scholarly journals Reducing blood culture contamination using an initial specimen diversion device

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic S. Zimmerman ◽  
Marc V. Assous ◽  
Shoshana Zevin ◽  
Yonit Wiener-Well
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Concomitant Reduction ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
Microbiological Laboratory

AbstractFalse positive blood cultures result from contamination, consuming microbiological laboratory resources and causing unnecessary antibiotic treatment and lengthened hospitalizations. Skin sterilization has been shown to reduce contamination; however, bacteria do not only colonize the surface of human skin, but are also found in deeper tissues, requiring additional techniques to reduce contamination. An initial specimen diversion device diverts the initial 1-2 ml of blood so as to remove any potentially contaminated skin plug, thus potentially further reducing culture contamination. The device has been associated with a reduction in culture contamination over short study periods in certain populations. However, more study is needed to understand whether the effect continues over longer periods of time and in hospitalized patients. Thus, in this prospective, controlled pragmatic study, cultures were obtained from hospitalized patients using the initial specimen diversion device, with cultures taken using standard methods serving as control. In total, 671 blood cultures were obtained: 207 cultures were taken using an initial specimen diversion device, with 2 (1.0%) contaminated cultures and 464 cultures were taken without the device, with 24 (5.2%) contaminated cultures (p < 0.008). No significant difference was shown in the rate of true positive cultures. Thus, use of a diversion device was associated with reduced culture contamination in hospitalized patients over a six month period without concomitant reduction in true positive cultures. This intervention may result in a reduction in costs, antibiotic use and duration of hospitalization.

scholarly journals 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S187-S187
Author(s):  
Lucy S Tompkins ◽  
Alexandra Madison ◽  
Tammy Schaffner ◽  
Jenny Tran ◽  
Pablito Ang
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Candida Sp ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Skin Flora

Abstract Background Blood samples obtained via traditional venipuncture can become contaminated by superficial and deeply embedded skin flora. We evaluated the hospital-wide use of an initial-specimen diversion device (ISDD) designed to shunt these microorganisms away from the culture bottle to reduce blood culture contamination (BCC) and sequelae: false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), repeat blood culture draws, inappropriate antibiotic usage, increased patient length-of-stay and misdiagnosis. The study aimed to show the proportion of blood cultures containing contaminants drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD versus those drawn using traditional methods. Nursing staff continued to use traditional methods to draw blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) and from inpatients. Methods Over a four-month trial at Stanford Health Care (SHC), 4,462 blood cultures were drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD (Steripath Gen2, Magnolia Medical Technologies) in the ED and from inpatients; 922 blood cultures were obtained by phlebotomy staff using standard methods. Additionally, 1,413 blood cultures were drawn by nursing staff using standard methods. The number of matched sets (2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic] plus 2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic], with total volume 40 ml) obtained through traditional methods and by the ISDD were recorded. Contaminants were defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). In addition, sets in which 1 out of 4 bottles contained vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) or Candida sp. were also recorded, even though these are not considered contaminants by the NHSN. Results Of 4,462 blood cultures obtained using the ISDD there were zero contaminants found (BCC rate 0%) versus 29 contaminated sets using traditional methods (BCC rate 3.15%). Twenty-eight contaminants were observed from nursing staff blood culture draws (BCC rate 1.98%). Zero false-positive CLABSIs were associated with use of the ISDD for the trial period. No matched sets containing 1 of 4 bottles with VRE or Candida sp. were observed. Table Stanford Health Care blood culture collection methods and contamination events (March 15, 2019 - July 21, 2019) Conclusion The trial results encourage adoption of the ISDD as standard practice for blood culture at SHC. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Routine blood cultures in the management of community acquired pneumonia; is it necessary?

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-57
Author(s):  
TM Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Case Fatality ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
True Positive ◽  
It Use ◽  
The Cost

INTRODUCTION: The role of blood cultures (BCs) in the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) has generated a lot of controversy among clinicians in recent times. The main objectives of this audit were to determine if BC results impact the choice of antibiotics, and hospital outcomes in CAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adults with CAP treated in the ED of Goulbourn Valley Base Hospital, Shepparton in Australia from November 2010 to November 2011. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty five patients were treated for CAP during the period in review with a mean age of 67.09±19.82 yrs and male:female of 1.5:1. 277 sets of BCs were performed and only 2.2% of the cases had true positive BCs .87% of the total cost of performing these BCs was spent on those with negative cultres.15.1% of the cases had their antibiotics changed during their hospitalization but the results of the BCs had no impact on the antibiotic change. Even though not statistically significant true positive BCs was associated with prolong length of hospital stay (7.6 ± 9.39 days vs 4.89 ± 3.24 days, p=0.44), and duration of IV antibiotic use (4.8±3.27 days vs 3.58±1.97 days, p=0.39). But the case fatality rate was much lower in those with positive BCs, (0 vs 5.7%,p< 0.05). Tachycardia (>120.4±12.46 bpm), neutrophilia (15.0± 8.16 /ul), and high CRP (326.4±146.32 ug/l) were predictors of true positive BCs. CONCLUSIONS: Routine BCs in the management of CAP is not cost-effective with large portion of the cost spent on cultures that returned negative result .Therefore it use show be limited to those likely to return positive cultures. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ijim.v1i2.7408 Int J Infect Microbiol 2012;1(1):54-57

scholarly journals Evaluation of an Initial Specimen Diversion Device (ISDD) on Rates of Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Blake Buzard ◽  
Patrick Evans ◽  
Todd Schroeder
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Contamination Rate ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Initial Specimen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Blood cultures are the gold standard for identifying bloodstream infections. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends a blood culture contamination rate of <3%. Contamination can lead to misdiagnosis, increased length of stay and hospital costs, unnecessary testing and antibiotic use. These reasons led to the development of initial specimen diversion devices (ISDD). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of an initial specimen diversion device on rates of blood culture contamination in the emergency department.  Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-site study including patients who had blood cultures drawn in an emergency department. February 2018 to April 2018, when an ISDD was not utilized, was compared with June 2019 to August 2019, a period where an ISDD was being used. The primary outcome was total blood culture contamination. Secondary outcomes were total hospital cost, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, vancomycin days of use, vancomycin serum concentrations obtained, and repeat blood cultures obtained.  Results: A statistically significant difference was found in blood culture contamination rates in the Pre-ISDD group vs the ISDD group (7.47% vs 2.59%, p<0.001). None of the secondary endpoints showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Implementation of an ISDD reduces blood culture contamination in a statistically significant manner. However, we were unable to capture any statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes.

scholarly journals 1360. Prevalence of Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S766-S766
Author(s):  
Maria J Suarez ◽  
Yu Shia Lin
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Foot Ulcer ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
True Negative

Abstract Background Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) are common in outpatient and inpatient settings. The prevalence of positive blood cultures (BC) ranges from 2% to 52%. Because of the variations in published data, the exact prevalence of bacteremia in hospitalized patients with SSTI is unknown. Our objective is to determine the prevalence of bacteremia in hospitalized patients with SSTI. Methods Retrospective chart review from January 2017 to December 2018. Patients older than 18 years admitted with SSTI who required BC on admission were included. Patients who met the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)/sepsis or severe SSTI, or had an underlying immunodeficiency underwent BC collection. Patients with diabetic foot ulcer, device related SSTI, necrotizing fasciitis, and osteomyelitis were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups: true positive (TP) defined as a true pathogen, false positive (FP) defined as a contaminant, and true negative (TN) defined as no growth in BC. Physician assessment, microorganisms isolated, number of positive bottles/culture sets, and timing of growth were reviewed. Patients’ comorbidities, presence of SIRS, laboratory data, duration of antibiotic use, and length of stay (LOS) were compared. Results We screened 583 patients and included 541 patients. The mean age was 62 ± 18.4 years, and 60% were male. 47/ 541 (8.6%) had skin abscesses. 57 patients (11%) had positive BC, of whom 32 were TP (6%), and 25 were FP (5%). 89% of patients (484) had TN BC. The organisms isolated are described in Figures 1 and 2. Patients in the FP and TN groups had prior antibiotic use, compared to TP (P&lt; 0.05). The FP group had a longer LOS and duration of antibiotic use compared to the TN group (p&lt; 0.05). 76% of FP had repeated BC. Beta-lactam antibiotics were mostly used, followed by anti-MRSA antibiotics (40%). We did not find risk factors to predict the likelihood of bacteremia. The outcome was not different among the 3 groups. Figure 1. Microorganisms isolated from blood cultures of patients with SSTI – True pathogens Figure 2. Microorganisms isolated from blood cultures of patients with SSTI – Isolated contaminants Conclusion There was a low incidence of true bacteremia (6%) in hospitalized patients with SSTI. More than 90% of TP were predictable causal microorganisms, which are covered by empiric antibiotics. BC may not affect the initial treatment of SSTI. FP BC were associated with an increased LOS, longer antibiotic use, and increased healthcare cost. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Delayed Versus Initial Risk-Categorization of Pediatric Cancer Patients with Prolonged Febrile Neutropenia. A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3119-3119
Author(s):  
Nabil M. Ahmed ◽  
Hadir El Mahallawy ◽  
Alaa M. El Haddad
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Outpatient Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
Risk Categorization

Abstract Purpose: Hospitalization with empiric broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics has been the standard of care for treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia. In an attempt to improved hospital utilization we attempt to identify a group of patients at a lower risk of sepsis that would be eligible for outpatient therapy. We hypothesized that patients initially considered at high risk for sepsis can be candidates for outpatient therapy if at 72 hours satisfied certain selection criteria. Patients and methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 119 febrile neutropenic pediatric cancer patients. Patients were randomized into two groups depending on the time of risk-categorization: Initial (control) vs. delayed (study) groups. Patients in the study group were risk-assessed at 72 hours and accordingly considered for outpatient therapy if afebrile, had an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 100/uL, negative blood cultures, and no signs of infection among other carefully defined “Early Discharge Criteria”. Those randomized to the control group were treated in the hospital. We analyzed the clinical features, microbiological data, hospital course, duration of hospitalization and treatment cost. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: We found a statistically significant difference between the duration of hospitalization in the group risk-assessed at 72 hours and control group (p<0.01). “Delayed Risk-categorization” correlated better with the duration of neutropenia, need for antibiotic change and episode outcome. Duration of hospitalization and per-episode median treatment cost were significantly less in the study group vs. control (p< 0.001). There was a significant tendency for blood cultures to cluster around the first 48 hours. Comparing the blood culture yield between patients treated in the hospital to those treated as outpatients after risk-assessment at 72 hours there was no statistically significant difference demonstrated [p=0.35]. Readmission rate after early discharge was 3.3%. Conclusion: We conclude that pediatric febrile-neutropenic patients initially at considered at “high risk for sepsis” can be reevaluated at 72 hours for outpatient therapy. The practice of “Delayed Risk-Categoriztion” could be particularly useful to reduce the overall treatment costs, and duration of hospitalization. In addition, this practice could potenitally offer a superior quality of life.

scholarly journals The Use of Antimicrobial Agents after Diagnosis of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections in Hospitalized Adults: Antibiotics or Anxiolytics?

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1177-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Shiley ◽  
Ebbing Lautenbach ◽  
Ingi Lee
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Chest Radiograph ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Abnormal Chest ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory

Objective.Because extensive antibiotic use by inpatients has been associated with the development of multidrug-resistant organisms, we aimed to determine which variables were associated with the use of antibiotics after viral respiratory tract infection diagnosis among adult patients admitted to the hospital with respiratory symptoms.Methods.A retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 affiliated urban hospitals in Pennsylvania. We identified all adult patients admitted to the hospital during the period from November 1, 2005, through August 1, 2007, with a viral assay positive for influenza A or B, parainfluenza, adenovirus, or respiratory syncytial virus. Among these patients, we identified those who received antibiotics after the diagnosis of viral RTL Data on demographics; comorbidities; and physical examination, laboratory, and radiographic findings were ascertained to identify risk factors for antimicrobial use among these patients.Results.A total of 196 hospitalized patients with positive viral assay results were included; 125 of 131 patients administered antibiotics continued to receive them after viral RTI diagnosis. Among 52 patients with an abnormal chest radiograph, 46 continued antibiotic therapy. An abnormal chest radiograph was independently associated with continued antibiotic use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.28 [95% confidence interval, 1.71-10.77]; P = .002). However, the majority of patients (79 of 125 [63%]) who continued antibiotic therapy had normal chest imaging findings. Eight patients (6%) who continued antibiotic therapy and no patients who stopped developed C. difficile infection (95% CI, 1.5-00; p = .05), but there was no significant difference in length of stay or mortality.Conclusions.Antibiotics are commonly used to treat hospitalized patients with known acute viral RTIs. Continued use is strongly associated with abnormal radiograph findings at admission. However, the reasons for continuation of antibiotics in the treatment of the majority of patients with normal radiographs are unclear and may represent inappropriate use.

Is perioperative antibiotic necessary in straightforward implant placement procedures?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elçin Bedeloğlu ◽  
Mustafa Yalçın ◽  
Cenker Zeki Koyuncuoğlu
Keyword(s):  
Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotic ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Experimental Group

The purpose of this non-random retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the impact of prophylactic antibiotic on early outcomes including postoperative pain, swelling, bleeding and cyanosis in patients undergoing dental implant placement before prosthetic loading. Seventy-five patients (45 males, 30 females) whose dental implant placement were completed, included to the study. Patients used prophylactic antibiotics were defined as the experimental group and those who did not, were defined as the control group. The experimental group received 2 g amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 1 h preoperatively and 1 g amoxicillin + clavulanic acid twice a day for 5 days postoperatively while the control group had received no prophylactic antibiotic therapy perioperatively. Data on pain, swelling, bleeding, cyanosis, flap dehiscence, suppuration and implant failure were analyzed on postoperative days 2, 7, and 14 and week 12. No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with regard to pain and swelling on postoperative days 2, 7, and 14 and week 12 ( p &gt;0.05), while the severity of pain and swelling were greater on day 2 compared to day 7 and 14 and week 12 in both groups ( p =0.001 and p &lt;0.05, respectively). Similarly, no significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to postoperative bleeding and cyanosis. Although flap dehiscence was more severe on day 7 in the experimental group, no significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to the percentage of flap dehiscence assessed at other time points. Within limitations of the study, it has been demonstrated that antibiotic use has no effect on implant failure rates in dental implant surgery with a limited number of implants. We conclude that perioperative antibiotic use may not be required in straightforward implant placement procedures. Further randomized control clinical studies with higher numbers of patients and implants are needed to substantiate our findings.

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in hospitalized patients at a tertiary referral center in North India (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Animesh Ray ◽  
Dr. Komal Singh ◽  
Souvick Chattopadhyay ◽  
Farha Mehdi ◽  
Dr. Gaurav Batra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
North India ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is an important tool to estimate the true extent of infection in a population. However, seroprevalence studies have been scarce in South East Asia including India, which, as of now, carries the third largest burden of confirmed cases in the world. The present study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody among hospitalized patients at one of the largest government hospital in India OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study is to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody among patients admitted to the Medicine ward and ICU METHODS This cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital in North India, recruited consecutive patients who were negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR or CB-NAAT. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels targeting recombinant spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein of SARS CoV-2 were estimated in serum sample by the ELISA method RESULTS A total of 212 hospitalized patients were recruited in the study with mean age (±SD) of 41.2 (±15.4) years and 55% male population. Positive serology against SARS CoV-2 was detected in 19.8%patients(95% CI 14.7-25.8). Residency in Delhi conferred a higher frequency of seropositivity 26.5% (95% CI 19.3-34.7) as compared to that of other states 8% (95% CI 3.0-16.4) with p-value 0.001. No particular age groups or socio-economic strata showed a higher proportion of seropositivity CONCLUSIONS Around, one-fifth of hospitalized patients, who were not diagnosed with COVID-19 before, demonstrated seropositivity against SARS-CoV-2. While there was no significant difference in the different age groups and socio-economic classes; residence in Delhi was associated with increased risk (relative risk of 3.62, 95% CI 1.59-8.21)

scholarly journals 288. Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bacteremia: How Do They Impact Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S144-S144
Author(s):  
Azza Elamin ◽  
Faisal Khan ◽  
Ali Abunayla ◽  
Rajasekhar Jagarlamudi ◽  
aditee Dash
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background As opposed to Staphylococcus. aureus bacteremia, there are no guidelines to recommend repeating blood cultures in Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia (GNB). Several studies have questioned the utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in GNB, but the impact of this practice on clinical outcomes is not fully understood. Our aim was to study the practice of obtaining FUBCs in GNB at our institution and to assess it’s impact on clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age admitted with GNB between January 2017 and December 2018. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes in those with and without FUBCs. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, presumed source of bacteremia and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Presence of fever, hypotension /shock and white blood cell (WBC) count on the day of FUBC was recorded. The primary objective was to compare 30-day mortality between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare differences in 30-day readmission rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and duration of antibiotic treatment. Mean and standard deviation were used for continuous variables, frequency and proportion were used for categorical variables. P-value &lt; 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results 482 patients were included, and of these, 321 (67%) had FUBCs. 96% of FUBCs were negative and 2.8% had persistent bacteremia. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between those with and without FUBCs (2.9% and 2.7% respectively), or in 30-day readmission rate (21.4% and 23.4% respectively). In patients with FUBCs compared to those without FUBCs, hospital LOS was longer (7 days vs 5 days, P &lt; 0.001), and mean duration of antibiotic treatment was longer (14 days vs 11 days, P &lt; 0.001). A higher number of patients with FUBCs needed ICU care compared to those without FUBCs (41.4% and 25.5% respectively, P &lt; 0.001) Microbiology of index blood culture in those with and without FUBCs Outcomes in those with and without FUBCs FUBCs characteristics Conclusion Obtaining FUBCs in GNB had no impact on 30-day mortality or 30-day readmission rate. It was associated with longer LOS and antibiotic duration. Our findings suggest that FUBCs in GNB are low yield and may not be recommended in all patients. Prospective studies are needed to further examine the utility of this practice in GNB. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Empiric use of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a propensity score-matched study of risks and benefits

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yu ◽  
Victor Perez Gutierrez ◽  
Alex Carlos ◽  
Gregory Hoge ◽  
Anjana Pillai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Risk Estimation ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrate a higher risk of developing thromboembolism. Anticoagulation (AC) has been proposed for high-risk patients, even without confirmed thromboembolism. However, benefits and risks of AC are not well assessed due to insufficient clinical data. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes from AC in a large population of COVID-19 patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1189 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 5 and May 15, 2020, with primary outcomes of mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation, and major bleeding. Patients who received therapeutic AC for known indications were excluded. Propensity score matching of baseline characteristics and admission parameters was performed to minimize bias between cohorts. Results The analysis cohort included 973 patients. Forty-four patients who received therapeutic AC for confirmed thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation were excluded. After propensity score matching, 133 patients received empiric therapeutic AC while 215 received low dose prophylactic AC. Overall, there was no difference in the rate of invasive mechanical ventilation (73.7% versus 65.6%, p = 0.133) or mortality (60.2% versus 60.9%, p = 0.885). However, among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, empiric therapeutic AC was an independent predictor of lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.476, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.345–0.657, p < 0.001) with longer median survival (14 days vs 8 days, p < 0.001), but these associations were not observed in the overall cohort (p = 0.063). Additionally, no significant difference in mortality was found between patients receiving empiric therapeutic AC versus prophylactic AC in various subgroups with different D-dimer level cutoffs. Patients who received therapeutic AC showed a higher incidence of major bleeding (13.8% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with a HAS-BLED score of ≥2 had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.482, 95% CI 1.110–1.980, p = 0.008), while those with a score of ≥3 had a higher risk of major bleeding (Odds ratio: 1.883, CI: 1.114–3.729, p = 0.016). Conclusion Empiric use of therapeutic AC conferred survival benefit to patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, but did not show benefit in non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Careful bleeding risk estimation should be pursued before considering escalation of AC intensity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document