P–700 Increased progesterone to mature oocyte index is associated with lower top-quality embryo rate in GnRH antagonist protocols

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y E Şükür ◽  
K Pouya ◽  
B Özmen ◽  
M Sönmezer ◽  
B Berker ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Do progesterone elevation (PE) on trigger day and progesterone to mature oocyte index (PMOI) affect embryo quality and the chance of live birth? Summary answer The top-quality embryo rate is decreased by increasing PMOI, but it has no association with absolute serum progesterone levels. What is known already Progesterone elevation have been reported to significantly decrease pregnancy and implantation rates. The main mechanism of this adverse effect is mainly related to an asynchrony between the endometrium and the embryo. Many of the previous studies have failed to show a significant impact of PE on embryo quality and the success of subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. However, PMOI was suggested to be more predictive than PE of ART outcome and might be associated with embryo quality. Study design, size, duration A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted. All FET cycles performed in a university hospital infertility centre between January 2016 and December 2019 were reviewed. A total of 44 patients who had PE (>1.5 ng/ml) on trigger day and 134 patients who did not have PE were assessed. Participants/materials, setting, methods The study group consisted of patients who had PE (>1.5 ng/mL) during fresh COS cycle and the control group consisted of patients who did not have PE. In addition to effect of PE on subsequent FET cycle outcome, an association between PMOI and embryo quality was assessed. The threshold level to define increased PMOI (>0.12 ng/ml) was calculated as the median level of the whole study cohort. Main results and the role of chance The mean ages of the study and control groups were 30.4±5.4 years and 31.1±5.6 years, respectively (P = 0.413). Although the number of oocytes collected and MII oocytes were significantly higher in patients with PE, the total number of frozen embryos were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences concerning the outcome measures including live birth rate in the subsequent FET cycle between participants with and without PE (27.3% vs. 23.9%, respectively; P = 0.652). The rate of top-quality embryos was similar between participants with and without PE (43% vs. 52%, respectively; P = 0.370). However, the rate of top-quality embryos was significantly lower in cycles with PMOI>0.12 ng/ml than in cycles PMOI<0.12 ng/ml (42% vs. 56%, respectively; P = 0.027). Limitations, reasons for caution The retrospective design and the small sample size derived from a single institution. Wider implications of the findings: Increased PMOI, which is associated to lower top-quality embryo rate, may in turn result in diminished cumulative live birth rate. Trial registration number Not applicable

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H K Kim ◽  
S.-Y Ku ◽  
S H Kim ◽  
C S Suh ◽  
H Kim

Abstract Study question When is the optimal timing of day 6 (D6) blastocyst transfer between the 6thday (P6)and the 7th(P7) day of progesterone administration in artificially prepared frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET) cycle Summary answer When transferring D6 blastocysts in artificially prepared FET cycles, live birth rate tended to be higher in P6 group than in P7 group. What is known already Blastocyst transfer in FET cycles has increased due to several reasons including convenience for optimization of endometrial synchronization, improvement of laboratory techniques and preimplantation genetic testing. Meanwhile, D6 blastocyst which cryopreserved on day 6 after being developed to the full blastocyst stage, presented lower pregnancy outcomes in FET cycle than D5 blastocysts. However, there have been few studies on the optimal duration of progesterone administration when transferring D6 blastocysts. Study design, size, duration This was a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in artificially prepared cycles from January 2000 to May 2020. Patients with D6 blastocyst transfer on the 6th day of progesterone administration were included in D6-P6 group, and patients with D6 blastocyst transfer on the 7th day of progesterone administration were included in D6-P7 group. Participants/materials, setting, methods Increasing dose of estradiol valerate was administered from the 3rd day of menstruation: 4 mg/day for the first four days, 6 mg/day for next four days, and then 8 mg/day until the confirmation of pregnancy. Progesterone was administered from the 14th day of menstruation if the endometrial thickness reached ≥7 mm. The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were performed. Main results and the role of chance A total of 50 patients were included, and 13 patients underwent FET on P6 and 37 patients underwent FET on P7. Live birth rate was comparable between the P6 group and the P7 group (18.9% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.775). Live birth rate was higher in the D6-P6 group than in the D6-P7 group after adjusting for age, AMH, endometrial thickness on the starting day of progesterone administration and good embryo rate transferred with statistical significance (OR: 6.716, p = 0.005). Limitations, reasons for caution Limitations of the present study is the retrospective design and the small sample size. Caution is needed in extrapolating results of this study because only intramural and vaginal progesterone supplementations were included in this study. Wider implications of the findings: Even if the duration of blastocyst formation was delayed, frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst may need to be considered for on P6 rather than P7. The difference of live birth rate is not statistically significant. This study should be acknowledged for the underestimation of the difference because of the small sample size. Trial registration number Not applicable


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Wang ◽  
H Groen ◽  
K C Va. Zomeren1 ◽  
A E P Cantineau ◽  
A Va. Oers ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does lifestyle intervention prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF) improve embryo utilization rate (EUR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in women with obesity? Summary answer A six-month lifestyle intervention preceding IVF improved neither EUR, nor CLBR in women with obesity. What is known already A randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of a low caloric liquid formula diet (LCD) preceding IVF in women with obesity was unable to demonstrate an effect of LCD on embryo quality and live birth rate. In that study, only one fresh embryo transfer (ET) or, in case of freeze-all strategy, the first transfer with frozen-thawed embryos was reported. We hypothesized that any effect on embryo quality of a lifestyle intervention in women with obesity undergoing IVF treatment is better revealed by EUR and CLBR after transfer of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos. Study design, size, duration This is a nested cohort study within an RCT. The LIFEstyle study examined whether a six-month lifestyle intervention prior to assisted reproductive technology (ART) in women with obesity improved live birth rate, compared to prompt ART within 24 months after randomization. In the original study, 577 women with obesity and infertility were assigned to a lifestyle intervention followed by ART (N = 290) or to prompt ART (N = 287) between 2009 and 2012. Participants/materials, setting, methods The first IVF cycle with successful oocyte retrieval was included, resulting in 51 participants in the intervention group and 72 in the control group. EUR was defined as the proportion of inseminated/injected oocytes that could be transferred or cryopreserved as an embryo. Analysis was performed per cycle and per oocyte/embryo. CLBR was defined as the percentage of participants with at least one live birth from the first fresh and subsequent frozen-thawed ET(s). Main results and the role of chance The overall mean age was 31.64 years, and the mean BMI was 35.40 ± 3.21 kg/m2 in the intervention group, and 34.86 ± 2.86 kg/m2 in the control group (P = 0.33). The mean difference of weight change at six months between the two groups was in favor of the intervention group (mean difference in kg: –3.14, 95% CI: –5.73 – –0.56). The median (Q25; Q75) of EUR was 33.3% (12.5; 60.0) in the intervention group and 33.3% (16.7; 50.0) in the control group in the per cycle analysis (adjusted B: 2.7%, 95% CI: –8.6 – 14.0). In the per oocyte/embryo analysis, in total 280 oocytes were injected or inseminated in the intervention group, 113 were utilized (transferred or cryopreserved embryos, EUR = 40.4%); in the control group EUR was 30.8% (142/461). The lifestyle intervention did not significantly improve EUR (adjusted OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.94 – 1.98) in the per oocyte/embryo analysis taking into account the interdependency of the oocytes per participant. CLBR was not significantly different between the intervention group and the control group after adjusting for type of infertility (male factor and unexplained) and smoking (27.5% vs 22.2%, adjusted OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.43 – 2.47). Limitations, reasons for caution This study is a nested cohort study within an RCT, and no power calculation was performed. The randomization was not stratified for indicated treatment. The limited absolute weight loss and the short duration of the lifestyle intervention might be insufficient to affect EUR and CLBR. Wider implications of the findings: Our data do not support the hypothesis of a beneficial effect of lifestyle intervention on embryo quality and CLBR after IVF in women with obesity. Trial registration number NTR 1530


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqin Bu ◽  
Jiaxin Zhang ◽  
Yile Zhang ◽  
Yingpu Sun

BackgroundCurrently, in China, only women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles can donate oocytes to others, but at least 15 oocytes must be kept for their own treatment. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether oocyte donation compromises the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of donors and whether it is possible to expand oocyte donors’ crowd.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study from August 2015 to July 2017 including a total of 2,144 patients, in which 830 IVF–embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients were eligible for oocyte donation and 1,314 patients met all other oocyte donation criteria but had fewer oocytes retrieved (10–17 oocytes). All 830 patients were advised to donate approximately three to five oocytes to others and were eventually divided into two groups: the oocyte donation group (those who donated) and the control group (those who declined). The basic patient parameters and CLBR, as well as the number of supernumerary embryos after achieving live birth, were compared. These two factors were also compared in all patients (2,144) with oocyte ≥10.ResultsIn 830 IVF-ET patients who were eligible for oocyte donation, only the oocyte number was significantly different between two groups, and the donation group had more than the control group (25.49 ± 5.76 vs. 22.88 ± 5.11, respectively; p = 0.09). No significant differences were found between the two groups in other factors. The results indicate that the live birth rate in the donation group was higher than that in the control group (81.31% vs. 82.95%, p = 0.371), without significance. In addition, CLBR can still reach as high as 73% when the oocyte number for own use was 10. Supernumerary embryos also increased as the oocyte number increased in all patients (oocyte ≥10).ConclusionsCurrently, oocyte donation did not compromise CLBR, and oocyte donation can decrease the waste of embryos. In addition, in patients with 10 oocytes retrieved, the CLBR was still good (73%). Thus, it is possible to expand oocyte donors if the number of oocyte kept for own use was decreased from 15 to 10 after enough communication with patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yossi Mizrachi ◽  
Eran Horowitz ◽  
Jacob Farhi ◽  
Arieh Raziel ◽  
Ariel Weissman

Abstract BACKGROUND Freeze-all IVF cycles are becoming increasingly prevalent for a variety of clinical indications. However, the actual treatment objectives and preferred treatment regimens for freeze-all cycles have not been clearly established. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We aimed to conduct a systematic review of all aspects of ovarian stimulation for freeze-all cycles. SEARCH METHODS A comprehensive search in Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Library was performed. The search strategy included keywords related to freeze-all, cycle segmentation, cumulative live birth rate, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, fertility preservation, oocyte donation and frozen-thawed embryo transfer. We included relevant studies published in English from 2000 to 2018. OUTCOMES Our search generated 3292 records. Overall, 69 articles were included in the final review. Good-quality evidence indicates that in freeze-all cycles the cumulative live birth rate increases as the number of oocytes retrieved increases. Although the risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is virtually eliminated in freeze-all cycles, there are certain risks associated with retrieval of large oocyte cohorts. Therefore, ovarian stimulation should be planned to yield between 15 and 20 oocytes. The early follicular phase is currently the preferred starting point for ovarian stimulation, although luteal phase stimulation can be used if necessary. The improved safety associated with the GnRH antagonist regimen makes it the regimen of choice for ovarian stimulation in freeze-all cycles. Ovulation triggering with a GnRH agonist almost completely eliminates the risk of OHSS without affecting oocyte and embryo quality and is therefore the trigger of choice. The addition of low-dose hCG in a dual trigger has been suggested to improve oocyte and embryo quality, but further research in freeze-all cycles is required. Moderate-quality evidence indicates that in freeze-all cycles, a moderate delay of 2–3 days in ovulation triggering may result in the retrieval of an increased number of mature oocytes without impairing the pregnancy rate. There are no high-quality studies evaluating the effects of sustained supraphysiological estradiol (E2) levels on the safety and efficacy of freeze-all cycles. However, no significant adverse effects have been described. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of late follicular progesterone elevation in freeze-all cycles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Ovarian stimulation for freeze-all cycles is different in many aspects from conventional stimulation for fresh IVF cycles. Optimisation of ovarian stimulation for freeze-all cycles should result in enhanced treatment safety along with improved cumulative live birth rates and should become the focus of future studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 106-114
Author(s):  
Shiuan Yee Tan ◽  
Yi-Xuan Lee ◽  
Cindy Chan ◽  
Chii-Ruey Tzeng

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors that could affect the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) among subfertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). Methods: A retrospective analysis study of a total of 2186 cycles of IUI among 1784 subfertile women between 2012 and 2017 at the infertility clinic in Taipei Medical University Hospital was conducted. Social demographics, CPR, and LBR were measured. Eleven prognostic factors were analysed with multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 2186 cycles, 569 became pregnant (26.0%), resulting in 454 live births. The LBR per cycle and per patient were 20.8% and 24.6%, respectively. Eight factors were found to significantly predict the obstetric outcome among the women who underwent IUI (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). Age, [Formula: see text] 35.0 years old; serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, [Formula: see text] 1.2 ng/mL; delayed sperm insemination, [Formula: see text] 36.0 hour following human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection; serum estradiol level, [Formula: see text] 500 pg/mL; endometrial thickness, [Formula: see text] 7.0 mm on the day of HCG administration; and post-wash total motile sperm count (TMSC), [Formula: see text] 5 million/mL were found to be prognostic factors in determining the CPR and LBR (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). However, duration of subfertility and the presence of urine luteinizing hormone surge during the day of the HCG trigger inversely affected the LBR (p = 0.006 and p = 0.033, respectively) but not the CPR (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). The type of infertility, total antral follicle count, and pre-wash TMSC were not able to predict pregnancy outcome (p [Formula: see text] 0.05). Conclusions: Six out of 11 factors were identified as strong prognostic factors for successful pregnancies and live births: age, serum AMH and serum estradiol levels, endometrial thickness, post-wash TMSC, and delayed sperm insemination after HCG injection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yanxia Zhang ◽  
Meiqing Li ◽  
Lian Li ◽  
Jianghua Xiao ◽  
Zhe Chen

Objective. To investigate the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in patients with endometriosis (EMT). Methods. Female patients diagnosed with EMT in our hospital from May 2018 to May 2019 were selected. The patients were divided into the control group (n = 22) and the DHEA group (n = 22) according to the random number table. Patients in the control group received placebo and patients in the DHEA group received DHEA. Patients in both groups received either DHEA (25 mg) or placebo orally 3 times a day for 90 days from the first day of menstruation. Patients were subsequently treated with an IVF cycle. In the control group, 22 patients completed the first cycle and 13 patients completed the second cycle. In the DHEA group, 22 patients completed the first cycle and 11 patients completed the second cycle. Serum sex hormone levels including serum E2 on hCG day, mean progesterone on hCG day, FSH on day 2, AMH on day 2, and gonadotropin dose were determined using a chemiluminescent immunoassay kit. The number of antral follicles of the bilateral ovaries was counted by transvaginal B-ultrasound, and the maximum length and transverse diameter of the ovaries were measured at the same time, to calculate the average diameter of the ovaries, observe the morphology of endometrium, and measure the thickness of the endometrium. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, persistent pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were compared between the two groups. Results. There were no significant differences in serum E2, progesterone, endometrial thickness, recovered oocytes, mean number of transferred embryos, and mean score of leading embryo transfer between the DHEA group and the women who completed the first and second cycles ( P > 0.05 ). The AMH, antral follicle count, serum E2 on hCG day, the number of recovered oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and the fertilization rate in the DHEA group were higher than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The doses of FSH on day 2, COH on day 3, and gonadotropin were lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the total number of embryos, the number of high-quality embryos, and the number of transplanted embryos between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, persistent pregnancy rate, and live birth rate in the DHEA group were higher than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. DHEA can significantly increase serum E2 level and improve IVF outcome by regulating the hormone synthesis process, thus improving oocyte and embryo quality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianyuan Song ◽  
Tingting Liao ◽  
Kaiyou Fu ◽  
Jian Xu

Objectives: Unexplained infertility has been one of the indications for utilization of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, whether ICSI should be preferred to IVF for patients with unexplained infertility remains an open question. This study aims to determine if ICSI improves the clinical outcomes over conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) in couples with unexplained infertility.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 549 IVF and 241 ICSI cycles for patients with unexplained infertility at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and fertilization rate.Results: The live birth rate was 35.2% (172/488) in the IVF group and 33.3% (65/195) in ICSI group, P = 0.635. The two groups also had similar clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and miscarriage rates. The fertilization rate of IVF group was significantly higher than that of ICSI group (53.8 vs. 45.7%, P = 0.000, respectively). Sixty-one and 46 patients did not transfer fresh embryos in IVF and ICSI cycles, respectively. Patients with IVF cycles had lower cancellation rates than those with ICSI (11.1 vs. 19.1%, P = 0.003, respectively).Conclusion: ICSI does not improve live birth rates but yields higher cancellation rates than conventional IVF in the treatment of unexplained infertility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document