Work motivation, task delegation and job satisfaction of general practice staff: a cross-sectional study

Abstract BackgroundWork motivation and job satisfaction are linked with the performance and retention of health workforce. Primary health facilities, mostly comprising mid-level health workers, serve the majority of the population in Nepal. The aim of the study was to assess the determinants of job satisfaction in relation to socio-demographics, job characteristics and work motivation status among health workers working in primary health facilities. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Jhapa district in Eastern Nepal covering 40 primary health facilities. The data collection involved 151 self-administered questionnaire interviews and 16 in-depth interviews with health workers. Mean differences in work motivation among those satisfied and unsatisfied with their job was examined using t tests. Logistic regression with 95% confidence interval at p<0.05 was used for identifying associated factors with job satisfaction. Thematic analysis was done to analyze qualitative data. ResultsAmong the study participants, 78.2% were either auxiliary health workers or auxiliary nurse midwives. The median employment period of health workers was 174 months. On the 5-point Likert scale, the mean score of work motivation was highest for team work (3.99) and lowest for financial motivation (2.21). Higher age of health workers and satisfaction with career development, and financial motivation were significantly associated with job satisfaction. The qualitative findings also revealed that the majority of the health workers were not satisfied with the existing career development opportunities, availability of resources in health facility, or financial motivation. ConclusionSatisfaction with career development and financial motivation significantly increased job satisfaction among health workers. Resource availability in health facility, recognition of work and management support affected work motivation and job satisfaction of health workers. A focus on improving work environment through increased financial motivation and career development opportunities as well as investing in primary health facilities with increased resource support is recommended to improve job satisfaction.

Download Full-text

Sharing Responsibilities within the General Practice Team – A Cross-Sectional Study of Task Delegation in Germany

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0157248 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. e0157248 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Karola Mergenthal ◽

Martin Beyer ◽

Ferdinand M. Gerlach ◽

Corina Guethlin

Keyword(s):

General Practice ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Task Delegation ◽

Practice Team

Download Full-text

Associations between multimorbidity and glycaemia (HbA1c) in people with type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional study in Australian general practice

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039625 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (11) ◽

pp. e039625

Author(s):

Jason I Chiang ◽

John Furler ◽

Frances Mair ◽

Bhautesh D Jani ◽

Barbara I Nicholl ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

General Practice ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Linear Regression Models ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Long Term Conditions ◽

Australian General Practice

ObjectivesTo explore the prevalence of multimorbidity as well as individual and combinations of long-term conditions (LTCs) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) attending Australian general practice, using electronic health record (EHR) data. We also examine the association between multimorbidity condition count (total/concordant(T2D related)/discordant(unrelated)) and glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c).DesignCross-sectional study.SettingAustralian general practice.Participants69 718 people with T2D with a general practice encounter between 2013 and 2015 captured in the MedicineInsight database (EHR Data from 557 general practices and >3.8 million Australian patients).Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrevalence of multimorbidity, individual and combinations of LTCs. Multivariable linear regression models used to examine associations between multimorbidity counts and HbA1c (%).ResultsMean (SD) age 66.42 (12.70) years, 46.1% female and mean (SD) HbA1c 7.1 (1.4)%. More than 90% of participants with T2D were living with multimorbidity. Discordant conditions were more prevalent (83.4%) than concordant conditions (69.9 %). The three most prevalent discordant conditions were: painful conditions (55.4%), dyspepsia (31.6%) and depression (22.8%). The three most prevalent concordant conditions were hypertension (61.4%), coronary heart disease (17.1%) and chronic kidney disease (8.5%). The three most common combinations of conditions were: painful conditions and hypertension (38.8%), painful conditions and dyspepsia (23.1%) and hypertension and dyspepsia (22.7%). We found no associations between any multimorbidity counts (total, concordant and discordant) or combinations and HbA1c.ConclusionsMultimorbidity was common in our cohort of people with T2D attending Australian general practice, but was not associated with glycaemia. Although we did not explore mortality in this study, our results suggest that the increased mortality in those with multimorbidity and T2D observed in other studies may not be linked to glycaemia. Interestingly, discordant conditions were more prevalent than concordant conditions with painful conditions being the second most common comorbidity. Better understanding of the implications of different patterns of multimorbidity in people with T2D will allow more effective tailored care.

Download Full-text

Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data

BMJ ◽

10.1136/bmj.j84 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. j84 ◽

Cited By ~ 108

Author(s):

Isaac Barker ◽

Adam Steventon ◽

Sarah R Deeny

Keyword(s):

General Practice ◽

Ambulatory Care ◽

Continuity Of Care ◽

Hospital Admissions ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Level Data ◽

Ambulatory Care Sensitive

Download Full-text

A cross-sectional study reporting concussion exposure, assessment and management in Western Australian general practice

BMC Family Practice ◽

10.1186/s12875-021-01384-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Elizabeth Thomas ◽

HuiJun Chih ◽

Belinda Gabbe ◽

Melinda Fitzgerald ◽

Gill Cowen

Keyword(s):

General Practice ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Limited Information ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Usual Practice ◽

Exact Test ◽

Concussion Management ◽

Practice Knowledge ◽

Western Australian

Abstract Background General Practitioners (GPs) may be called upon to assess patients who have sustained a concussion despite limited information being available at this assessment. Information relating to how concussion is actually being assessed and managed in General Practice is scarce. This study aimed to identify characteristics of current Western Australian (WA) GP exposure to patients with concussion, factors associated with GPs’ knowledge of concussion, confidence of GPs in diagnosing and managing patients with concussion, typical referral practices and familiarity of GPs with guidelines. Methods In this cross-sectional study, GPs in WA were recruited via the RACGP WA newsletter and shareGP and the consented GPs completed an electronic survey. Associations were performed using Chi-squared tests or Fisher’s Exact test. Results Sixty-six GPs in WA responded to the survey (response rate = 1.7%). Demographics, usual practice, knowledge, confidence, identification of prolonged recovery as well as guideline and resource awareness of GPs who practised in regional and metropolitan areas were comparable (p > 0.05). Characteristics of GPs were similar between those who identified all symptoms of concussion and distractors correctly and those who did not (p > 0.05). However, 84% of the respondents who had never heard of concussion guidelines were less likely to answer all symptoms and distractors correctly (p = 0.039). Whilst 78% of the GPs who were confident in their diagnoses had heard of guidelines (p = 0.029), confidence in managing concussion was not significantly associated with GPs exposure to guidelines. It should be noted that none of the respondents correctly identified signs of concussion and excluded the distractors. Conclusions Knowledge surrounding concussion guidelines, diagnosis and management varied across GPs in WA. Promotion of available concussion guidelines may assist GPs who lack confidence in making a diagnosis. The lack of association between GPs exposure to guidelines and confidence managing concussion highlights that concussion management may be an area where GPs could benefit from additional education and support.

Download Full-text