scholarly journals 920. Use of the Web by State and Territorial Health Departments to Promote the Dissemination of State Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Data, United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S494-S495
Author(s):  
Xin Yin ◽  
Keith W Hamilton ◽  
Heather Tate ◽  
Nkuchia M M’ikanatha
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
One Health ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Web Survey ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Appropriate Antimicrobial Use ◽  
The Web

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria pose a serious threat to public health. The national response to this threat includes calls for promoting judicious use of antibiotics in humans and animals and strengthening integrated One Health surveillance of AMR bacteria in humans, animals, and environment. However, the extent to which public health jurisdictions are disseminating surveillance findings to promote judicious use of antimicrobials is unclear. Methods We used a standardized web audit tool to manually review and document the presence of AMR-related information on the websites of all public health jurisdictions that participate in national notifiable disease surveillance in the United States. We also emailed a survey to representatives in the 54 jurisdictions that participate in the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) activities coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The survey asked questions about AMR-related information on their public health department website. Results Of the 37 (68.5%) jurisdictions that responded to the email survey, 26 (70.3%) indicated that their websites have information on appropriate antibiotic use for health professionals, veterinarians and general public, compared to 89.3% from the web survey (Figure). Eleven (29.7%) indicated that they have data on antimicrobial susceptibility for pathogens, or antibiograms, on their websites, compared to 48.2% from the web survey. While 11 (29.7%) jurisdictions indicated that they have highlighted appropriate antimicrobial use on the homepage, the web survey found no reference on the homepage. Comparison of results from email and web survey on public health jurisdictions’ website, United States - 2020 Conclusion Public health jurisdictions have begun to use websites to increase awareness about the threat of antimicrobial resistance. However, the limited presence of information on appropriate antimicrobial use for the public, health professionals and veterinarians suggest the need for improvement. Gaps exist between the awareness of the epidemiologists and laboratorians and the information reported on public health jurisdictions’ websites. Websites can be expanded and better leveraged to increase visibility of AMR and appropriate antimicrobial prescribing across One Health domains. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals CIPARS: A One-Health Approach to Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Deckert ◽  
Agnes Agunos ◽  
Brent Avery ◽  
Carolee Carson ◽  
Danielle Daignault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
One Health ◽  
Health Agency ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
The Public ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance ◽  
Holistic Understanding ◽  
National Trends

The objective of the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) is to provide a unified approach to monitor national trends in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial use (AMU) in humans and animals and to facilitate the assessment of the public health impact of antimicrobial use. CIPARS is a combination of passive and active surveillance that is coordinated by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) but is based on extensive collaborations. Stakeholder engagement has led to action based on surveillance results. This One-Health approach provides a holistic understanding of AMR in Canada and enables the evaluation of interventions.

Cuba and the Covid-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-131
Author(s):  
Bob Oram
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Universal Health

For the UK struggling to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic, the experience of Cuba’s Ministry of Public Health over the past six decades provides the clearest case for a single, universal health system constituting an underlying national grid dedicated to prevention and care; an abundance of health professionals, accessible everywhere; a world-renowned science and biotech capability; and an educated public schooled in public health. All this was achieved despite being under a vicious blockade by the United States for all of that time.

scholarly journals Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in United States Hospitals: Project ICARE Phase 2

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott K. Fridkin ◽  
Christine D. Steward ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
Erica R. Pryor ◽  
John E. McGowan, Jr. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Phase 2

scholarly journals Measuring Appropriate Antimicrobial Use: Attempts at Opening the Black Box

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Spivak ◽  
Sara E. Cosgrove ◽  
Arjun Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Consensus Definition ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Public Health Officials ◽  
Appropriate Antimicrobial Use

Abstract Indiscriminate antimicrobial use has plagued medicine since antibiotics were first introduced into clinical practice >70 years ago. Infectious diseases physicians and public health officials have advocated for preservation of these life-saving drugs for many years. With rising burden of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile infections, halting unnecessary antimicrobial use has become one of the largest public health concerns of our time. Inappropriate antimicrobial use has been quantified in various settings using numerous definitions; however, no established reference standard exists. With mounting national efforts to improve antimicrobial use, a consensus definition and standard method of measuring appropriate antimicrobial use is imperative. We review existing literature on systematic approaches to define and measure appropriate antimicrobial use, and describe a collaborative effort at developing standardized audit tools for assessing the quality of antimicrobial prescribing.

Perception, Attitude, and Knowledge Regarding Antimicrobial Resistance, Appropriate Antimicrobial Use, and Infection Control Among Future Medical Practitioners: A Multicenter Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuttagarn Chuenchom ◽  
Visanu Thamlikitkul ◽  
Romanee Chaiwarith ◽  
Rawisut Deoisares ◽  
Pinyo Rattanaumpawan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Appropriate Antimicrobial Use

A questionnaire-based study was conducted among final-year Thai medical students. The problem of antimicrobial resistance is well recognized, but their knowledge of antimicrobial resistance, appropriate antimicrobial use, and infection control was substantially limited. Only half of these students recognized existence of an antimicrobial stewardship program or infection control unit in their hospitals.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:603–605

scholarly journals Health Information Seeking Behaviors on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among American Social Networking Site Users: Survey Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Neely ◽  
Christina Eldredge ◽  
Ron Sanders
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Public Health Officials ◽  
Health Consumers

BACKGROUND In recent years, medical journals have emphasized the increasingly critical role that social media plays in the dissemination of public health information and disease prevention guidelines. However, platforms such as Facebook and Twitter continue to pose unique challenges for clinical health care providers and public health officials alike. In order to effectively communicate during public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is increasingly critical for health care providers and public health officials to understand how patients gather health-related information on the internet and adjudicate the merits of such information. OBJECTIVE With that goal in mind, we conducted a survey of 1003 US-based adults to better understand how health consumers have used social media to learn and stay informed about the COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which they have relied on credible scientific information sources, and how they have gone about fact-checking pandemic-related information. METHODS A web-based survey was conducted with a sample that was purchased through an industry-leading market research provider. The results were reported with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 3. Participants included 1003 US-based adults (aged ≥18 years). Participants were selected via a stratified quota sampling approach to ensure that the sample was representative of the US population. Balanced quotas were determined (by region of the country) for gender, age, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS The results showed a heavy reliance on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic; more than three-quarters of respondents (762/1003, 76%) reported that they have relied on social media at least “a little,” and 59.2% (594/1003) of respondents indicated that they read information about COVID-19 on social media at least once per week. According to the findings, most social media users (638/1003, 63.6%) were unlikely to fact-check what they see on the internet with a health professional, despite the high levels of mistrust in the accuracy of COVID-19–related information on social media. We also found a greater likelihood of undergoing vaccination among those following more credible scientific sources on social media during the pandemic (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub>16</sub>=50.790; <i>φ</i>=0.258; <i>P</i><.001). CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that health professionals will need to be both strategic and proactive when engaging with health consumers on social media if they hope to counteract the deleterious effects of misinformation and disinformation. Effective training, institutional support, and proactive collaboration can help health professionals adapt to the evolving patterns of health information seeking.

scholarly journals The Missing Professional Perspective: Medical, Veterinary, and Dual Degree Public Health Student Perceptions of One Health

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohini Roopnarine ◽  
Ellen Boeren ◽  
Julie-Anne Regan
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
One Health ◽  
Role Theory ◽  
Emerging Diseases ◽  
Policy Formation ◽  
Master Of Public Health ◽  
Professional Perspective ◽  
Dual Degree

Introduction: One Health (OH) is an important concept to design appropriate public health responses to emerging diseases such as COVID-19. How trainee health professionals understand this concept is important to its implementation. In this study, we explored how medical (MD), veterinary (DVM), and dual degree MD and DVM Master of Public Health (MPH) students define OH and its relevance to practice.Methods: Students participated in a survey that included the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS), and two questions requiring them to define and explain the relevance of OH. The transcripts of the OH responses underwent thematic analysis. Role theory was used to explain the variation in how students from these different programmes viewed the concept.Results: The responses of the MD and DVM students in contrast to the dual degree MPH students reflected gaps in their understanding of the concept that pertained to the specific health impacts of global warming; antimicrobial resistance, food security; social, cultural and environmental determinants of zoonoses occurrence, and health policy formation.Discussion: Mitigation of the global risks to public health require a collaborative approach by health professionals. Our findings suggest that MD and DVM students are unaware of many factors that impact patient health outside of their own discipline. The inclusion of dual degree students revealed novel insights that undertaking an MPH may have enabled them to be more aware about the interdisciplinary relevance of OH to their professional practice. We recommend that structured incorporation of OH should inform future medical and veterinary curricula.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document