scholarly journals 153. Development of a Pathway for Removal of Inappropriate Penicillin Allergy Labels in Hospitalized Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S86-S87
Author(s):  
Fnu Shweta ◽  
Pooja Gurram ◽  
Natalia E Castillo Almeida ◽  
Douglas Challener ◽  
Edison J Cano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background More than 90% of reported penicillin allergies are found inaccurate when formally assessed. These allergy labels lead to decreased utilization of first-line beta-lactam antibiotics, and adverse clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop a multi-disciplinary approach to decrease inaccurate labeling among hospitalized patients with documented penicillin allergy. Methods A team of clinicians, pharmacists, and nurses utilized the DMAIC quality strategy to improve accuracy of penicillin allergy labeling. Allergic reactions were stratified to develop a penicillin allergy de-labeling algorithm (Figure 1). Admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for anaphylaxis was defined as a balancing measure. We reviewed baseline data from patients with a documented penicillin allergy admitted to a single inpatient floor at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between June and October 2019. A cause and effect diagram was used to conduct a root cause analysis. The intervention was then applied to patients who reported penicillin allergy admitted to the same floor from November 2019 to January 2020. Study data were collected and basic descriptive statistics generated. Figure 1: Penicillin allergy delabeling algorithm Results 96 patients were included in the control group with mean age of 71 years (range 65–84 years) and 55% females. Breakdown of documented allergic reactions are represented in Figure 2. 58 (60%) received an antibiotic for a median duration of 1.5 days (IQR: 0 – 6). Of these, 7(12%) received penicillin-class antibiotics, and 41 (70.6%) received non-beta-lactam antibiotics. 2 (2%) of these patients were de-labeled without any penicillin skin tests. Detailed metrics of each PDSA cycle are shown in Table 1. During PDSA cycle 2, inaccurate penicillin documentation was removed in 9/19 (47.4%) of hospitalized patients. There were no ICU admissions for anaphylaxis. Figure 2: Graphic representation of proportion of type of documented allergic reactions to penicillin Table 1: Metrics and outcomes at baseline and during successive PDSA cycles Conclusion Various factors contribute to penicillin allergy mislabeling. Our comprehensive algorithm addresses nuances of penicillin allergic reactions and increased accurate penicillin allergy labeling in 47.4% of the cases. Beta-lactam use also increased to 37% through our pilot project while maintaining patient safety. A multi-disciplinary and patient-centered approach aligned with institutional workflows is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

CHEST Journal ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy A. Pleasants ◽  
Terrence R. Walker ◽  
Wayne M. Samuelson

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-304
Author(s):  
Zahra SADEGHI DEYLAMDEH ◽  
Abolfazl JAFARI SALES

Beta-lactamases are the most common cause of bacterial resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. AmpC-type beta-lactamases hydrolyze cephalosporins, penicillins, and cephamycins. Therefore, the study aims was to determine antibiotic resistance and to investigate the presence of AmpC beta-lactamase gene in clinical strains of Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients in Tabriz. In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 289 E. coli specimens were collected from clinical specimens. Disk diffusion method and combined disk method were used to determine the phenotype of extended spectrum β-Lactamase producing (ESBLs) strains. Then PCR was used to evaluate the presence of AmpC (FOX) beta-lactamase gene in the strains confirmed in phenotypic tests. Antibiotic resistance was also determined using disk diffusion by the Kibry-Bauer method. A total of 121 isolates were identified as generators of beta-lactamase genes. 72 (59.5 %) isolates producing ESBL and 49 (40.5 %) isolates were identified as AmpC generators. In the PCR test, 31 isolates contained the FOX gene. The highest resistance was related to the antibiotics amoxicillin (76.12%), ceftazidime (70.24%) and nalidixic acid (65.05%). The results indicate an increase in the prevalence of beta-lactamase genes and increased resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, which can be the result of improper use of antibiotics and not using antibiotic susceptibility tests before starting treatment. Also, using phenotypic and molecular diagnostic methods such as PCR together can be very useful.


2021 ◽  
pp. 001857872110468
Author(s):  
Hanna M. Harper ◽  
Michael Sanchez

Objective: To describe the impact of pharmacy driven penicillin allergy assessments on de-labeling penicillin allergies and antibiotic streamlining opportunities for hospitalized patients. Design: Multi-center, retrospective case-series study. Setting: A health system of 4 non-teaching hospitals. Participants: Patients aged 18 years and older with a physician order for a pharmacist penicillin allergy assessment. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients with anaphylaxis or a type II penicillin allergy, anaphylaxis of any cause within 4 weeks, refusal of penicillin allergy skin test (PAST), antihistamine use within 24 hours, penicillin intolerance, immunosuppression or immunosuppressive medications, or skin conditions that could interfere with PAST. Interventions: The primary endpoint evaluated the number of de-labeled penicillin allergies after pharmacists provided penicillin allergy assessments. Secondary endpoints evaluated the percent of patients with antibiotics deescalated to beta-lactam antibiotics and classification of notable interventions made by pharmacists. Measurements and Main Results: There were 35 patients who met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four patients underwent both penicillin allergy skin testing and oral (PO) amoxicillin challenge. Five patients had allergies de-labeled only after a pharmacist interview. Four patients received only the PO amoxicillin challenge and 2 patients received only PAST. Penicillin allergies were de-labeled from the electronic health record (EHR) in 31 (89%) patients despite all testing negative for a penicillin allergy from PAST or a PO amoxicillin challenge. Four patients had the allergy re-added to the chart on subsequent admissions. No patients experienced a reaction from PAST, PO amoxicillin challenge, or subsequent beta-lactam antibiotics. Twenty-eight (80%) patients had their antibiotic therapy changed as a result of the allergy assessment. Seventeen patients were de-escalated onto beta-lactam antibiotics and aztreonam was stopped in 6 patients. Conclusion: Results from this study suggests that pharmacists expanding their scope of practice with PAST is a safe and effective allergy de-labeling tool. Pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy assessments could provide antibiotic cost savings and avoid aztreonam use. The study supports the need to emphasize education for patients and caretakers regarding allergy testing results to avoid relabeling in future hospital visits.


Pharmacy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley D. Kufel ◽  
Julie Ann Justo ◽  
P. Brandon Bookstaver ◽  
Lisa M. Avery

Penicillin allergies are among of the most commonly reported allergies, yet only 10% of these patients are truly allergic. This leads to potential inadvertent negative consequences for patients and makes treatment decisions challenging for clinicians. Thus, allergy assessment and penicillin skin testing (PST) are important management strategies to reconcile and clarify labeled penicillin allergies. While PST is more common in the inpatient setting where the results will immediately impact antibiotic management, this process is becoming of increasing importance in the outpatient setting. PST in the outpatient setting allows clinicians to proactively de-label and educate patients accordingly so beta-lactam antibiotics may be appropriately prescribed when necessary for future infections. While allergists have primarily been responsible for PST in the outpatient setting, there is an increasing role for pharmacist involvement in the process. This review highlights the importance of penicillin allergy assessments, considerations for PST in the outpatient setting, education and advocacy for patients and clinicians, and the pharmacist’s role in outpatient PST.


2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. S13
Author(s):  
K. Sacco ◽  
R. Chirila ◽  
C. Libertin ◽  
A. Bhasin ◽  
T. Pongdee ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrine Dornbusch ◽  
Stellan Bengtsson ◽  
John Eric Brorson ◽  
Hans Fritz ◽  
Claes Henning ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 2597-2600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Veziris ◽  
Chantal Truffot ◽  
Jean-Luc Mainardi ◽  
Vincent Jarlier

ABSTRACTAlthough beta-lactam antibiotics are not considered as antituberculous drugs, it has been recently shown that the combination of carbapenems and clavulanate is bactericidalin vitro. We evaluated in a murine model of tuberculosis the activity of carbapenems alone and combined with clavulanate againstMycobacterium tuberculosis. Swiss mice infected intravenously with 3 × 105M. tuberculosisH37Rv were treated for 4 weeks with clavulanate alone or imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem alone or combined with clavulanate, whereas a positive control group was treated with isoniazid, and a negative control group was held without treatment. The combination of imipenem or meropenem plus clavulanate significantly improved survival. Among groups of mice with 100% survival, only isoniazid reduced lung CFU counts; the carbapenem-clavulanate combinations did not prevent bacterial growth. Although less active than isoniazid, the combinations of imipenem or meropenem plus clavulanate improved the survival of mice infected withM. tuberculosisand should be further evaluated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document