scholarly journals 692 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome: a propensity-weighted, multicentre study

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Zecchino ◽  
Vincenzo De Marzo ◽  
Roberto Licordari ◽  
Francesco Costa ◽  
Alessandro Caracciolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Mechanical Complication ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Past ◽  
Weighted Analysis ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically changed the management and the prognosis of patients experiencing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Several scientific societies have highlighted the need for dedicated paths to deliver better and faster care to improve outcomes. Nevertheless, data depicting the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ACS in Italy are still poor. To perform a propensity weighted analysis on a multicentre Italian registry involving patients with ACS managed before vs. during COVID-19 pandemic, taking into account baseline patients characteristics, clinical presentation, procedural aspects, and in-hospital outcomes (death, bleeding, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, mechanical complication, and arrhythmic complication). Methods and results We included all consecutive patients who have suffered from ACS during two periods before (March/April 2018, March/April 2019) vs. the period of COVID-19 pandemic (March/April 2020). A generalized boosted non-parsimonious regression was used to estimate the propensity scores of having an ACS in 2020 (year of COVID-19) vs. 2018/2019 using an average treatment effect and balancing for all baseline confounders. We included 2851 patients admitted to hospital with ACS in 17 Italian centres: 1079 (37.8%) during 2018, 1056 (37.0%) in 2019, and 716 (25.1%) during the first COVID-19 wave of 2020. Seventy (2.5%) patients had a positive swab for SARS-CoV-2 at admission. During 2020 there were higher time-to-emergency-call (P = 0.028) and less diagnosis of unstable angina (P = 0.029) and MINOCA (P = 0.004); none of the admission symptoms differ significantly across the years (P > 0.05) except for fever that was more prevalent in 2020 (P < 0.001). Patients suffering from ACS had lower admission EF (P = 0.006). After PS weighting, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed age (P < 0.001), night admission (P = 0.017), cardiocirculatory arrest before cath-lab (P = 0.041), worst Killip class (P = 0.039), admission EF (P = 0.026), and need for left-ventricle mechanical support (P = 0.011) as independent predictors of in-hospital death. After propensity weighted analysis none of the in-hospital outcomes differed significantly across the years of investigation (all P > 0.05). Conclusions During COVID-19 pandemic in Italy the characteristics and management of ACS was slightly different than the past. However, the rates of ‘hard’, in-hospital outcomes (e.g. deaths) are almost similar to the past, suggesting appropriate care and well-organized emergency-paths for ACS.

The predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score on adverse in-hospital outcomes among patients with the acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation who undergo PCI

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A Borovac ◽  
C.S Kwok ◽  
M.O Mohamed ◽  
D.L Fischman ◽  
M Savage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Vascular Injury ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract Background Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and having concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) have a greater risk of adverse short- and long-term outcomes and death compared with patients in the same setting but without AF. On the other hand, the predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in terms of in-hospital mortality and periprocedural adverse events following PCI among patients with ACS and AF is unknown. Purpose We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with the main admission diagnosis of ACS that underwent PCI and had AF during the 2004–2014 period from the large nationwide US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Methods A CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated for each patient and incorporated into a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to determine its independent impact on in-hospital outcomes consisting of death, acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, vascular injury, and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Results A total of 283,890 patients with AF who underwent PCI following ACS were included in the analysis. The average reported prevalence of the AF in the whole cohort was 10.0% with a significant trend (p<0.001) of increase during the observed 10-year period. The average age of the cohort was 72.1±11 years, 63.4% were male while the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (IQR 2–4). Crude rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes were significantly higher among patient groups with higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (Table 1). Following adjustment for baseline covariates, incremental increase in CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with an increased odds of in-hospital death (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.18–1.22), periprocedural vascular injury (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.17–1.20), bleeding (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.16–1.18), stroke/TIA (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15–1.19), and AKI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06) (Figure 1). Conclusions The CHA2DS2-VASc score provides important prognostic information in ACS patients with AF undergoing PCI and is independently associated with in-hospital death and periprocedural adverse events. Therefore, CHA2DS2-VASc score could be used as a practical and inexpensive tool for risk stratification in this population. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P4634Acute-phase high platelet reactivity with prasugrel loading is correlated with clinical outcomes during hospitalization in acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kuroda ◽  
S Gentaro ◽  
K Kawamura ◽  
T Ono ◽  
K Tokioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
High Platelet Reactivity ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background/Introduction Although high platelet reactivity (HPR) seems to be associated with adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the relationship between post-procedure HPR with prasugrel loading and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is still unclear. Moreover, factors contributing to HPR in ACS with prasugrel loading are also unknown. Purpose This study aimed to assess the impact of post-procedure HPR with prasugrel loading on clinical outcomes in ACS during hospitalization, as well as to define appropriate cut-off values and identify factors contributing to HPR. Methods We performed a single-centre, retrospective observational study that enrolled 132 patients who underwent emergent PCI for ACS with prasugrel loading. The P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value was measured immediately after PCI with the VerifyNowR System. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia needing defibrillation). Results Mean patient age (standard deviation) was 70.7 (±12.5) years, 76% were male, and average time from prasugrel intake to PRU calculation was 101 (±48.8) min. During a mean hospital stay of 15.4 (±8.0) days, there were 22 (16%) MACE events and 6 (4%) deaths. The post-procedure PRU value was 241±66. HPR was significantly higher in MACE group than non-MACE group [287 (±55) vs 232 (±64), p<0.001]. The ROC curve analysis of PRU for discriminating significant in-hospital MACE showed a cut off value of 293 (sensitivity: 64%, specificity: 84% [AUC=0.764, p<0.0001]). Thus, 33 patients (25%) were found to have HPR (PRU>293) immediately after emergent PCI. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed MACE events occurred more frequently in the HPR group than in the non-HPR group (42% vs 8%, log rank p<0.001). Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that peak creatine phosphokinase >3,000 U/L and HPR were independent predictors of MACE in patients with ACS who underwent PCI (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.86–13.26, p=0.001, and OR 7.52, 95% CI 2.73–20.7, p<0.0001, respectively). HPR was significantly correlated with age, female sex, and reference lumen short diameter (pre-dilation) used in PCI. Conclusion HPR was significantly associated with adverse event during hospitalization in ACS patients. Female patients with large culprit lesion diameter were more likely to have HPR. Appropriate cut-off value of HPR in this study was 293. HPR in early-phase of ACS with prasugrel loading is a useful predictor of adverse events during hospitalization.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Following Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Tertiary level Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
MSI Tipu Chowdhury ◽  
Khaled Md. Iqbal ◽  
Zahidul Mostafa ◽  
Md. Fakhrul Islam Khaled ◽  
Sadia Sultana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Level Hospital

scholarly journals Is the use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by patients with COPD associated with a higher risk of acute coronary syndrome in real-world clinical practice?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000840
Author(s):  
Lianne Parkin ◽  
Sheila Williams ◽  
David Barson ◽  
Katrina Sharples ◽  
Simon Horsburgh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidity ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundCardiovascular comorbidity is common among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and there is concern that long-acting bronchodilators (long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs)) may further increase the risk of acute coronary events. Information about the impact of treatment intensification on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk in real-world settings is limited. We undertook a nationwide nested case–control study to estimate the risk of ACS in users of both a LAMA and a LABA relative to users of a LAMA.MethodsWe used routinely collected national health and pharmaceutical dispensing data to establish a cohort of patients aged >45 years who initiated long-acting bronchodilator therapy for COPD between 1 February 2006 and 30 December 2013. Fatal and non-fatal ACS events during follow-up were identified using hospital discharge and mortality records. For each case we used risk set sampling to randomly select up to 10 controls, matched by date of birth, sex, date of cohort entry (first LAMA and/or LABA dispensing), and COPD severity.ResultsFrom the cohort (n=83 417), we identified 5399 ACS cases during 281 292 person-years of follow-up. Compared with current use of LAMA therapy, current use of LAMA and LABA dual therapy was associated with a higher risk of ACS (OR 1.28 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.44)). The OR in an analysis restricted to fatal cases was 1.46 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.91).ConclusionIn real-world clinical practice, use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by people with COPD is associated with a higher risk of ACS.

scholarly journals Immediate versus staged revascularisation in multivessel coronary disease: an updated meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Von Renteln ◽  
S Hassan ◽  
K Szummer ◽  
R Edfors ◽  
D Venetsanos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Disease ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Interventional Treatment ◽  
Index Hospitalisation ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Interventions ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are often aimed at the culprit vessel in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) followed by revascularisation of other stenoses later in the index hospitalisation or shortly after discharge. PCI delay of non-culprit coronary vessels stenoses is supported by lower contrast fluid use and thrombocyte aggregation. Distinct coronary interventions increase the risk of both non- and coronary artery complications, e.g. acute abdominal and periphery artery bleeding, suggesting undertaking all PCIs at the same time. Purpose To assess the effect on mortality and re-myocardial infarction (MI) of immediate versus staged revascularisation in multivessel coronary disease, with the latter constrained to initial PCI of the culprit coronary vessel. Methods The syntax of “randomised controlled trial (RCT) & acute coronary syndrome & complete revascularisation” was undertaken in PubMed. Clinical characteristics were gathered at the index hospitalisation. The intervention scenario was acute coronary syndrome or not. Meta-analyses calculated relative risk (RR) reductions on outcomes of 1) mortality and 2) re-MI. Meta-regression assessed linear difference between interventional treatment benefits and baseline characteristics. Results A total of 148 studies was found. Of those, 8 was found eligible for further analyses and their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Comparison of immediate versus staged revascularisation on mortality was nonsignificant (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 0.78–1.81, p=0.43) (Figure 1). The impact of Immediate vs staged revascularisation on re-MI was also nonsignificant (RR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.44–1.55, p=0.56). Meta-regression found no associations between the outcomes and study characteristics (not shown). Conclusion The intervention of immediate compared to staged revascularisation assessed on outcomes of all-cause mortality and re-MI were nonsignificant. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Impact of timing of randomization after an acute coronary syndrome and subsequent events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the EXAMINE trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Elharram ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
W White ◽  
G Bakris ◽  
P Rossignol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The timing of enrolment following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potentially treatment effect in clinical trials. Using a large contemporary trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) post-ACS, we examined the impact of timing of enrolment on subsequent CV outcomes. Methods EXAMINE was a randomized trial of alogliptin versus placebo in 5380 patients with T2DM and a recent ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], or non-fatal stroke. The median follow-up was 18 months. In this post hoc analysis, we examined the occurrence of subsequent CV events by timing of enrollment divided by tertiles of time from ACS to randomization: 8–34, 35–56, and 57–141 days. Results Patients randomized early (compared to the latest times) had less comorbidities at baseline including a history of heart failure (HF; 24.7% vs. 33.0%), prior coronary artery bypass graft (9.6% vs. 15.9%), or atrial fibrillation (5.9% vs. 9.4%). Despite the reduced comorbidity burden, the risk of the primary outcome was highest in patients randomized early compared to the latest time (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.47; 95% CI 1.21–1.74) (Figure 1). Similarly, patients randomized early had an increased risk of recurrent MI (aHR 1.51; 95% CI 1.17–1.96) and HF hospitalization (1.49; 95% CI 1.05–2.10). Conclusion In a contemporary cohort of T2DM with a recent ACS, early randomization following the ACS increases the risk of CV events including recurrent MI and HF hospitalization. This should be taken into account when designing future clinical trials. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Takeda Pharmaceutical

scholarly journals 68 The impact of the weekend admission on early mortality after acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (Suppl 5) ◽  
pp. A51-A52
Author(s):  
Chun Shing Kwok ◽  
Mohammed Al-Dokheal ◽  
Sami Aldaham ◽  
Claire Rushton ◽  
Robert Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

Abstract 14873: Is There Difference in Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) between Hospitals With and Without Onsite Cardiac Surgery Backup?

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Akasaka ◽  
Seiji Hokimoto ◽  
Noriaki Tabata ◽  
Kenji Sakamoto ◽  
Kenichi Tsujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Background: Based on 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI PCI guideline, it is recommended that PCI should be performed at hospital with onsite cardiac surgery. But, recent data suggests that there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following primary or elective PCI between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery. The proportion of PCI centers without onsite cardiac surgery comprises approximately more than half of all PCI centers in Japan. We examined the impact of with or without onsite cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes following PCI to ACS. Methods: From Aug 2008 to March 2011, subjects (n=2288) were enrolled from the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS), which is a multicenter registry, and enrolling consecutive patients undergoing PCI in 15 centers in Japan. Patients were assigned to two groups treated in hospitals with (n=1954) or without (n=334) onsite cardiac surgery. Clinical events were followed up for 12 months. Primary endpoint was in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. And we monitored other events those were non-cardiovascular deaths, bleeding complications, revascularizations, and emergent CABG. Results: There was no overall significant difference in primary endpoint between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery (9.6%vs9.5%; P=0.737). There was also no significant difference when events in primary endpoint were considered separately. In other events, only revascularization was more frequently seen in hospitals with onsite cardiac surgery (22.1%vs12.9%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis for primary endpoint showed that there was no significant difference between two groups (Log Rank P=0.943). By cox proportional hazards model analysis for primary endpoint, without onsite cardiac surgery was not a predictive factor for primary endpoint (HR 0.969, 95%CI 0.704-1.333; P=0.845). We performed propensity score matching analysis to correct for the disparate patient numbers between two groups, and there was also no significant difference for primary endpoint (6.9% vs 8.0%; P=0.544). Conclusions: There is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following PCI for ACS between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup in Japan.

Predictive Value of Endocan Based on TIMI Risk Score on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Angiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 952-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Ziaee ◽  
Sina Mashayekhi ◽  
Samad Ghaffari ◽  
Javad Mahmoudi ◽  
Parvin Sarbakhsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Creatine Kinase Mb ◽  
Timi Risk Score

We assessed the prognostic value of serum levels of endocan in patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) through its correlation with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score and compared the possible association with clinical outcomes. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we enrolled 320 patients with documented ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), or unstable angina (UA) who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography. Endocan was measured soon after admission in the emergency department. In-hospital death, heart failure, and recurrent infarction were considered major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). There was a significant positive correlation between endocan level and TIMI risk score and MACE. The optimal cutoff values of endocan to predict clinical end points were 3.45 ng/mL in patients with STEMI and 2.85 ng/mL in patients with UA/NSTEMI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that endocan independently correlated with MACE. Moreover, cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, and circulating endocan were found to be independently associated with MACE in patients with ACS. In conclusion, a high endocan level on hospital admission is an independent predictor of worse cardiovascular outcomes and higher TIMI risk score in patients with ACS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document