scholarly journals Human CPR (Cell Cycle Progression Restoration) Genes Impart a Far– Phenotype on Yeast Cells

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 1063-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C Edwards ◽  
Nanette Liegeois ◽  
Joe Horecka ◽  
Ronald A DePinho ◽  
George F Sprague ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Growth Control ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Mating Pheromone ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Yeast Genes

Regulated cell cycle progression depends on the proper integration of growth control pathways with the basic cell cycle machinery. While many of the central molecules such as cyclins, CDKs, and CKIs are known, and many of the kinases and phosphatases that modify the CDKs have been identified, little is known about the additional layers of regulation that impinge upon these molecules. To identify new regulators of cell proliferation, we have selected for human and yeast cDNAs that when overexpressed were capable of specifically overcoming G1 arrest signals from the cell cycle branch of the mating pheromone pathway, while still maintaining the integrity of the transcriptional induction branch. We have identified 13 human CPR (cell cycle progression restoration) genes and 11 yeast OPY (overproduction-induced pheromone-resistant yeast) genes that specifically block the G1 arrest by mating pheromone. The CPR genes represent a variety of biochemical functions including a new cyclin, a tumor suppressor binding protein, chaperones, transcription factors, translation factors, RNA-binding proteins, as well as novel proteins. Several CPR genes require individual CLNs to promote pheromone resistance and those that require CLN3 increase the basal levels of Cln3 protein. Moreover, several of the yeast OPY genes have overlapping functions with the human CPR genes, indicating a possible conservation of roles.

scholarly journals DiSUMO-LIKE Interacts with RNA-Binding Proteins and Affects Cell-Cycle Progression during Maize Embryogenesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1548-1560.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyi Chen ◽  
Kamila Kalinowska ◽  
Benedikt Müller ◽  
Julia Mergner ◽  
Rainer Deutzmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals RNA-binding protein CELF6 is cell cycle regulated and controls cancer cell proliferation by stabilizing p21

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Liu ◽  
Qianwen Zhang ◽  
Li Xia ◽  
Mengjuan Shi ◽  
Jin Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cancer Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Specific Alternative ◽  
Cycle Dependent

Abstract CELF6, a member of the CELF family of RNA-binding proteins, regulates muscle-specific alternative splicing and contributes to the pathogenesis of myotonic dystrophy (DM), however the role of CELF6 in cancer cell proliferation is less appreciated. Here, we show that the expression of CELF6 is cell cycle regulated. The cell cycle-dependent expression of CELF6 is mediated through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, SCF-β-TrCP recognizes a nonphospho motif in CELF6 and regulates its proteasomal degradation. Overexpression or depletion of CELF6 modulates p21 gene expression. CELF6 binds to the 3′UTR of p21 transcript and increases its mRNA stability. Depletion of CELF6 promotes cell cycle progression, cell proliferation and colony formation whereas overexpression of CELF6 induces G1 phase arrest. The effect of CELF6 on cell proliferation is p53 and/or p21 dependent. Collectively, these data demonstrate that CELF6 might be a potential tumor suppressor, CELF6 regulates cell proliferation and cell cycle progression via modulating p21 stability.

scholarly journals Cohesin interacts with a panoply of splicing factors required for cell cycle progression and genomic organization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Sik Kim ◽  
Xiaoyuan He ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Zhijun Duan ◽  
Taeyeon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Genomic Organization ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Splicing Factors ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractThe cohesin complex regulates sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome organization, gene expression, and DNA repair. Here we report that endogenous human cohesin interacts with a panoply of splicing factors and RNA binding proteins, including diverse components of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP complex and several splicing factors that are commonly mutated in cancer. The interactions are enhanced during mitosis, and the interacting splicing factors and RNA binding proteins follow the cohesin cycle and prophase pathway of regulated interactions with chromatin. Depletion of cohesin-interacting splicing factors results in stereotyped cell cycle arrests and alterations in genomic organization. These data support the hypothesis that splicing factors and RNA binding proteins control cell cycle progression and genomic organization via regulated interactions with cohesin and chromatin.One Sentence SummaryEndogenous tagging reveals that cohesin interacts with diverse chromatin-bound splicing factors that regulate cell cycle progression and genomic organization in human cells.

scholarly journals STAU2 protein level is controlled by caspases and the CHK1 pathway and regulates cell cycle progression in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Condé ◽  
Yulemi Gonzalez Quesada ◽  
Florence Bonnet-Magnaval ◽  
Rémy Beaujois ◽  
Luc DesGroseillers
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cycle Progression

AbstractBackgroundStaufen2 (STAU2) is an RNA binding protein involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In neurons, STAU2 is required to maintain the balance between differentiation and proliferation of neural stem cells through asymmetric cell division. However, the importance of controlling STAU2 expression for cell cycle progression is not clear in non-neuronal dividing cells. We recently showed that STAU2 transcription is inhibited in response to DNA-damage due to E2F1 displacement from theSTAU2gene promoter. We now study the regulation of STAU2 steady-state levels in unstressed cells and its consequence for cell proliferation.ResultsCRISPR/Cas9-mediated and RNAi-dependent STAU2 depletion in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells both facilitate cell proliferation suggesting that STAU2 expression influences pathway(s) linked to cell cycle controls. Such effects are not observed in the CRISPR STAU2-KO cancer HCT116 cells nor in the STAU2-RNAi-depleted HeLa cells. Interestingly, a physiological decrease in the steady-state level of STAU2 is controlled by caspases. This effect of peptidases is counterbalanced by the activity of the CHK1 pathway suggesting that STAU2 partial degradation/stabilization fines tune cell cycle progression in unstressed cells. A large-scale proteomic analysis using STAU2/biotinylase fusion protein identifies known STAU2 interactors involved in RNA translation, localization, splicing, or decay confirming the role of STAU2 in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In addition, several proteins found in the nucleolus, including proteins of the ribosome biogenesis pathway and of the DNA damage response, are found in close proximity to STAU2. Strikingly, many of these proteins are linked to the kinase CHK1 pathway, reinforcing the link between STAU2 functions and the CHK1 pathway. Indeed, inhibition of the CHK1 pathway for 4 h dissociates STAU2 from proteins involved in translation and RNA metabolism.ConclusionsThese results indicate that STAU2 is involved in pathway(s) that control(s) cell proliferation, likely via mechanisms of posttranscriptional regulation, ribonucleoprotein complex assembly, genome integrity and/or checkpoint controls. The mechanism by which STAU2 regulates cell growth likely involves caspases and the kinase CHK1 pathway.

scholarly journals The TIA1 RNA-Binding Protein Family Regulates EIF2AK2-Mediated Stress Response and Cell Cycle Progression

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 622-635.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Meyer ◽  
Aitor Garzia ◽  
Michael Mazzola ◽  
Stefanie Gerstberger ◽  
Henrik Molina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Protein Family ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals Compartmentalized nodes control mitotic entry signaling in fission yeast

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1872-1881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Deng ◽  
James B. Moseley
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Entry

Cell cycle progression is coupled to cell growth, but the mechanisms that generate growth-dependent cell cycle progression remain unclear. Fission yeast cells enter into mitosis at a defined size due to the conserved cell cycle kinases Cdr1 and Cdr2, which localize to a set of cortical nodes in the cell middle. Cdr2 is regulated by the cell polarity kinase Pom1, suggesting that interactions between cell polarity proteins and the Cdr1-Cdr2 module might underlie the coordination of cell growth and division. To identify the molecular connections between Cdr1/2 and cell polarity, we performed a comprehensive pairwise yeast two-hybrid screen. From the resulting interaction network, we found that the protein Skb1 interacted with both Cdr1 and the Cdr1 inhibitory target Wee1. Skb1 inhibited mitotic entry through negative regulation of Cdr1 and localized to both the cytoplasm and a novel set of cortical nodes. Skb1 nodes were distinct structures from Cdr1/2 nodes, and artificial targeting of Skb1 to Cdr1/2 nodes delayed entry into mitosis. We propose that the formation of distinct node structures in the cell cortex controls signaling pathways to link cell growth and division.

scholarly journals A Survey of Essential Gene Function in the Yeast Cell Division Cycle

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 4736-4747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Yu ◽  
Lourdes Peña Castillo ◽  
Sanie Mnaimneh ◽  
Timothy R. Hughes ◽  
Grant W. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Yeast Cell ◽  
Dna Content ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Nucleotide Metabolism ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
New Genes ◽  
Yeast Genes

Mutations impacting specific stages of cell growth and division have provided a foundation for dissecting mechanisms that underlie cell cycle progression. We have undertaken an objective examination of the yeast cell cycle through flow cytometric analysis of DNA content in TetO7promoter mutant strains representing 75% of all essential yeast genes. More than 65% of the strains displayed specific alterations in DNA content, suggesting that reduced function of an essential gene in most cases impairs progression through a specific stage of the cell cycle. Because of the large number of essential genes required for protein biosynthesis, G1 accumulation was the most common phenotype observed in our analysis. In contrast, relatively few mutants displayed S-phase delay, and most of these were defective in genes required for DNA replication or nucleotide metabolism. G2 accumulation appeared to arise from a variety of defects. In addition to providing a global view of the diversity of essential cellular processes that influence cell cycle progression, these data also provided predictions regarding the functions of individual genes: we identified four new genes involved in protein trafficking (NUS1, PHS1, PGA2, PGA3), and we found that CSE1 and SMC4 are important for DNA replication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document