scholarly journals Spatial and velocity offsets of Galactic masers from the centres of spiral arms

2019 ◽  
Vol 489 (2) ◽  
pp. 2819-2829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques P Vallée
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Pitch Angle ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Galactic Centre ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
Corotation Radius ◽  
Pattern Speed ◽  
Spiral Model ◽  
Spiral Arm ◽  
Co Gas

ABSTRACT Some theories about the spiral arms of galaxies predict an offset between different tracers of star formation. Our goal in this paper is to find such an offset between the observed locations of radio masers and the locations of the arms, using a recent four-arm model fitted to the CO 1–0 gas. Our method is to compare a recent global four-arm spiral model (as fitted to the arms’ tangents in the observed broad CO 1–0 gas) with the recent results for the trigonometric distances of radio masers, for the main arms (Cygnus–Norma, Perseus, Sagittarius–Carina, Scutum and Norma). Our results indicate that most radio masers are near the inner edge of each spiral arm (towards the Galactic Centre). These masers are offset from the model arm (where the broad CO 1–0 molecular region resides), by 0.34 ± 0.06 kpc inward. In radial velocity space, the median offset between masers and the CO-fitted model is around 10 ± 1 km s–1. Based on the fact that the masers are observed here to be radially inward of the broad CO gas in the Cygnus arm at 15 kpc along the Galactic meridian, the corotation radius of the Milky Way disc is >15 kpc distant from the Galactic Centre and the density wave’s angular pattern speed is <15 km s–1 kpc–1. The pitch angle of the arm should be measured using many arm tracers, and located on both sides of the Galactic meridian, to ensure better precision and to avoid a bias pertinent to a single tracer.

scholarly journals Galactic spiral structure

2009 ◽  
Vol 465 (2111) ◽  
pp. 3425-3446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Francis ◽  
Erik Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Pitch Angle ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Spiral Galaxies ◽  
Stellar Orbits ◽  
Grand Design ◽  
Galactic Spiral Structure ◽  
Pattern Speed ◽  
Galactic Spiral ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Spiral Arm

We describe the structure and composition of six major stellar streams in a population of 20 574 local stars in the New Hipparcos Reduction with known radial velocities. We find that, once fast moving stars are excluded, almost all stars belong to one of these streams. The results of our investigation have led us to re-examine the hydrogen maps of the Milky Way, from which we identify the possibility of a symmetric two-armed spiral with half the conventionally accepted pitch angle. We describe a model of spiral arm motions that matches the observed velocities and compositions of the six major streams, as well as the observed velocities of the Hyades and Praesepe clusters at the extreme of the Hyades stream. We model stellar orbits as perturbed ellipses aligned at a focus in coordinates rotating at the rate of precession of apocentre. Stars join a spiral arm just before apocentre, follow the arm for more than half an orbit, and leave the arm soon after pericentre. Spiral pattern speed equals the mean rate of precession of apocentre. Spiral arms are shown to be stable configurations of stellar orbits, up to the formation of a bar and/or ring. Pitch angle is directly related to the distribution of orbital eccentricities in a given spiral galaxy. We show how spiral galaxies can evolve to form bars and rings. We show that orbits of gas clouds are stable only in bisymmetric spirals. We conclude that spiral galaxies evolve toward grand design two-armed spirals. We infer from the velocity distributions that the Milky Way evolved into this form about 9 billion years ago (Ga).

scholarly journals Autonomous Gaussian decomposition of the Galactic Ring Survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 640 ◽  
pp. A72
Author(s):  
M. Riener ◽  
J. Kainulainen ◽  
J. D. Henshaw ◽  
H. Beuther
Keyword(s):  
Milky Way ◽  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Galactic Plane ◽  
Gas Emission ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
Precise Knowledge ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Co Emission ◽  
Spiral Arm

Knowledge about the distribution of CO emission in the Milky Way is essential to understanding the impact of the Galactic environment on the formation and evolution of structures in the interstellar medium. However, our current insight as to the fraction of CO in the spiral arm and interarm regions is still limited by large uncertainties in assumed rotation curve models or distance determination techniques. In this work we use the Bayesian approach from Reid et al. (2016, ApJ, 823, 77; 2019, ApJ, 885, 131), which is based on our most precise knowledge at present about the structure and kinematics of the Milky Way, to obtain the current best assessment of the Galactic distribution of 13CO from the Galactic Ring Survey. We performed two different distance estimates that either included (Run A) or excluded (Run B) a model for Galactic features, such as spiral arms or spurs. We also included a prior for the solution of the kinematic distance ambiguity that was determined from a compilation of literature distances and an assumed size-linewidth relationship. Even though the two distance runs show strong differences due to the prior for Galactic features for Run A and larger uncertainties due to kinematic distances in Run B, the majority of their distance results are consistent with each other within the uncertainties. We find that the fraction of 13CO emission associated with spiral arm features ranges from 76 to 84% between the two distance runs. The vertical distribution of the gas is concentrated around the Galactic midplane, showing full-width at half-maximum values of ~75 pc. We do not find any significant difference between gas emission properties associated with spiral arm and interarm features. In particular, the distribution of velocity dispersion values of gas emission in spurs and spiral arms is very similar. We detect a trend of higher velocity dispersion values with increasing heliocentric distance, which we, however, attribute to beam averaging effects caused by differences in spatial resolution. We argue that the true distribution of the gas emission is likely more similar to a combination of the two distance results discussed, and we highlight the importance of using complementary distance estimations to safeguard against the pitfalls of any single approach. We conclude that the methodology presented in this work is a promising way to determine distances to gas emission features in Galactic plane surveys.

Perseus arm - a new perspective on star formation and spiral structure in our home galaxy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wienen ◽  
C M Brunt ◽  
C L Dobbs ◽  
D Colombo
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Surface Density ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Data Cube ◽  
High Angular Resolution ◽  
Molecular Gas ◽  
Linear Scale ◽  
Perseus Arm ◽  
Spiral Arm

Abstract Expansion of (sub)millimetre capabilities to high angular resolution offered with interferometers allows to resolve giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in nearby galaxies. This enables us to place the Milky Way in the context of other galaxies to advance our understanding of star formation in our own Galaxy. We thus remap 12CO (1 - 0) data along the Perseus spiral arm in the outer Milky Way to a fixed physical resolution and present the first spiral arm data cube at a common distance as it would be seen by an observer outside the Milky Way. To achieve this goal we calibrated the longitude-velocity structure of 12CO gas of the outer Perseus arm based on trigonometric distances and maser velocities provided by the BeSSeL survey. The molecular gas data were convolved to the same spatial resolution along the whole spiral arm and regridded on to a linear scale map with the coordinate system transformed to the spiral arm reference frame. We determined the width of the Perseus spiral arm to be 7.8 ± 0.2 km s−1 around the kinematic arm centre. To study the large scale structure we derived the 12CO gas mass surface density distribution of velocities shifted to the kinematic arm centre and arm length. This yields a variation of the gas mass surface density along the arm length and a compression of molecular gas mass at linear scale. We determined a thickness of ∼63 pc on average for the Perseus spiral arm and a centroid of the molecular layer of 8.7 pc.

scholarly journals Using synthetic emission maps to constrain the structure of the Milky Way

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (S298) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex R. Pettitt ◽  
Clare L. Dobbs ◽  
David M. Acreman ◽  
Daniel J. Price
Keyword(s):  
Pitch Angle ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Particle Hydrodynamics ◽  
Smoothed Particle ◽  
Pattern Speeds ◽  
Best Fit ◽  
Grid Based ◽  
Key Questions

AbstractWe present the current standing of an investigation into the structure of the Milky Way. We use smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) to simulate the ISM gas in the Milky Way under the effect of a number of different gravitational potentials representing the spiral arms and nuclear bars, both fixed and time-dependent. The gas is subject to ISM cooling and chemistry, enabling us to track the CO and HI density. We use a 3D grid-based radiative transfer code to simulate the emission from the SPH output, allowing for the construction of synthetic longitude-velocity maps as viewed from the Earth. By comparing these maps with the observed emission in CO and HI from the Milky Way ([Dame et al. 2001, Kalberla et al. 2005]), we can infer the arm/bar geometry that provides a best fit to our Galaxy. By doing so we aim to answer key questions concerning the morphology of the Milky Way such as the number of the spiral arms, the pattern speeds of the bar(s) and arms, the pitch angle of the arms and shape of the bar(s).

scholarly journals Interarm islands in the Milky Way – the one near the Cygnus spiral arm

2020 ◽  
Vol 494 (1) ◽  
pp. 1134-1142
Author(s):  
Jacques P Vallée
Keyword(s):  
Observational Data ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Young Stars ◽  
H Ii Regions ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
The One ◽  
Loop 2 ◽  
Perseus Arm ◽  
Spiral Arm

ABSTRACT This study extends to the structure of the Galaxy. Our main goal is to focus on the first spiral arm beyond the Perseus arm, often called the Cygnus arm or the ‘Outer Norma’ arm, by appraising the distributions of the masers near the Cygnus arm. The method is to employ masers whose trigonometric distances were measured with accuracy. The maser data come from published literature – see column 8 in Table 1 here, having been obtained via the existing networks (US VLBA, the Japanese VERA, the European VLBI, and the Australian LBA). The new results for Cygnus are split in two groups: those located near a recent CO-fitted global model spiral arm and those congregating within an ‘interarm island’ located halfway between the Perseus arm and the Cygnus arm. Next, we compare this island with other similar interarm objects near other spiral arms. Thus, we delineate an interarm island (6 × 2 kpc) located between the two long spiral arms (Cygnus and Perseus arms); this is reminiscent of the small ‘Local Orion arm’ (4 × 2 kpc) found earlier between the Perseus and Sagittarius arms and of the old ‘Loop’ (2 × 0.5 kpc) found earlier between the Sagittarius and Scutum arms. Various arm models are compared, based on observational data (masers, H II regions, H I gas, young stars, CO 1–0 gas).

scholarly journals The link between solenoidal turbulence and slow star formation in G0.253+0.016

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (S322) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Federrath ◽  
J. M. Rathborne ◽  
S. N. Longmore ◽  
J. M. D. Kruijssen ◽  
J. Bally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Star Formation Rate ◽  
Formation Rate ◽  
Dust Emission ◽  
Volume Density ◽  
Galactic Centre ◽  
Galactic Disc ◽  
Density Variance

AbstractStar formation in the Galactic disc is primarily controlled by gravity, turbulence, and magnetic fields. It is not clear that this also applies to star formation near the Galactic Centre. Here we determine the turbulence and star formation in the CMZ cloud G0.253+0.016. Using maps of 3 mm dust emission and HNCO intensity-weighted velocity obtained with ALMA, we measure the volume-density variance σρ /ρ 0=1.3±0.5 and turbulent Mach number $\mathcal{M}$ = 11±3. Combining these with turbulence simulations to constrain the plasma β = 0.34±0.35, we reconstruct the turbulence driving parameter b=0.22±0.12 in G0.253+0.016. This low value of b indicates solenoidal (divergence-free) driving of the turbulence in G0.253+0.016. By contrast, typical clouds in the Milky Way disc and spiral arms have a significant compressive (curl-free) driving component (b > 0.4). We speculate that shear causes the solenoidal driving in G0.253+0.016 and show that this may reduce the star formation rate by a factor of 7 compared to nearby clouds.

Molecular Gas, Kinematics, and OB Star Formation in the Spiral Arms of the Southern Milky Way

2006 ◽  
Vol 641 (2) ◽  
pp. 938-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Luna ◽  
L. Bronfman ◽  
L. Carrasco ◽  
J. May
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Molecular Gas ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
Gas Kinematics

scholarly journals Understanding our Galaxy: from the center to outskirts

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (S248) ◽  
pp. 470-473
Author(s):  
Z. Q. Shen ◽  
Y. Xu ◽  
J. L. Han ◽  
X. W. Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Radio Source ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Galactic Center ◽  
Galactic Disk ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
Compact Radio Source ◽  
Sgr A ◽  
Spiral Arm

AbstractWe describe the efforts to understand our Milky Way Galaxy, from its center to outskirts, including (1) the measurements of the intrinsic size of the galactic center compact radio source Sgr A*; (2) the determination of the distance from the Sun to the Perseus spiral arm; and (3) the revealing of large scale global magnetic fields of the Galaxy.With high-resolution millimeter-VLBI observations, Shen et al. (2005) have measured the intrinsic size of the radio-emitting region of the galactic center compact radio source Sgr A* to be only 1 AU in diameter at 3.5 mm. When combined with the lower limit on the mass of Sgr A*, this provides strong evidence for Sgr A* being a super-massive black hole. Comparison with the intrinsic size detection at 7 mm indicates a frequency-dependent source size, posing a tight constraint on various theoretical models.With VLBI phase referencing observations, Xu et al. (2006) have measured the trigonometric parallax of W3OH in the Perseus spiral arm with an accuracy of 10 μas and also its absolute velocity with an accuracy of 1 km s−1. This demonstrates the capability of probing the structure and kinematics of the Milky Way by determining distances to 12 GHz methanol (CH3OH) masers in star forming regions of distant spiral arms and Milky Way's outskirts.With pulsar dispersion measures and rotation measures, Han et al. (2006) can directly measure the magnetic fields in a very large region of the Galactic disk. The results show that the large-scale magnetic fields are aligned with the spiral arms but reverse their directions many times from the most inner Norma arm to the outer Perseus arm.

scholarly journals Distances to Galactic X-ray Binaries with Gaia DR2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R M Arnason ◽  
H Papei ◽  
P Barmby ◽  
A Bahramian ◽  
M Gorski
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Spatial Separation ◽  
High Mass ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Type I ◽  
Spiral Arms ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Low Mass ◽  
X Ray Binaries ◽  
Spiral Arm

Abstract Precise and accurate measurements of distances to Galactic X-ray binaries (XRBs) reduce uncertainties in the determination of XRB physical parameters. We have cross-matched the XRB catalogues of Liu et al. (2006, 2007) to the results of Gaia Data Release 2. We identify 86 X-ray binaries with a Gaia candidate counterpart, of which 32 are low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) and 54 are high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs). Distances to Gaia candidate counterparts are, on average, consistent with those measured by Hipparcos and radio parallaxes. When compared to distances measured by Gaia candidate counterparts, distances measured using Type I X-ray bursts are systematically larger, suggesting that these bursts reach only 50% of the Eddington limit. However, these results are strongly dependent on the prior assumptions used for estimating distance from the Gaia parallax measurements. Comparing positions of Gaia candidate counterparts for XRBs in our sample to positions of spiral arms in the Milky Way, we find that HMXBs exhibit mild preference for being closer to spiral arms; LMXBs exhibit mild preference for being closer to inter-arm regions. LMXBs do not exhibit any preference for leading or trailing their closest spiral arm. HMXBs exhibit a mild preference for trailing their closest spiral arm. The lack of a strong correlation between HMXBs and spiral arms may be explained by star formation occurring closer to the midpoint of the arms, or a time delay between star formation and HMXB formation manifesting as a spatial separation between HMXBs and the spiral arm where they formed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document