scholarly journals WORK-RELATED OPPORTUNITY COSTS OF PROVIDING UNPAID FAMILY CARE

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S135-S135
Author(s):  
Stipica Mudrazija

Abstract Older Americans living in the community who need help with basic activities of daily living overwhelmingly rely on unpaid care provided most commonly by working-age family members. Because unpaid family care limits the demand for nursing facilities and reduces expenses paid by Medicaid and other government programs, previous estimates of its economic value have mostly focused on estimating the benefits of unpaid family care. However, to assess accurately the overall economic value of unpaid family care and define better the scope for policy intervention, it is also important to account for the costs of such care, yet our knowledge of their magnitude remains limited. This study assesses the impact of unpaid family caregiving on the likelihood of working and hours worked for caregivers, and calculates the related cost of forgone earnings today and in 2050. To do so, it matches family caregivers from the National Study of Caregiving with non-caregivers from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, and uses projections from the Urban Institute’s DYNASIM microsimulation model to inform calculations of future costs of foregone earnings. Results suggest that the cost of foregone earnings attributable to caregiving is currently about $67 billion. By mid-century, it will likely more than double, outpacing the growth of disabled older population as the share of better-educated caregivers with higher earning capacity increases. Policymakers can use these results to inform their current and future policy efforts aimed at assisting family caregivers who are facing the challenge of balancing work and caregiving responsibilities.

2022 ◽  
pp. 107755872110624
Author(s):  
Yulya Truskinovsky ◽  
Jessica M. Finlay ◽  
Lindsay C. Kobayashi

Little is known about the effects of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on older family caregivers. Using data from a national sample of 2,485 U.S. adults aged ≥55, we aimed to describe the magnitude of disruptions to family care arrangements during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the associations between these disruptions and the mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, loneliness, and self-rated health) and employment outcomes (job loss or furlough, hours or wages reduced, transition to work-from-home) of family caregivers. We found that COVID-19 disrupted over half of family caregiving arrangements, and that care disruptions were associated with increased depression, anxiety, and loneliness among caregivers, compared with both noncaregivers and caregivers who did not experience disruptions. Family caregivers who experienced pandemic-related employment disruptions were providing more care than caregivers who did not experience disruptions. These findings highlight the impact of the pandemic on an essential and vulnerable health care workforce.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 681-682
Author(s):  
Susan Reinhard ◽  
Lynn Feinberg

Abstract Family caregivers often face key challenges when caring for a relative or close friend with health or functional needs. This paper presents findings from Caregiving in the U.S. 2020 on the impact of caregiving on the physical health and well-being of family caregivers and the financial impacts of family care. The data suggest that the caregiver’s own health has declined, with 1 in 5 (21%) saying they are in fair to poor health themselves, up from 17 percent in 2015. Nearly 1 in 4 (23%) feel caregiving has made their health worse. Nearly 4 in 10 (38%) family caregivers of adults experience a moderate to a high degree of financial strain from providing care. Forty-five percent have experienced at least one financial impact (e.g., stopped savings, debt, ability to pay bills, and ability to afford necessary expenses, like food). These findings reveal that because family caregiving today is more complex, costly, and stressful than in the past, action is needed to recognize and support family caregivers in the U.S adequately.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 360-360
Author(s):  
Barbara Hodgdon ◽  
Jen Wong

Abstract Filial caregivers (e.g., individuals caring for a parent or parent-in-law) are a part of the growing number of family caregivers in midlife and late adulthood. The responsibilities that filial caregivers navigate in midlife and late adulthood may expose them to multiple types of discrimination that may decrease their physical health, though this relationship has been understudied. As numbers of family caregivers grow, it is important to examine the potential vulnerability of younger and older filial caregivers’ physical health in the context of discrimination. Informed by the life course perspective, this study compares the physical health of younger (aged 34-64) and older (aged 64-74) filial caregivers who experience discrimination. Filial caregivers (N=270; Mage=53; SD=9.37) from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS-II) Survey reported on demographics, family caregiving, daily discrimination, self-rated physical health, and chronic conditions via questionnaires and phone interviews. Regression analyses showed no differences between younger and older adults’ self-rated physical health or average chronic conditions. However, moderation analyses revealed that younger filial caregivers who experienced greater discrimination reported poorer self-rated physical health than their older counter parts as well as younger and older filial caregivers who experienced less discrimination. Additionally, younger caregivers with greater discrimination exposure exhibited more number of chronic conditions as compared to other caregivers. The study results highlight the impact of the intersection between filial caregivers’ age and discrimination on physical health. Findings have the potential to inform programs that could promote the health of filial caregivers in the face of discrimination.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Lin Wang ◽  
Li-Min Kuo ◽  
Yi-Chen Chiu ◽  
Hsiu-Li Huang ◽  
Huei-Ling Huang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:To develop a theoretical model explaining the longitudinal changes in the caregiving process for family caregivers of persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Taiwan.Methods:A longitudinal, grounded theory approach using in-depth face-to-face interviews and an open-ended interview guide. We conducted 42 interviews over a two-year period; each participant was interviewed at least once every six months. All participants were interviewed in their home. The participants total of 13 family caregivers of persons with MCI.Results:One core theme emerged: “protective preparation.” This reflected the family caregiving process of preparation for a further decline in cognitive function, and protection from the impact of low self-esteem, accidents, and symptoms of comorbidities for the family member with MCI. Protective preparation contained three components: ambivalent normalization, vigilant preparation, and protective management.Conclusions:Interventions to help family caregivers manage the changes in persons with MCI can reduce caregiver burden. Our findings could provide a knowledge base for use by healthcare providers to develop and implement strategies to reduce caregiver burden for family caregivers of persons with MCI.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eniola Salami ◽  
Bonnie Lashewicz

In Canadian law, the concept of autonomy is individualistic in nature, manifest as the capacity, or legal ability of an individual to actively understand the purpose and consequences of their actions according to whether they have faculties to comprehend and weigh risks and benefits.  Feminist scholars critique such conceptualizations of autonomy and, instead, argue the importance of “relational autonomy” which is predicated on the view that actions result from one’s own volition in combination with the influence of one’s social and relational connections. In this paper, we examine the dynamics and implications of relational autonomy in decision-making by adults with developmental disabilities by studying adults with developmental disabilities in interaction with their caregiving family members.  Our purpose is to contribute understandings of how and in what ways family caregiving relational contexts both support and hinder decision-making by adults with developmental disabilities.  We begin with an overview of conceptualizations and applications of autonomy, then illustrate relational autonomy dynamics through comparative analysis of data from two women with developmental disabilities who were interviewed together with their family caregivers about successes and struggles in giving and receiving care and making decisions. These two women, and their family caregivers (N=9) are selected from a larger sample of adults with developmental disabilities and their family caregivers (N = 26) because the contrasts, as well as the similarities, between their family care situations are striking, and taken together, illustrate a range of ways in which decision-making is supported and hindered.  We conclude by upholding the importance of relational autonomy for legal understandings of decision-making, yet we caution that critical examination of relationship dynamics is vital. En droit canadien, le concept de l’autonomie est un concept individualiste de par sa nature et est perçu comme l’aptitude, physique ou juridique, d’une personne à comprendre activement l’objet et les conséquences de ses actes en fonction de la question de savoir si elle possède les facultés voulues pour apprécier et soupeser les risques et les avantages en jeu. Des universitaires féministes critiquent ces conceptualisations de l’autonomie et mettent plutôt l’accent sur l’importance de l’« autonomie relationnelle », qui repose sur l’interaction entre la volonté de la personne et l’influence de ses contacts sociaux et relationnels. Dans le présent document, nous nous penchons sur la dynamique et sur les incidences de l’autonomie relationnelle dans les décisions que prennent les adultes handicapés en étudiant l’interaction d’adultes handicapés avec leurs aidants familiaux. Notre but est de favoriser une meilleure compréhension de la mesure dans laquelle les contextes relationnels dans lesquels se trouvent les aidants familiaux peuvent à la fois appuyer et entraver le processus de prise de décisions chez les adultes handicapés. Après avoir présenté un bref aperçu des conceptualisations et des applications de l’autonomie, nous illustrons la dynamique de l’autonomie relationnelle au moyen d’une analyse comparative de données provenant de deux femmes handicapées qui ont été interrogées ainsi que leurs aidants familiaux au sujet des défis et des réussites liés à la prestation et à la réception de soins et à la prise de décisions. Ces deux femmes et leurs aidants familiaux (N=9) ont été choisis à partir d’un plus grand échantillon d’adultes handicapés et de leurs aidants familiaux (N=26), parce que les contrastes, tout comme les similitudes, entre leurs situations sont frappants et que, examinées ensemble, ces données illustrent différentes façons dont la prise de décisions est appuyée et entravée. Nous concluons en insistant sur l’importance de l’autonomie relationnelle pour la compréhension des aspects juridiques de la prise de décisions, tout en soulignant qu’un examen critique de la dynamique des relations est vital.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Kaplan

The United States relies on uncompensated family caregivers to provide most of the long-term care required by older adults as they age. But such care comes at a significant financial cost to these caregivers in the form of lower lifetime earnings and diminished (or even no) Social Security retirement benefits, ineligibility for Medicare coverage of their healthcare costs, and minimal retirement savings. To reduce the impact of uncompensated caregiving on the intergenerational transmission of poverty, this paper discusses three possible mechanisms of compensating family caregivers: public payments, deemed wage credits under Social Security, and income tax incentives.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Allison Williams ◽  
Peter Kitchen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of various employment characteristics on the health of Canadian caregiver-employees (CEs), who are working full-time in the labor market while also providing informal/family care to adults. Design/methodology/approach Framed with Pearlin et al.’s (1990) stress model and using data from Statistic Canada’s General Social Survey Cycle 26 (2012), several work-related variables for caregivers were considered, including the availability of various forms of caregiver-friendly workplace policies (CFWPs), and a series of work interferences (WIs) experienced as a result of the caregiving role. Findings This study provides evidence for the value of CFWPs in all workplaces. Counter-intuitively, family and other forms of support were found to negatively relate to both physical and mental health. Originality/value This suggests that CFWPs will not only have an impact on CEs’ physical health outcomes, but will likely decrease the effect of the WIs experienced.


1996 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 502-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. McDonald ◽  
Graciela Couchonnal ◽  
Theresa Early

The authors examine the family caregiving experience among families with children with severe emotional disabilities from a perspective that recognizes the importance of the family's views and feelings. This viewpoint anticipates the occurrence of both positive and negative experiences and seeks to illuminate the caregiving process from the perspective of outcomes achieved. Family caregivers of 164 children with serious emotional disorders were asked to identify major pleasant and stressful events that had occurred in the past 12 months. The most frequently described pleasant events related to children's behavior, school activities, and interactions with professionals and friends. Frequently described problem areas included children's behavior, professionals/services, and difficulty with school. The impact of these pleasant and stressful events was examined with respect to caregivers' perceived well-being: (1) overall stress, (2) the ability to fulfill responsibilities, and (3) pleasure experienced in various life domains. Implications of the study findings for supporting family caregivers in their roles are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Eric Jutkowitz ◽  
Joseph Gaugler ◽  
Zachary Baker

Abstract Due to multiple long-term sociodemographic and health trends contributing to the impending family care gap, there likely is no single policy or intervention that could increase the number of family caregivers in the U.S. to the levels required to fill such a gap. However, the amount of time that a family caregiver spends providing assistance is potentially mutable. Given the pressing concerns of the family care gap, identifying interventions or approaches that could reduce existing caregiving time is of considerable importance. This presentation provides the results of a systematic review of published research to identify the effects of interventions on the amount of time family caregivers spend on their caregiving tasks. Pharmaceutical approaches directed to care recipients, technology interventions, case management, multicomponent interventions, and care settings all appeared to reduce caregiving time. Improved operationalization, study design, and similar factors will help guide future intervention research to reduce caregiving time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document