scholarly journals CTIM-15. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB WITH HYPOFRACTIONATED RE-RADIATION AND BEVACIZUMAB FOR RECURRENT MGMT METHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii36
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Minesh Mehta ◽  
Alexandra Miller ◽  
Mariza Daras ◽  
Anna Piotrowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Significant Finding ◽  
Trial Treatment

Abstract Standard of standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) remains unsatisfactory with universal disease recurrence and a median survival of < 2 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown limited single-agent activity in GBM thus far. GBMs with methylated MGMT promoter and no baseline corticosteroid dependence may be most likely to derive benefit from ICI. The combination of ICIs with radiation has shown promising activity in other human cancers. Combining nivolumab and re-RT/bevacizumab in GBM may augment ICI activity through immunogenic effects of radiation, may reduce the risk of radiation necrosis by addition of bevacizumab at the time of radiation, and may reduce the need for corticosteroids. In this multicenter phase II study, nivolumab is combined with re-irradiation and optional concurrent bevacizumab followed by nivolumab in patients with first recurrence of IDH-wildtype and MGMT methylated glioblastoma. Primary objective is to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 33 (based on EORTC 26101) to 50%. Nine-three patients are required to show a significant finding with an α of 0.05 and 81% power. Thirteen of 93 patient (14%) have been enrolled with a median age of 59 (range 42–71) with a median KPS of 90 (range 70–90). Treatment has been tolerated well without any grade ≥ 4 toxicities and only one grade 3 (amylase elevation). The most common adverse events were pruritus and hypothyroidism in 3/13 (23%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 7 months with a 6months PFS of 55.6%. The 12months OS is 66.7%. Patients with recurrent MGMT methylated, IDH-wildtype glioblastoma tolerate trial treatment with acceptable toxicities. Clinical efficacy in the first patients enrolled shows a promising effect. Enrollment is ongoing.

RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab + ipilimumab combination in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Cohen ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Julie Henriques ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
Christelle De La Fouchardiere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

101 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICKi) are highly effective for MSI/dMMR mCRC pts. RECIST1.1 criteria are reported to underestimate response to ICKi. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate disease control rate (DCR) using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST for MSI/dMMR mCRC pts treated with nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI). Methods: MSI/dMMR mCRC pts previously treated with fluoropyrimidines (FP), oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) ± targeted therapies received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 cycles then NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. CT-scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks during 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. Primary objective was DCR at 12 weeks (12wDCR) according to RECIST1.1 and iRECIST by central review. Response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) by central review were secondary objectives. A one-stage Fleming design was used with a targeted improvement of 12wDCR from 70% to 85%. Results: Of 57 pts included between Dec 2017 and Nov 2018, 43.9% had received ≥ 3 prior lines including FP (100%), OX (100%), IRI (95.5%), antiangiogenics (57.9%) and anti-EGFRs (45.6%). 17.5% of pts had BRAF mutation and 27.5% Lynch syndrome. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 49.1% of pts, mainly hepatitis (12.3%). 12wDCR was 86.0% and 87.7% using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST respectively, with only 1 pseudo-progression (1.8%) observed during the first 12 weeks, and one later. Kappa coefficient between RECIST and iRECIST 12wDCR was 0.92 (95%CI 0.77-1.0). Best observed responses with RECIST1.1/iRECIST were: 2/2 complete responses (3.5/3.5%), 19/19 partial responses (33.3/33.3%), 30/31 stable diseases (52.6/54.4%) and 3/2 disease progressions (5.3/3.5%), with 3 pts not evaluable (cancer-related deaths before first evaluation). Conclusions: Combination of NIVO and IPI in MSI/dMMR mCRC is associated with a low frequency of pseudo-progression and high DCR rate. PFS will be evaluated in Dec 2019, with all pts having completed the predefined 1-year of ICKi therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT033501260.

Gefitinib plus celecoxib in chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A phase II study from the Hoosier Oncology Group

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7066-7066 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Agarwala ◽  
L. Einhorn ◽  
W. Fisher ◽  
D. Bruetman ◽  
J. McClean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Ecog Ps

7066 Background: Gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, has single agent activity in NSCLC. Preclinical studies demonstrate significant interactions between the EGFR and cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) pathways and that simultaneous inhibition against NSCLC may have benefits over gefitinib alone. Methods: Eligibility required that pts were chemotherapy-naïve, had stage IIIb (with pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC and an ECOG PS 0–1. Pts received gefitinib 250mg orally daily plus celecoxib 400mg orally every 12 hours. Cycles consisted of 21 day treatment and continued until unacceptable toxicity or progression of disease. The primary objective of this single arm, two-stage, phase II study was to evaluate the overall response rate. If ≤ 10 out of 30 pts achieved a complete (CR) or partial response (PR), the study would be stopped early. If >10 out of 30 pts had a CR or PR, enrollment would continue to 50 pts. Results: From 1/04 to 11/04, 31 pts were enrolled: male/female 13/18; median age 70.8 years (range, 19–93); 67.7% had adenocarcinoma; ECOG PS 0/1 13/18; stage IIIb/IV 2/29; 5 were current smokers, 9 were remote (>30 years) or never smokers, 16 quit smoking > 3 months ago. Median number of cycles was 4 (range, 0–16). 6 pts (19.4%) discontinued therapy due to toxicity, including 3 who died due to treatment. Select grade 3/4 toxicities included: pulmonary (6.5%), hepatic (6.5%), diarrhea (6.5%), skin (3.2%). Responses included PR 5 (16.1%), stable disease 8 (25.8%), and progressive disease 18 (58.1%). Median duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival was 5.7, 2.8, and 7.2 months, respectively. All responders were females with adenocarcinoma, 2 were remote or never smokers and 3 were former smokers. Conclusion: Gefitinib plus celecoxib in an unselected population of chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS of 0–1 has a lower response rate and overall efficacy compared with historical controls of chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase II trial of the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod plus pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e002057
Author(s):  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
Robert R McWilliams ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
Joseph Drabick ◽  
Montaser F Shaheen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Evaluable Population

BackgroundThe indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a key counter-regulatory mechanism that, in cancer, is exploited by tumors to evade antitumor immunity. Indoximod is a small-molecule IDO pathway inhibitor that reverses the immunosuppressive effects of low tryptophan (Trp) and high kynurenine (Kyn) that result from IDO activity. In this study, indoximod was used in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab for the treatment for advanced melanoma.MethodsPatients with advanced melanoma were enrolled in a single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluating the addition of indoximod to standard of care CPI approved for melanoma. Investigators administered their choice of CPI including pembrolizumab (P), nivolumab (N), or ipilimumab (I). Indoximod was administered continuously (1200 mg orally two times per day), with concurrent CPI dosed per US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved label.ResultsBetween July 2014 and July 2017, 131 patients were enrolled. (P) was used more frequently (n=114, 87%) per investigator’s choice. The efficacy evaluable population consisted of 89 patients from the phase II cohort with non-ocular melanoma who received indoximod combined with (P).The objective response rate (ORR) for the evaluable population was 51% with confirmed complete response of 20% and disease control rate of 70%. Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 6.4 to 24.9). The ORR for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients was 70% compared with 46% for PD-L1-negative patients. The combination was well tolerated, and side effects were similar to what was expected from single agent (P).ConclusionIn this study, the combination of indoximod and (P) was well tolerated and showed antitumor efficacy that is worth further evaluation in selected patients with advanced melanoma.

scholarly journals Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin as first-line therapy for advanced squamous NSCLC patients: a prospective randomized international phase II study (NAVoTrial 03)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110229
Author(s):  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Piotr Jaśkiewicz ◽  
Marion Ferreira ◽  
Grzegorz Czyżewicz ◽  
Dariusz Kowalski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Objective: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine-cisplatin (OV-CDDP) and gemcitabine-cisplatin (GEM-CDDP) in patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter, international phase II study that enrolled untreated patients with advanced sq-NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of either 60–80 mg/m2 OV days 1 and 8 in combination with 80 mg/m2 CDDP day 1 (arm A) or 1250 mg/m2 GEM days 1 and 8 in combination with 75 mg/m2 CDDP day 1 (arm B). After four cycles, patients without disease progression continued maintenance dose of OV or GEM until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Results: A total of 114 patients with sq-NSCLC were randomized, and 113 were treated (57 in arm A and 56 in arm B). DCR was high in both arms: 73.7% (95%CI: 62.4–100.0) in arm A and 75.0% (95%CI: 63.7–100.0) in arm B. Median PFS and TTF were similar in arm A and B 4.2 and 2.8 months, and 4.3 and 3.1 months, respectively. Even though the difference was not significant, the OS was 10.2 for arm A and 8.4 months for arm B. The safety profiles were consistent with the current knowledge of adverse events. QoL results revealed an improvement in patients under OV treatment. Conclusion: The OV-CDDP combination showed comparable efficacy to GEM-CDDP with acceptable safety profile and enhanced patients’ QoL. Trial registration: The study was registered under EudraCT number 2012-003531-40.

scholarly journals Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Nan Tie ◽  
Julia Lai-Kwon ◽  
Michael Alexander Rtshiladze ◽  
Lumine Na ◽  
James Bozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
In Transit

BackgroundThe efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments.ResultsFifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26–94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2–46).ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR.Conclusions and relevanceICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence.

Phase II trial of anti-transforming growth factor-beta (TGFß) monoclonal antibody GC1008 in relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7077-7077 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Stevenson ◽  
Hedy Lee Kindler ◽  
Daniel Schwed ◽  
Anjana Ranganathan ◽  
Mona Jacobs-Small ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Beta ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Modified Recist

7077 Background: TGFβ is a pleiotropic cytokine overexpressed by MPM. Based on preclinical data documenting a key role for TGFβ in promoting growth and progression of MPM, we are conducting a phase II trial of GC1008 in patients (pts) with progressive MPM. Methods: Pts with progressive MPM by modified RECIST criteria and PS 0-1 with 1-2 prior systemic therapies (at least 1 pemetrexed-based) are eligible. Treatment plan: GC1008 3mg/kg IV over 90 minutes every 21 days. Responses are assessed by modified RECIST every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 months; secondary objectives include safety with GC1008, response rate by modified RECIST, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results: The modified Gehan stage 1 stopping criterion of 1/13 pts with 3 month PFS has been exceeded. To date, 13 pts (10 PS 0; 3 PS 1) with MPM (median age 69; 2F, 11M; 11 epithelial, 1 sarcomatoid, 1 biphasic) enrolled. Treatment-related toxicities include G1/2 fatigue (3 pts), nausea (1 pt) and xerosis (1 pt). Other adverse events possibly related to GC1008 were rapid disease progression in 1 pt after 2 cycles, and G2 skin keratoacanthoma in 1 pt after 5 cycles. Three pts met the primary objective of 3 month PFS at 4.1, 4.2 and 9 months each. Stable disease (SD) was seen in 3 pts (23%). Median TTP is 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2-∞); median OS is 13 months (95% CI 6-∞). Increased serum mesothelin levels have closely tracked disease progression. Serum from 6/13 pts showed new antibodies against MPM tumor lysates as measured by immunoblotting. Two of 3 pts with SD had anti-tumor antibody responses. Mean baseline plasma level of TGFβ was 2447 pg/ml but did not correlate with baseline plasma TGFβ or TTP. Conclusions: GC1008 was well tolerated in pretreated MPM patients. SD occurred in 3 pts, all with prior disease progression. Evidence for humoral anti-tumor immunity was seen in nearly half of enrollees and in 2 of 3 pts with SD. OS compares favorably to prior single-agent studies in pretreated MPM.

A multicenter random assignment phase II study of irinotecan and flavopiridol versus irinotecan alone for patients with p53 wild-type gastric adenocarcinoma (NCI 8060).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14586-e14586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Yuriy Janjigian ◽  
Laura H. Tang ◽  
Stephen Shibata ◽  
David Paul Kelsen ◽  
Michal Segal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Wild Type

e14586 Background: Preclinical studies demonstrate that tumors wild-type for p53 (p53wt) are refractory to irinotecan relative to non-functional or mutant p53, and that sequential therapy with flavopiridol, a cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor that inhibits homologous recombination and DNA repair, and irinotecan overcomes p53 mediated drug resistance in vivo. This phase II study is designed to assess cell cycle mediated drug resistance in p53wt gastric cancer, and test the hypothesis that administration of flavopiridol following irinotecan can overcome resistance to irinotecan. Methods: Pts with advanced p53wt (≤ 20% nuclear IHC staining using D07 antibody) gastric adenocarcinoma and disease progression on non-irinotecan chemotherapy regimen were randomized in 2:1 fashion to irinotecan 100 mg/m2 followed 7 h later by flavopiridol 60 mg/m2 administered over 1h or irinotecan 100 mg/m2 administered weekly on a 2 week on/1 week off schedule. Response assessment is performed every 2 cycles and the primary endpoint is 3-month progression free survival (PFS). Pre- and post-treatment biopsies were obtained for molecular assessments of p53 mediated drug resistance. Results: To date 30 of 55 patients screened were p53wt (54%), 19 pts were randomized to receive irinotecan + flavopiridol (n=13) and irinotecan (n=6). Median characteristics of 19 evaluable patients: age 61 (44 to 76), KPS 80% (70 to100), 13 male, 1 prior regimen (1 to 2). The common treatment emergent toxicities were anemia (Grade 2/3 21%), neutropenia (grade 2/3 31%, grade 4 .05%), nausea (grade 2/3 21%) and fatigue (grade 2/3 37%). With irinotecan + flavopiridol 1/13 (8%) confirmed partial response was seen and 5 month disease stabilization in 3/13 (23%) patients. No responses were seen with single agent irinotecan. The median PFS was similar, 1.6 mos irinotecan + flavopiridol vs 1.3 mos in irinotecan group (p=0.21). Conclusions: 54% of gastric cancers are p53wt. Correlative tissue analysis including p53 sequencing, p21, Rad51 is ongoing. Due to lack of activity with irinotecan alone, an amendment to a single arm irinotecan + flavopiridol study is planned.

Phase II study of biweekly administration of CPT-11 and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15150-e15150
Author(s):  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Takuo Yamai ◽  
Nobuyasu Fukutake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

e15150 Background: The current standard therapies for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Japan are the single-agent Gemcitabine (Gem) or S-1 and Gem plus erlotinib. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is one of the promising drugs for Gem-refractory PC pts. Both Irinotecan and Gem have shown activity against these diseases with different mechanisms and are non-cross-resistant with each other. Japanese pts have the different metabolism with Irinotecan rather than pts in western countries. Methods: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPT-11 and Gem in Japanese pancreatic cancer pts. Patients with MPC and PS 0-2 were enrolled in this phase II trial. CPT-11, 100mg/m (2), was administered in 90 min. and Gem, 1000mg/m (2), was administered in 30 min. soon after CPT-11 on day1. Chemotherapy was repeated biweekly. Results: From May 2002 to May 2006 40 pts, with median age of 62 (40-74) years, were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate (RR) was 15% with disease control rate of 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (range: 1.0-15.0 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (range: 3.0-24.0 months). Grade 3/4 anemia, leucopenia occurred in 26.3, 5.2% of pts. The most common non-hematologic toxities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and anorexia. Grade 3 diarrhea and nausea occurred in 10.5% of pts. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy with Gem and CPT-11 showed favorable RR as expected and the treatment was manageable in Japanese pts with MPC. We plan to evaluate this combination chemotherapy for MPC pts after progression of FOLFIRINOX in near the future. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009963.

FOLFERA: A randomized phase II study of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FOLFIRI) with or without addition of the endothelin receptor antagonist (ETAR) zibotentan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 406-406
Author(s):  
Anne L. Thomas ◽  
Angela Claire Casbard ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

406 Background: Zibotentan (Z) is an oral specific ETAR antagonist. The ETAR is over expressed in colorectal cancer, and pre-clinically, antagonism of the ETAR has been shown to enhance cytotoxicity when combined with cytotoxics such as 5-FU. This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study evaluated the safety and anti-tumor activity of irinotecan and 5-FU (as the FOLFIRI regimen) in combination with Z in advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer who had progressed after oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy (FOLFOX) were randomized (1:1) to receive 10 mg O.D Z/placebo (continuous dosing) with standard dose FOLFIRI for a maximum of 12 cycles. Z /placebo could be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity in those patients with a documented response. The primary objective was progression–free survival (PFS) with secondary endpoints of safety and blood and archival tumor samples collected for translational work including circulating tumour cell (CTC) analysis. This study was run as part of the AZ/NCRN alliance, endorsed by Cancer Research UK (CRUKE/09/023) and coordinated by the Wales Cancer Trials Unit, Cardiff University. Results: A total of 111 patients were recruited: 61% men, median age of 62 years. Z was well tolerated with G3/4 toxicity balanced between both groups (34/55 patients in Z and 38/56 in placebo group). The study was terminated before the planned number of pts (122) were recruited due to lack of efficacy of the drug in two other tumour types. Median PFS was 4.0 months in the Z group and 7.4 months in the placebo group (HR=1.86, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.87, p=0.005). The CTC analysis in relation to outcome in the placebo group will be presented. Conclusions: Zibotentan does not have anti-cancer activity in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with colorectal cancer treated with previous FOLFOX. Taken in consideration with the other trial data we do not recommend the further development of zibotentan in oncology. Clinical trial information: 73199181.

IMAGE, a randomized phase Ib/II study of elisidepsin (E) as a single agent in pretreated advanced gastroesophageal (GE) cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Jean Philippe Metges ◽  
David Alan Anthoney ◽  
Gianluca Laus ◽  
Maria Alsina Maqueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Flat Dose

92 Background: E is a new marine compound with broad in vitro/in vivo antitumor activity. Low μM concentrations lead to cell-death through membrane permeabilization. E has shown evidence of activity in pre-treated GE patients (pts) in phase I trials. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and efficacy of E in pts with GE cancer after 1-2 prior chemotherapy (CT) lines. Initially, dose was optimized (Phase Ib) in two different schedules: a fixed flat dose (FD) of intravenous (i.v) E (8 and 10 mg), in 24h, biweekly (Arm A) and i.v E (3.0 and 3.75mg), in 3h, weekly (Arm B). After dose optimization patients were included and stratified by histology to each optimal dose (Phase II) to determine the rate of progression-free survival at week 16 ± 1 (PFS4) in an intention to treat analysis. If at least two out of 15 pts reached PFS4, recruitment would continue to a maximum of 40 pts per arm. Results: A total of 45 pts were recruited, 12 pts into Phase Ib (Arm A/B: 6/6 pts) and 33 pts into Phase II (Arm A/B: 15/18 pts). Median age was 60 years (35–81 years), 39 were males and ECOG PS was 1 in 75% of pts. Tumour sites were gastric (32% pts), esophageal (39% pts) and esophago-gastric junction (30% pts). Ninety percent of pts had metastatic disease, 31.8% of which had liver metastasis; 55% of pts had two prior lines of CT . No DLTs occurred during the first cycle in the Phase Ib. The optimal dose for Arm A was 10 mg FD, 24h, biweekly; the optimal dose for Arm B was 3.75mg FD, 3h, weekly. Two patients reached PFS4 in Phase Ib (Arm A). Only one patient reached PFS4 in Phase II (Arm A). No objective responses were observed. Therefore, protocol criteria for further recruitment were not met. The safety profile showed grade 1-2 toxicity pruritus (29.5%), nausea (15.9%), vomiting (6.8%) and fatigue (25%). Grade 3-4 toxicity consisted of asymptomatic reversible liver enzyme increases in 20.5% of patients. Conclusions: E is a very tolerable drug with a unique mechanism of action. In the current setting of non-stratified advanced GE patients, E has insufficient antitumor activity to warrant further investigation. Clinical trial information: 2010-020325-40.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document