scholarly journals Characteristics of primary and repeated recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: outcomes after aggressive surgeries at a single institution

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1412-1418
Author(s):  
Kenta Ishii ◽  
Yukihiro Yokoyama ◽  
Yoshihiro Nishida ◽  
Hiroshi Koike ◽  
Suguru Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Radical Cure ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Objective This study sought to investigate the characteristics of primary and repeated recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Methods Patients treated with primary or recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival time analysis of recurrence-free survival and overall survival was conducted using Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test. Results Fifty-two patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma were analysed. Amongst them, 46 patients (88%) had undergone surgery. Histologic grades included well-differentiated (n = 21), dedifferentiated (n = 21), myxoid (n = 3) and pleomorphic (n = 1) subtypes. The patients undergoing R0 resection in the first surgery had significantly higher recurrence-free survival rates compared with the patients undergoing non-R0 resection (3-year recurrence-free survival: 80 versus 38%; 5-year recurrence-free survival: 49 versus 29%, P = 0.033). Although overall survival rates tended to be higher in the patients undergoing R0 resection compared with the non-R0 resection, it did not reach to a statistical significant difference (5-year overall survival: 93 versus 75%; 10-year overall survival: 93 versus 59%, P = 0.124). The recurrence rates were 65, 67, 73 and 100%, and the median recurrence-free survival times were 46, 20, 9 and 3 months after the first, second, third and fourth surgeries, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 82, 69, 40 and 0% after the first, second, third and fourth surgeries, respectively. Conclusions With repeated recurrence and surgeries, the time to recurrence decreased and the recurrence rate increased. R0 resection in the first surgery was considered the most important for longer recurrence-free survival and radical cure.

scholarly journals Cryoablation of renal tumors: long-term follow-up from a multicenter experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulvio Stacul ◽  
Camilla Sachs ◽  
Fabiola Giudici ◽  
Michele Bertolotto ◽  
Michele Rizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Purpose To retrospectively investigate long-term outcomes of renal cryoablation from a multicenter database. Methods 338 patients with 363 renal tumors underwent cryoablation in 4 centers in North-Eastern Italy. 340/363 tumors (93.7%) were percutaneously treated with CT guidance. 234 (68.8%) were treated after conscious sedation, 76 (22.3%) under local lidocaine anesthesia only and 30 (8.8%) under general anesthesia. Treatment efficacy and complication rate considered all procedures. Oncologic outcomes considered a subset of 159 patients with 159 biopsy proven renal cell carcinoma. Results Mean tumor size was 2.53 cm. Technical success was achieved in 355/363 (97.8%) treatments. Treatment efficacy after the first treatment was achieved in 348/363 (95.9%) tumors. Statistical analysis revealed a significant lower treatment efficacy for ASA score >3, Padua score >8, tumor size >2.5 cm, use of >2 cryoprobes, presence of one single kidney. In the subset of 159 patients, recurrence-free survival rates were 90.5% (95% CI 83.0%, 94.9%) at 3 years and 82.4% (95% CI 72.0%, 89.4%) at 5 years; overall survival rates were 96.0% (95% CI 90.6%, 98.3%) at 3 years and 91.0% (95% CI 81.7%, 95.7%) at 5 years; no patient in this subset developed metastatic disease. Clavien-Dindo >1 complications were recorded in 14/369 procedures (3.8%) and were related to age >70 years, tumor size >4 cm and use of >2 cryoprobes. Conclusion Cryoablation performed across four different centers in a large cohort of predominantly small renal tumors showed that this technique provides good recurrence-free survival rates and overall survival rates at three- and five-year with very low major complications rate.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of synchronous splenectomy and hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric variceal bleeding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-li Ma ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Ling-ling He ◽  
Hong-shan Wei
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Aim: This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with pericardial devascularization (PCDV) plus splenectomy for patients with cirrhosis having hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric variceal bleeding.Materials and Methods: Between October 2008 and March 2018, 46 patients with cirrhosis having hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric variceal bleeding for portal hypertension were included in this study. The overall survival curves, recurrence-free survival curves, and rebleeding-free survival curves were plotted using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The log-rank test was used to compare time-to-event curves between groups.Results: The median follow-up time was 38 months. Among 20 patients undergoing RFA, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.00%,60.00%, and 35.00%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 35.00%, 25.00%, and 10.00%, respectively. The 1,3- and 5-year rebleeding-free survival rates were 85.00%, 60.00%, and 40.00%, respectively. Among 26 patients undergoing hepatectomy, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.15%,50.00%, and 34.62%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 65.38%, 19.23%, and 11.54%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rebleeding-free survival rates were 73.08%, 42.31%, and 26.92%, respectively. No significant differences were found in overall, recurrence-free, and rebleeding-free survival rates.Conclusions: Hepatectomy or RFA with PCDV plus splenectomy might be a safe and effective treatment for patients with cirrhosis having hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric variceal bleeding. “Hepatectomy first” strategy may be considered due to its lower and later recurrence. More attention should be paid to background liver diseases after surgery.

Significance of c-myc Rearrangements in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2030-2030
Author(s):  
Philip Bierman ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
Bhavana Dave ◽  
Warren Sanger ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene can be seen in 5–10% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, studies examining the significance of this finding have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine the clinical significance of c-myc rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The results of classical cytogenetic studies and FISH analyses were used to identify diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases in the database of the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group with or without c-myc rearrangements. Patients who were HIV positive and those with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were excluded. We identified 16 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and c-myc rearrangements. All patients were initially treated with doxorubicin- or mitoxantrone-containing chemotherapy regimens. The median age of these 16 patients was 61 years (range 40 to 80), and 5 (31%) were males. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 0–2 at diagnosis in 9 patients (56%), and 3–5 in 7 patients (44%). Eleven patients (69%) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm) at diagnosis. No significant differences in outcome were identified when the 16 c-myc positive patients were compared with 97 c-myc negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the same age range. The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for the c-myc positive patients was 23% (95% CI 6% to 46%), as compared with 38% (95% CI 29% to 48%) for c-myc negative patients (p=0.17). The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 36% (95% CI 14% to 59%) and 47% (95% CI 36% to 56%), respectively (p=0.19). Classical cytogenetics and FISH analyses were also used to examine the 16 c-myc positive cases for bcl-2 rearrangements. Eight (50%) cases had rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc rearrangements. These patients were similar to the c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients except for a higher likelihood of an elevated LDH level at diagnosis (88% vs. 25%; p=0.03). The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients was 0%, as compared to 33% (95% CI 6% to 66%) for patients with rearrangements of c-myc alone, and 37% (95% CI 28% to 47%) for c-myc negative patients. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 12% (95% CI 1% to 42%), 47% (95% CI 12% to 76%), and 41% (95% CI 31% to 51%), respectively. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for IPI score, demonstrated that the relative risk (RR) of treatment failure was significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32–6.23; p=0.008). Similarly, mortality was also significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.18–6.11; p=0.02). In contrast, no significant differences in treatment failure or overall survival were demonstrated when c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients were compared with c-myc negative patients. Our results demonstrate that the c-myc rearrangement is not associated with poorer survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, patients with rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival.

Long-term results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11: A phase III trial to preserve the larynx—Induction cisplatin/5-FU and radiation therapy versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy versus radiation therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Forastiere ◽  
M. Maor ◽  
R. S. Weber ◽  
T. Pajak ◽  
B. Glisson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lower Death Rate

5517 Background: The 2-year results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11 were published in 2003 (NEJM 349:2091–8,2003). We now present the 5-year results (after median follow-up for surviving patients of 6.9 years) of 515 eligible pts with resectable stage III or IV (excluding T1 and high volume T4), cancer of the glottic or supraglottic larynx. Methods: Patients were randomized to induction cisplatin/5-FU (CF) with responders then receiving RT (I+RT) (n = 173); or concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 q 21 days × 3) and RT (CRT) (n = 171); or RT alone (R) (n = 171). Laryngectomy was performed for < partial response to induction CF, for persistent/recurrent disease or for laryngeal dysfunction. Results: At 5 years, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (44.6%, p = 0.011) or CRT (46.6%, p = 0.011) compared to R (33.9%). There was no difference in LFS between I+RT and CRT (p = 0.98). Laryngeal preservation (LP) was significantly better with CRT (83.6%) compared to I+RT (70.5%, p = 0.0029) or R (65.7%, p = 0.00017). Local-regional control (LRC) was significantly better with CRT (68.8%) compared to I+RT (54.9%, p = 0.0018) or R (51%, p = 0.0005). I+RT compared to R for LP and LRC showed no significant difference (p = 0.37 and 0.62, respectively). The distant metastatic rate was low (I+RT 14.3%, CRT 13.2%, R 22.3%) with a trend (p ∼0.06) for benefit from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (38.6%, p = 0.016) or CRT (39%, p = 0.0058) compared to R (27.3%). Overall survival rates were similar for the first 5 years (I+RT 59.2%, CRT 54.6%, R 53.5%); thereafter I+RT had a non-significant lower death rate. Compared to CRT, significantly more pts in the R group died of their cancer (34% vs 58.3%, p = 0.0007); the rate for I+RT was 43.8%. Conclusion: These 5-year results differ from the 2-year analysis by a significant improvement in LFS now seen for both I+RT and CRT treatments compared to R. For the endpoints of LP and LRC, CRT is still the superior treatment with no advantage seen to the addition of induction CF to R. There is no significant difference in overall survival. [Table: see text]

Is RECIST-defined progression free-survival a meaningful endpoint in the era of immunotherapy?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhvinder Johal ◽  
Irene Santi ◽  
Justin Doan ◽  
Saby George
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Beyond Progression ◽  
Significant Difference

488 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is often used as a primary endpoint in oncology clinical trials as a surrogate for overall survival. Traditionally, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have defined disease progression as a significant increase in the size of tumor lesions and the development of new lesions. However, some patients starting immunotherapy have shown initial increased size of tumor lesions followed by tumor regression, due to the unique mechanism of action of immunotherapies. This initial “pseudo-progression” could be classified inaccurately as disease progression, as evidenced by benefit from the treatment beyond progression approach ( JAMA Oncol 2016). The phase III CheckMate 025 trial of nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma allowed treatment beyond progression if there was investigator-assessed clinical benefit and tolerability. The purpose of our study was to test if treatment duration for an immunotherapy was different from RECIST-defined PFS, and as such, could potentially explain the apparent lack of correlation between RECIST progression and overall survival shown in CheckMate 025. Methods: Using 1-year data from CheckMate 025, Kaplan–Meier methodology was used to estimate the median duration of PFS and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Stratified log-rank test was used to assess the difference in treatments. Results: For all patients, the median PFS with nivolumab was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4 months) and median TTD was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.7 months). For everolimus, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.5 months) and median TTD was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–4.6 months). Conclusions: Patients in CheckMate 025 had significantly longer survival with nivolumab than with everolimus, but with similar PFS. Our analysis demonstrated that while PFS was similar to TTD with everolimus, there was a significant difference between the 2 measures for nivolumab, suggesting that RECIST-defined PFS may not be the proper endpoint to define progression for immunotherapies. Further evaluation of the association of TTD and other immune-related progression endpoints with overall survival is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01668784.

scholarly journals The efficacy of adjuvant imatinib therapy in improving the prognosis of patients with colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumourss

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Li ◽  
X Meng
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Imatinib ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The One

Introduction Although it has now been accepted that imatinib is a valid treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients in the adjuvant setting, information on its clinical efficacy in improving the prognosis for patients with colorectal GISTs is limited. Methods The clinical and follow-up records of 42 colorectal GIST patients who underwent surgical resection at our institution between January 2004 and December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. The effect of postoperative imatinib treatment on recurrence free survival and overall survival time was analysed with the Kaplan–Meier method and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results Sixteen patients were assigned to imatinib treatment (imatinib group) after surgical tumour resection while twenty-six patients did not receive any adjuvant treatment (control group). The one, three and five-year recurrence free survival rates were 100%, 90% and 77% respectively. This was significantly higher than in the control group (92%, 53% and 36%) (logrank test, p=0.012). The one, three and five-year overall survival rates were 100%, 91% and 68% in the imatinib group compared with 96%, 77% and 39% in the control group (logrank test, p=0.021). Analysis with the multivariate Cox regression model yielded similar results on the efficacy of adjuvant imatinib in prolonging both recurrence free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07–0.80) and overall survival (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.91). Conclusions Adjuvant imatinib therapy seems to be effective in decreasing the risk of tumour occurrence and prolonging the overall survival time in colorectal GIST patients.

scholarly journals 15-year Follow-up of Comparing Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Multicentres, Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyu Luo ◽  
Guang Cao ◽  
wenbin Guo ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Qiuru Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Backgroud: Longer follow-up was necessary to testify the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND).Methods：From January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005,1027 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND. 996 eligible patients were enrolled. The end points are disease free survival and overall survival.Results：The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 184 months. The distribution of all events was fairly similar between two groups of patients. The incidence of local in-breast events did not differ in a significant manner between two cohorts. Similarly, the rate of distant metastases was not significantly different with 30.0% in MLND and 32.6% in CALND. And no significant difference was observed in other primary tumor between two groups (p=0.46). Patients who remain alive with no event comprise a total of 37.2% in MALND and 35.4% in CALND. Other primary cancers and deaths from other causes were distributed equally between two groups. The 15-year disease-free survival rates were41.1 percent for the MALND group and 39.6 percent for the CALND group (p=0.79). MALND was found to be not inferior for overall survival (P =0.54). The 15-year overall survival rates were 49.5 percentafter MALND and 51.2 percentafter CALND (p=0.86). Probability of overall survival was not significantly different between two groups.Conclusions：MALND does not increase unfavorable events, and also does not affect the long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery.

Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) on impact and trend of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upper urinary tract urothelial cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 408-408
Author(s):  
Rashad Khan ◽  
Danning Huang ◽  
Alina Basnet
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Significant Difference

408 Background: Five year cancer specific survival rate is between 12- 70% for pT2 and higher UUTUC tumors. Adjuvant platinum based therapies have proven to improve Overall survival (OS) in observational series. Compromised renal function after surgery, delayed recovery from surgery pose challenge for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Thus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an appealing option. However, there is only limited evidence on the role of NAC in UUTUC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of UUTUC (stage I- III) who underwent complete or partial nephroureterectomy with peri-operative chemotherapy. We then compared OS outcome among NAC vs AC groups. OS was calculated using Kaplan Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazard regression model to adjust for different variables. Results: Out of 50539 UUTUC patients reported in NCDB (2004-2016), 20121 met our inclusion criteria. 360 patients received NAC, 2617 received AC and 17144 received only surgery. Patients who received NAC were more likely to be younger, treated at academic centers, have Medicare and private insurance, have clinical T3 and higher tumor, have lower Charlson-Deyo Score (CDCC) score and undergo complete nephroureterctomy. One, three and five year OS among NAC and AC is depicted in table 1. With 150 months (m) follow up, median OS was 73.89 m for NAC and 54.14 m for AC group. A log rank test with p value=0.3437 shows no significant difference in survival rates of the two groups. Though consistent upward trend is observed in the use of NAC from 2004 to 2015, significantly higher percentages of patients still undergo only surgery without perioperative chemotherapy. Conclusions: Numerically higher mOS in NAC group was not statistically significant different from AC group. Use of perioperative chemotherapy appears to be much lower in UUTUC. Limitations that exist with this registry based study include lack of randomization, differences in surgical and radiation techniques, duration of chemotherapy, and provider/patient selection bias. Overall survival among two groups. [Table: see text]

Combination therapy with PD-1 blockade and radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma：A retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Shu Chen ◽  
Huaqiang Bi ◽  
Feng Xia ◽  
Kai Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Number

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether combined therapy with PD-1 blockade (anti-PD-1) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was superior to RFA monotherapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).METHODS: A total of 127 patients who underwent anti-PD-1 plus RFA treatment (n = 41) or RFA alone treatment (n = 86) for recurrent HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data including post-RFA HCC recurrence (the primary end point), overall survival (OS) (the secondary end point), adverse events and toxic effects were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTS: The 1-year recurrence-free survival rates for the anti-PD-1 plus RFA and RFA groups were 36.6% and 16.3%, respectively. The corresponding overall survival rates for the two groups were 95.1% and 74.4%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in recurrence-free survival rate (P = 0.002) or overall survival rate (P = 0.008). Tumor number, TNM stage and anti-PD-1 treatment were demonstrated to be important factors associated with 1-year recurrence-free survival probability by univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumor number, TNM stage and anti-PD-1 treatment were significant prognostic factors for OS. RFA treatment-related adverse events were pleural effusion requiring drainage and mild or moderate increase in body temperature. Grade 3 or higher events related to anti-PD-1 treatment occurred in 12.8% (6) patients and were infrequent.CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy of anti-PD-1 plus RFA was superior to RFA alone in improving survival for recurrent HCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document