scholarly journals 1677. Evaluation of Optimal Treatment for Urinary Tract Infections in Outpatient Clinics at an Academic Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S824-S824
Author(s):  
Jennifer Walters ◽  
Jihye Kim ◽  
Michael Stevens

Abstract Background Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics is an important modifiable risk factor for antibiotic resistance. The Joint Commission has identified the need for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship efforts. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of optimal empiric antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in outpatient clinics at VCU Health. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients seen in internal medicine (IM) and urology clinics between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. Patients were included if they were ≥ 18 years old, had a diagnosis of UTI per ICD-10 code, and received a prescription to treat a UTI at the visit. Patients were excluded if they had a concurrent infection, currently prescribed antibiotics, or pregnant. The primary outcome was to evaluate the incidence of optimal empiric treatment for UTIs. Appropriateness of antibiotic therapy was assessed based on prior culture data along with our institutional UTI treatment guideline. Results Two hundred and twenty-six patients were included: 136 in IM clinics and 90 in urology clinics. Patients in the IM clinics were significantly older (mean age 64.8 vs. 60.5, p= 0.033) and more were female (88% vs. 38%, p< 0.001). More patients in the urology clinics had a history of a UTI within 24 months (72% vs. 57%, p= 0.016), history of fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-Negative UTIs (35% vs. 13%, p= 0.007), and history of genitourinary cancer (28% vs. 1%, p< 0.001). Overall, 61% of patients were treated with optimal empiric antibiotics. Incidence of optimal prescribing in the IM clinics was significantly higher compared to urology clinics (69% vs 49%, p= 0.002). See table 1 for additional results. Table 1. Optimal UTI Treatment in Internal Medicine Clinics vs Urology Clinics Conclusion IM clinics more frequently prescribed optimal empiric antibiotics for UTIs compared to urology clinics. Resident prescribers were more likely to prescribe optimal empiric therapy. Presence of a beta-lactam allergy was not predictive of optimal prescribing. These data highlight opportunities for antibiotic therapy optimization for UTIs at our health system. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-9
Author(s):  
Ertugrul Guclu ◽  
Fikret Halis ◽  
Elif Kose ◽  
Aziz Ogutlu ◽  
Oğuz Karabay

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most seen infection among community. Objectives: In this cross-sectional study we aimed to investigate the risk factors of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria that caused community-acquired UTI (CA-UTI). Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to the Urology and Infectious Diseases policlinics with the diagnosis of CA-UTI were included in the study. A standard form including possible predisposing factors for MDR bacteria was applied. Results: In total, 240 patients (51.3% females) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of participants were 59.8 ± 18.3 years old. Escherichia coli (n =166; 69.2%)was the most frequently isolated bacteria and its incidence was higher in females than in males (p=0.01). In total, 129 (53.8%) of the identified pathogens were MDR bacteria. According to multivariate analysis, the use of antibiotics three or more times increased the risk of infection with MDR bacteria by 4.6 times, the history of urinary tract infection in the last 6 months by 2 times, being male and over 65 years old by 3 times. Conclusion: Doctors should consider prescribing broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with severe UTIs with a history of UTI, advanced age, male gender, and multiple antibiotic usage, even if they have a CA-UTI. Keywords: Urinary tract infection; community acquired; multidrug-resistant; male; multiple antibiotic usage; advanced age.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document