Cathepsin D Expression and Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract Background Cathepsin-D (CatD), owing to its dual role as a proteolytic enzyme and as a ligand, has been implicated in cancer progression. The role of CatD in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is unknown. Methods CatD expression quantified by immunohistochemistry of tumor-tissue microarrays of 403 resected pancreatic cancer patients from the ESPAC-Tplus trial, a translational study within the ESPAC (European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer) trials, was dichotomously distributed to low and high H scores (cut off 22.35) for survival and multivariable analysis. The validation cohort (n = 69) was recruited based on the hazard ratio of CatD from ESPAC-Tplus. 5-fluorouracil-, and gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell lines were employed for mechanistic experiments. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Median overall survival was 23.75 months and median overall survival for patients with high CatD expression was 21.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.31 to 24.80) months vs 27.20 (95% CI = 23.75 to 31.90) months for low CatD expression (χ2LR, 1DF = 4.00; P = .04). Multivariable analysis revealed CatD expression as a predictive marker in gemcitabine-treated (z stat = 2.33; P = .02) but not in 5-fluorouracil-treated (z stat = 0.21; P = .82) patients. An independent validation cohort confirmed CatD as a negative predictive marker for survival (χ2LR, 1DF = 6.80; P = .009) and as an independent predictive marker in gemcitabine-treated patients with a hazard ratio of 3.38 (95% CI = 1.36 to 8.38, P = .008). Overexpression of CatD was associated with a concomitant suppression of the acid sphingomyelinase, and silencing of CatD resulted in upregulation of acid sphingomyelinase with rescue of gemcitabine resistance. Conclusions Adjuvant gemcitabine is less effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with high CatD expression, and thus CatD could serve as a marker for biomarker-driven therapy.

Download Full-text

The Role of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid as Second-Line Treatment Option in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

10.21203/rs.3.rs-489414/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Se Jun Park ◽

Hyunho Kim ◽

Kabsoo Shin ◽

Tae Ho Hong ◽

Ja Hee Suh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Real World ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundAccording to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who previously treated gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to hematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefit and toxicity of this regimen in a real-world setting. Herein, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure.MethodsWe conducted a single institution retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. ResultsFifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced any grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (58.8%) and most non-hematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1-18.4).ConclusionsNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, after gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Trial registration Retrospectively registered

Download Full-text

Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid as a second-line treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-021-08887-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Se Jun Park ◽

Hyunho Kim ◽

Kabsoo Shin ◽

Tae Ho Hong ◽

Ja Hee Suh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Free Survival ◽

Median Progression Free Survival ◽

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan ◽

Previously Treated

Abstract Background According to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to haematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefits and toxicity of this regimen in real-world settings. In this study, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. Methods We conducted a single institution, retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80 mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to obtain median progression free survival and median overall survival. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify the effects of clinical factors. Results Fifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.8–3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0–7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (58.8%). Most non-haematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1–18.4). Conclusions Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, following gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is a feasible sequential treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Download Full-text

Impact of an inter-professional clinic on pancreatic cancer outcomes: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) experience.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.444 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 444-444

Author(s):

Hamzeh Albaba ◽

Anna Dodd ◽

Rebecca M. Prince ◽

Kyaw Lwin Aung ◽

David W. Hedley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Social Worker ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Performance Status ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Nurse Specialist ◽

The Impact

444 Background: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have limited treatment options. Management of complex symptoms and psychosocial implications requires an interprofessional approach as prognosis is often measured in months. A multidisciplinary approach has been associated with improvement in clinical outcomes including survival. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an inter-professional approach for PDAC patients at the Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer (WMCPC) at PM on their management and clinical outcomes. Methods: We undertook retrospective review of all patients with PDAC seen at PM two years before (July ‘12 – June ‘14) and two years after (July ‘14 – June ‘16) establishment of the WMCPC. Standard therapies (surgical approach, chemotherapy, radiation therapy) were the same during both time periods. Comparison of overall survival (OS), stage at diagnosis, surgical outcomes, waiting times, and proportion seen by social worker, dietician and clinical nurse specialist (CNS) was explored with descriptive statistic and survival analysis. Results: A total of 993 patients were reviewed; 482 patients pre- and 511 patients post-WMCPC. Age (median 67 yrs), sex (54% men) and stage III/IV (52%) were similar in both groups. There was a trend to improved OS in the post-WMCPC group (9.6 vs. 10.9 m; p = 0.055); multivariable analysis found a significant improvement in OS after adjustment for performance status and stage (p = 0.023; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98). Rate of R0 versus R1/R2 resection for curative surgery (n = 264, 28%) was similar in both groups. Time from referral to first clinic visit significantly decreased from 13.4 to 8.8 days in the post-WMCPC group (p < 0.001) as did time from first clinic appointment to diagnostic biopsy (25.9 vs. 16.9 days, p = 0.022). Patients in the post-WMCPC were more frequently seen by a social worker, dietician or CNS (8% vs. 38%, 9% vs. 35% and 31% vs. 50% respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Establishment of an interprofessional clinic for the treatment of PDAC patients at PM has streamlined diagnosis, aided symptom management and improved overall survival. This has implications for planning care delivery models and proves the value of this intervention.

Download Full-text

A prospectively validated machine learning model for the prediction of survival and tumor subtype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

10.1101/643809 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Georgios Kaissis ◽

Sebastian Ziegelmayer ◽

Fabian Lohöfer ◽

Hana Algül ◽

Matthias Eiber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Validation Cohort ◽

Learning Algorithm ◽

External Validation ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Machine Learning Algorithm ◽

Training Cohort ◽

Histopathological Subtype

AbstractPurposeTo develop a supervised machine learning algorithm capable of predicting above vs. below-median overall survival from medical imaging-derived radiomic features in a cohort of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Materials and Methods102 patients with histopathologically proven PDAC were retrospectively assessed as the training cohort and 30 prospectively enrolled patients served as the external validation cohort. Tumors were segmented in pre-operative diffusion weighted-(DW)-MRI derived ADC maps and radiomic features were extracted. A Random Forest machine learning algorithm was fit to the training cohort and tested in the external validation cohort. The histopathological subtype of the tumor samples was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 21/30 patients of the external validation cohort. Individual radiomic feature importance was evaluated.ResultsThe machine learning algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 80% (ROC-AUC 90%) for the prediction of above- vs. below-median survival on the unseen data of the external validation cohort. Heterogeneity-related features were highly ranked by the model. Of the 21 patients for whom the histopathological subtype was determined, 8/9 patients predicted by the model to experience below-median overall survival exhibited the quasi-mesenchymal subtype, while 11/12 patients predicted to experience above-median survival exhibited a non-quasi-mesenchymal subtype (Fisher’s exact test P<0.001).ConclusionThe application of machine-learning to the radiomic analysis of DW-MRI-derived ADC maps allowed the prediction of overall survival with high diagnostic accuracy in a prospectively collected cohort. The high overlap of clinically relevant histopathological subtypes with model predictions underlines the potential of quantitative imaging workflows in pre-operative subtyping and risk assessment in PDAC.

Download Full-text

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival in resected stage I to II pancreatic cancer: A propensity-adjusted analysis

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0243170 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (12) ◽

pp. e0243170

Author(s):

Zhuang-Bin Lin ◽

Jian-Yuan Song ◽

An-Chuan Li ◽

Cheng Chen ◽

Xiao-Xue Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Positive Lymph Node ◽

Stage I ◽

Resected Stage ◽

Survival Effect

Background The survival time of patients with early pancreatic cancer (PC) is still disappointing, even after surgical resection. PC has an extremely poor prognosis. Herein, we aimed to investigate the survival effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on resected stage I to II PC. Material and methods A large eligible sample of patients was identified from 2010 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of PORT. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias and to make the groups comparable. Results A total of 3219 patients with resected stage I to II PC was included after rigid screening. The median overall survival (OS) was 26 months with PORT (n = 1055) versus 21 months with non-PORT (n = 2164) before matching (p<0.001). By multivariable analysis, PORT remained a favorable prognostic predictor for OS. In PSM analysis, receiving PORT was associated with improved OS (median, 26 months vs. 23 months; at 2 years, 51.7% vs. 46.7%; at 5 years, 23.3% vs. 17.4% (P = 0.006). After further meticulous exploration, only the stage IIB subgroup benefited from PORT (p<0.001). This result was due to the positive lymph node state (N+), whose mortality risk was cut by 23.4% (p<0.001) by PORT. Conclusion Addition of PORT to the treatment of patients with resected stage I to II PC conveys a survival benefit, particularly among those with N-positive or stage IIB disease.

Download Full-text

Somatic Mutation Profiling in the Liquid Biopsy and Clinical Analysis of Hereditary and Familial Pancreatic Cancer Cases Reveals KRAS Negativity and a Longer Overall Survival

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13071612 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 1612

Author(s):

Julie Earl ◽

Emma Barreto ◽

María E. Castillo ◽

Raquel Fuentes ◽

Mercedes Rodríguez-Garrote ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Somatic Mutation ◽

Disease Status ◽

Clinical Analysis ◽

Cytotoxic Agents ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Familial Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Circulating Free Dna

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents many challenges in the clinic and there are many areas for improvement in diagnostics and patient management. The five-year survival rate is around 7.2% as the majority of patients present with advanced disease at diagnosis that is treatment resistant. Approximately 10–15% of PDAC cases have a hereditary basis or Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC). Here we demonstrate the use of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma as a prognostic biomarker in PDAC. The levels of cfDNA correlated with disease status, disease stage, and overall survival. Furthermore, we show for the first time via BEAMing that the majority of hereditary or familial PDAC cases (around 84%) are negative for a KRAS somatic mutation. In addition, KRAS mutation negative cases harbor somatic mutations in potentially druggable genes such as KIT, PDGFR, MET, BRAF, and PIK3CA that could be exploited in the clinic. Finally, familial or hereditary cases have a longer overall survival compared to sporadic cases (10.2 vs. 21.7 months, respectively). Currently, all patients are treated the same in the clinic with cytotoxic agents, although here we demonstrate that there are different subtypes of tumors at the genetic level that could pave the way to personalized treatment.

Download Full-text

41 Cathepsin D Expression in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Cells Increases Proliferation and Reduces Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Gastroenterology ◽

10.1016/s0016-5085(15)30041-x ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 148 (4) ◽

pp. S-13

Author(s):

Ujjwal M. Mahajan ◽

Enno Langhoff ◽

Eithne Costello ◽

William Greenhalf ◽

Christopher Halloran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cathepsin D ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Download Full-text

Precursors of pancreatic cancer in background of chronic opisthorchiasis

Medical Science And Education Of Ural ◽

10.36361/1814-8999-2021-22-1-118-121 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 118-121

Author(s):

V. U. Rayn ◽

◽

M. A. Persidskiy ◽

E. V. Malakhova ◽

I. V. Anuchina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Morphological Data ◽

Small Samples ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Preneoplastic Lesions ◽

Opisthorchis Felineus ◽

Disease Free

Aim. To establish the association between pancreatic cancer precursor lesions and chronic opisthorchiasis. Materials and methods. A single center case-control study was conducted at a low-volume pancreatic surgery center in Khanty-Mansiysk. We retrospectively collected morphological data from 47 pancreatoduodenectomies performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The study group included 23 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with concomitant chronic Opisthorchis felineus invasion which were compared to 24 controls consisting of “pure” cancer. Qualitative analysis was performed using χ2 Pearson criterion. Exact Fisher test was used for small samples. Time to progression and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Data were collected and analyzed in Statistica 7.0. Results. PanINs were seen in 41,7% pancreata resected for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head and in 95,7% cases of pancreatic cancer in background of chronic opisthorchiasis (р = 0,000; 95% CI 3,5-268). PanIN high grade were observed only in opisthorchiasis group. In mixed pathology invasive cancer component tended to be more dedifferentiated and advanced when compared to pure cancer group (p = 0,029). Median disease free survival was 9 mo. in both groups and overall survival was 13 mo. in non-opisthorchiasis group and 15,3 mo. in opisthorchiasis group (р = 0,437). Conclusion. Chronic opisthorchiasis is associated with pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in background of opisthorchiasis with preneoplastic lesions tend to be more advanced in stage and poorly differentiated. Disease free and overall survival have no statistically significant differences in patients with and without Opisthorchis felineus invasion.

Download Full-text

Use of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: A multicenter real-world experience

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/10781552211038677 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 107815522110386

Author(s):

Angela Chen ◽

Vincent H Ha ◽

Sunita Ghosh ◽

Carole R Chambers ◽

Michael B Sawyer

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Colony Stimulating Factor ◽

Free Survival ◽

Colony Stimulating Factors ◽

Median Progression Free Survival ◽

Stimulating Factor

Introduction The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. Methods A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1–7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6–26.0). Conclusions The patient’s progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating Immunohistochemical Results for the Overall Survival of Patients with Bladder Cancer.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-24644/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Tianwei Wang ◽

Yunyan Wang

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Bladder Cancer ◽

Risk Model ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Validation Cohort ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Clinical Information ◽

Internal Validation ◽

Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Objectives: In this study, we want to combine GATA3, VEGF, EGFR and Ki67 with clinical information to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram for bladder cancer.Methods: A total of 188 patients with clinical information and immunohistochemistry were enrolled in this study, from 1996 to 2018. Univariable and multivariable cox regression analysis was applied to identify risk factors for nomogram of overall survival (OS). The calibration of the nomogram was performed and the Area Under Curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the performance of the nomogram. Internal validation was performed with the validation cohort., the calibration curve and the AUC were calculated simultaneously.Results: Univariable and multivariable analysis showed that age (HR: 2.229; 95% CI: 1.162-4.274; P=0.016), histology (HR: 0.320; 95% CI: 0.136-0.751; P=0.009), GATA3 (HR: 0.348; 95% CI: 0.171-0.709; P=0.004), VEGF (HR: 2.295; 95% CI: 1.225-4.301; P=0.010) and grade (HR: 4.938; 95% CI: 1.339-18.207; P=0.016) remained as independent risk factors for OS. The age, histology, grade, GATA3 and VEGF were included to build the nomogram. The accuracy of the risk model was further verified with the C-index. The C-index were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58-0.72) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.70) in the training and validation cohort respectively. Conclusions: A combination of clinical variables with immunohistochemical results based nomogram would predict the overall survival of patients with bladder cancer.

Download Full-text