scholarly journals Cohesin interacts with a panoply of splicing factors required for cell cycle progression and genomic organization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Sik Kim ◽  
Xiaoyuan He ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Zhijun Duan ◽  
Taeyeon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Genomic Organization ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Splicing Factors ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractThe cohesin complex regulates sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome organization, gene expression, and DNA repair. Here we report that endogenous human cohesin interacts with a panoply of splicing factors and RNA binding proteins, including diverse components of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP complex and several splicing factors that are commonly mutated in cancer. The interactions are enhanced during mitosis, and the interacting splicing factors and RNA binding proteins follow the cohesin cycle and prophase pathway of regulated interactions with chromatin. Depletion of cohesin-interacting splicing factors results in stereotyped cell cycle arrests and alterations in genomic organization. These data support the hypothesis that splicing factors and RNA binding proteins control cell cycle progression and genomic organization via regulated interactions with cohesin and chromatin.One Sentence SummaryEndogenous tagging reveals that cohesin interacts with diverse chromatin-bound splicing factors that regulate cell cycle progression and genomic organization in human cells.

scholarly journals DiSUMO-LIKE Interacts with RNA-Binding Proteins and Affects Cell-Cycle Progression during Maize Embryogenesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1548-1560.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyi Chen ◽  
Kamila Kalinowska ◽  
Benedikt Müller ◽  
Julia Mergner ◽  
Rainer Deutzmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals Human CPR (Cell Cycle Progression Restoration) Genes Impart a Far– Phenotype on Yeast Cells

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 1063-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C Edwards ◽  
Nanette Liegeois ◽  
Joe Horecka ◽  
Ronald A DePinho ◽  
George F Sprague ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Growth Control ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Mating Pheromone ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Yeast Genes

Regulated cell cycle progression depends on the proper integration of growth control pathways with the basic cell cycle machinery. While many of the central molecules such as cyclins, CDKs, and CKIs are known, and many of the kinases and phosphatases that modify the CDKs have been identified, little is known about the additional layers of regulation that impinge upon these molecules. To identify new regulators of cell proliferation, we have selected for human and yeast cDNAs that when overexpressed were capable of specifically overcoming G1 arrest signals from the cell cycle branch of the mating pheromone pathway, while still maintaining the integrity of the transcriptional induction branch. We have identified 13 human CPR (cell cycle progression restoration) genes and 11 yeast OPY (overproduction-induced pheromone-resistant yeast) genes that specifically block the G1 arrest by mating pheromone. The CPR genes represent a variety of biochemical functions including a new cyclin, a tumor suppressor binding protein, chaperones, transcription factors, translation factors, RNA-binding proteins, as well as novel proteins. Several CPR genes require individual CLNs to promote pheromone resistance and those that require CLN3 increase the basal levels of Cln3 protein. Moreover, several of the yeast OPY genes have overlapping functions with the human CPR genes, indicating a possible conservation of roles.

scholarly journals RNA-binding protein CELF6 is cell cycle regulated and controls cancer cell proliferation by stabilizing p21

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Liu ◽  
Qianwen Zhang ◽  
Li Xia ◽  
Mengjuan Shi ◽  
Jin Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cancer Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Specific Alternative ◽  
Cycle Dependent

Abstract CELF6, a member of the CELF family of RNA-binding proteins, regulates muscle-specific alternative splicing and contributes to the pathogenesis of myotonic dystrophy (DM), however the role of CELF6 in cancer cell proliferation is less appreciated. Here, we show that the expression of CELF6 is cell cycle regulated. The cell cycle-dependent expression of CELF6 is mediated through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, SCF-β-TrCP recognizes a nonphospho motif in CELF6 and regulates its proteasomal degradation. Overexpression or depletion of CELF6 modulates p21 gene expression. CELF6 binds to the 3′UTR of p21 transcript and increases its mRNA stability. Depletion of CELF6 promotes cell cycle progression, cell proliferation and colony formation whereas overexpression of CELF6 induces G1 phase arrest. The effect of CELF6 on cell proliferation is p53 and/or p21 dependent. Collectively, these data demonstrate that CELF6 might be a potential tumor suppressor, CELF6 regulates cell proliferation and cell cycle progression via modulating p21 stability.

scholarly journals STAU2 protein level is controlled by caspases and the CHK1 pathway and regulates cell cycle progression in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Condé ◽  
Yulemi Gonzalez Quesada ◽  
Florence Bonnet-Magnaval ◽  
Rémy Beaujois ◽  
Luc DesGroseillers
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cycle Progression

AbstractBackgroundStaufen2 (STAU2) is an RNA binding protein involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In neurons, STAU2 is required to maintain the balance between differentiation and proliferation of neural stem cells through asymmetric cell division. However, the importance of controlling STAU2 expression for cell cycle progression is not clear in non-neuronal dividing cells. We recently showed that STAU2 transcription is inhibited in response to DNA-damage due to E2F1 displacement from theSTAU2gene promoter. We now study the regulation of STAU2 steady-state levels in unstressed cells and its consequence for cell proliferation.ResultsCRISPR/Cas9-mediated and RNAi-dependent STAU2 depletion in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells both facilitate cell proliferation suggesting that STAU2 expression influences pathway(s) linked to cell cycle controls. Such effects are not observed in the CRISPR STAU2-KO cancer HCT116 cells nor in the STAU2-RNAi-depleted HeLa cells. Interestingly, a physiological decrease in the steady-state level of STAU2 is controlled by caspases. This effect of peptidases is counterbalanced by the activity of the CHK1 pathway suggesting that STAU2 partial degradation/stabilization fines tune cell cycle progression in unstressed cells. A large-scale proteomic analysis using STAU2/biotinylase fusion protein identifies known STAU2 interactors involved in RNA translation, localization, splicing, or decay confirming the role of STAU2 in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In addition, several proteins found in the nucleolus, including proteins of the ribosome biogenesis pathway and of the DNA damage response, are found in close proximity to STAU2. Strikingly, many of these proteins are linked to the kinase CHK1 pathway, reinforcing the link between STAU2 functions and the CHK1 pathway. Indeed, inhibition of the CHK1 pathway for 4 h dissociates STAU2 from proteins involved in translation and RNA metabolism.ConclusionsThese results indicate that STAU2 is involved in pathway(s) that control(s) cell proliferation, likely via mechanisms of posttranscriptional regulation, ribonucleoprotein complex assembly, genome integrity and/or checkpoint controls. The mechanism by which STAU2 regulates cell growth likely involves caspases and the kinase CHK1 pathway.

scholarly journals Downstream of human NDR kinases: Impacting on c-myc and p21 protein stability to control cell cycle progression

Cell Cycle ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1897-1904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hauke Cornils ◽  
Reto S. Kohler ◽  
Alexander Hergovich ◽  
Brian A. Hemmings
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Stability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
P21 Protein ◽  
Control Cell Cycle Progression

The regulation of the DNA damage response at telomeres: focus on kinases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Galli ◽  
Chiara Frigerio ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese ◽  
Michela Clerici
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Replicative Senescence ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Linear Chromosomes

The natural ends of linear chromosomes resemble those of accidental double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs induce a multifaceted cellular response that promotes the repair of lesions and slows down cell cycle progression. This response is not elicited at chromosome ends, which are organized in nucleoprotein structures called telomeres. Besides counteracting DSB response through specialized telomere-binding proteins, telomeres also prevent chromosome shortening. Despite of the different fate of telomeres and DSBs, many proteins involved in the DSB response also localize at telomeres and participate in telomere homeostasis. In particular, the DSB master regulators Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR contribute to telomere length maintenance and arrest cell cycle progression when chromosome ends shorten, thus promoting a tumor-suppressive process known as replicative senescence. During senescence, the actions of both these apical kinases and telomere-binding proteins allow checkpoint activation while bulk DNA repair activities at telomeres are still inhibited. Checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest also prevents further telomere erosion and deprotection that would favor chromosome rearrangements, which are known to increase cancer-associated genome instability. This review summarizes recent insights into functions and regulation of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR at telomeres both in the presence and in the absence of telomerase, focusing mainly on discoveries in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Loss of ISWI ATPase SMARCA5 (SNF2H) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Inhibits Proliferation and Chromatid Cohesion

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2073
Author(s):  
Tomas Zikmund ◽  
Helena Paszekova ◽  
Juraj Kokavec ◽  
Paul Kerbs ◽  
Shefali Thakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells ◽  
Acute Myeloid

ISWI chromatin remodeling ATPase SMARCA5 (SNF2H) is a well-known factor for its role in regulation of DNA access via nucleosome sliding and assembly. SMARCA5 transcriptionally inhibits the myeloid master regulator PU.1. Upregulation of SMARCA5 was previously observed in CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Since high levels of SMARCA5 are necessary for intensive cell proliferation and cell cycle progression of developing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in mice, we reasoned that removal of SMARCA5 enzymatic activity could affect the cycling or undifferentiated state of leukemic progenitor-like clones. Indeed, we observed that CRISPR/cas9-mediated SMARCA5 knockout in AML cell lines (S5KO) inhibited the cell cycle progression. We also observed that the SMARCA5 deletion induced karyorrhexis and nuclear budding as well as increased the ploidy, indicating its role in mitotic division of AML cells. The cytogenetic analysis of S5KO cells revealed the premature chromatid separation. We conclude that deleting SMARCA5 in AML blocks leukemic proliferation and chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals The Sub-Nuclear Localization of RNA-Binding Proteins in KSHV-Infected Cells

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1958
Author(s):  
Ella Alkalay ◽  
Chen Gam Ze Letova Refael ◽  
Irit Shoval ◽  
Noa Kinor ◽  
Ronit Sarid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Periphery ◽  
Lytic Cycle ◽  
Splicing Factors ◽  
Nuclear Speckles ◽  
Viral Rnas ◽  
Infected Cells

RNA-binding proteins, particularly splicing factors, localize to sub-nuclear domains termed nuclear speckles. During certain viral infections, as the nucleus fills up with replicating virus compartments, host cell chromatin distribution changes, ending up condensed at the nuclear periphery. In this study we wished to determine the fate of nucleoplasmic RNA-binding proteins and nuclear speckles during the lytic cycle of the Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV). We found that nuclear speckles became fewer and dramatically larger, localizing at the nuclear periphery, adjacent to the marginalized chromatin. Enlarged nuclear speckles contained splicing factors, whereas other proteins were nucleoplasmically dispersed. Polyadenylated RNA, typically found in nuclear speckles under regular conditions, was also found in foci separated from nuclear speckles in infected cells. Poly(A) foci did not contain lncRNAs known to colocalize with nuclear speckles but contained the poly(A)-binding protein PABPN1. Examination of the localization of spliced viral RNAs revealed that some spliced transcripts could be detected within the nuclear speckles. Since splicing is required for the maturation of certain KSHV transcripts, we suggest that the infected cell does not dismantle nuclear speckles but rearranges their components at the nuclear periphery to possibly serve in splicing and transport of viral RNAs into the cytoplasm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document