scholarly journals Estrogens and Progestogens in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Do They Harm?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2506
Author(s):  
Mark van Barele ◽  
Bernadette A. M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen ◽  
Yvonne V. Louwers ◽  
Mijntje B. Vastbinder ◽  
John W. M. Martens ◽  
...  

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) occur more frequently in younger women and do not express estrogen receptor (ER) nor progesterone receptor (PR), and are therefore often considered hormone-insensitive. Treatment of premenopausal TNBC patients almost always includes chemotherapy, which may lead to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and can severely impact quality of life. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is contraindicated for patients with a history of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, but the data on safety for TNBC patients is inconclusive, with a few randomized trials showing increased risk-ratios with wide confidence intervals for recurrence after HRT. Here, we review the literature on alternative pathways from the classical ER/PR. We find that for both estrogens and progestogens, potential alternatives exist for exerting their effects on TNBC, ranging from receptor conversion, to alternative receptors capable of binding estrogens, as well as paracrine pathways, such as RANK/RANKL, which can cause progestogens to indirectly stimulate growth and metastasis of TNBC. Finally, HRT may also influence other hormones, such as androgens, and their effects on TNBCs expressing androgen receptors (AR). Concluding, the assumption that TNBC is completely hormone-insensitive is incorrect. However, the direction of the effects of the alternative pathways is not always clear, and will need to be investigated further.

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Tiffany A. Traina

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype distinguished by negative immunohistochemical assays for expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) represents 15% of all breast cancers. Patients with TNBC generally experience a more aggressive clinical course with increased risk of disease progression and poorer overall survival. Furthermore, this subtype accounts for a disproportionate number of disease-related mortality in part due to its aggressive natural history and our lack of effective targeted agents beyond conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis, and the molecular and clinicopathologic features that distinguish TNBC from other subtypes of breast cancer. In addition, we will examine the available data for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of TNBC in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and explore the ongoing development of newer targeted agents.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 997-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Roy ◽  
C A Sawka ◽  
K I Pritchard

PURPOSE To review critically the literature regarding effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT)/combined estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy (HRT) on the risk of breast cancer and on other health risks and benefits in postmenopausal women, with a focus on risks and benefits in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. METHOD A literature search was conducted using Medline, Cancerline, and the bibliographies of reports published as of March 1995. All five published meta-analyses that examined the risk of breast cancer in relation to ERT/HRT in otherwise healthy women were critically reviewed. All known reports of women with a history of breast cancer given ERT/HRT subsequent to diagnosis and additional reports regarding the benefits of ERT/HRT were also reviewed. RESULTS None of the five meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly increased risk of developing breast cancer in ever users compared with never users of ERT/HRT. Current use may be associated with a small increased risk. This increased risk should be balanced by the expected benefits of ERT/HRT on quality of life, bone metabolism, and cardiovascular function. Preliminary information does not suggest a major detrimental effect of ERT/HRT in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, but these reports include few women with limited follow-up data. There are no randomized trials in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. CONCLUSION In healthy postmenopausal women, the benefits associated with ERT/HRT outweigh the risks. In women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, the balance of risks and benefits should be explored in randomized controlled trials.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 160-160
Author(s):  
Jennifer Chun ◽  
Freya Ruth Schnabel ◽  
Shira Schwartz ◽  
Jessica Billig ◽  
Karen Hiotis ◽  
...  

160 Background: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) represent 10%–20% of invasive breast cancers. Current guidelines recommend genetic testing for women who are diagnosed with TNBC. Studies have shown that BRCA1 mutations are associated with TNBC, but there is little information on the relationship of BRCA2 mutations and TNBC. The purpose of this study was to look at the clinical characteristics of TNBC compared to non-TNBC in a cohort of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods: The Breast Cancer Database at our institution was queried for patients with invasive breast cancer. We included the following variables: age, race, BRCA1,2, tumor characteristics, and personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). Statistical analyses included Pearson’s Chi-Square and Fisher’s Exact Tests. Results: Out of a total of 1,332 women, 125 (9%) had TNBC. The median age for both TNBC and non-TNBC was 59 years. Majority of women had early stage breast cancer (92%) with ductal carcinoma (80%). There was a significantly higher proportion of Blacks and Asians with TNBC (p < 0.0001). Women with TNBC had higher Ki-67 (p < 0.0001). Within the TNBC group, there were 12 (29%) patients who tested positive for BRCA1,2 mutation and 23 (8%) who tested positive for BRCA 1,2 mutations in the non-TNBC group. Interestingly, BRCA1 was not associated with TNBC (p = 0.40) and BRCA2 was significantly associated with TNBC (p < 0.0001). We also found a higher proportion of TNBC in women who had a PHBC (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In our study, women with TNBC were similar in age to women who did not have TNBC. We found that the women with TNBC in our cohort had elevated rates of BRCA2 mutations. We also found that women with a personal history of breast cancer were at risk for developing TNBC. This may be related to the use of hormonal therapy that reduces the risk of ER/PR-positive tumors. Women of all ages are at risk for developing TNBC and older age at TNBC should not deter from genetic testing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1101-1101
Author(s):  
Evelyn Mawunyo Jiagge ◽  
Aisha Jibril ◽  
George Divine ◽  
Kofi K. Gyan ◽  
Jessica Miley Bensenhaver ◽  
...  

1101 Background: Population-based incidence rates of breast cancers that are negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2/ neu(triple negative breast cancer {TNBC}) are higher among African American (AA) compared to White American (WA) women. Several studies show higher TNBC frequency among selected populations of African patients. The colonial-era trans-Atlantic slave trade resulted in shared West African ancestry between contemporary AA and Ghanaian (Gh) populations. The extent to which TNBC susceptibility is related to East African versus West African ancestry, and whether these associations extend to expression of other biomarkers such as Androgen Receptor (AR) and mammary stem cell marker ALDH1 is unknown. Methods: We used immunohistochemistry to assess ER, PR, HER2/ neu, AR and ALDH1 among WA (n = 153); AA (n = 76); Ethiopian (Eth)/East African (n = 90) and (Gh)/West African (n = 286) breast cancers through an IRB-approved international research program. Results: Mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 43; 49; 60; and 57 years for the Eth; Gh; AA; and WA patients, respectively. Frequency of TNBC was significantly higher for AA and Gh patients (54% and 41%, respectively) compared to WA and Eth patients (23% and 15%, respectively); p < 0.001. These associations were unchanged when limited to patients age 50 and younger (47% and 49% for AA and Gh, respectively; versus 18% and 16% for WA and Eth, respectively); p < 0.001. Frequency of ALDH1 positivity was also higher for tumors from AA and Gh patients (32% and 36%, respectively) compared to those from WA and Eth patients (23% and 17%, respectively); p = 0.007. Significant differences were observed for distribution of AR positivity, which was 71%; 55%; 42% and 50% for the WA; AA; Gh; and Eth cases, respectively (p = 0.008). Conclusions: We found a correlation between extent of African ancestry and risk of particular BC phenotypes. West African ancestry was associated with increased risk of TNBC and breast cancers that are positive for ALDH1. Future studies of hereditary TNBC susceptibility among women with African ancestry are warranted.


F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice R T Bergin ◽  
Sherene Loi

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subtype renowned for its capacity to affect younger women, metastasise early despite optimal adjuvant treatment and carry a poor prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy has focused on combinations of systemic agents to optimise pathological complete response. Treatment algorithms now guide the management of patients with or without residual disease, but metastatic TNBC continues to harbour a poor prognosis. Innovative, multi-drug combination systemic therapies in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings have led to significant improvements in outcomes, particularly over the past decade. Recently published advances in the treatment of metastatic TNBC have shown impressive results with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and immunotherapy agents. Immunotherapy agents in combination with traditional systemic chemotherapy have been shown to alter the natural history of this devastating condition, particularly in patients whose tumours are positive for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
Bikash Nepal ◽  
Yogendra Singh ◽  
Prakash Sayami ◽  
Gita Sayami

Introduction: Breast cancers in less than 40 years of age group usually present with aggressive biology and has poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to see clinic-pathological and hormone receptors of breast cancers in young women and compare with less than 40 year age group.Methods: Prospective analysis of 97 breast cancer in patients less than 40 years out of total 373 patients (26%) over a period of 8 years (2007 Jan to 2014 Dec) was carried out at the Department of Surgery, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.Result: Among the young women diagnosed with breast cancer, the mean age was 34.5±6.2 years. Mean tumour size was larger in younger women (5±2.5 vs 4.5±2.4 cm). Locally advanced disease was higher in younger patients (55% vs 47%). Lymphatic and vascular invasions were higher (63% vs 35% and 40% vs 25%). Grade II and III tumours was higher (56% vs 25%). ER, PR and HER2 positivity was detected in 46.9%, 48.9% and 28.9% respectively. Significant lower ER or PR expression (34.5% vs 54%) was seen in younger women, p=.002.Triple negative tumours (ER -ve, PR -ve and HER2 -ve) was proportionately higher in younger patients (23% vs 13.7%, p=.043).Conclusion: Young Nepali women presents one quarter of all female breast cancers, more frequently locally advanced with aggressive tumour biology like ER/PR negative and triple negative breast cancers. Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal, 2015; 18 (2), page: 16-19


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan R Flanagan ◽  
Mei-Tzu C Tang ◽  
Michelle L Baglia ◽  
Peggy L Porter ◽  
Kathleen E Malone ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundWomen with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have an elevated risk of a second breast cancer, but few data are available regarding the impact of modifiable lifestyle factors on this risk.MethodsIn a population-based case–control patient study of women with a history of DCIS in western Washington diagnosed between 1996 and 2013, 497 patients diagnosed with DCIS and a second ipsilateral or contralateral invasive or in situ breast cancer were enrolled. There were 965 matched control patients with one DCIS diagnosis. Associations between anthropometric factors and risk of an invasive or in situ second breast cancer event were evaluated using conditional logistic regression. Statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsObesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) at initial DCIS diagnosis was associated with a 1.6-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 2.2) increased risk of any second breast cancer and a 2.2-fold increased risk of a contralateral second breast cancer (95% CI = 1.4 to 3.3) compared with normal weight women (BMI < 25 kg/m2). BMI and weight, both at initial DCIS diagnosis and at the time of the second breast cancer diagnosis, were positively associated with risk of any second and second invasive breast cancers (odds ratio = 1.01–1.04, all P ≤ .03).ConclusionsAlthough additional confirmatory studies are needed, obesity appears to be an important contributor to the risk of second breast cancers within the growing population of women with DCIS. This has potential clinical relevance with respect to identifying which women with a history of DCIS may require more careful monitoring and who may benefit from lifestyle modifications.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giske Ursin ◽  
Chiu-Chen Tseng ◽  
Annlia Paganini-Hill ◽  
Shelley Enger ◽  
Peggy C. Wan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We and other investigators have previously shown that postmenopausal combined estrogen and progestin replacement therapy (EPRT) increases the risk of breast cancer and that the risk associated with EPRT is substantially higher than for estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) alone. The present study was conducted to determine whether any particular subgroup of women are at particularly high risk of breast cancer if they use EPRT and whether tumor characteristics in women who develop cancer while on ERT or EPRT are different from those in women not using ERT or EPRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study in Los Angeles, CA, with patients diagnosed with breast cancer in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Control subjects were matched to patients on age, ethnicity, and neighborhood of residence. We present data on 1,897 postmenopausal patients and 1,637 controls aged 55 to 72 years who had not undergone a simple hysterectomy. RESULTS: Relative risk of breast cancer associated with EPRT use did not vary with body mass index (body mass index at or below v above median [24.6 kg/m2]; P = .98), alcohol intake (≥ one v < one drink per week; P = .16), parity (nulliparous v parous; P = .45), history of benign breast disease (yes v no; P = .99), or family history of breast cancer (first degree v none; P = .57). All of these results were compatible with our previously reported estimate of an increased risk of breast cancer of 5% per year of use of EPRT. Hormone users, principally EPRT users, were more likely to have hormone receptor–positive, especially progesterone-positive, tumors. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that the risk of breast cancer associated with EPRT is limited to subgroups of women with specific cofactors. Tumors in EPRT users are more often hormone receptor–positive, indicating that they may have a better prognosis than breast cancer overall.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Sandy Goyette

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Clinical trials and studies show that post-menopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy containing a combination of estrogen and progestin (P) have an increased risk of breast cancer compared with women taking estrogen alone or placebo. Using animal models, we previously showed that both natural and synthetic P accelerate the development of breast tumors in vivo and increase their metastasis to lymph nodes. Our studies included an assessment of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a synthetic P that is widely used clinically. Having established the deleterious effects associated with P, we sought to better understand the mechanisms underlying breast tumor growth and metastasis. We show that exposure of human breast cancer cells to synthetic P causes the overexpression of several cancer stem cell (CSC) markers, which we further demonstrate to be functionally significant, since mammosphere formation increases. Based on our observations, we contend that exposure of breast cancer cells to synthetic P, including MPA, leads to an enrichment of CSCs, which would likely support the development of P-accelerated tumors in vivo. An enriched CSC pool greatly increases the likelihood that resistance to therapy will arise, as well as raising the chance of metastasis. Our findings suggest that clinicians may be able to combat P-dependent tumor growth by blocking PR-mediated induction of CSC markers by immunotherapy, tissue-selective anti-Ps, or through a combination approach involving both immunotherapy against CD44 and small-molecule targeting of PR. We carried out a series of studies to determine whether RO 48-8076, an oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC) inhibitor, might reduce P-induced CSC expansion. In previous studies, we showed that RO diminishes tumor formation in vivo and found that it exerts its potent anti-tumor effects in part through PR degradation. This in turn reduces P-induced expression of CD44, a process we showed to be PR-dependent. Importantly, treatment of hormone-responsive breast cancer cells with RO abolished MPA-induced mammosphere formation. We therefore contend that RO may represent a novel means by which to prevent MPA-induced CSC expansion. RO treatment may also represent a novel strategy of reducing resistance to anti-hormone therapies, given that survival of stem cells following chemotherapy is the major reason why such treatments fail. In addition to being a novel treatment option for hormone-dependent breast cancers, we show that RO might also be used to treat highly aggressive triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). Herein we present in vivo data showing that RO reduces the metastasis of TNBCs to the lungs. We hypothesize that by virtue of its ability to downregulate MetAP2 protein, RO might target the metastatic cascade by inhibiting angiogenesis and cell cycle progression, or by inducing apoptosis. Further mechanistic studies are needed to elucidate the importance of RO-mediated MetAP2 downregulation. We also demonstrate that RO inhibits TNBC cell migration and invasion, though the mechanism through which RO exerts these effects requires more in-depth study. Nevertheless, we show that RO, a compound hitherto considered as simply an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis, clearly possesses potent anti-cancer effects. Its potential as an agent which might be used to combat both hormone-dependent and hormone-independent breast cancers, including TNBC, warrants further investigation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 995-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Rice ◽  
Saffron A Whitehead

The majority of breast cancers are oestrogen dependent and in postmenopausal women the supply of oestrogens in breast tissue is derived from the peripheral conversion of circulating androgens. There is, however, a paradox concerning the epidemiology of breast cancer and the dietary intake of phytoestrogens that bind weakly to oestrogen receptors and initiate oestrogen-dependent transcription. In Eastern countries, such as Japan, the incidence of breast cancer is approximately one-third that of Western countries whilst their high dietary intake of phytoestrogens, mainly in the form of soy products, can produce circulating levels of phytoestrogens that are known experimentally to have oestrogenic effects. Indeed, their weak oestrogenicity has been used to advantage by herbalist medicine to promote soy products as a natural alternative to conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Such usage could increase in light of recent evidence that long-term HRT usage may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer with a consequent reduction in prescription rates. So, are phytoestrogens safe as a natural alternative to HRT and could they be promoters or protectors of breast cancer? If they are promoters, then we must assume that it is due to their oestrogenic effect. If they are protectors, then other actions of phytoestrogens, including their ability to inhibit enzymes that are responsible for converting androgens and weak oestrogens into oestradiol, must be considered. This paper addresses these questions by reviewing the actions of phytoestrogens on oestrogen receptors and key enzymes that convert androgens to oestrogens in relation to the growth of breast cancer cells. In addition, it compares the experimental and epidemiological evidence pertinent to the potential beneficial or harmful effects of phytoestrogens in relation to the incidence/progression of breast cancer and their efficacy as natural alternatives to conventional HRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document