scholarly journals Progressive renal insufficiency, hypercalcaemia, bicytopaenia and a history of breast cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
S. Letterer ◽  
U. Lindner ◽  
H.-W. Bernd ◽  
F. M. Vogt ◽  
U. Helmchen ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22104-e22104 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Langeberg ◽  
C. D. O'Malley ◽  
C. W. Critchlow ◽  
J. P. Fryzek

e22104 Background: Risk of acute renal failure (ARF) among breast cancer (BC) patients may increase with nephrotoxic chemotherapy and other exposures, but this risk is not well characterized. Furthermore, among patients who present with renal insufficiencies (RI) at cancer diagnosis, subsequent treatment patterns are not well described. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a large national commercial claims database. The cohort included all women diagnosed with BC from 2000 to 2007 who were 18–64 years at diagnosis with no history of cancer (n=13,296). We defined a diagnosis of BC as at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims more than 30 days apart with an ICD-9 code of 174. Among patients with no history of RI (n=13,150), we calculated the cumulative incidence (CI) of ARF_the proportion with at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims with an ICD-9 code of 584 or 586 in the first year following cancer diagnosis. Treatment for BC patients with a history of RI (n=146) was also assessed. Results: Among BC patients with no history of RI, 0.3% were diagnosed with ARF within a year after cancer diagnosis. The CI of ARF was higher in patients with metastases: 0.7% for any metastasis, 2.3% for bone metastasis, and 0.1% for no metastasis. The CI of ARF among patients undergoing radiation or mastectomy was similar to the overall rate (0.3%) but was higher in patients receiving nephrotoxic chemotherapy (1.0%) or intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BPs) (2.1%). The CI of ARF was higher in patients with congestive heart failure (1.4%), diabetes (0.9%), and/or hypertension (0.8%) at cancer diagnosis compared to patients without these comorbidities (0.2%). Among BC patients with a history of RI, 7.5% were administered nephrotoxic chemotherapy, 30.1% received potentially nephrotoxic chemotherapy, and 1.4% were given IV BPs. Conclusions: Breast cancer patients who present with comorbidities, develop metastases, or are given nephrotoxic chemotherapy or IV bisphosphonates are at higher risk of acute renal failure in the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. More research is warranted on the treatment of breast cancer patients with a history of renal insufficiency. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 889
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Cecilia Y. S. Ho ◽  
Vivian Y. Shin ◽  
Chun Hang Au ◽  
Tsun Leung Chan ◽  
...  

The germline carrier of the BRCA1 pathogenic mutation has been well proven to confer an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Despite BRCA1 biallelic pathogenic mutations being extremely rare, they have been reported to be embryonically lethal or to cause Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we describe a patient who was a 48-year-old female identified with biallelic pathogenic mutations of the BRCA1 gene, with no or very subtle FA-features. She was diagnosed with ovarian cancer and breast cancer at the ages of 43 and 44 and had a strong family history of breast and gynecological cancers.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2506
Author(s):  
Mark van Barele ◽  
Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen ◽  
Yvonne V. Louwers ◽  
Mijntje B. Vastbinder ◽  
John W. M. Martens ◽  
...  

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) occur more frequently in younger women and do not express estrogen receptor (ER) nor progesterone receptor (PR), and are therefore often considered hormone-insensitive. Treatment of premenopausal TNBC patients almost always includes chemotherapy, which may lead to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and can severely impact quality of life. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is contraindicated for patients with a history of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, but the data on safety for TNBC patients is inconclusive, with a few randomized trials showing increased risk-ratios with wide confidence intervals for recurrence after HRT. Here, we review the literature on alternative pathways from the classical ER/PR. We find that for both estrogens and progestogens, potential alternatives exist for exerting their effects on TNBC, ranging from receptor conversion, to alternative receptors capable of binding estrogens, as well as paracrine pathways, such as RANK/RANKL, which can cause progestogens to indirectly stimulate growth and metastasis of TNBC. Finally, HRT may also influence other hormones, such as androgens, and their effects on TNBCs expressing androgen receptors (AR). Concluding, the assumption that TNBC is completely hormone-insensitive is incorrect. However, the direction of the effects of the alternative pathways is not always clear, and will need to be investigated further.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document