scholarly journals 177. Distinctive Features of Ertapenem Mono-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in the United States: A Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S108-S109
Author(s):  
Max W Adelman ◽  
Chris W Bower ◽  
Julian E Grass ◽  
Uzma Ansari ◽  
Isaac See ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Whether CRE resistant only to ertapenem among carbapenems (ertapenem mono-resistant) represent a unique CRE subset with regards to risk factors, carbapenemase genes, and outcomes is unknown. Methods We analyzed laboratory- and population-based surveillance data from nine sites participating in CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP). We defined an incident case as the first isolation of Enterobacter cloacae complex, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, K. oxytoca, K. pneumoniae, or K. variicola resistant to doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, or meropenem (determined at clinical laboratory) from a normally sterile site or urine identified from a resident of the EIP catchment area in 2016-2017. We compared risk factors, carbapenemase genes (determined via polymerase chain reaction at CDC), and mortality of cases with ertapenem “mono-resistant” to “other” CRE (resistant to ≥ 1 carbapenem other than ertapenem). We additionally conducted survival analysis to determine the effect of ertapenem mono-resistant status and isolate source (sterile vs. urine) on survival. Results Of 2009 cases, 1249 (62.2%) were ertapenem mono-resistant and 760 (37.8%) were other CRE (Figure 1). Ertapenem mono-resistant CRE cases were more frequently ≥ 80 years old (29.1% vs. 19.5%, p< 0.0001), female (67.9% vs 59.0%, p< 0.0001), and white (62.6% vs. 45.1%, p< 0.0001). Ertapenem mono-resistant isolates were more likely than other CRE to be Enterobacter cloacae complex (48.4% vs. 15.4%, p< 0.0001) but less likely to be isolated from a normally sterile site (7.1% vs. 11.7%, p< 0.01) or have a carbapenemase gene (2.4% vs. 47.4%, p< 0.0001) (Figure 2). Ertapenem mono-resistance was not associated with difference in 90-day mortality (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.06) in logistic models or survival analysis (Figure 3). Figure 1. Flow diagram of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales cases included in analysis, 2017-2018. CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration. Ertapenem mono-resistant CRE are only resistant to ertapenem (among carbapenems). Other CRE are resistant to ≥1 carbapenem other than ertapenem. We excluded isolates that (1) had no interpretable MICs for any carbapenem, (2) were only tested against ertapenem, (3) had unknown death status, or (4) were not associated with patient’s first incident case. Figure 2. Proportion of ertapenem mono-resistant carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) vs. other CRE isolates with specific carbapenemase genes. KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase; OXA, oxacillinase. Ertapenem mono-resistant carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are only resistant to ertapenem (among carbapenems). Other CRE are resistant to ≥1 carbapenem other than ertapenem. Testing via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Figure 3. Survival analysis comparing patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that are ertapenem mono-resistant to other CRE (i.e., resistant to ≥1 carbapenem other than ertapenem), either total (A) or stratified by isolate site (B). Ertapenem mono-resistant) isolates were not associated with decreased mortality, and sterile isolate source (i.e., non-urinary isolates) was associated with increased mortality regardless of ertapenem mono-resistance. Conclusion Ertapenem mono-resistant CRE rarely have carbapenemase genes and have distinct clinical and microbiologic characteristics compared to other CRE. These findings may inform antibiotic choice particularly when testing for carbapenemases is not readily available. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Author(s):  
Max W Adelman ◽  
Chris W Bower ◽  
Julian E Grass ◽  
Uzma A Ansari ◽  
Elizabeth A Soda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Whether CRE resistant only to ertapenem among carbapenems (ertapenem “mono-resistant”) represent a unique CRE subset with regards to risk factors, carbapenemase genes, and outcomes is unknown. Methods We analyzed surveillance data from nine CDC Emerging Infections Program (EIP) sites. A case was the first isolation of a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, K. oxytoca, K. pneumoniae, or K. variicola from a normally sterile site or urine in an EIP catchment area resident in 2016-2017. We compared risk factors, carbapenemase genes, antibiotic susceptibility, and mortality of ertapenem “mono-resistant” cases to “other” CRE cases (resistant to ≥1 carbapenem other than ertapenem), and analyzed risk factors for mortality. Results Of 2009 cases, 1249 (62.2%) were ertapenem mono-resistant and 760 (37.8%) were other CRE. Ertapenem mono-resistant CRE cases were more frequently ≥80 years old (29.1% vs. 19.5%, p<0.0001) and female (67.9% vs 59.0%, p<0.0001). Ertapenem mono-resistant isolates were more likely to be Enterobacter cloacae complex (48.4% vs. 15.4%, p<0.0001) but less likely to be isolated from a normally sterile site (7.1% vs. 11.7%, p<0.01) or have a carbapenemase gene (2.4% vs. 47.4%, p<0.0001). Ertapenem mono-resistance was not associated with 90-day mortality in logistic regression models. Carbapenemase-positive isolates were associated with mortality (odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.30-2.86). Conclusions Ertapenem mono-resistant CRE rarely have carbapenemase genes and have distinct clinical and microbiologic characteristics from other CRE. These findings may inform antibiotic choice and infection prevention practices, particularly when carbapenemase testing is not available.


Author(s):  
Wan Huang ◽  
Jisheng Zhang ◽  
Lingyi Zeng ◽  
Chengru Yang ◽  
Lining Yin ◽  
...  

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the molecular characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates in a hospital in western Chongqing, southwestern China.MethodsA total of 127 unique CRKP isolates were collected from the Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, identified using a VITEK-2 compact system, and subjected to microbroth dilution to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration. Enterobacteriaceae intergenic repeat consensus polymerase chain reaction and multilocus sequence typing were used to analyze the homology among the isolates. Genetic information, including resistance and virulence genes, was assessed using polymerase chain reaction. The genomic features of the CRKP carrying gene blaKPC-2 were detected using whole-genome sequencing.ResultsST11 was the dominant sequence type in the homology comparison. The resistance rate to ceftazidime-avibactam in children was much higher than that in adults as was the detection rate of the resistance gene blaNDM (p < 0.0001). Virulence genes such as mrkD (97.6%), uge (96.9%), kpn (96.9%), and fim-H (84.3%) had high detection rates. IncF (57.5%) was the major replicon plasmid detected, and sequencing showed that the CRKP063 genome contained two plasmids. The plasmid carrying blaKPC-2, which mediates carbapenem resistance, was located on the 359,625 base pair plasmid IncFII, together with virulence factors, plasmid replication protein (rep B), stabilizing protein (par A), and type IV secretion system (T4SS) proteins that mediate plasmid conjugation transfer.ConclusionOur study aids in understanding the prevalence of CRKP in this hospital and the significant differences between children and adults, thus providing new ideas for clinical empirical use of antibiotics.


Author(s):  
María Fernanda Calderón Hernádez ◽  

Background: The main objective of this research is to learn the symptoms that occur in this pathology, since we are currently still fighting COVID-19, because of this, it is important to keep us informed about the different diagnostic methods available, which help us reach an earlier and more effective diagnosis. Various articles have been compiled to identify as soon as possible the active cases and thus reduce the number of infections. Materials and methods: This research was conducted on the basis of scientific articles and books, related to COVID-19. Methods: This research was conducted based on 15 scientific articles and 3 books, related to COVID-19. Results: The most important risk factors are diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, age and sex. The most common symptoms in Latin America are dry cough, fatigue, sore throat, and fever. The preferred diagnostic test for COVID-19 is the polymerase chain reaction for its specificity and sensitivity Conclusions: As a conclusion, the main objective of the research was achieved, which is to inform the reader about the most relevant symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 in order to improve the identification of suspected cases. Furthermore, we compare various diagnostic methods that exist to date and determine that PCR is the most specific and sensitive.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2110400
Author(s):  
Bilal Chaudhry ◽  
Lidiya Didenko ◽  
Maaria Chaudhry ◽  
Andrew Malek ◽  
Kirill Alekseyev

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia was first noted in Wuhan, China. Since the start of the pandemic, there have been millions of cases diagnosed. The average time from onset of symptoms to testing negative SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is roughly 25 days. In patients who continually test positive for COVID-19, it is essential to determine precisely which risk factors contribute to the increase in viral shedding duration. We present a case about a 62-year-old man who has persistently tested positive for COVID-19 for more than 230 days. We followed his treatment course, in which he had been hospitalized multiple times since the onset of symptoms back in April 2020. We have determined that patients with immunosuppression, especially those taking corticosteroids, are at increased risk of prolonged viral shedding. It is essential to continually monitor these immunocompromised patients as they required a greater time period in order to have an appropriate immune response in which antibodies are created.


1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R Couroux ◽  
Zafar Hussain ◽  
Frank Rutledge ◽  
Robert Lannigan ◽  
Edward D Ralph ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and RNA hybridization method for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and to compare its sensitivity with blood cultures.DESIGN: Blood cultures and a blood sample for PCR were taken from patients with suspected invasive candidiasis. A 105 base pair conserved segment within the rDNA ofCandidaspecies was amplified. The amplicon was detected by hybridization and gel electrophoresis.SETTING: Intensive care units of two tertiary care hospitals.PATIENTS: One hundred and eighteen patients 16 years of age or older with four more risk factors for invasive candidiasis were enrolled. Present or recent past treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics, cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive drugs, granulocytopenia or granulocytosis, intravascular catheterization, tracheal intubation, recent abdominal surgery and parenteral nutrition were considered risk factors.RESULTS: Forty-three patients had invasive candidiasis. PCR detected infections in 28 and 26 patients (sensitivity 65.1% and 60.4%) by hybridization and gel electrophoresis, respectively. The sensitivity of blood cultures was 58.1%. Of 25 patients with positive blood cultures, 17 were positive by PCR with the hybridization method. Eleven patients with invasive candidiasis had negative blood cultures but were positive by PCR.CONCLUSION: PCR, especially with a hybridization detection method, is more sensitive than blood culture for invasive candidiasis and may facilitate the diagnosis of nonfungemic disease.


Sexual Health ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferra O. Mawu ◽  
Stephen C. Davies ◽  
Michelle McKechnie ◽  
Endang R. Sedyaningsih ◽  
Asti Widihastuti ◽  
...  

Background: Sexually transmissible infections (STIs) remain highly prevalent, and HIV is increasing, among female sex workers (FSWs) in Indonesia. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, STIs among FSWs in Manado, Indonesia. Methods: We recruited FSWs mainly at their workplace: they completed a questionnaire and provided a urine sample and self-collected vaginal swab. Samples were tested using multiplex polymerase chain reaction, followed by reverse line blot hybridisation. Results: We recruited 221 FSWs, (median age: 25 years). During the previous 3 months, 30% reported never using condoms; only 2.7% always used condoms. Of 217 women with urine samples, 49% had a ‘curable STI’: 10.6% with gonorrhoea, 26.7% with chlamydia, 12.4% with Mycoplasma genitalium and 22.6% with trichomoniasis. Independent risk factors for gonorrhoea were: domiciled outside North Sulawesi (P = 0.001) and age 16–25 years (P = 0.02); for chlamydia: no prior history of STI symptoms (P = 0.003) and age 16–25 years (P = 0.02); for Mycoplasma genitalium: number of clients on last day of sex work (P = 0.004); for trichomoniasis: number of clients per week (P = 0.04). When these four infections were grouped as any ‘curable STI’, independent associations were: number of clients on the last day of sex work (P = 0.001), age 16–25 years (P = 0.02) and sex working for fewer than 2 years (P = 0.03). Conclusions: This is the first report of M. genitalium infection in Indonesia. The high prevalence of STIs and low condom use among these FSWs suggest their vulnerability to the HIV epidemic in Indonesia. They need enhanced interventions, including outreach screening, and periodic presumptive treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document