scholarly journals IVF outcomes in patients with a history of bariatric surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2755-2762
Author(s):  
V Grzegorczyk-Martin ◽  
T Fréour ◽  
A De Bantel Finet ◽  
E Bonnet ◽  
M Merzouk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Infertile Women ◽  
Severely Obese ◽  
History Of ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract STUDY QUESTION How does a history of dramatic weight loss linked to bariatric surgery impact IVF outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER Women with a history of bariatric surgery who had undergone IVF had a comparable cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) to non-operated patients of the same BMI after the first IVF cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In the current context of increasing prevalence of obesity in women of reproductive age, weight loss induced by bariatric surgery has been shown to improve spontaneous fertility in obese women. However, little is known on the clinical benefit of bariatric surgery in obese infertile women undergoing IVF. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This exploratory retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in 10 287 IVF/ICSI cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. We compared the outcome of the first IVF cycle in women with a history of bariatric surgery to two age-matched groups composed of non-operated women matched on the post-operative BMI of cases, and non-operated severely obese women. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The three exposure groups of age-matched women undergoing their first IVF cycle were compared: Group 1: 83 women with a history of bariatric surgery (exposure, mean BMI 28.9 kg/m2); Group 2: 166 non-operated women (non-exposed to bariatric surgery, mean BMI = 28.8 kg/m2) with a similar BMI to Group 1 at the time of IVF treatment; and Group 3: 83 non-operated severely obese women (non-exposed to bariatric surgery, mean BMI = 37.7 kg/m2). The main outcome measure was the CLBR. Secondary outcomes were the number of mature oocytes retrieved and embryos obtained, implantation and miscarriage rates, live birth rate per transfer as well as birthweight. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No significant difference in CLBR between the operated Group 1 patients and the two non-operated Groups 2 and 3 was observed (22.9%, 25.9%, and 12.0%, in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively). No significant difference in average number of mature oocytes and embryos obtained was observed among the three groups. The implantation rates were not different between Groups 1 and 2 (13.8% versus 13.7%), and although lower (6.9%) in obese women of Group 3, this difference was not statistically significant. Miscarriage rates in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were 38.7%, 35.8% and 56.5%, respectively (P = 0.256). Live birth rate per transfer in obese patients was significantly lower compared to the other two groups (20%, 18%, 9.3%, respectively, in Groups 1, 2 and 3, P = 0.0167). Multivariate analysis revealed that a 1-unit lower BMI increased the chances of live birth by 9%. In operated women, a significantly smaller weight for gestational age was observed in newborns of Group 1 compared to Group 3 (P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study was conducted in France and nearly all patients were Caucasian, questioning the generalizability of the results in other countries and ethnicities. Moreover, 950 women per group would be needed to achieve a properly powered study in order to detect a significant improvement in live birth rate after bariatric surgery as compared to infertile obese women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These data fuel the debate on the importance of pluridisciplinary care of infertile obese women, and advocate for further discussion on whether bariatric surgery should be proposed in severely obese infertile women before IVF. However, in light of the present results, infertile women with a history of bariatric surgery can be reassured that surgery-induced dramatic weight loss has no significant impact on IVF prognosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by unrestricted grants from FINOX—Gédéon Richter and FERRING Pharmaceuticals awarded to the ART center of the Clinique Mathilde to fund the data collection and the statistical analysis. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02884258

O-219 Detailed morpho-kinetic analysis of the first cleavage can help in evaluating the viability of direct-cleaved human zygotes

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Shimura ◽  
K Yumoto ◽  
M Sugishima ◽  
Y Mio
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Cell Group ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Time Lapse Imaging ◽  
Human Zygotes ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Study question Why do some direct-cleaved human zygotes still lead to a live birth? Summary answer Direct-cleaved zygotes which have undergone the 2-cell stage can lead to a live birth, while zygotes cleaved from 1-cell to ≥ 3-cell do not. What is known already In recent years, zygotes that develop from 2-cell to 3-cell within 5 hours after the first cleavage have been evaluated as “direct-cleaved” zygotes, because normal cleavage takes approximately 12 hours to complete. It was reported that their implantation rate was significantly lower than zygotes with normal cleavage pattern, and eliminating direct-cleaved zygotes from transfer could improve the implantation rate. However, some direct-cleaved zygotes at the first cleavage could still lead to a live birth. Few reports have examined the difference between a cleavage from 1-cell to ≥ 3-cell and 2-cell to ≥ 3-cell within 5 hours after the first cleavage. Study design, size, duration A retrospective study involving 2,077 cycles of IVF/ICSI between July 2012 and July 2019. A total of 5,991 normally fertilized zygotes (2PN/2PB) were included. Of those, 3,508 were evaluated as usable good/fair quality embryos on Day2/3, and the rest (n = 2,483) were evaluated as poor quality and rejected from transfer or cryopreservation after 7 days of culture. Of 3,508 usable embryos, 884 were selected based on the availability of results of live birth for this study. Participants/materials, setting, methods Time-lapse imaging (5 slices along Z-axis every 10 minutes) was performed in EmbryoScopeTM. Zygotes were morphokinetically analyzed in detail and classified into four groups by their cleavage patterns: Group1 (1-cell→2-cell); Group 2 (1-cell→3-cell); Group 3 (1-cell→2-cell→≥3-cell within 5 hours after the first cleavage); and Group 4 (1-cell→2-cell→≥5-cell). The proportion, mean maternal age and live birth rate of each group were examined. Main results and the role of chance The proportion of Groups 1-4 was 83.6% (n = 739), 3.8% (n = 34), 5.9% (n = 52), and 6.7% (n = 59), respectively. 0f 884 zygotes examined in this study, the mean maternal age was significantly higher in Group 2 and 4 than in Group 1 (P < 0.05; 37.4±4.9 in Group1, 39.1±5.2 in Group 2, 38.6±6.0 in Group 3, and 38.7±5.1 in Group 4). The rate of confirmed gestational sac was significantly lower in Group 2 and 4 than in Group 1 [P < 0.01; 36.3% (n = 268/739), 0% (n = 0/34), 25.0% (n = 13/52), and 18.6% (n = 11/59) in Groups 1-4, respectively]. Furthermore, the live birth rate was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2, 3 and 4 [P < 0.01; 28.4% (n = 210/739), 0% (n = 0/34), 13.5% (n = 7/52), and 15.3% (n = 9/59) in Groups 1-4, respectively]. Above all, while zygotes in Group 2 showed no pregnancy and live birth at all, zygotes in Group 3 showed a live birth rate of 13.5%. However, they had a significantly higher miscarriage rate (42.9%, n = 6) compared to zygotes in Group 1 (19.5%, n = 55). Limitations, reasons for caution It is very difficult to capture cleavage patterns by routine observations because the timings of developmental events are different between embryos. A time-lapse imaging and culturing system is essential to solve this problem, however, it cannot visualize the distribution of chromosomes, and no chromosomal analysis was conducted in this study. Wider implications of the findings This study revealed that zygotes previously classified as “direct-cleaved” and eliminated from transfer included viable zygotes which could lead to a live birth. Therefore, it is crucial to optimize the use of time-lapse imaging of human zygotes in order to precisely evaluate the first cleavage. Trial registration number not applicable

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Overweight or Obese Infertile Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 7438
Author(s):  
Seo Yun Kim ◽  
Eun-Sun Park ◽  
Hae Won Kim
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Infertile Women ◽  
Natural Conception ◽  
The Impact

Obesity is a well-known risk factor for infertility, and nonpharmacological treatments are recommended as effective and safe, but evidence is still lacking on whether nonpharmacological interventions improve fertility in overweight or obese women. The aim of this study was to systematically assess the current evidence in the literature and to evaluate the impact of nonpharmacological interventions on improving pregnancy-related outcomes in overweight or obese infertile women. Seven databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of nonpharmacological interventions for infertile women with overweight or obesity through August 16, 2019 with no language restriction. A meta-analysis was conducted of the primary outcomes. A total of 21 RCTs were selected and systematically reviewed. Compared to the control group, nonpharmacological interventions significantly increased the pregnancy rate (relative risk (RR), 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04–1.81; p = 0.03; I2 = 58%; nine RCTs) and the natural conception rate (RR, 2.17, 95% CI, 1.41–3.34; p = 0.0004; I2 = 19%, five RCTs). However, they had no significant effect on the live birth rate (RR, 1.36, 95% CI, 0.94–1.95; p=0.10, I2 = 65%, eight RCTs) and increased the risk of miscarriage (RR: 1.57, 95% CI, 1.05–2.36; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%). Therefore, nonpharmacological interventions could have a positive effect on the pregnancy and natural conception rates, whereas it is unclear whether they improve the live birth rate. Further research is needed to demonstrate the integrated effects of nonpharmacological interventions involving psychological outcomes, as well as pregnancy-related outcomes.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing the Live Birth Rate Following Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycles in Infertile Women After Endometrioma Cystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Tongye Sha ◽  
Yuzhen Huang ◽  
Zizhen Guo ◽  
Lei Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Female Age ◽  
Infertile Women ◽  
Ovarian Cystectomy ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
History Of

Background: Reproductive outcomes after fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI–ET) cycles are diverse in infertile women with a history of ovarian cystectomy for endometriomas. We aimed to develop a logistic regression model based on patients' characteristics including number of embryos transferred and stimulation protocols to predict the live birth rate in fresh IVF/ICSI–ET cycles for such patients.Methods: We recruited 513 infertile women with a history of ovarian cystectomy for endometriomas who underwent their first fresh ET with different stimulation protocols following IVF/ICSI cycles in our unit from January 2014 to December 2018. One or two embryo are implanted. Clinical and laboratory parameters potentially affecting the live birth rate following fresh ET cycles were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the relationship between predictive factors and live birth rate.Results: The overall live birth rate was 240/513 (46.8%). Multivariable modified Poisson regression models showed that two factors were significantly lowers the probability of live birth: female age ≥ 5 years (aOR 0.603; 95% CI 0.389–0.933; P = 0.023); BMI range 21–24.99 kg/m2 compared with BMI <21 kg/m2 (aOR 0.572; 95% CI 0.372–0.881, P = 0.011). And two factors significantly increased the probability of live birth: AFC >7 (aOR 1.591; 95% CI 1.075–2.353; P = 0.020); two embryos transferred (aOR 1.607; 95% CI 1.089–2.372; P = 0.017).Conclusions: For these infertile women who had undergone ovarian cystectomy for endometriosis, female age <35 years, AFC > 7, and two embryos transferred might achieve better clinical fresh IVF/ICSI–ET outcomes. BMI <21 kg/m2 or ≥25 kg/m2 might also have positive effects on the live birth rate, but different ovarian stimulation protocols had no significant effects. However, a larger sample size may be needed for further study.

scholarly journals High Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentrations Are Associated With Poor Pregnancy Outcome in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycle but Not Cumulative Live Birth Rate in PCOS Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaxin Guo ◽  
Shuai Liu ◽  
Shiqiao Hu ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Lei Jin
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between baseline serum Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).DesignRetrospective study.SettingReproductive medicine center in a hospital.Population2436 PCOS patients (Rotterdam criteria) who underwent their first fresh IVF/ICSI cycles were divided into three groups on the basis of the <25th (Group 1, n=611), 25 to 75th (Group 2, n=1216), or >75th (Group 3, n=609) percentile of baseline serum AMH level.Intervention(s)Baseline serum AMH levels measured on the 2-3 days of spontaneous menstrual cycle before IVF/ICSI treatment.Main Outcome Measure(s)Live birth rate (LBR), cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and normal fertilization rate (FR).Result(s)The LBR, CPR, and FR were significantly increased in Group 1 than Group 2 and Group 3, however, CLBR was similar between the three groups. The LBR were 46.6%, 40.5%, and 39.4% in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 respectively. The CPR were 53.0%, 47.0%, and 45.5%, respectively. The FR was highest in Group 1 (61.7%, P<0.05), but there was no uniform reverse trend with the AMH level. CLBR were 68.7%, 70.4%, and 71.3%, respectively. Although women in Group 1 were older (p < 0.05) and had higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.05), binomial logistic regression analysis used age, BMI, FSH, and AMH as independent variables indicated that only AMH was significantly associated with LBR and CPR. Nevertheless, binomial logistic regression analysis used age, BMI, FSH, AMH, and the number of retrieved oocytes as independent variables indicated that only the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly correlated with CLBR. After stratifying by age, the negative relationship between baseline AMH level and LBR and CPR remained only in the patients <30 years old.Conclusion(s)Higher baseline AMH level in PCOS women resulted in lower LBR, CPR, and FR but did not influence CLBR.

scholarly journals Pregnancy Outcomes Following the First Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Among Women Aged Less Than 35 Years Old: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Le Hoang ◽  
Le Duc Thang ◽  
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong ◽  
Nguyen Minh Thuy ◽  
Vu Thi Mai Anh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Many guidelines have been issued regarding the number of embryos to be transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF), but patients and clinicians may be reluctant to accept or offer a single embryo transfer due to the expected lower chance of pregnancy or live birth. This study was aimed to provide additional information on cycle outcome according to the number and quality of thawed transferred blastocysts. Methods:A retrospective cohort study was designed to collect the data of 505 patients who performed the first frozen blastocysts transfer at Tam Anh General Hospital from June 2018 to September 2019. One good-quality embryo was transferred for 121 patients (Group 1), two good for 214 patients (Group 2), one good and one poor for 112 patients (Group 3), one good and two poor for 25 patients (Group 4), and one or two poor for 33 patients (Group 5). Results:The pregnancy rate was 71.9%, 74.8%, 69.4%, 84.0%, and 39.4% in Group 1–5, respectively. The multiple pregnancy rate was 36.9%, 16.9%, and 32.0% in Groups 2–4, respectively, higher than Group 1 (4.9%). The live birth rate was 55.6%, 50.9%, and 60.0% in Group 2–4, respectively, but not significantly different from the Group 1 (47.9%). Conclusions:Transferring an additional good or poor embryo, along with a good embryo, does not increase the live birth rate while the incidence of multiple pregnancies rises significantly.

scholarly journals Association of a family history of autoimmune disease with time to pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rate

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e34
Author(s):  
T.C. Plowden ◽  
M.T. Connell ◽  
P. Mendola ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
C. Nobles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Time To Pregnancy ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Cumulative live birth rates after weight reduction in obese women scheduled for IVF: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Kluge ◽  
C Bergh ◽  
S Einarsson ◽  
A Pinborg ◽  
A-L Mikkelsen Englund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Weight Reduction ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Did weight reduction in obese women scheduled for IVF increase cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after 2 years? SUMMARY ANSWER Weight loss prior to IVF did not increase CLBR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Few studies have investigated the effect of weight reduction in obese infertile women scheduled for IVF. In a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), including one IVF cycle, we found no increase in live birth rate after weight reduction. Weight regain after obesity reduction treatment often occurs, and children born to obese women have a higher risk of childhood obesity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A 2-year follow-up of a multicenter, RCT running between 2012 and 2018 was performed. Out of 317 women randomized to weight reduction followed by IVF treatment or IVF treatment-only, 305 remained in the full analysis set. Of these women, 90.5% (276/305) participated in this study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Nine infertility clinics in Sweden, Denmark and Iceland participated in the RCT. Obese women under 38 years of age having a BMI ≥30 and < 35 kg/m2 were randomized to weight reduction and IVF or IVF-only. In all, 160 patients were randomized to a low calorie diet for 12 weeks and 3–5 weeks of weight stabilization, before IVF and 157 patients to IVF-only. Two years after randomization, the patients filled in a questionnaire regarding current weight, live births and ongoing pregnancies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE 42 additional live births were achieved during the follow-up in the weight reduction and IVF group, and 40 additional live births in the IVF-only group, giving a CLBR, the main outcome of this study, of 57.2% (87/152) and 53.6% (82/153), respectively (P = 0.56; odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI: 0.74–1.52). Most of the women in the weight reduction and IVF group had regained their pre-study weight after 2 years. The mean weight gain over the 2 years was 8.6 kg, while women in the IVF-only group had a mean weight loss of 1.2 kg. At the 2-year follow-up, the weight standard deviation scores of the children born in the original RCT (index cycle) were 0.218 (1.329) (mean, SD) in the weight reduction and IVF group and − 0.055 (1.271) (mean, SD) in the IVF-only group (P = 0.25; mean difference between groups, 0.327; 95% CI: −0.272 to 0.932). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION All data presented in this follow-up study were self-reported by the participants, which could affect the results. A further limitation is in power for the main outcome. The study is a secondary analysis of a large RCT, where the original power calculation was based on live-birth rate after one cycle and not on CLBR. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The follow-up indicates that for women with a BMI ≥30 and < 35 kg/m2 and scheduled for IVF, the weight reduction did not increase their chance of a live birth either in the index cycle or after 2 years. It also shows that even in this highly motivated group, a regain of pre-study weight occurred. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The 2-year follow-up was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-70940 and ALFGBG-77690), Merck AB, Solna, Sweden (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Hjalmar Svensson Foundation. Ms Kluge has nothing to disclose. Dr Bergh has been reimbursed for lectures and other informational activities (Ferring, MSD, Merck, Gedeon Richter). Dr Einarsson has been reimbursed for lectures for Merck and Ferring. Dr Thurin-Kjellberg reports grants from Merck, and reimbursement for lectures from Merck outside the submitted work. Dr Pinborg has been reimbursed for lectures and other informational activities (Ferring, MSD, Merck, Gedeon Richter). Dr Englund has nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01566929.

Advantages of the two-step embryo transfer strategy in human IVF/ICSI cycles

Zygote ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chadi Yazbeck ◽  
Nadia Ben Jamaa ◽  
André Hazout ◽  
Paul Cohen-Bacrie ◽  
Anne-Marie Junca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Human Ivf ◽  
Group 1

SummaryThe aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of the two-step embryo transfer (ET) strategy combining a day 2/3 ET with a day 5/6 blastocyst transfer. In an observational comparative study, 400 infertile women were enrolled from two assisted reproductive technology (ART) units according to inclusion criteria: age below 42 years and at least three embryos obtained on day 2 thus allowing an extended in vitro culture. Two groups were defined according to the ET strategy adopted: group 1 had a two-step ET; and group 2 had a day 2/3 ET with (subgroup 2a) or without (subgroup 2b) blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5/6. Live birth rate was significantly higher in group 1 than in subgroups 2a and 2b (36.5% versus 29.4% and 13.4%, respectively; p < 10−3). Multiple pregnancy rates were comparable between groups. After adjusting on major prognostic factors, the two-step ET strategy was still associated with a significantly higher live birth rate than the day 2/3 ET (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.32–3.77). The two-step ET provides better live birth rates than the cleavage-stage ET. It does not increase multiple pregnancy rates if the number of embryos transferred is limited. It also prevents cycle loss when embryos fail to develop into blastocysts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document