scholarly journals ACTR-18. A PHASE IB/II CLINICAL TRIAL OF DODECAFLUOROPENTANE EMULSION (DDFPE) AS A RADIOSENSITIZER IN GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi16-vi16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Lickliter ◽  
Jeremy Ruben ◽  
Ross Jennens ◽  
Ganessan Kichenadasse ◽  
Cecelia Gzell ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor hypoxia decreases the response of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (temozolomide[TMZ]). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel oxygen therapeutic, dodecafluoropentane emulsion (DDFPe), in chemoradiation treatment of GBM and stratify the results based on predicted TMZ response. METHODS With ethics approval and informed consent, 11 adult GBM patients were enrolled. Patients were administered DDFPe via IV infusion (2% w/vol at doses of 0.05, 0.1 or 0.17 mL/kg) within 5–30 minutes prior to each 2 Gy fraction of RT (30 fractions over 6-weeks) while breathing supplemental oxygen. Patients also received standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. To evaluate the reversal of tumor hypoxia, patients underwent oxygen-sensitive (TOLD) MRI before and after DDFPe administration. Patients were also studied with serial MRI scans per standard of care and followed for survival. RESULTS The non-serious adverse events considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to DDFPe administration included fatigue (n=4), headache (n=2) and decrease in platelet count (n=2). Serious adverse events included two patients with symptomatic radiation necrosis: one patient at each of dose levels 0.1 and 0.17 mL/kg. Enrollment continued at the 0.1 mL/kg dose without additional significant DDFPe-related toxicity. Historically, the average overall survival for GBM patients is about 14.6 months. The median overall survival for the study was 591 days, or 19.4 months. According to independent review of the serial MR images, the median time to progression was 555 days, or 18 months, compared to a historical control of 6.9 months. TOLD MRI showed a trend in improved tumor oxygenation. CONCLUSION Although small, this trial shows that DDFPe used as a radiosensitizer appears to be safe and may provide some survival benefit. The FDA has allowed a Phase II clinical trial to assess its effectiveness.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2561-2561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan C. Unger ◽  
Jason D. Lickliter ◽  
Jeremy Ruben ◽  
Ross Jennens ◽  
Ganessan Kichenadasse ◽  
...  

2561 Background: Tumor hypoxia limits the response of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (temozolomide[TMZ]). Additionally, patient biomarkers are strong predictors of responsiveness to TMZ. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a novel oxygen therapeutic, dodecafluoropentane emulsion (DDFPe), in chemoradiation treatment of GBM and stratify the results based on predicted TMZ response. Methods: 11 adult GBM patients have been enrolled. Patients were administered DDFPe via IV infusion (2% w/vol at doses of 0.05, 0.1 or 0.17 mL/kg) an hour prior to each 2 Gy fraction of RT (30 fractions over 6-weeks) with supplemental oxygen. Patients also received standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. To confirm tumor re-oxygenation, patients underwent TOLD MRI before and after DDFPe administration. Archived tumor specimens were studied with GliomaSTRAT assay for methylated genes predictive of response. Patients were also studied with serial MRI scans per standard of care and followed for survival. Results: There were minimal acute adverse events related to DDFPe administration. One patient at each of dose levels 0.1 and 0.17 mL/kg developed symptomatic radiation necrosis, which was judged to be related to DDFPe. Enrollment has continued at the 0.1 mL/kg dose without additional significant DDFPe-related toxicity. TOLD MRI showed significant decrease in T1of tumor tissue consistent with tumor re-oxygenation (p=0.015) with no significant change in oxygenation of normal brain tissue. Historically, the average overall survival for GBM patients, for both TMZ responders and non-responders, is about 14.6 months. The progress chart for patient overall survival is listed below, 4 patients have died. All other patients are alive. Conclusions: DDFPe is a promising oxygen therapeutic for reversing tumor hypoxia. A Phase II study is being planned to assess its effectiveness. Clinical trial information: NCT02189109. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Streinu-Cercel ◽  
Oana Sandulescu ◽  
Victor Daniel Miron ◽  
Alina-Alexandra Oana ◽  
Maria Magdalena Motoi ◽  
...  

Background: Trans Sodium Crocetinate (TSC) is a bipolar synthetic carotenoid under development as a drug to enhance oxygenation to hypoxic tissue in addition to standard of care. TSC acts via a novel mechanism of action, improving the diffusivity of oxygen in blood plasma. Thus, it is based on physical-chemical principles, unlike most drugs which are based on biochemistry-based mechanisms. We explored the use of escalating doses and multiple daily dosing of TSC as a potential therapeutic for patients suffering from hypoxemia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Individuals ≥18 years who were hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypoxemia, defined as SpO2 < 94% on room air or requiring supplemental oxygen, WHO ordinal scale 3 through 7 (exclusive of Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation [ECMO]) were enrolled in cohorts of six subjects, each of whom received the same dose (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/kg) of TSC via intravenous bolus every 6 hours in addition to standard of care (SOC). This report describes the safety and efficacy results from the lead-in phase of the study and the population pharmacokinetics (PK) analyses. Safety was assessed as the number of serious adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed with each dose. Several efficacy parameters were examined in the lead-in phase and descriptive statistics of efficacy parameters are provided. No formal statistical analyses were performed. The population PK analyses were based on previous analyses and examination of the concentration profiles, and two-compartment linear pharmacokinetic models were evaluated and validated. Covariates, including body size, age, sex, organ function, and dose level, were evaluated for inclusion into the model. Results: TSC was well tolerated. There were no treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported. There were 2 serious adverse events (SAEs) reported during the study, neither were considered treatment-related. A total of 24 (96%) subjects survived. One subject (4.0%) died during the study as a result of an SAE (respiratory failure), and that event was determined to be due to COVID-19 complications and not related to study drug. There was an observed reduction in the time to improvement in WHO Ordinal Scale with increasing dose. The median time to 1-point reduction in subjects receiving 0.25 mg/kg was 11.5 days versus 7.5 days in the 1.5 mg/kg treatment cohort. The overall range across all doses was 1 day to 28 days. A total of 36.0% of subjects had a 1-point improvement in WHO Ordinal Scale to Day 7. The 1.5 mg/kg dose resulted in observed superior outcomes for multiple secondary clinical outcomes: time to 1-point WHO Ordinal Score improvement through Day 29/discharge, 1-point improvement by Day 7, days to return to room air, and hospital length of stay. The PK results showed that the two-compartment model fit the data well. Clearance decreased with increasing dose level and there was no evidence that clearance was affected by covariates other than dose level. Conclusions: These findings suggest that TSC administration every 6 hours at doses up to 1.5 mg/kg for up to 15 days is safe and well tolerated with predictable pharmacokinetics and demonstrated an observed clinical benefit in the treatment of COVID-19-related hypoxemia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9583-9583
Author(s):  
Melissa Wilson ◽  
Larisa J. Geskin ◽  
Richard D. Carvajal ◽  
Janice M. Mehnert ◽  
Cody Chiuzan ◽  
...  

9583 Background: Recent studies have shown 5-yr recurrence rates for Stage IIB and IIC melanoma of up to 46%. These high-risk patients currently have few options for adjuvant therapy to prevent this inevitable recurrence, with the only FDA approved therapy being high-dose interferon-alfa, which is quite toxic. However, there are now immunotherapies (anti-PD1) and targeted therapies (anti-BRAF and anti-MEK combinations) which are approved as adjuvants for Stage III patients, some of whom will have a lower baseline recurrence risk than those with Stage IIB/IIC melanoma. We sought to determine if adjuvant PD1 inhibition with nivolumab (N) would improve the recurrence free survival (RFS) compared to historical RFS rates. Methods: Our study (NCT03405155) is a single-arm, open label, multi-center, phase 2 clinical trial evaluating RFS at 24 months in patients with Stage IIB/IIC melanoma on treatment with N at 480 mg IV every 4 weeks for 12 cycles. Overall survival is a secondary endpoint. Associated translational research includes circulating tumor cell DNA and immune correlates. Results: Twenty three patients with Stage IIB and three patients with Stage IIC melanoma were enrolled onto the study and received at least one dose of N. At data cutoff, 22 patients remain in follow up, as four patients withdrew consent at different time points in the study – one patient after one dose who wished to discontinue, one due to concern for COVID and need for repeat visits, one due to insurance issues, and one due to recurrence and wish to discontinue (which was captured in study data and RFS calculations). Seventeen patients have been on the clinical trial for at least two years with nine patients having finished treatment but with less than two years follow-up; the median follow-up is currently 21.9 months. Two patients demonstrated melanoma recurrence, one after receiving cycle six of N and another one year after completing treatment, resulting in a 87.8% RFS (90% CI (64.2%-96.3%) at 2 years, compared to the historical RFS at 2 years of 70%. No N related serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed, with only 2% Grade 3 AEs observed (varied and unrelated to treatment) and all others were Grade 1-2, including 21% GI, 18% cutaneous, and 10% musculoskeletal, respiratory, and fatigue, each; overall, 2% of these Grade 1-2 AEs were treatment related. Conclusions: Our preliminary results show a trend towards improved RFS in patients with Stage IIB/IIC melanoma treated with nivolumab. The cohort has not reached a minimum follow up of at least 2 years for RFS; patients are continuing to be monitored. On study, we observed the expected adverse events, without evidence of new toxicities. Data maturation will reveal the full effect of adjuvant N on disease relapse and overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival in stage IIB/IIC melanoma patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03405155.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. F171-F175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Kent ◽  
Kazim Beebeejaun ◽  
Serena Braccio ◽  
Seilesh Kadambari ◽  
Paul Clarke ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo assess the risk of significant adverse events in premature infants receiving the novel 4-component group B meningococcal vaccine (4CMenB) with their routine immunisations at 2 months of age.Participants, design and settingIn December 2015, Public Health England requested neonatal units across England to voluntarily participate in a national audit; 19 units agreed to participate. Anonymised questionnaires were completed for infants receiving 4CMenB alongside their routine immunisations. For comparison, a historical cohort of premature infants receiving their primary immunisations without 4CMenB or paracetamol prophylaxis was used.Main outcome measuresParacetamol use; temperature, cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological status before and after vaccination; and management and investigations postvaccination, including serum C reactive protein levels, infection screens and antibiotic use.ResultsComplete questionnaires were returned for 133 premature infants (<35 weeks’ gestation) who received their first dose of 4CMenB at 8 weeks of age, including 108 who received prophylactic paracetamol according to national recommendations. Overall, 7% (8/108) of infants receiving 4CMenB with paracetamol had fever (>38°C) after vaccination compared with 20% (5/25) of those receiving 4CMenB without paracetamol (P=0.06) and none of those in the historical cohort. There were no significant differences between cohorts in the proportion of infants with apnoea, bradycardia, desaturation and receiving respiratory support after vaccination.Conclusions4CMenB does not increase the risk of serious adverse events in hospitalised premature infants. This audit supports the current national recommendations to offer 4CMenB with other routine vaccinations and prophylactic paracetamol to premature infants at their chronological age.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1956-1956
Author(s):  
Amy Wang ◽  
Justin Kline ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
Satyajit Kosuri ◽  
Andrew S. Artz ◽  
...  

Background:Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We hypothesized that checkpoint inhibitors may offer a novel approach for maintaining remission after allo-SCT. Data from pre-clinical studies have suggested a potential role for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Zhang et al., Blood 2009), so it is possible that immunomodulation with checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate the donor anti-leukemia immune response and prevent disease relapse. However, the safety of checkpoint blockade early after allografting remains to be established. Methods:We conducted a pilot study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT (NCT02985554). Pts were eligible if they were post allo-SCT without evidence of relapse or active graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) or history of prior greater than stage I skin acute GVHD. Nivolumab was to be administered intravenously at 1mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses followed by dosing every 12 weeks. Treatment started 4 weeks after routine immunosuppression was discontinued until 2 years after the transplant. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of Nivolumab on this schedule. Secondary objectives were evaluation of adverse events, relapse, and overall survival. Results:Four pts were enrolled from December 2017 through November 2018. (Table 1)All pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE) from Nivolumab, and 2 (50%) pts experienced serious adverse events. (Table 2)One pt developed grade (G) 4 neutropenia soon after the first dose. (Figure 1)The absolute neutrophil count nadired at 20 cells/µL, at which point pegfilgrastim was administered. An interim bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) confirmed no evidence of relapsed disease. Full neutrophil recovery occurred approximately 3 months after the initial dose, and no subsequent toxicities occurred. Another pt developed G3 autoimmune encephalopathy concurrently with G2 transaminitis and G2 thrombocytopenia after one dose of Nivolumab. (Figure 2)Intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg daily for 3 days) and immunoglobulin (2g/kg in 4 divided doses) were administered, followed by a 7-week steroid taper with full resolution of symptoms. Relapsed disease was ruled out by a BMBx. A third pt developed G2 skin rash approximately 10 days after the first dose of Nivolumab. Skin biopsy demonstrated drug hypersensitivity reaction vs GVHD, and the pt was treated with a 3-week prednisone course (starting at 1mg/kg followed by a taper). A mild flare recurred 2 weeks later, which was treated with topical steroids only. However, Nivolumab was not resumed. The fourth pt developed G2 elevated TSH approximately 2 months into therapy and after 4 doses of Nivolumab. Thyroid hormone replacement was initiated with subsequent symptom improvement and normalization of TSH over a 4-month period. As a result of these unexpected severe toxicities, the study was closed to further enrollment, and further Nivolumab administration ceased. Thus far, one pt (#1) relapsed after a total remission duration of 530 days; the remission duration after starting Nivolumab was 318 days. One pt has mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients remain alive with a median overall survival of 2.3 years (range, 1.9-4.7). Conclusions:Even at low doses, the use of Nivolumab as maintenance therapy in the post allo-SCT setting was not tolerable at the current dosing and schedule due to an unexpected number of high grade irAEs. Additional studies of dose and timing after allo-SCT are needed to improve safety and tolerability, in conjunction with correlative studies to better understand the immunomodulatory processes in the post-transplant setting. Disclosures Kline: Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Celgene: Consultancy. Riedell:Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liu:Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab used as maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting


Author(s):  
Michel Prud’homme ◽  
François Mathieu ◽  
Nicolas Marcotte ◽  
Sylvine Cottin

AbstractBackground: Current opinions regarding the use of dexamethasone in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) are only based on observational studies. Moreover, the use of corticosteroids in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patient with this condition remains controversial. Here, we present data from a prospective randomized pilot study of CSDH patients treated with dexamethasone or placebo. Methods: Twenty patients with imaging-confirmed CSDH were recruited from a single center and randomized to receive dexamethasone (12 mg/day for 3 weeks followed by tapering) or placebo as a conservative treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months and the rate of success of conservative treatment with dexamethasone versus placebo was measured. Parameters such as hematoma thickness and clinical changes were also compared before and after treatment with chi-square tests. Adverse events and complications were documented. Results: During the 6-month follow-up, one of ten patients treated with corticosteroids had to undergo surgical drainage and three of ten patients were treated surgically after placebo treatment. At the end of the study, all remaining patients had complete radiological resolution. No significant differences were observed in terms of hematoma thickness profile and impression of change; however, patients experienced more severe side effects when treated with steroids as compared with placebo. Dexamethasone contributed to many serious adverse events. Conclusions: Given the small sample size, these preliminary results have not shown a clear beneficial effect of dexamethasone against placebo in our patients. However, the number of secondary effects reported was much greater for corticosteroids, and dexamethasone treatment was responsible for significant complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (154) ◽  
pp. 190012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Delaunay ◽  
Grégoire Prévot ◽  
Samia Collot ◽  
Laurent Guilleminault ◽  
Alain Didier ◽  
...  

Immunotherapy has become a standard of care in oncology, following the recent approvals of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 and programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, bladder, head and neck cancers. Besides their efficacy, these agents also generate specific immune-related adverse events. Due to the increasing prescription of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune toxicity will continue to rise. The awareness of immune-related adverse events is key to ensuring both diagnosis and management of the possible serious adverse events. Although severe immune-related adverse events remain rare, they can lead to discontinued treatment or to death if they are not forecasted and managed properly. Even if lung toxicity is not the most frequent adverse event, it remains critical as it can be life-threatening. Herein, the main aspects of pulmonary toxicity are reviewed and guidelines are also proposed in order to manage the possible side-effects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi29-vi29
Author(s):  
Garni Barkhoudarian ◽  
Michael Badruddoja ◽  
Nicholas Blondin ◽  
Ricky Chen ◽  
Sajeel Chowdhary ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The EMulate Therapeutics Voyager system is an investigational non-sterile, non-invasive, non-thermal, non-ionizing, portable, home-use medical device that uses a specific, localized ultra-low radio frequency energy (ulRFE®) cognate for the treatment of brain cancer. METHODS This ongoing, open-label, multi-center study (NAT-101) is being conducted in the US and Australia in patients with recurrent GBM. There are 3 treatment groups: 32 patients treated with Voyager alone, 43 patients treated with Voyager + Investigator’s choice of anti-cancer therapy, and 21 patients treated with Voyager+lomustine+/-bevacizumab. The objective of the study is to assess if the Voyager is a safe and feasible treatment for recurrent GBM. The primary outcome measure is safety, assessed by the incidence and evaluation of adverse events (AEs) associated with the Voyager. The secondary outcome measures are progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Enrollment is closed, and long-term treatment and follow-up is ongoing. 96 patients were enrolled and treated. 82 patients reported at least one AE, and 18 AEs were assessed as device-related (mild-moderate; 12 headache, 2 vomiting, 1 nausea, 1 confusion, 1 insomnia, and 1 skin irritation). 31 patients reported at least one serious AE, and none were assessed as device-related. 33% of patients treated with Voyager alone and 36% of patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy were progression-free after 6 months. 58% of patients treated with Voyager alone and 60% of patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy remained alive after 6 months; median overall survival is 7 months (95% CI=4.4±14.3) in patients treated with Voyager alone and 10 months (95% CI=6.7±11.5) in patients treated with Voyager + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The Voyager system appears to be safe and feasible for the treatment of recurrent GBM. Given that therapy is delivered non-invasively and no device-related serious adverse events were reported, further prospective study of the investigational device is planned.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document