scholarly journals The Drosophila chk2 Gene loki Is Essential for Embryonic DNA Double-Strand-Break Checkpoints Induced in S Phase or G2

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 973-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisrine Masrouha ◽  
Long Yang ◽  
Sirine Hijal ◽  
Stéphane Larochelle ◽  
Beat Suter
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Phylogenetic Study ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

Abstract Cell cycle checkpoints are signal transduction pathways that control the order and timing of cell cycle transitions, ensuring that critical events are completed before the occurrence of the next cell cycle transition. The Chk2 family of kinases is known to play a central role in mediating the cellular responses to DNA damage or DNA replication blocks in various organisms. Here we show through a phylogenetic study that the Drosophila melanogaster serine/threonine kinase Loki is the homolog of the yeast Mek1p, Rad53p, Dun1p, and Cds1 proteins as well as the human Chk2. Functional analyses allowed us to conclude that, in flies, chk2 is involved in monitoring double-strand breaks (DSBs) caused by irradiation during S and G2 phases. In this process it plays an essential role in inducing a cell cycle arrest in embryonic cells. Our results also show that, in contrast to C. elegans chk2, Drosophila chk2 is not essential for normal meiosis and recombination, and it also appears to be dispensable for the MMS-induced DNA damage checkpoint and the HU-induced DNA replication checkpoint during larval development. In addition, Drosophila chk2 does not act at the same cell cycle phases as its yeast homologs, but seems rather to be involved in a pathway similar to the mammalian one, which involves signaling through the ATM/Chk2 pathway in response to genotoxic insults. As mutations in human chk2 were linked to several cancers, these similarities point to the usefulness of the Drosophila model system.

scholarly journals Increased Genome Instability and Telomere Length in the elg1-Deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutant Are Regulated by S-Phase Checkpoints

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1557-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soma Banerjee ◽  
Kyungjae Myung
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Telomere Maintenance ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) are frequently observed in cancer cells. Abnormalities in different DNA metabolism including DNA replication, cell cycle checkpoints, chromatin remodeling, telomere maintenance, and DNA recombination and repair cause GCRs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Recently, we used genome-wide screening to identify several genes the deletion of which increases GCRs in S. cerevisiae. Elg1, which was discovered during this screening, functions in DNA replication by participating in an alternative replication factor complex. Here we further characterize the GCR suppression mechanisms observed in the elg1Δ mutant strain in conjunction with the telomere maintenance role of Elg1. The elg1Δ mutation enhanced spontaneous DNA damage and resulted in GCR formation. However, DNA damage due to inactivation of Elg1 activates the intra-S checkpoints, which suppress further GCR formation. The intra-S checkpoints activated by the elg1Δ mutation also suppress GCR formation in strains defective in the DNA replication checkpoint. Lastly, the elg1Δ mutation increases telomere size independently of other previously known telomere maintenance proteins such as the telomerase inhibitor Pif1 or the telomere size regulator Rif1. The increase in telomere length caused by the elg1Δ mutation was suppressed by a defect in the DNA replication checkpoint, which suggests that DNA replication surveillance by Dpb11-Mec1/Tel1-Dun1 also has an important role in telomere length regulation.

Overlapping Roles of the Spindle Assembly and DNA Damage Checkpoints in the Cell-Cycle Response to Altered Chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-534
Author(s):  
Peter M Garber ◽  
Jasper Rine
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Abstract The MAD2-dependent spindle checkpoint blocks anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved successful bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. The DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints block anaphase in response to DNA lesions that may include single-stranded DNA and stalled replication forks. Many of the same conditions that activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints also activated the spindle checkpoint. The mad2Δ mutation partially relieved the arrest responses of cells to mutations affecting the replication proteins Mcm3p and Pol1p. Thus a previously unrecognized aspect of spindle checkpoint function may be to protect cells from defects in DNA replication. Furthermore, in cells lacking either the DNA damage or the DNA replication checkpoints, the spindle checkpoint contributed to the arrest responses of cells to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, and mutations affecting Mcm2p and Orc2p. Thus the spindle checkpoint was sensitive to a wider range of chromosomal perturbations than previously recognized. Finally, the DNA replication checkpoint did not contribute to the arrests of cells in response to mutations affecting ORC, Mcm proteins, or DNA polymerase δ. Thus the specificity of this checkpoint may be more limited than previously recognized.

A method for assaying the sensitivity of Drosophila replication checkpoint mutants to anti-cancer and DNA-damaging drugs.

Genome ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M Radcliffe ◽  
Elizabeth A Silva ◽  
Shelagh D Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Genes ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

In multi-cellular organisms, failure to properly regulate cell-cycle progression can result in inappropriate cell death or uncontrolled cell division leading to tumor formation. To guard against such events, conserved regulatory mechanisms called "checkpoints" block progression into mitosis in response to DNA damage and incomplete replication, as well as in response to other signals. Checkpoint mutants in organisms as diverse as yeast and humans are sensitive to various chemical agents that inhibit DNA replication or cause DNA damage. This phenomenon is the primary rationale for chemotherapy, which uses drugs that preferentially target tumor cells with compromised checkpoints. In this study, we demonstrate the use of Drosophila checkpoint mutants as a system for assaying the effects of various DNA-damaging and anti-cancer agents in a developing multicellular organism. Dwee1, grp and mei-41 are genes that encode kinases that function in the DNA replication checkpoint. We tested zygotic mutants of each gene for sensitivity to the DNA replication inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU), methyl methanosulfonate (MMS), ara-C, cisplatin, and the oxygen radical generating compound paraquat. The mutants show distinct differences in their sensitivity to each of the drugs tested, suggesting an underlying complexity in the responses of individual checkpoint genes to genotoxic stress.Key words: hydroxyurea (HU), ara-C, cisplatin, methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), paraquat.

scholarly journals DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints and DNA strand break repair in development and tumorigenesis

Oncogene ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (55) ◽  
pp. 7883-7899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gopal K Dasika ◽  
Suh-Chin J Lin ◽  
Song Zhao ◽  
Patrick Sung ◽  
Alan Tomkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Strand Break ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Dna Strand

scholarly journals The DNA damage and the DNA replication checkpoints converge at the MBF transcription factor

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 3350-3357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsvetomira Ivanova ◽  
Isabel Alves-Rodrigues ◽  
Blanca Gómez-Escoda ◽  
Chaitali Dutta ◽  
James A. DeCaprio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Transcriptional Complex ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
Cycle Regulation

In fission yeast cells, Cds1 is the effector kinase of the DNA replication checkpoint. We previously showed that when the DNA replication checkpoint is activated, the repressor Yox1 is phosphorylated and inactivated by Cds1, resulting in activation of MluI-binding factor (MBF)–dependent transcription. This is essential to reinitiate DNA synthesis and for correct G1-to-S transition. Here we show that Cdc10, which is an essential part of the MBF core, is the target of the DNA damage checkpoint. When fission yeast cells are treated with DNA-damaging agents, Chk1 is activated and phosphorylates Cdc10 at its carboxy-terminal domain. This modification is responsible for the repression of MBF-dependent transcription through induced release of MBF from chromatin. This inactivation of MBF is important for survival of cells challenged with DNA-damaging agents. Thus Yox1 and Cdc10 couple normal cell cycle regulation in unperturbed conditions and the DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints into a single transcriptional complex.

scholarly journals Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stress

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 1886-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Weiss ◽  
Tamar Enoch ◽  
Philip Leder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Genome Damage

The eukaryotic cell cycle is overseen by regulatory mechanisms, termed checkpoints, that respond to DNA damage, mitotic spindle defects, and errors in the ordering of cell cycle events. The DNA replication and DNA damage cell cycle checkpoints of the fission yeastSchizosaccharomyces pombe require the hus1+(hydroxyurea sensitive) gene. To determine the role of the mouse homolog of hus1+ in murine development and cell cycle checkpoint function, we produced a targeted disruption of mouse Hus1. Inactivation of Hus1results in mid-gestational embryonic lethality due to widespread apoptosis and defective development of essential extra-embryonic tissues. DNA damage-inducible genes are up-regulated inHus1-deficient embryos, and primary cells fromHus1-null embryos contain increased spontaneous chromosomal abnormalities, suggesting that loss of Hus1 leads to an accumulation of genome damage. Embryonic fibroblasts lackingHus1 fail to proliferate in vitro, but inactivation ofp21 allows for the continued growth of Hus1-deficient cells.Hus1−/−p21−/−cells display a unique profile of significantly heightened sensitivity to hydroxyurea, a DNA replication inhibitor, and ultraviolet light, but only slightly increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Taken together, these results indicate that mouse Hus1 functions in the maintenance of genomic stability and additionally identify an evolutionarily-conserved role for Hus1 in mediating cellular responses to genotoxins.

scholarly journals The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Frei ◽  
Susan M. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

We have examined the cellular function of Sgs1p, a nonessential yeast DNA helicase, homologs of which are implicated in two highly debilitating hereditary human diseases (Werner's and Bloom's syndromes). We show that Sgs1p is an integral component of the S-phase checkpoint response in yeast, which arrests cells due to DNA damage or blocked fork progression during DNA replication. DNA polε and Sgs1p are found in the same epistasis group and act upstream of Rad53p to signal cell cycle arrest when DNA replication is perturbed. Sgs1p is tightly regulated through the cell cycle, accumulates in S phase and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci, even in the absence of fork arrest. The association of Rad53p with a chromatin subfraction is Sgs1p dependent, suggesting an important role for the helicase in the signal-transducing pathway that monitors replication fork progression.

The Spd1p S phase inhibitor can activate the DNA replication checkpoint pathway in fission yeast

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (23) ◽  
pp. 4341-4350 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Borgne ◽  
P. Nurse
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

Spd1p (for S phase delayed) is a cell cycle inhibitor in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Spd1p overexpression blocks the onset of both S phase and mitosis. In this study, we have investigated the mechanisms by which Spd1p overexpression blocks cell cycle progression, focussing on the block over mitotic onset. High levels of Spd1p lead to an increase in Y15 phosphorylation of Cdc2p and we show that the block over G(2) requires the Wee1p kinase and is dependent on the rad and chk1/cds1 checkpoint genes. We propose that high levels of Spd1p in G(2) cells activate the DNA replication checkpoint control, which leads to a Wee1p-dependent increase of Cdc2p Y15 phosphorylation blocking onset of mitosis. The Spd1p block at S phase onset may act by interfering directly with DNA replication, and also activates the G(2)rad/hus checkpoint pathway to block mitosis.

scholarly journals Rad4TopBP1, a Scaffold Protein, Plays Separate Roles in DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints and DNA Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 3456-3468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Taricani ◽  
Teresa S.F. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Novel Mutation ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Brct Domain ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Sensor Proteins

Rad4TopBP1, a BRCT domain protein, is required for both DNA replication and checkpoint responses. Little is known about how the multiple roles of Rad4TopBP1 are coordinated in maintaining genome integrity. We show here that Rad4TopBP1 of fission yeast physically interacts with the checkpoint sensor proteins, the replicative DNA polymerases, and a WD-repeat protein, Crb3. We identified four novel mutants to investigate how Rad4TopBP1 could have multiple roles in maintaining genomic integrity. A novel mutation in the third BRCT domain of rad4+TopBP1 abolishes DNA damage checkpoint response, but not DNA replication, replication checkpoint, and cell cycle progression. This mutant protein is able to associate with all three replicative polymerases and checkpoint proteins Rad3ATR-Rad26ATRIP, Hus1, Rad9, and Rad17 but has a compromised association with Crb3. Furthermore, the damaged-induced Rad9 phosphorylation is significantly reduced in this rad4TopBP1 mutant. Genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that Crb3 has a role in the maintenance of DNA damage checkpoint and influences the Rad4TopBP1 damage checkpoint function. Taken together, our data suggest that Rad4TopBP1 provides a scaffold to a large complex containing checkpoint and replication proteins thereby separately enforcing checkpoint responses to DNA damage and replication perturbations during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Early Embryonic Lethality in PARP-1 AtmDouble-Mutant Mice Suggests a Functional Synergy in Cell Proliferation during Development

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1828-1832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josiane Ménissier-de Murcia ◽  
Manuel Mark ◽  
Olivia Wendling ◽  
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris ◽  
Gilbert de Murcia
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Early Embryonic Lethality ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Parp 1 ◽  
Extraembryonic Tissues

ABSTRACT PARP-1 and ATM are both involved in the response to DNA strand breaks, resulting in induction of a signaling network responsible for DNA surveillance, cellular recovery, and cell survival. ATM interacts with double-strand break repair pathways and induces signals resulting in the control of the cell cycle-coupled checkpoints. PARP-1 acts as a DNA break sensor in the base excision repair pathway of DNA. Mice with mutations inactivating either protein show radiosensitivity and high radiation-induced chromosomal aberration frequencies. Embryos carrying double mutations of both PARP-1 and Atm genes were generated. These mutant embryos show apoptosis in the embryo but not in extraembryonic tissues and die at embryonic day 8.0, although extraembryonic tissues appear normal for up to 10.5 days of gestation. These results reveal a functional synergy between PARP-1 and ATM during a period of embryogenesis when cell cycle checkpoints are not active and the embryo is particularly sensitive to DNA damage. These results suggest that ATM and PARP-1 have synergistic phenotypes due to the effects of these proteins on signaling DNA damage and/or on distinct pathways of DNA repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document