scholarly journals PSIX-24 Comparison of serial real-time A-mode vs. B-mode ultrasound fat depth measures on prediction of final carcass value endpoints

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 332-332
Author(s):  
Chandler A Dockray ◽  
Tommy L Perkins ◽  
Flavio Riberio ◽  
Tylo J Kirkpatrick ◽  
Kaitlyn R Wesley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Feeding Period ◽  
Ultrasound Scanning ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
Total Percentage ◽  
Ultrasound Measurements ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Positive Correlations

Abstract Charolais x Angus steers (n = 80) were evaluated across a 378-day feeding period in response to administration of a growth promoting implant containing trenbolone acetate (TBA) and estradiol (E2) using A-mode and B-mode ultrasound. Steers were scanned at 42-d intervals (0, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336) during 10 separate ultrasound scanning sessions 24-h prior to harvest. Ultrasound B-mode rump fat images (BRFU) were obtained by a certified Ultrasound Guidelines Council (UGC) technician using an ALOKA 500V console equipped with a 17.2 cm carcass probe. Ultrasound A-mode images (ARFU) were obtained by a non-UGC certified technician using a RENCO Lean Meater. Images of BRFU were analyzed by the CUP lab whereas ARFU image results were determined chute side by the scanning technician. Carcasses were dissected into total lean, fat and bone post-harvest. Rump fat thickness ultrasound measurements were compared to carcass traits used to determine carcass value. Carcass endpoints included 12th–rib fat thickness (FTC), 12th rib-eye area (REAC), marbling score (MARB), and total percentage of carcass fat (PCF). The correlation between BRFU and ARFU was 0.70 (P < 0.01). Positive correlations (P < 0.01) between ultrasound rump fat measures taken the day before harvest and carcass measurements indicated moderate relationships between BRFU and FTC (r=0.80); BRFU and REAC (r=0.66); BRFU and MARB (r=0.68); BRFU and PCF (r=0.75); ARFU and FTC (r=0.69); ARFU and REAC (r=0.76); ARFU and MARB (r=0.79); and ARFU and PCF (r=0.80). These results indicate A- and B-mode ultrasound measures of rump fat may be adequate measures for estimation of total percent carcass fat.

scholarly journals PSIX-27 Evaluation of real-time ultrasound to predict pre-harvest market endpoints in serial slaughtered British x Continental steers administered an E2+TBA implant treatment vs non-implanted controls

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 331-332
Author(s):  
Becca B Grimes ◽  
Tylo J Kirkpatrick ◽  
Travis Tennant ◽  
Ty Lawrence ◽  
Kimberly B Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Longissimus Muscle ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Muscle Area ◽  
Start Date ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Strong Relationships

Abstract Steers (n = 80; initial BW 271 ± 99) were serially scanned at 42-d intervals during a 378-d feeding period using an Aloka 500 device by a certified Ultrasound Guidelines Council (UGC) technician using real-time ultrasound. This included 10 separate ultrasound scanning sessions following the initial weight and ultrasound data taken on day minus 7 (one week prior to initial start date). Steers were randomly assigned to implant treatment (either implanted with Revalor XS or not) at day -7. Cattle were weighed and scanned for 12th-rib fat thickness (FTU), 12th-rib longissimus muscle area (LMAU), percentage intramuscular fat (%FATU), and rump fat thickness (RFU) to determine the ability of ultrasound to predict carcass grading outcomes at harvest. Scans were processed by CUP Lab technicians. Eight steers were harvested each 42 days. Carcasses were assessed 48h after harvest to determine 12th-rib fat thickness (FTC), 12th-rib longissimus muscle area (LMAC), and marbling score (MARB). Data were analyzed via Pearson correlation and linear regression to determine the relationship of ultrasound measures to carcass outcomes. Positive correlations (P < 0.01) between ultrasound measures taken the day before harvest and carcass measurements indicated strong relationships between FTU and FTC (r = 0.91), LMAU and LMAC (r = 0.93), and moderately strong relationships between %FATU and MARB (r = 0.76). Prediction equations were generated to estimate FTC = .0088 + (1.02585 x FTU), LMAC = 16.29720 + (0.77197 x LMAU) and MARB = 19.87510 + (5.19832 x %FATU). Results suggest real-time ultrasound data provides an effective tool to estimate carcass outcomes pre-harvest.

PSIII-8 Sire breed differences for carcass attributes in feedlot steers using ultrasound technology

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 291-291
Author(s):  
Harley Buie ◽  
Noah P Jesko
Keyword(s):  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Live Animal ◽  
Feedlot Steers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ultrasound Measurements ◽  
Ribeye Area ◽  
Ultrasound Technology ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Sire Breed

Abstract Live animal ultrasound measurements were taken on thirty-two feedlot steers and heifers for estimation of carcass endpoints including 12th rib fat thickness (FTU), ribeye area (REAU) and intramuscular fat (%FatU). Ultrasound measurements were collected by an inexperienced technician using an Aloka 500 ultrasound unit using Beef Image Analysis (BIA) software. The objective of the study was to evaluate carcass differences of four sire breed types including Angus (n = 11), Ultrablack (n = 6), Nelore (n = 6), Braunvieh (n = 1) and Angus X Nelore X Braunvieh hybrid (n = 8). Carcass data collected at harvest included 12th rib fat Thickness (FTC), Ribeye area (REAC), marbling score (MS), Yield Grade (YG), and Quality Grade (QG). The data were analyzed using SAS to determine breed effects. Means for FTU, FTC, REAU, REAC, %FatU and MS were 0.59 cm, 0.57 cm, 90.80 cm2, 83.53 cm2, 4.83%, and 483.75, respectively. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in YG and FT due to breed of sire. However, there was a trend for sire breed for ribeye area (P = 0.0728) for Angus X Nelore X Braunvieh cross and MS (P = 0.0786) for Ultrablack. Pearson correlation values between FTU and FTC, REAU and REAC, and %FatU and MS were 0.1217 (P = 0.05068), 0.3545 (P = .0465) and 0.5161 (P = 0.0025), respectively. These data suggest little differences existed in carcass attributes between various sire breeds out of a set of crossbred commercial cows.

273 Effect of Feedlot Implant Dose and Terminal Window Timing on Heifer Performance and Carcass Characteristics

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
Nathan Pyatt ◽  
Gary Vogel ◽  
Mike Brown ◽  
Frank White ◽  
William Kayser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Model ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Carcass Characteristics ◽  
Live Performance ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
Quality Grade ◽  
Final Weight ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Main Effects

Abstract Feedlot heifers (n = 3,778; initial BW = 310 kg; SD = 28 kg) were utilized in a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement (9 pens/treatment) to investigate increasing implant dose and terminal window (TW) timing on growth and carcass merit. Component with Tylan® implant dose treatments were 1. Initial TE-IH [80 mg trenbolone acetate (TBA), 8 mg estradiol (E2)] and terminal TE-H (140 mg TBA, 14 mg E2; IH/H), 2. Initial TE-IH and terminal TE-200 (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E2; IH/200), or 3. Initial TE-200 and terminal TE-200 (200/200). Heifers were fed 171 d with terminal implant administered 100 or 60 d prior to slaughter; initial implant window was inverse (71 or 111 d) to TW. Data were analyzed as a mixed model with block included as a random effect. No significant dose x TW interactions occurred for growth or carcass characteristics (P ≥ 0.06) therefore, main effects are presented. Terminal window treatments resulted in similar (P > 0.25) live performance. Heifers reimplanted 60 d prior to slaughter had improved (P < 0.05) marbling score and lower YG2 carcasses. Final weight, gain, HCW, yield, and LM area increased (linear; P < 0.05), while marbling score and fat thickness decreased (linear; P < 0.05) with increasing heifer implant dose. Heifers implanted with IH/200 had lower (P < 0.05) DMI compared to IH/H. IH/200 and 200/200 had improved (+2.1%; P < 0.05) efficiency compared to IH/H. HCW for 200/200 was +3.2 and 5.5 kg greater than IH/200 and IH/H, respectively. 200/200 were leaner with +7.4% YG 1&2 and -5.4% YG 4&5, but -8.5% Prime & Choice carcass compared to IH/H. Shortening TW from 100 to 60 d prior to slaughter did not alter growth performance. Increased implant dose in heifers improved gain, efficiency, HCW and yield with some quality grade considerations.

276 Evaluation of a Long-acting Growth-promoting Implant (Revalor-XS) as an Initial Implant in a Re-implant Program with a revalor-200 Terminal Implant in Feedlot Cattle: A Three-study Pooled Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 128-129
Author(s):  
Grant I Crawford ◽  
Wade T Nichols ◽  
John P Hutcheson ◽  
Marshall N Streeter ◽  
Brandon L Nuttelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Feedlot Cattle ◽  
Carcass Weight ◽  
Initial Body Weight ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
The Third ◽  
Ribeye Area ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Data from three large-pen feedlot studies were pooled to evaluate use of a long-acting implant (Revalor-XS) as an initial implant in a re-implant program. The three studies consisted of 2,764 steers in 40 pens, with an initial body weight (BW) of 271 kg. Treatments consisted of Revalor-IS [80 mg trenbolone acetate (TBA), 16 mg estradiol (E2)] administered on arrival, followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E2) terminal implant (IS/200) or Revalor-XS (80 mg TBA, 16 mg E2 uncoated; 120 mg TBA, 24 mg E2 coated; 200 mg TBA, 40 mg E2 total) on arrival followed by Revalor-200 terminal implant (XS/200). Steers were fed to equal days-on-feed (DOF) within study and averaged 210 DOF. Steers within treatment were re-implanted at same DOF in two studies (Day 124 on average followed by an 81-day terminal implant window). In the third study, IS/200 steers were implanted on Day 120 and XS/200 steers on Day 140 of the 217-day study. Final BW averaged 635.6 and 638.3 kg for IS/200 and XS/200, respectively (P = 0.21). There were no differences (P > 0.26) in DMI, ADG and Gain:Feed between treatments. Hot carcass weight tended (P = 0.07) to be greater with XS/200 (412.7 kg) compared with IS/200 (409.1 kg). Ribeye area was greater (P < 0.01) and fat thickness tended (P = 0.06) to be lower with XS/200 compared with IS/200. Distributions of USDA quality grades were not affected (P = 0.26) by treatment. Distributions of USDA yield grades (YG) were affected (P = 0.01) by treatment with a shift toward more YG 1 and 2 carcasses with XS/200 and more YG 4 and 5 carcasses with IS/200. This analysis indicates that using Revalor-XS as an initial implant leads to greater carcass weight and ribeye area and lower YG when compared with Revalor-IS.

scholarly journals 105 A comparison of long-acting growth-promoting implants and re-implant programs in finishing heifers fed for 184 days

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 131-132
Author(s):  
Grant Crawford ◽  
Wade Nichols ◽  
John Hutcheson ◽  
Marshall Streeter ◽  
Brandon Nuttelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Design Experiment ◽  
Hormone Release ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Initial Processing ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Yearling beef heifers (n = 6,239) were used in a randomized complete block design experiment to evaluate the effects of long-acting implants on feedlot growth performance and carcass characteristics when compared with re-implant programs. Heifers (initial BW = 324 kg, SEM = 0.85) were randomized to 1 of 4 implant treatments with 12 pens/treatment: 1) Revalor-IH (80 mg trenbolone acetate [TBA], 8 mg estradiol [E]) at initial processing followed by a Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E) 90 d later (IH/200); 2) Revalor-200 at initial processing followed by a Revalor-200 90 d later (200/200); 3) Revalor-XH (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E) at initial processing (XH); and 4) Synovex One Feedlot (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E) at initial processing (ONE). Revalor-XH and Synovex One are long-acting implants designed to extend hormone release, eliminating the need to re-implant cattle. After initial processing, XH and ONE heifers were not removed from their pens until harvest. Final BW (556 kg), DMI (7.95 kg/d), ADG (1.26 kg), and feed efficiency (0.158) did not differ (P > 0.23) among treatments. Hot carcass weight (HCW) was greater (P < 0.10) for 200/200 (364 kg) than XH (361 kg) and ONE (360 kg), with no other differences (P > 0.10) in HCW among treatments. Dressing percentage (DP) and longissimus muscle (LM) area were greater (P < 0.01) for 200/200 than all other treatments, and greater for IH/200 than XH and ONE. Marbling score was reduced and average yield grade (YG) was improved (P < 0.01) for 200/200 vs. all other treatments and for IH/200 vs. XH and ONE. Compared with re-implant programs, long-acting implants decreased DP and LM area, increased marbling score and YG, and did not differ in final BW. The Revalor-200/200 re-implant program resulted in improved HCW when compared with long-acting implants.

scholarly journals PSVII-19 Serial ultrasound measures of implanted and non-implanted feedlot steers to determine carcass endpoints

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 292-293
Author(s):  
Tommy L Perkins ◽  
Flavio Riberio ◽  
Tylo J Kirkpatrick ◽  
Kaitlyn R Wesley ◽  
Sierra L Pillmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Least Square ◽  
Longissimus Muscle ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Muscle Area ◽  
Final Body Weight ◽  
Start Date ◽  
Feedlot Steers ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Implant Treatment

Abstract An Aloka SSD-500V real-time ultrasound unit, equipped with a 17.2cm carcass probe, was used to serially scan feedlot steers (n = 80; initial BW 271 ± 99) at 42-d intervals during a 378-d feeding period by a certified Ultrasound Guidelines Council (UGC) technician. This included 10 separate ultrasound scanning sessions following the initial weight and ultrasound data taken on day minus 7 (one week prior to initial start date). Steers were randomly assigned to implant treatment (REV) or not (CON) at day -7 with the implanted group being re-implanted on day 190. Cattle were weighed and scanned for 12th-rib fat thickness (FTU), 12th-rib longissimus muscle area (LMAU), percentage intramuscular fat (%FATU), and rump fat thickness (RFU) to determine the ability of ultrasound to predict carcass grading outcomes at harvest in implanted vs non-implanted steers. Eight steers were harvested each 42 days and evaluated 48h after harvest to determine final body weight (FBW), 12th-rib fat thickness (FTC), 12th-rib longissimus muscle area (LMAC), and marbling score (MARB). Data were analyzed to determine treatment (TRT) and days on feed (DOF) interactions using the GLIMMIX procedure. Least square (LS) means illustrated differences (P < 0.05) between TRT for FBW, FTU, REAU, and %FATU. No differences (P = 0.088) between TRT for RFU were observed. Differences (P < 0.05) between DOF were observed for FBW through all 10 weigh days. A difference (P < 0.05) across DOF for days 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, and 294 was noted for FTU. These data suggest growth promoting implants cause differences (increases) in weight and traditional ultrasound measures of carcass endpoints.

scholarly journals 101 Effects of traditional growth-promoting re-implant or long-acting implant programs on growth performance and carcass characteristics of heifers fed for 221 days

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Marshall Streeter ◽  
John Hutcheson ◽  
Wade Nichols ◽  
Brandon Nuttelman ◽  
Grant Crawford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Performance ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Carcass Characteristics ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Muscle Area ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Initial Processing ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Implant Treatment

Abstract Beef heifers (n=1478) were used in a randomized complete block design to compare the effects of a traditional re-implant (Revalor-IH/Revalor-200) or a long-acting implant program (Revalor-XH) on feed yard growth performance and carcass characteristics. Heifers (initial BW = 263 kg; SD = 3.44 kg) were randomized to 1 of 20 pens with pens randomly assigned to Revalor-IH (80 mg trenbolone acetate [TBA], 8 mg estradiol [E]) at initial processing followed by Revalor-200 (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E; Rev-IH/200) 103 days later or Revalor-XH (200 mg TBA, 20 mg E; Rev-XH) implant treatments. Heifers were on feed for an average of 221 d with Rev-XH heifers remaining in their pens for the duration of the study. Final BW (559 kg) and feed efficiency (0.175) did not differ (P > 0.11) between treatments. Dry matter intake was greater (P < 0.10) for Rev-IH/200 (7.70 kg) compared with Rev-XH (7.60 kg) heifers causing greater (P < 0.10) ADG for Rev-IH/200 (1.35 kg) versus Rev-XH (1.33 kg). Heifers implanted with Rev-IH/200 (365 kg) had greater (P < 0.10) HCW than those implanted with Rev-XH (361 kg). However, differences in dressing percentage were not detected (P > 0.15). Longissimus muscle area was greater (P < 0.05) for heifers implanted with Rev-IH/200 (89.55 cm2) versus those implanted with Rev-XH (87.87 cm2). Back fat thickness (1.76 cm), calculated yield grade (3.28) and marbling score (487) did not differ (P > 0.42) due to implant treatment. Differences resulting from implant treatment in the percentage of carcasses within USDA Quality Grades (P > 0.34) and USDA Yield Grades (P > 0.18) were not observed. Heifers that were re-implanted had improved ADG, DMI and HCW compared with those receiving a long-acting implant with minimal effects on carcass characteristics.

scholarly journals Examination of repeatability of ultrasound scanning technique in young bulls

2008 ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Sándor Harangi ◽  
Béla Béri ◽  
Levente Czeglédi
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Linear Array ◽  
The Body ◽  
Ultrasound Images ◽  
Ultrasound Scanning ◽  
Body Images ◽  
Young Bull ◽  
Array Transducer ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Ultrasonic Scanner

The author’s goal with the methodology examination was to determine repeatability of taking and evaluating ultrasound images. In the trial an operator person took two images about the ribeye area and rump fat thickness (P8) of every young bull, which were measured by the same person in four repetitions. Also, we had altogether eight images about the same part of the body. Images were collected using Falco 100 (Pie Medical) real-time ultrasonic scanner equipped with an ASP 3,5 MHz, 18 cm linear array transducer.

scholarly journals 108 Effect of Revalor-XH, Revalor-200, and combination Revalor-IH/Revalor-200 on Yearling Heifer Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Zachary Carlson ◽  
Caitlin Coulson ◽  
Galen E Erickson ◽  
D J Jordon ◽  
Rob Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Performance ◽  
Active Ingredient ◽  
Carcass Characteristics ◽  
Live Performance ◽  
Marbling Score ◽  
Trenbolone Acetate ◽  
Grade Distribution ◽  
Fat Thickness ◽  
Carcass Performance

Abstract A commercial feedlot trial utilizing 1,728 crossbred heifers (initial BW = 410; SD = 10 kg) examined three implant strategies on growth performance and carcass characteristics. Treatments included: 1) Revalor-200 (REV-200) on d 1; 2) Revalor-IH on d 1 and Revalor-200 on d 56 (REV-IH/200; range 54-58 d) to target approximately 80 d with terminal implant; and 3) Revalor-XH (REV-XH) on d 1. Heifers implanted with REV-IH/200 combination had greater carcass-adjusted final BW and G:F compared to REV-200 and REV-XH (637 vs. 630 and 630 kg; 0.146 vs. 0.140 and 0.140, respectively; P ≤ 0.05). There were no differences (P ≥ 0.24) observed for live performance including final BW, DMI, or ADG on a live basis among implant strategies. Hot carcass weights and LM area improved for REV-IH/200 implanted heifers relative to REV-200 and REV-XH implanted heifers (397 vs. 393 and 393 kg; 90.9 vs. 87.7 and 88.7 cm2, respectively; P ≤ 0.05). Dressing percent was greater for REV-IH/200 implanted heifers compared to REV-200 and REV-XH (62.7 vs. 62.1 and 62.2 %, respectively; P = 0.01). Marbling score and 12th-rib fat thickness were not different (P ≥ 0.12) among implant treatments. Calculated yield grades improved for REV-IH/200 compared to REV-200 (3.63 vs. 3.82, respectively; P = 0.05). Heifers implanted with REV-IH/200 had a significant (P < 0.01) shift to a lower calculated yield grade distribution compared to REV-200 and REV-XH implanted heifers. The REV-IH/200 combination provided 280 mg of trenbolone acetate (TBA) and 28 mg estradiol (E2), while total active ingredient doses for REV-200 and REV-XH are 200 mg TBA and 20 mg E2. Thus, the greater concentration of TBA and E2 provided by REV-IH/200 combination improved carcass adjusted growth and carcass performance compared to the non-coated REV-200 implant and partially coated REV-XH implant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document