scholarly journals FC 034SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A 6-MONTH OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Rovin ◽  
Richard Furie ◽  
Frédéric A Houssiau ◽  
Gabriel Contreras ◽  
Y K O Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Appreciable Change ◽  
Sledai Score ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background and Aims Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), occurring in up to 40% of patients (pts) with SLE over their disease course, and resulting in 10–20% of pts progressing to end-stage kidney disease.1-3 The BLISS-LN (GSK Study BEL114054; NCT01639339) study demonstrated that the addition of intravenous (IV) belimumab (BEL) to standard therapy (ST) in pts with active LN significantly improved renal responses over 2 years compared with ST alone.4 Here we present additional safety and efficacy data from the 6-month open-label (OL) extension phase of BLISS-LN. Method In this OL phase, eligible completers of the Phase 3 BLISS-LN study (those who received BEL or placebo [PBO] through Week 100 and completed Week 104 assessments) received BEL 10 mg/kg IV plus ST every 28 days for 24 weeks. Endpoints at OL Week 28 included: safety; Primary Efficacy Renal Response (PERR; defined as urine protein:creatinine ratio [uPCR] ≤0.7; eGFR no more than 20% below OL baseline value or ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy); Complete Renal Response (CRR; defined as uPCR <0.5; eGFR no more than 10% below OL baseline value or ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2; no rescue therapy); uPCR; eGFR; the proportion of pts with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score <4; Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI); and corticosteroid use. Analyses were based on observed data and summarised relative to the OL baseline (last available value measured prior to dosing on or before the date of the first OL treatment dose). Results Of 257 pts (57.4 % of pts in BLISS-LN double-blind [DB] study) screened and enrolled, 255 pts were treated (safety population: 123 pts switched from PBO to BEL; 132 pts remained on BEL). In total, 254 pts were included in the efficacy analyses (PBO to BEL: 122 pts; BEL to BEL: 132 pts). Mean (standard deviation) age was 35.9 (10.3) years. In total, 3.5% of pts withdrew from the OL phase, mainly due to adverse events (AE; 2.0%). Overall, 168/255 (65.9%) pts experienced ≥1 AE (76/123 [61.8%] PBO to BEL pts; 92/132 [69.7%] BEL to BEL pts); 49/255 (19.2%) pts had ≥1 treatment-related AE (25/123 [20.3%] PBO to BEL pts; 24/132 [18.2% ] BEL to BEL pts); 15/255 (5.9%) pts had ≥1 serious AE (5/123 [4.1%] PBO to BEL pts; 10/132 [7.6%] BEL to BEL pts); and 1 death was reported in the PBO to BEL group. The proportion of patients achieving PERR and CRR increased from OL baseline to OL Week 28 in both groups (Table). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) for uPCR and eGFR were maintained from OL baseline through to OL Week 28 (Table). The proportion of SLEDAI score <4 responders in BEL to BEL group tended to increase from OL baseline to OL Week 28, and decrease in the PBO to BEL group (Table). SDI worsening (change >0) was experienced by 7 (2.9%) pts (4 [3.3%] PBO to BEL; 3 [2.5%] BEL to BEL) compared with OL baseline. There was no appreciable change in the number of patients receiving average daily prednisone-equivalent doses of ≤5 mg or ≤7.5 mg from OL baseline to OL Week 28 (Table). Conclusion BEL was well tolerated as an add-on to ST, with no new safety signals. Efficacy among pts with LN randomised to BEL during the DB phase was maintained during the OL phase. Study funding GSK. Editorial assistance (GSK-funded): Olga Conn, PhD, Fishawack Indicia Ltd., part of Fishawack Health, UK.

scholarly journals Childhood Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Tertiary Care Centre Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-116
Author(s):  
Luna Bajracharya ◽  
Surya Bahadur Thapa
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Active Lupus

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic immunologic disorder with multisystem manifestations. Even more awareness is required to diagnose the disease at younger age. Objective of this study was to explore clinico-laboratory manifestations and management of SLE in children at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH).Materials and Methods: The study was retrospective hospital based study conducted from 15th July, 2008 to 14th July, 2014. Medical charts of all children and adolescent (6- 16years of age) with SLE admitted at TUTH were reviewed for analysis of data.Results: The total number of patients was 33, with 28(84.8%) girls and 5 (15.2%) boys. The mean age of diagnosis was 12.12 (SD 1.89). Facial puffiness (27.3%) and arthralgia (24.2%) were the commonest presentations at disease onset. The most frequent clinical features during the entire course of illness were edema (78.9%), anemia (69.7%) and fever (66.7%). Twenty three (69.6%) patients underwent renal biopsy in which class IV was the commonest lupus nephritis. The commonly used drugs after prednisolone were intravenous cyclophosphamide, intravenouse methylprednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. Total 17 (51.5%) patients went into remission. Two patients died due to active lupus and four due to sepsis.Conclusion: Lupus nephritis was the commonest feature at disease onset, at the time of diagnosis and throughout the disease course among Nepalese children with SLE. The most frequently used medications were prednisolone and iv cyclophosphamide. Infection and active lupus were the leading causes of complications and death.J Nepal Paediatr Soc 2015;35(2):111-116

scholarly journals SAT0193 A PHASE 3, OPEN-LABEL, CONTINUATION STUDY EVALUATING LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS FROM JAPAN AND KOREA WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, FOR UP TO 7 YEARS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1038.2-1039
Author(s):  
Y. Tanaka ◽  
S. C. Bae ◽  
D. Bass ◽  
M. Chu ◽  
P. Curtis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Sledai Score ◽  
Organ Domain ◽  
Domain Scores

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder more prevalent in the Asian population vs Caucasians. Belimumab (BEL), a monoclonal antibody targeting B-lymphocyte stimulator, is approved in patients (pts) ≥5 years with active, autoantibody-positive SLE.Objectives:Evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) BEL + standard SLE therapy (SST) in pts with SLE in Japan/Korea.Methods:In this Phase 3, multicentre, open-label (OL) study (BEL114333;NCT01597622), eligible (≥18 years of age) completers of the double-blind phase of GSK study BEL113750 in Japan and South Korea or the subcutaneous OL phase of GSK Study BEL112341 in Japan, received monthly BEL 10 mg/kg IV plus SST. Primary endpoints: safety assessments. Key secondary endpoints: SRI4 response rate at each scheduled visit (observed data), defined as a ≥4-point reduction from baseline in SELENA-SLEDAI score, no worsening in PGA (<0.3-point increase from baseline) and no new BILAG 1A/2B organ domain scores; time to first severe SFI flare over time. Endpoints were analysed relative to first BEL dose (parent or current study). No follow-up data were collected after study withdrawal.Results:Overall, 142 pts were enrolled (Japan n=72; Korea n=70), 104 (73.2%) completed the study, 1 (0.7%) died and 37 (26.1%) withdrew.Overall, 139 (97.9%) pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE) (Table). Most frequent AEs included: nasopharyngitis (60.6%); headache (28.2%); cough, herpes zoster and viral upper respiratory tract infection (18.3% each). Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 48 (33.8%) pts. Most common SAEs were infections and infestations, reported in 24 (16.9%) pts (Table). During this study, the annual incidence of AEs, including SAEs and AESI, remained stable or declined, with no trends of clinical concerns regarding the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 values for laboratory parameters. There was 1 transient positive immunogenicity result of no clinical concern.Table.The proportion of SRI4 responders was 47.8% at Year 1 (Week 24) and tended to increase numerically up to 84.6% at Year 7 (Week 48). The proportion of pts with a ≥4-point decrease from baseline in SELENA-SLEDAI score numerically increased from 51.5% at Year 1 (Week 24) to 84.6% at Year 7 (Week 48). Proportion of pts with no PGA worsening was 91.3-100% and the proportion with no new BILAG 1A/2B organ domain scores was 93.3-100% up to Year 7 (Week 48). A total of 21 (14.8%) pts had 24 severe SFI flares.Conclusion:BEL was well tolerated as add-on therapy to SST for ≤7 years in pts with SLE from Japan/Korea. Safety results were consistent with the known BEL safety profile.Study funding: GSK.Disclosure of Interests:Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Received research grants from Asahi-Kasei, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Ono, Speakers bureau: Received speaking fees and/or honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Teijin, Sang-Cheol Bae: None declared, Damon Bass Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Myron Chu Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paula Curtis Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Kathleen DeRose Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Beulah Ji Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Regina Kurrasch Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Jenny Lowe Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, Paige Meizlik Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK, David Roth Shareholder of: GSK, Employee of: GSK

Effect of Autoantibodies to Erythropoietin Receptor in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Biopsy-proven Lupus Nephritis

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1328-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinori Hara ◽  
Kengo Furuichi ◽  
Junya Yamahana ◽  
Haruka Yasuda ◽  
Yasunori Iwata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Erythropoietin Receptor ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Renal Response

Objective.We examined the clinical significance of autoantibodies to the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who had biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (LN).Methods.Forty-six Japanese patients with SLE with LN who had undergone renal biopsy during 1993–2014 were enrolled in this study and followed for a mean of 83 months. Sera from those patients were screened for anti-EPOR antibodies using ELISA.Results.Anti-EPOR antibodies were detected in 18 (39%) of the 46 patients with SLE with anemia. Anti-EPOR antibodies were associated with low hemoglobin concentrations and reticulocytopenia. In addition, anti-EPOR antibodies were positively correlated with SLE disease activity, even though serum levels of the complement factors 3 and 4 did not differ between the 2 groups. In patients with International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 class IV LN, anti-EPOR antibodies were associated with active lesions including cellular crescents in glomeruli. Decrease in renal function was more frequently observed in patients without complete or partial renal response than in patients with it, and serum levels of the antibodies as well as renal response to treatment were significant risk factors for progression of renal dysfunction.Conclusion.The present study suggests that anti-EPOR antibodies might be involved in overall disease activity and active renal lesions, as well as in the impaired erythropoiesis in patients with SLE with LN. Further, the levels of anti-EPOR antibodies may be an additional predictor for renal injury.

scholarly journals Assessment of SLEDAI Score in Children with Lupus Nephritis Class III-IV in Vietnam National Children’s Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Duong Thi Thanh Binh ◽  
Nguyen Thu Huong ◽  
Nguyen Thi Kien ◽  
Pham Van Dem ◽  
Tran Minh Dien
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Sledai Score ◽  
Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

This study describes clinical, paraclinical characteristics and treatment response in children with nephritis class II-IV caused by systemic lupus erythematosus and validates SLEDAI for the evaluation of disease activity and the appropriate treatment strategy. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out on 40 children, 37 girls (92%) and 3 boys (8%), with an average age of 11.7 years with lupus nephritis class III- IV in Vietnam National Children’s Hospital in 2019. The study results show that the average score of SLEDAI in the children with pericardial and pleural effusions was 20.94 ± 4.09; high blood pressure, 20.89 ± 4.23; and gross hematuria, 20.29 ± 5.03, which were higher than those in children without these manifestations with p< 0.05. The most common kidney manifestations were nephrotic-range nephritis with renal failure (40%) and Glomerulonephritis (35%), corresponding to an average SLEDAI score of 24.25 ± 5.52 and 24.33 ± 3.2, respectively (p = 0.001). SLEDAI had an inverse correlation with the C3 complement value (r -0.315, p <0.05). The average SLEDAI score decreased gradually from 18.75 ± 4.22 to 3.38 ± 3.95 points (p <0.001) after 12 months of treatment.  The study concludes that SLEDAI score was higher in patients with pleural and/or pericardial effusions, hypertension and gross hematuria, nephrotic-range nephritis with kidney failure or glomerulonephritis. SLEDAI score corresponded with the C3 complement value and the average SLEDAI score decreased gradually with treatment. Keywords: Lupus Nephritis class III- IV, SLEDAI. References [1] George Bertsias, Ricard Cervera và Dimitrios T Boumpas, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pathogenesis and Clinical Features<sample chapter 20_mod 17_Systemic Lupus nephritis 2012.pdf> (2012), EULAR Textbook on Rheumatic Diseases, EULAR, 476-505.[2] D.M. Levy and S. Kamphuis, Systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am59(2) (2012)345-64.[3] Thai Thien Nam, 2018, Lupus in National Children,s Hospital, [4] C.Bombardier, M.B. Hurwitz et al, Derivation of the SLEDAI: A disease activity index for lupus patients. The committee on prognosis studies in SLE, Arthritis Rheum 35(6) (1992) 630-640.[5] R. Shamim, S. Farman, S. Batool et al, Association of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index score with clinical and laboratory parameters in pediatric onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Pak J Med Sci. 36(3) (2020) 467-472.[6] Le Thuy Hang, Assesment of SLEDAI score and panthology in children with lupus nephritis, 2016, Pediatrician thesis, Hanoi Medical University.[7] S.K.S.M. Nazri, K.K. Wong and W.Z.W.A. Hamid, Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Retrospective analysis of clinico-laboratory parameters and their association with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score, Saudi Med J. 39(6) (2018) 627-631. [8] Nguyen Thuy Duong, clinical, paraclinical and pathology characteristics in children with nephritis caused by systemic lupus erythematosus, 2011, Master thesis, Hanoi Medical University.[9] S.N. Wong, W.K. Chan, J.Hui et al, Membranous lupus nephritis in Chinese children--a case series and review of the literature. Pediatr Nephrol, 24(10)(2009) 1989-1996.[10] N.T.N. Dung, H.T. Loan, S. Nielsen et al, Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus onset patterns in Vietnamese children: a descriptive study of 45 children. Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal, 10 (2010) 38-48.[11] T. Pusongchai, J. Jungthirapanich, S. Khositseth, Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Thammasat University Hospital, J Med Assoc Thai. 93(12) (2010) 283-290.    

THE CLINICAL, LABORATORY MANIFESTATIONS AND HISTOPATHOLOGY IN NEPHROTIC PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2018 ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Le Thuan Nguyen ◽  
Bui Bao Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Tubulointerstitial Lesions

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organ systems. The kidney appears to be the most commonly affected organ, especially nephrotic is a serious kidney injury. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathology are very useful for diagnosis, provide the means of predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in nephrotic patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of nephrotic patients with lupus treated in the Department of Nephrology Trung Vuong Hospital and Cho Ray Hospital between May/2014 and May/2017. Renal histopathological lesions were classified according to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society - ISN/RPS ’s 2003. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathological features were described. Results: Of 32 LN with nephritic range proteinuria cases studied, 93.7% were women. The 3 most common clinical manifestations were edema (93.8%), hypertension (96.8%) and pallor (68.9%), musculoskeletal manifestions (46.9%), malar rash (40.6%). There was significant rise in laboratory and immunological manifestions with hematuria (78.1%), Hb < 12g/dL (93.5%), increased Cholesterol (100%), and Triglycerid (87.5%), Creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL (87.5%), increased BUN 71.9%, ANA (+) 93.8%, Anti Ds DNA(+) 96.9%, low C3: 96.9%, low C4: 84.4%. The most various and severe features were noted in class IV with active tubulointerstitial lesions and high activity index. Conclusion: Lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria has the more severity of histopathological feature and the more severity of the more systemic organ involvements and laboratory disorders were noted. Key words: Systemic lupus, erythematosus (SLE) lupus nepphritis, clinical

scholarly journals Assessment of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), adiponectin, and other adipokines as potential markers of proteinuria and renal dysfunction in lupus nephritis: a cross-sectional study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ivan Gamez-Nava ◽  
Valeria Diaz-Rizo ◽  
Edsaul Emilio Perez-Guerrero ◽  
Jose Francisco Muñoz-Valle ◽  
Ana Miriam Saldaña-Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Macrophage Migration ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background To date, the association of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and serum adipokines with lupus nephritis is controversial. Objective To assess the utility of serum MIF, leptin, adiponectin and resistin levels as markers of proteinuria and renal dysfunction in lupus nephritis. Methods Cross-sectional study including 196 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 52 healthy controls (HCs). Disease activity was assessed by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Renal SLE involvement was investigated by renal-SLEDAI. MIF, adiponectin, leptin and resistin levels were quantified by ELISA. We assessed the correlations of quantitative variables by Spearman correlation (rs). Multivariable linear regression adjusted the variables associated with the severity of proteinuria. Results SLE patients had higher MIF (p = 0.02) and adiponectin (p < 0.001) than HCs. Patients with renal SLE involvement (n = 43) had higher adiponectin (19.0 vs 13.3 μg/mL, p = 0.002) and resistin (10.7 vs 8.9 ng/mL, p = 0.01) than patients with non-renal SLE (n = 153). Proteinuria correlated with high adiponectin (rs = 0.19, p < 0.009) and resistin (rs = 0.26, p < 0.001). MIF (rs = 0.27, p = 0.04). Resistin correlated with increased creatinine (rs = 0.18, p = 0.02). High renal-SLEDAI correlated with adiponectin (rs = 0.21, p = 0.004). Multiple linear regression showed that elevated adiponectin (p = 0.02), younger age (p = 0.04) and low MIF (p = 0.02) were associated with the severity of proteinuria. Low MIF and high adiponectin levels interacted to explain the association with the severity of proteinuria (R2 = 0.41). Conclusions High adiponectin combined with low MIF concentrations int+eract to explain the severity of proteinuria in renal SLE. These findings highlight the relevance of adiponectin, resistin and MIF as markers of LN.

scholarly journals SAT0211 RENAL INJURY IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS CHARACTERIZED BY THROMBOTIC MICROANGIOPATHY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1048.1-1048
Author(s):  
W. Hu
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Nephritis ◽  
Renal Biopsy ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Thrombotic Microangiopathy ◽  
Renal Injury ◽  
Renal Outcome ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Tubulointerstitial Lesions

Background:Classical lupus nephritis (LN) is characterized by glomerular immune complex(IC) deposition with glomerular proliferation, basement membrane destruction and cell infiltration. Non-IC mediated renal injury with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was also reported in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE-renal TMA), but most studies were reported in patients with both LN and renal TMA.Objectives:In this study, clinical features and outcomes of SLE-renal TMA in absence of obvious IC in SLE patients were analyzed.Methods:Patients with glomerular TMA and/or vascular TMA in the absence of obvious subendothelial or epithelial immune deposits were screened out from 2332 biopsied in SLE patients who underwent first renal biopsy from January 2005 to August 2016. Their clinical, histological features and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.Results:In 2332 renal biopsies obtained from SLE patients, 257 (11.0%) showed renal TMA, of which 237 showed both renal TMA and LN, and 20 biopsies had only renal TMA (SLE-renal TMA). There were 2 males and 18 females with an average age of (25 ± 10) years. The median course of SLE and LN were 3.0(1.0, 6.0) and 0.8(0.5, 1.9) months. All 20 patients deserved acute kidney injury, of which 11 (55%) needed renal replacement therapy (RRT) and 12 (60%) were nephrotic syndrome. Blood system involvement was found in all cases, including 13 cases (65.0%) with TMA triad (microvascular hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase).Pathological examination showed that 17 cases (85.0%) had both glomerular TMA and vascular TMA. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy showed that 8 cases (40%) had no IC deposition in glomerulus and 12 cases (60%) had only IC deposition in mesangium. Acute tubulointerstitial lesions in patients requiring RRT were more serious than those no needing for RRT((43.6±24.9) %vs(21.7±20.1) %,P=0.047). The fusion range of foot process was positively correlated with proteinuria (r2= 0.347,P=0.006).All patients received high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Four patients received plasma exchange and three patients received gamma globulin, respectively. Eleven patients requiring RRT all stop RRT in a median time of 16.0 (9.0, 30.0) days. During a median follow-up of 58.0 (36.0, 92.3) months, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 15 cases, partial remission in 4 cases and no remission in 1 case. Six cases (30%) relapsed. No case died or progressed to end stage renal disease.Conclusion:Renal injury characterized by TMA is not uncommon in SLE renal biopsy cases. The clinical manifestation is special and the renal injury is serious. The renal outcome is good by intensive immunosuppressive therapy. It should be considered as a unique type of renal injury in SLE.References:[1]Moake JL. Thrombotic microangiopathies. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347(8): 589-600.[2]Anders HJ, Weening JJ. Kidney disease in lupus is not always ‘lupus nephritis’. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013. 15(2): 108.[3]Song D, Wu LH, Wang FM, et al. The spectrum of renal thrombotic microangiopathy in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013. 15(1): R12.[4]Hu WX, Liu ZZ, Chen HP, Zhang HT, Li LS, Liu ZH. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis with thrombotic microangiopathy. Lupus. 2010. 19(14): 1591-8.[5]Tomov S, Lazarchick J, Self SE, Bruner ET, Budisavljevic MN. Kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with SLE treated with romiplostim. Lupus. 2013. 22(5): 504-9.[6]Li C, Yap D, Chan G, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Clinico-pathological Correlations in Lupus Nephritis with Kidney Biopsy Showing Thrombotic Microangiopathy. J Rheumatol. 2019 .[7]Chen MH, Chen MH, Chen WS, et al. Thrombotic microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cohort study in North Taiwan. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011. 50(4): 768-75.[8]Park MH, AUID- Oho, Caselman N, Ulmer S, Weitz IC, AUID- Oho. Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy associated with lupus nephritis. Blood Adv. 2018. 2(16): 2090-2094.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document