Diagnosis of oliguria and acute kidney injury

Author(s):  
John A. Kellum

Diagnosis and classification of acute pathology in the kidney is major clinical problem. Azotemia and oliguria represent not only disease, but also normal responses of the kidney to extracellular volume depletion or a decreased renal blood flow. Clinicians routinely make inferences about both the presence of renal dysfunction and its cause. Pure prerenal physiology is unusual in hospitalized patients and its effects are not necessary benign. Sepsismay alter renal function without the characteristic changes in urine indices. The clinical syndrome known as acute tubular necrosis does not actually manifest the histological changes that the name implies. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a term proposed to encompass the entire spectrum of the syndrome from minor changes in renal function to a requirement for renal replacement therapy. Criteria based on both changes in serum creatinine and urine output represent a broad international consensus for diagnosing and staging AKI.

2020 ◽  
pp. 4807-4829
Author(s):  
John D. Firth

Definition—for practical clinical purposes, acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as a significant decline in renal excretory function occurring over hours or days, detected by either a fall in urinary output or a rise in the serum concentration of creatinine. Oliguria—defined (arbitrarily) as a urinary volume of less than 400 ml/day—is usually present, but not always. Clinical approach: diagnosis—all patients admitted to hospital with acute illness, but particularly older people and those with pre-existing chronic kidney disease, should be considered at risk of developing AKI. The most common precipitant is volume depletion. Serum creatinine and electrolytes should be measured on admission in all acutely ill patients, and repeated daily or on alternate days in those who remain so. Assessment—after treatment of life-threatening complications, the initial assessment of a patient who appears to have AKI must answer three questions: (1) is the kidney injury really acute? (2) Is urinary obstruction a possibility? And (3) is there a renal inflammatory cause? General aspects of management—the immediate management of a patient with renal impairment is directed towards three goals: (1) recognition and treatment of any life-threatening complications of AKI, (2) prompt diagnosis and treatment of hypovolaemia, and (3) specific treatment of the underlying condition—if this persists untreated then renal function will not improve. Specific causes of acute kidney injury—there are many possible causes of AKI, but in any given clinical context few of these are likely to require consideration. By far the most frequent are prerenal failure and acute tubular necrosis, which together account for 80 to 90% of cases of AKI seen by physicians.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. e232884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Ferro ◽  
Meryl Griffiths ◽  
Rona Smith ◽  
Andrew Fry

We present the case of ceftazidime-induced immune-mediated haemolysis with associated acute kidney injury in a 43-year-old woman. The patient initially presented to the regional cystic fibrosis centre for treatment of an infective exacerbation of cystic fibrosis. After initiation of ceftazidime (a third-generation cephalosporin), renal function rapidly deteriorated and a fall in haemoglobin was noted. On transfer to our care, a haemolysis screen identified immune-mediated haemolysis, and renal biopsy confirmed the finding of acute tubular necrosis secondary to haem pigment. The patient’s renal function deteriorated such that she required haemodialysis, although she subsequently recovered and is now dialysis-independent. Although acute haemolytic reactions are recognised with third-generation cephalosporins, this is the first reported case of ceftazidime-induced immune-mediated haemolysis with acute kidney injury. Given the increased frequency of cephalosporin usage, it is important for both nephrologists and general physicians to be aware of this rare but very serious complication.


Author(s):  
Norbert Lameire ◽  
Raymond Vanholder ◽  
Wim Van Biesen

The prognosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) depends on early diagnosis and therapy. A multitude of causes are classified according to their origin as prerenal, intrinsic (intrarenal), and post-renal.Prerenal AKI means a loss of renal function despite intact nephrons, for example, because of volume depletion and/or hypotension.There is a broad spectrum of intrinsic causes of AKI including acute tubular necrosis (ATN), interstitial nephritis, glomerulonephritis, and vasculitis. Evaluation includes careful review of the patient’s history, physical examination, urinalysis, selected urine chemistries, imaging of the urinary tree, and eventual kidney biopsy. The history should focus on the tempo of loss of function (if known), associated systemic diseases, and symptoms related to the urinary tract (especially those that suggest obstruction). In addition, a review of the medications looking for potentially nephrotoxic drugs is essential. The physical examination is directed towards the identification of findings of a systemic disease and a detailed assessment of the patient’s haemodynamic status. This latter goal may require invasive monitoring, especially in the oliguric patient with conflicting clinical findings, where the physical examination has limited accuracy.Excluding urinary tract obstruction is necessary in all cases and may be established easily by renal ultrasound.Distinction between the two most common causes of AKI (prerenal AKI and ATN) is sometimes difficult, especially because the clinical examination is often misleading in the setting of mild volume depletion or overload. Urinary chemistries, like calculation of the fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), may be used to help in this distinction. In contrast to FENa, the fractional excretion of urea has the advantage of being rather independent of diuretic therapy. Response to fluid repletion is still regarded as the gold standard in the differentiation between prerenal and intrinsic AKI. Return of renal function to baseline or resuming of diuresis within 24 to 72 hours is considered to indicate ‘transient, mostly prerenal AKI’, whereas persistent renal failure usually indicates intrinsic disease. Transient AKI may, however, also occur in short-lived ATN. Furthermore, rapid fluid application is contraindicated in a substantial number of patients, such as those with congestive heart failure.‘Muddy brown’ casts and/or tubular epithelial cell casts in the urine sediment are typically seen in patients with ATN. Their presence is an important tool in the distinction between ATN and prerenal AKI, which is characterized by a normal sediment, or by occasional hyaline casts. There is a possible role for new serum and/or urinary biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of the patient with AKI, including the differential diagnosis between pre-renal AKI and ATN. Further studies are needed before their routine determination can be recommended.When a diagnosis cannot be made with reasonable certainty through this evaluation, renal biopsy should be considered; when intrarenal causes such as crescentic glomerulonephritis or vasculitis are suspected, immediate biopsy to avoid delay in the initiation of therapy is mandatory.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 62-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ponce Gabriel ◽  
Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori ◽  
Luis Cuadrado Martin ◽  
Pasqual Barretti ◽  
Andre Luis Balbi

Background In some parts of the world, peritoneal dialysis is widely used for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI), despite concerns about its inadequacy. It has been replaced in recent years by hemodialysis and, most recently, by continuous venovenous therapies. We performed a prospective study to determine the effect of continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD), as compared with daily hemodialysis (dHD), on survival among patients with AKI. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were assigned to receive CPD or dHD in a tertiary-care university hospital. The primary endpoint was hospital survival rate; renal function recovery and metabolic, acid–base, and fluid controls were secondary endpoints. Results Of the 120 patients, 60 were treated with CPD (G1) and 60 with dHD (G2). The two groups were similar at the start of RRT with respect to age (64.2 ± 19.8 years vs 62.5 ± 21.2 years), sex (men: 72% vs 66%), sepsis (42% vs 47%), shock (61% vs 63%), severity of AKI [Acute Tubular Necrosis Individual Severity Score (ATNISS): 0.68 ± 0.2 vs 0.66 ± 0.22; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II: 26.9 ± 8.9 vs 24.1 ± 8.2], pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen [BUN (116.4 ± 33.6 mg/dL vs 112.6 ± 36.8 mg/dL)], and creatinine (5.85 ± 1.9 mg/dL vs 5.95 ± 1.4 mg/dL). In G1, weekly delivered Kt/V was 3.59 ± 0.61, and in G2, it was 4.76 ± 0.65 ( p < 0.01). The two groups were similar in metabolic and acid–base control (after 4 sessions, BUN < 55 mg/dL: 46 ± 18.7 mg/dL vs 52 ± 18.2 mg/dL; pH: 7.41 vs 7.38; bicarbonate: 22.8 ± 8.9 mEq/L vs 22.2 ± 7.1 mEq/L). Duration of therapy was longer in G2 (5.5 days vs 7.5 days; p = 0.02). Despite the delivery of different dialysis methods and doses, the survival rate did not differ between the groups (58% in G1 vs 52% in G2), and recovery of renal function was similar (28% vs 26%). Conclusion High doses of CPD provided appropriate metabolic and pH control, with a rate of survival and recovery of renal function similar to that seen with dHD. Therefore, CPD can be considered an alternative to other forms of RRT in AKI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-168
Author(s):  
Amrit KC ◽  
Rahman Tanvir ◽  
Alam Muhammad Rafiqul ◽  
Ahmed A.H. Hamid ◽  
Noor Towhida

Background: Though peritoneal dialysis has several limitations, it is still used in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients as an alternative method of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT), especially in low socioeconomic countries. Materials and Method: This study included thirty patients diagnosed as AKI. Peritoneal access was established through flexible Tenckhoff catheter for Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis (CPD) and 6-8 exchanges were done in 24 hours. Results: Among 30 patients mean age was (mean±SD) 49.93±14.42 years. Seven (23.33%) patients were hemodynamically unstable. The cause of AKI was drug induced in 6(20.7%), hypovolemia/Acute Tubular Necrosis in 6(20.0%), sepsis in 5(16.7%), heart failure in 2(6.7%) and 11(36.7%) had multiple causes. In initial presentation, mean serum creatinine was 683.42 μmol/L, and the number of sessions required for stabilization of serum creatinine was 7.5±1.43, sessions required for correction of hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis were 2.15±0.69 and 2.5±0.76 respectively. The delivered Kt/V urea was 1.95±0.14 weekly. Six (20.0%) patients had peritonitis, five (16.7%) had pericatheter leakage and four (13.33%) had catheter blockage. Among 30 patients, three patients (10%) had died, sixteen (59.3%) had recovery of renal function and rest did not recover renal function. Conclusion: CPD was effective for correction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalance.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prit Kusirisin ◽  
Siriporn C. Chattipakorn ◽  
Nipon Chattipakorn

Abstract Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is an iatrogenic acute kidney injury observed after intravascular administration of contrast media for intravascular diagnostic procedures or therapeutic angiographic intervention. High risk patients including those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus with impaired renal function, congestive heart failure, intraarterial intervention, higher volume of contrast, volume depletion, old age, multiple myeloma, hypertension, and hyperuricemia had increased prevalence of CIN. Although CIN is reversible by itself, some patients suffer this condition without renal recovery leading to CKD or even end-stage renal disease which required long term renal replacement therapy. In addition, both CIN and CKD have been associated with increasing of mortality. Three pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed including direct tubular toxicity, intrarenal vasoconstriction, and excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), all of which lead to impaired renal function. Reports from basic and clinical studies showing potential preventive strategies for CIN pathophysiology including low- or iso-osmolar contrast media are summarized and discussed. In addition, reports on pharmacological interventions to reduce ROS and attenuate CIN are summarized, highlighting potential for use in clinical practice. Understanding this contributory mechanism could pave ways to improve therapeutic strategies in combating CIN.


Author(s):  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
John R. Prowle

Oliguria and acute kidney injury (AKI) are common in critically-ill patients with studies reporting AKI affecting more than 50% of critically-ill patients. AKI is independently associated with increased mortality and is a potentially modifiable aspect of critical illness. The pathogenesis of AKI is complex and varies according to aetiology. The most common trigger in ICU patients is sepsis—the pathophysiology of septic AKI is poorly understood and probably involves intrarenal haemodynamic and inflammatory processes. In the setting of septic AKI, the classic acute tubular necrosis described in experimental models does not occur and histological changes are only minor. Activation of neurohormonal mechanisms is also important, particularly in the hepatorenal syndrome, where activation of the remain-angiotensin system appears to play a major role. The treatment of oliguria and AKI in ICU patients has traditionally relied on the administration of intravenous fluids. While such therapy is warranted in patients with a clear history, and physical examination suggestive of intravascular and extravascular volume depletion, its usefulness in other patients (e.g. septic patients) remains controversial. Removal of nephrotoxins, rapid treatment of the triggering factors, and attention to cardiac output and mean arterial pressure remain the cornerstones of the prevention and treatment of AKI in ICU.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Acosta-Ochoa ◽  
Juan Bustamante-Munguira ◽  
Alicia Mendiluce-Herrero ◽  
Jesús Bustamante-Bustamante ◽  
Armando Coca-Rojo

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are global health problems. The pathophysiology of acute-on-chronic kidney disease (AoCKD) is not well understood. We aimed to study clinical outcomes in patients with previous normal (pure acute kidney injury; P-AKI) or impaired kidney function (AoCKD) across the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI classification. We performed a retrospective study of patients with AKI, divided into P-AKI and AoCKD groups, evaluating clinical and epidemiological features, distribution across KDIGO-2012 criteria, in-hospital mortality and need for dialysis. One thousand, two hundred and sixty-nine subjects were included. AoCKD individuals were older and had higher comorbidity. P-AKI individuals fulfilled more often the serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 3.0× criterion in AKI-Stage3, AoCKD subjects reached SCr ≥ 4.0 mg/dL criterion more frequently. AKI severity was associated with in-hospital mortality independently of baseline renal function. AoCKD subjects presented higher mortality when fulfilling AKI-Stage1 criteria or SCr ≥ 3.0× criterion within AKI-Stage3. The relationship between mortality and associated risk factors, such as the net increase of SCr or AoCKD status, fluctuated depending on AKI stage and stage criteria sub-strata. AoCKD patients that fulfil SCr increment rate criteria may be exposed to more severe insults, possibly explaining the higher mortality. AoCKD may constitute a unique clinical syndrome. Adequate staging criteria may help prompt diagnosis and administration of appropriate therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e233446
Author(s):  
Kevin John ◽  
Krupa Varughese ◽  
Ranil Johann Boaz ◽  
Tarun George

A 42-year-old woman presented with chronic fever, abdominal pain, intermittent loose stools and dysuria for 3 months. She had recently developed acute dyspnoea with acute kidney injury. She was found to have a contracted, thick-walled bladder with bilateral hydroureteronephrosis. She underwent bilateral percutaneous nephrostomies, following which her renal function recovered. She satisfied the clinical and immunological features of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). She was initiated on immunosuppression. Lupus cystitis with a contracted bladder is an uncommon presentation of SLE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document