Risk factors of post-operative pneumonia in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Author(s):  
Haruhiko Cho ◽  
Kazuhito Tsuchida ◽  
Kenichi Iwasaki ◽  
Yukio Maezawa

Abstract Background Post-operative pneumonia is a major complication after general elective surgery in elderly patients and is often caused by aspiration associated with oesophageal reflux. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of post-operative pneumonia after gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer with two potential risk factors of ageing and oesophageal reflux. Methods We retrospectively examined the data of 251 patients ≥75 years old who underwent gastrectomy between January 2014 and December 2018 in our institution. The reconstruction methods were Billroth-I or Roux-Y after distal gastrectomy, jejunal interposition or double tract after proximal gastrectomy and Roux-Y after total gastrectomy. The severity of pneumonia was evaluated by the Clavien–Dindo classification. Results Post-operative pneumonia was identified in 15 patients (5.9%) and was significantly associated with an age ≥80 years old, poor performance status, history of smoking and cardia-non-preserving gastrectomy (total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy) in univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses showed that a poor performance status and cardia-non-preserving gastrectomy were independent risk factors for post-operative pneumonia. The patients who suffered post-operative pneumonia required a longer hospital stay than those without post-operative pneumonia (P = 0.002). Conclusion We identified a poor performance status and cardia-non-preserving gastrectomy, which are likely to lead to oesophageal reflux, as risk factors for post-operative pneumonia in elderly patients with gastric cancer. These results warrant further prospective studies to evaluate their utility for reducing the rate of post-operative pneumonia in elderly patients through cardia-preserving gastrectomy or anti-reflux reconstruction.

Author(s):  
Alvin J. X. Lee ◽  
Karin Purshouse

AbstractThe SARS-Cov-2 pandemic in 2020 has caused oncology teams around the world to adapt their practice in the aim of protecting patients. Early evidence from China indicated that patients with cancer, and particularly those who had recently received chemotherapy or surgery, were at increased risk of adverse outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Many registries of cancer patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 emerged during the first wave. We collate the evidence from these national and international studies and focus on the risk factors for patients with solid cancers and the contribution of systemic anti-cancer treatments (SACT—chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapy) to outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Patients with cancer infected with SARS-Cov-2 have a higher probability of death compared with patients without cancer. Common risk factors for mortality following COVID-19 include age, male sex, smoking history, number of comorbidities and poor performance status. Oncological features that may predict for worse outcomes include tumour stage, disease trajectory and lung cancer. Most studies did not identify an association between SACT and adverse outcomes. Recent data suggest that the timing of receipt of SACT may be associated with risk of mortality. Ongoing recruitment to these registries will enable us to provide evidence-based care.


2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1.2) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
TARO ISOBE ◽  
KOUSUKE HASHIMOTO ◽  
JUNYA KIZAKI ◽  
SATORU MATONO ◽  
NAOTAKA MURAKAMI ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMT.S5191
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Michele Basso ◽  
Alessandra Cassano ◽  
Carlo Barone

Docetaxel, a member of the taxane family, promotes cell death by binding β-tubulin and has demonstrated activity against several human malignancies, both as a single agent and in combination therapy. It has been approved in Europe and the US as front-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF regimen). This approval was based on the results of a pivotal study (V325) which demonstrated that the addition of docetaxel to the reference regimen of cisplatin and fluorouracil improves overall survival and progression-free survival with a better quality of life despite increased toxicity (mainly haematological). Modifications of DCF regimen have been successfully investigated as a means of making the treatment more tolerable and suitable also for elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. Emerging data from several phase II studies suggest that other docetaxel-based combination regimens with anthracyclines or irinotecan have interesting activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, but the true efficacy of these regimens needs to be assessed in large randomized phase III studies. Thus, the best docetaxel-containing regimen has yet to be identified. Docetaxel also represents a good candidate for combination with novel molecular target agents. In light of the high response rates observed in phase II-III studies, a docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimen might also be considered a treatment option as perioperative or adjuvant therapy in potentially curable gastric cancer and further studies with or without biological agents are eagerly awaited in this setting.


Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-98
Author(s):  
Hartmut Link

Chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in cancer patients correlates with poor performance status and decreased quality of life. Currently recommended causal therapies are erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (epoetins), iron substitution, or a combination of both. Guidelines recommend considering red blood cell (RBC) transfusions for symptomatic anemia at a hemoglobin (Hb) level of <8 g/dl. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended if the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) following from the chosen chemotherapy protocol is ≥20%. If a chemotherapy is planned that induces a moderate FN risk (10-20%), the individual overall FN risk should be assessed prior to each chemotherapy cycle, taking into account patient- or tumor-related risk factors. G-CSF is required when risk factors such as age ≥ 65 years, advanced disease or relevant comorbidity, or previous neutropenia complications are present. Neutropenia that required a shift in chemotherapy is also an indication for G-CSF prophylaxis in subsequent cycles, in order to maintain the planned dose intensity. The use of G-CSF improves patient survival and reduces the rate of neutropenia complications.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1888-1888
Author(s):  
Esa Jantunen ◽  
Carmen Canals ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Herve Tilly ◽  
...  

Abstract Limited data is available on feasibility and efficacy of ASCT in elderly patients with NHL. Patients: In 2000–2005 15869 NHL patients with ASCT were reported to EBMT database, 3133 (20%) were ≥ 60 years. Only patients with MED-B dataset and those with either diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell (MCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) were subjected to more detailed analysis. This group included 906 elderly NHL patients (median age 63 years, range 60–75) (DLBCL, n = 463; MCL, n = 208; FL, n = 235) who were compared with 3661 patients &lt; 60 years (DLBCL, n = 2149; MCL, n = 435; FL, n = 1077) regarding outcome. Bulky disease was more common in younger patients (26% vs. 15%, p &lt; 0.001) as well as B-symptoms at diagnosis (42% vs. 36%, p = 0.02). Elderly patients had received more often at least two treatment lines before ASCT (70% vs. 59%, p&lt;0.001). The median follow-up for the surviving patients was 14 months. Results: Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was higher in patients ≥ 60 years of age: 3.8% vs.2.3% at 100 days, 6.9% vs. 3.9% at 1 year and 9.4% vs. 5.8% at 3 years (p&lt;0.001). No differences in NRM were observed between patients aged 60–64 years (n = 633) and those aged 65–69 (n = 240). A higher NRM was observed in DLBCL and MCL patients compared to FL patients (p=0.001and p=0.002, respectively). Other variables associated with a higher NRM were an elevated LDH at diagnosis (p=0.04), ≥ 2 treatment lines before ASCT (p&lt;0.001); a poor performance status at ASCT (p&lt;0.001); not being in CR1 at ASCT (chemosensitive disease vs. CR1, p=0.02; chemorefractory disease vs. CR1, p&lt;0.001) and BM as stem cell source (p=0.02). In multivariate analysis, elderly patients showed a higher NRM [RR = 1.6 (CI 1.2–2.1), p=0.001]. In patients with DLBCL, age ≥ 60 years at ASCT was associated with a trend to a higher risk of relapse or progression (p =0.07) and a worse PFS (p=0.008). PFS at 2 years was 69% vs. 79% for patients in CR1 and 52% vs. 60% for patients with sensitive disease at ASCT, respectively. In MCL, elderly patients had worse PFS (p=0.008). PFS at 2 years was 78 vs. 81% for MCL patients in CR1 and 52% vs. 67%, respectively for those patients autografted with sensitive disease. Older age was not a significant prognostic factor either for relapse rate or for PFS in patients with FL. PFS at 2 years was 69% and 81% for FL patients in CR1, and 69% and 69% for FL patients with sensitive disease, respectively. Conclusions: ASCT is feasible in selected NHL patients aged 60–69 years. The outcome is promising taking into account the generally poorer prognosis of lymphomas in elderly population.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9628-9628 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nair ◽  
M. Shirodkar ◽  
M. Mallath ◽  
A. D’Cruz ◽  
P. Shukla ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document