scholarly journals Inventory of microbial species with a rationale: a comparison of the IDF/EFFCA inventory of microbial food cultures with the EFSA Biohazard Panel qualified presumption of safety

2019 ◽  
Vol 366 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i83-i88
Author(s):  
F Bourdichon ◽  
S Laulund ◽  
P Tenning

ABSTRACT In order to provide a harmonised preassessment to support risk assessment performed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the Biohazard Panel in 2007 published guidelines for evaluation of the safety of a strain included in the food chain, the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS). Since 2008, the Biohazard Panel has published on a regular basis an update of the microbial strains submitted for approval and extends the list of species which have been granted QPS status. The International Dairy Federation (IDF) and the European Food and Feed Cultures Association (EFFCA) have, since 2002, been conducting a project on the safety demonstration of microbial food cultures (MFCs). Following the publication of IDF Bulletin 377–2002, an inventory of MFCs was published in IDF Bulletin 455–2012 and updated most recently in IDF Bulletin 495–2018. These two lists developed by EFSA (QPS) and IDF/EFFCA both propose as an outcome an inventory of microbial species that are safe for human consumption. To avoid confusion when these two inventories are compared, this review attempts to explain the rationale that was used to develop them and explain how the two lists should be understood.

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Oltmanns ◽  
O. Licht ◽  
A. Bitsch ◽  
M.-L. Bohlen ◽  
S. E. Escher ◽  
...  

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is responsible for risk assessment of all aspects of food and feed safety, including the establishment of procedures aimed at the identification of emerging risks to food safety.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Leone

Abstract In a time of structural challenges to the integrity, validity, and reliability of science, the new Regulation 2019/1381 aims to rethink the risk assessment phase for greater transparency and sustainability in the food chain. The novel set of provisions calls, inter alia, for Member States’ and civil society’s involvement in the management structure and scientific panels of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Using the European process of ‘agencification’ as a theoretical background, this analysis addresses which problems the reformed legal framework aims to solve as regards EFSA’s governance and which new questions it simultaneously brings to the forefront.


2017 ◽  
Vol 587-588 ◽  
pp. 524-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnès Rortais ◽  
Gérard Arnold ◽  
Jean-Lou Dorne ◽  
Simon J. More ◽  
Giorgio Sperandio ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 109515
Author(s):  
Ermolaos Ververis ◽  
Reinhard Ackerl ◽  
Domenico Azzollini ◽  
Paolo Angelo Colombo ◽  
Agnès de Sesmaisons ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  

The management board of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA, http://www.efsa.eu.int) met on 21 January, and among the issues discussed was selection of the experts who will provide scientific opinions to the EFSA (1). An expression of interest in membership of the EFSA Scientific Committee and panels was published the same day, with a closing date of 14 March (http://www.efsa.eu.int/recruitment_en.html). Those selected will be proposed to the board on 29 April, and the EFSA risk assessment programme is scheduled to begin soon after this date, making the EFSA scientifically operational.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
A. E. TYRPENOU (Α.Ε.ΤΥΡΠΕΝΟΥ)

The market internationalisation, free trading of products and the transport of services within and between the European Union Member States, more and more is based on their quality and integrity. In this particularly exigent environment, in markets that are rapidly altered with fast rythms and within the frames of an intensive worldwide competition, it is obvious the need for "quality". A term, which, in order to become reality, requires patience and insistence, collective efforts, systemisation and a spirit of collaboration. It should become a way of life I could say. But nothing could be done if personally ourselves, collectively and with collaboration, do not realise that the quality begins, continues, but never ends. Questions that are directly related to health, safety, environment, food and other factors come daily in the topicality. In order to be answered, industries and control laboratories should daily be in the position to prove their supremacy, their reliability and technical competence with the application of a suitable quality control system (QA/QC). With this assumption, from the moment that the European Union initiated the European Integrated Market, it became clear that the commercial barriers between the countries can be revoked, only when a country entrusts the quality of the trials of the other country or more generally it's "Quality Level". For all the above and because as much the measurements as the quality of foods considerably affect us, Community or National rules have been established in order to assure us that the controls are reliably executed to guarantee the quality of foods for our protection. In this framework, the European Union, following the entire process "from the farm to the fork" by applying internationally acceptable quality standards, very recently established the new legislation regime named "Hygiene Package". This legislation includes a series of regulations which are directly related to hygiene, control and food enterprises monitoring, in order to control the processes kept of the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) (Regulation 852/2004), special hygiene rules for the food of animal origin (Regulation 853/2004), special rules for the organisation of official controls (Regulation 854/2004), general rules for the execution of official controls for food and feed trade (Regulation 882/2004) and finally the determination of general legislation principles for foods, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the food safety processes and traceability towards the human health protection (Regulation 178/2002). Coming to modern production and focusing to food production safety from the point of view of chemical residues (veterinary drugs and environmental pollutants), we find out that an enormous number of chemical exogenic agents of a varied activity often constitute the main cause of a complicated situation of a food deteriorated with chemical residues and their quality level reduction, which finally leads, not only to the reduction of consumers' confidence, but also to their final rejection. In this issue and after a series of food crises like that in old days with hormones as well as recently with BSE, dioxins and the detection of several other residues in animal and plant products exported from our country, but also recently with the Avian influenza, consumers' confidence was shaken. Thus, the European Union concluded to establish a new scientific institution to provide it with independent scientific advices on food safety issues in the whole length of the food chain. The outcome was, as it had been initially decided with the White Book on Food Safety, the establishment of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Finally, in order the complete safeguard process of high quality foods to be concluded, of health and of good animal and plant management by taking suitable functioning measures of the internal market, the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) was created. The aim of this system is to provide the Competent Authorities with an effective way of information exchange for the measures which should be taken in order to safeguard food safety.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Peltonen ◽  
M. Jestoi ◽  
G. Eriksen

The contamination of the food and feed chain with mycotoxins and the subsequent threat to human health and animal welfare is evident. Today mycotoxin research is still strongly focused on mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and for Fusarium fungi mainly the trichothecenes deoxynivalenol (DON) and T-2 and HT-2 toxins. However, fungi of the Fusarium genus are clearly capable of synthesising other mycotoxins as well, including moniliformin (MON). The occurrence of MON is worldwide and the levels in grains vary from below the limit of quantification to the highest detected value in maize intended for human consumption being close to 20 mg/kg. In Finland and Norway, the reported levels are typically a few hundreds of micrograms per kilogram. The toxicology of MON is not well understood. It is characterised by major species differences but typically MON evokes myocardiac damage. For MON, No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) has not been established and a provisional Tolerable Daily Intake (pTDI) value has not been proposed. In our risk assessment, we applied a NOAEL value of 10 mg/kg bw/day which is based on our unpublished subchronic exposure experiments. By applying this value in the risk assessment combined with the estimated intakes from food in Finland and Norway, it seems that MON per se does not pose a clear threat to human health at current levels. On the other hand, one needs to bear in mind the concurrent exposure to other mycotoxins and the fact that the risk assessment of mycotoxin mixtures are in their infancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document