart dysfunction with a favorable effect on the LVEF.

Global risk factors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Liu ◽  
Y Liu ◽  
S Chen ◽  
E.Y.M Chung ◽  
L Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors ◽  
Funding Source

Abstract Background Administration of iodinated contrast is common but may be associated with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), particularly in at-risk patients. There is no recent systematic review of potentially modifiable risk factors. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (to 30 th June 2019) for observational studies assessing risk factors associated with CI-AKI. Twelve potentially modifiable risk factors were finally included in this thematic review and meta-analysis. Random or fixed meta-analysis was performed to derive the adjusted odds ratio (aOR), and the population attributable risk (PAR) was calculated for each risk factor globally and by region. Findings We included 157 studies (2,297,863 participants). The global incidence of CI-AKI was 5.4%. The potentially modifiable risk factors included high contrast volume (PAR 33%), eight cardiovascular risk factors (diuretic use, multivessel coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, hypertension, hypotension, heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and intra-aortic balloon pump use) (combined PAR 76.2%) and three noncardiovascular risk factors (renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus and anaemia) (combined PAR 47.4%) with geographical differences. Bubble chart of the 12 risk factors Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Science Foundation of China

Abstract 17284: Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients With Heart Failure With Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A Godoy Rivas ◽  
Samuel Urrutia ◽  
Eleazar Montalvan ◽  
Mario Rodriguez ◽  
Eduardo Venegas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Heart Failure (HF) is categorized according to the AHA/ACC 2013 HF Guidelines based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF); HF with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF, EF≤40%), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, EF ≥ 50%). There is a group of “borderline” patients with EF 41%-49%, termed Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF). Given this category is not well understood, we sought to evaluate clinical characteristics and management patterns for patients with HFmrEF. Methods: A systematic review was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and LILACS (1946 – 03/2018). Search terms included HF, mid-range, borderline LVEF with several ranges (40-50 or 40-45 or 45-50). Variables characterizing clinical features and medications were extracted for each HF group and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled. Results: Of 1,131 abstracts identified, 24 met inclusion criteria (total patients 480,188). Patients with HFmrEF compared to those with HFrEF were more likely to be female (OR 1.42), have hypertension [HTN] (OR 1.34) and diabetes (OR 1.11), higher SBP (OR 1.17), better NYHA-FC (FC I OR 1.73, FC II 1.33), less likely to have coronary artery disease [CAD] (OR 0.74) and more likely to be treated with ACEI, ARB, BB, Digoxin, MRA and statins (Figure 1-2). HFmrEF patients when compared to those with HFpEF were less likely to be female (OR 0.54) or have HTN (OR 0.68), and more likely to have CAD (OR 1.25), and to be treated with HF medications and statins. Conclusions: Patients with HFmrEF have higher SBP and better NYHA-FC (I and II) compared to HFrEF patients and are less likely to be female and more likely to have CAD compared to HFpEF patients. Further research is needed to help guide management in this unique but clinically important population. Figure 1A. Forest plot of adjusted ORs comparing baseline clinical characteristics of HFrEF vs HFmrEF patients Figure 1B. Forest plot of adjusted ORs comparing baseline clinical characteristics of HFmrEF vs HFpEF patients Figure 2A. Forest plot of adjusted ORs comparing medications used in HFrEF vs HFmrEF patients Figure 2B. Forest plot of adjusted ORs comparing medications used in HFmrEF vs HFpEF patients

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document