scholarly journals 785. Distribution and Associated Mortality in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in Japan: A Multicenter Study From Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms Clinical Research Network (MDRnet)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S489-S490
Author(s):  
Sho Saito ◽  
Aki Sakurai ◽  
Kohei Uemura ◽  
Yasufumi Matsumara ◽  
Ryota Hase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panel Member ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB) are increasingly reported around the world as a cause of serious infections. However, the epidemiology and clinical course of patients with CRGNB in Japan is not well understood. Methods We prospectively collected CR cases from 4/2019 to 9/2020 in Multi-Drug Resistant organisms clinical research network (MDRnet) consisting of 5 tertiary care facilities in Japan. We looked for all CRGNB, and all unique patients with CR Enterobacterales, CR nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) and CR Aeromonas sp. isolation were included. Carbapenem resistance was tested by agar dilution method and defined based on the CLSI criteria for each species. Infections were determined by NHSN protocols. Results In total, 156 patients (30 Enterobacterales, 119 NFGNB, 7 Aeromonas spp.) were included (11 Enterobacter spp., 11 Klebsiella spp., 86 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 29 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 7 Aeromonas spp.). Acinetobacter sp. was not detected. Isolation sites were sputum (n = 12) and urine (n = 7) in Enterobacterales, sputum (n = 62) and blood (n = 18) in NFGNB, and blood (n = 6) in Aeromonas spp. The median age and male ratio of the patients were 68 years [IQR: 53-74] and 19 (63.3%) in Enterobacterales, 72 years [IQR: 60-79] and 70 (58.8%) in NFGNB and 78 years [IQR: 54-83] and 2 (28.6%) in Aeromonas spp. Ten (33.3%) patients with Enterobacterales, 55 (46.2%) patients with NFGNB, and 6 (85.7%) patients with Aeromonas spp. were infected cases. The others were considered as colonized. There were no patients with ICU stay or intubation in Enterobacterales, while 5 (4.2%) and 4 (3.4%) patients were in ICU and intubated in NFGNB, and 2 patients were in ICU and intubated in Aeromonas spp., respectively. All-cause 30-day mortality rates were 10% in Enterobacterales, 16.8 % in NFGNB and 28.6% in Aeromonas spp. In the infected patients, 3 patients (30%) with Enterobacterales, 12 patients (21.8%) with NFGNB and 1 patient (16.7%) with Aeromonas spp. died within 30 days after isolation. Flow diagram outlining the characteristics of the patients and species in this study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with carbapenem resistant nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli Conclusion Mortality rates were high in infected cases of CR Enterobacterales, CR NFGNB and CR Aeromonas spp. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. was not detected, which differed from the CR epidemiology in Europe, the United States, and other Asian countries. Disclosures Sho Saito, n/a, Shionogi (Grant/Research Support) David van Duin, MD, PhD, Entasis (Advisor or Review Panel member)genentech (Advisor or Review Panel member)Karius (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Pfizer (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Qpex (Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)Utility (Advisor or Review Panel member) Yohei Doi, MD, PhD, AstraZeneca (Speaker's Bureau)bioMerieux (Consultant)FujiFilm (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead (Consultant)GSK (Consultant)Meiji (Consultant)MSD (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant) Yohei Doi, MD, PhD, Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; AstraZeneca (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Speakers' bureau; bioMerieux (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Speakers' bureau; Chugai (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Entasis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; FujiFilm (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Advisor or Review Panel member; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; GSK (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Kanto Chemical (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; MSD (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Speaking Fee; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Speakers' bureau; Teijin Healthcare (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Speakers' bureau; VenatoRx (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant

scholarly journals 1247. Molecular Epidemiology of Multi-drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. quasipneumoniae in Qatar

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S712-S712
Author(s):  
Clement Tsui ◽  
Fatma Ben Abid ◽  
Christi L McElheny ◽  
Muna Almaslamani ◽  
Abdullatif Al Khal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Molecular Epidemiology ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Klebsiella Species ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance Genes ◽  
Encoding Genes ◽  
Serotype K2

Abstract Background The molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella species is not well investigated in Qatar. The objective of this work was to characterize the genetic context of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella isolates recovered from clinical specimens. Methods Klebsiella isolates (n=100) were collected at 7 tertiary hospitals from 2015-2017. Identification and susceptibility testing were performed using MALDI-TOF MS and BD Phoenix system, respectively. Whole Genome Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq platform. Phylogenomic analysis, screening of resistance and virulence genes, and comparison of genetic environment of carbapenemase were carried out. Results Klebsiella pneumoniae was common (80), followed by K. quasipneumoniae (16), K. aerogenes (3) and K. oxytoca (1). The most prevalent were genes encoding NDM-1 (39), OXA-48 (20), OXA-232 (10) and OXA-181 (12). KPC-2 (3) and KPC-3 (2) were also identified; no carbapenemase-encoding genes could be identified in 15 isolates. Plasmid locations of 24 carbapenemase-encoding genes were determined; blaNDM-1 was localized on IncFII replicon, while blaOXA-181 and blaOXA-232 were commonly associated with ColKP3 plasmids. pOXA-48-like plasmid was detected in 17/20 isolates harboring blaOXA-48. blaKPC-3 was located on a contig with ‘traditional’ Tn4401a mobile genetic element. Sequence types (STs) were diverse and the ‘traditional’ clonal group (CG) 258 was rare. K. pneumoniae ST147 was predominant (13), followed by ST231 (7) and ST11 (5). Nine K. quasipneumoniae isolates belonged to ST196 and were highly clonal. The virulence loci such as yersiniabactin (ybt) and rmpA were not detected within the study’s K. quasipneumoniae isolates. Amongst K. pneumoniae, there were 50 ybt+ isolates; 8 isolates had rmpA, and of these, 3 belonged to ST383. K. pneumoniae serotype K2, the capsular serotype associated with invasive liver abscess syndrome, was detected in 5 isolates. Genetic relationship of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. quasipneumoniae isolates in Qatar inferred from core genome SNPs. The tree is overlaid with predicted antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors for each isolate. Conclusion The predominant carbapenemases among clinical Klebsiella species isolates in Qatar are NDM and OXA-48 like enzymes, disseminated through various plasmids. The detection of carbapenemase-producing isolate bearing rmpA and serotype K2 reflect the presence of both multidrug resistance and hypervirulence in K. pneumoniae. Disclosures Yohei Doi, MD, PhD, AstraZeneca (Speaker’s Bureau)bioMerieux (Consultant)FujiFilm (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Consultant)GSK (Consultant)Meiji (Consultant)MSD (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant) Yohei Doi, MD, PhD, Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; AstraZeneca (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Speakers’ bureau; bioMerieux (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Speakers’ bureau; Chugai (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Entasis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; FujiFilm (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Advisor or Review Panel member; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; GSK (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Kanto Chemical (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; MSD (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Speaking Fee; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Speakers’ bureau; Teijin Healthcare (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Speakers’ bureau; VenatoRx (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant

scholarly journals 158. Intra- and Inter-hospital Epidemiology of Carbapenem-resistant klebsiella Pneumoniae in US Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S208-S209
Author(s):  
Courtney Luterbach ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Blake Hanson ◽  
Michelle Earley ◽  
Lauren Komarow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Recent Common Ancestor ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Study Investigator

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and specifically Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) are a global threat. CRE rapidly spreading in a healthcare network may infect a distinct patient cohort or have higher virulence. We determined the impact of cluster assignment of CRKp on transmission dynamics and clinical outcomes. Methods CRACKLE-2 is a multi-site, prospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized patients with a clinical CRE culture from any anatomic site. We analyzed 351 patients enrolled 4/30/2016–8/31/2017 in 42 US hospitals with clonal group 258 CRKp. Static clusters were set as ≤ 21 core single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), identified by Snippy, and sharing a recent common ancestor, using a maximum likelihood phylogeny (RAxML v8.2.4). Dynamic clusters were set as > 80% probability of being within 3 transmissions by the R program transcluster (λ = 4, β = 1.6). Clinical outcome was assessed by desirability of outcome ranking with best outcome as alive without events and worst outcome as death. Events were no clinical response, unsuccessful discharge, and adverse events. We compared patients in and out of clusters. For patients in clusters, we also compared intra- vs inter-hospital clusters. Results In total, there were 49 static (median: 5, IQR: 2, 8) and 45 dynamic clusters (median: 5, IQR: 2, 20). For static clusters, 176 patients (50%) were in clusters with 82 (47%) patients in intra-hospital clusters. A higher proportion of patients in clusters, vs not in clusters, had a CRKp culture > 3 days from admission (P = 0.037). More patients in inter-hospital, vs intra-hospital, clusters had diabetes (P = 0.02). For dynamic clusters, 179 patients (51%) were in clusters with 69 (39%) patients in intra-hospital clusters. A lower proportion of patients in clusters, vs not in clusters, had CRKp isolated from urine (P = 0.04). More patients in inter-hospital, vs intra-hospital, clusters had a CRKp culture 3 days from admission (P = 0.04). Clinical outcomes were the same for patients in clusters vs not in clusters for static and dynamic clusters. Conclusion This analysis shows that clinical outcomes are independent of clustering assignment. Static clustering better represented nosocomial spread, based on a higher proportion of patients in clusters having a later CRKp culture. Disclosures Gregory Weston, MD MSCR, Allergan (Grant/Research Support) W. Charles Huskins, MD, MSc, ADMA Biologics (Consultant)Pfizer, Inc (Consultant) Jason C. Gallagher, PharmD, Allergan (Consultant)Astellas (Consultant)Merck (Consultant)Nabriva (Consultant)Qpex (Consultant)scPharmaceuticals (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Spero (Consultant)Tetraphase (Consultant) Robert A. Bonomo, MD, Entasis, Merck, Venatorx (Research Grant or Support) Cesar A. Arias, MD, MSc, PhD, FIDSA, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)MeMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support) David van Duin, MD, PhD, Achaogen (Advisor or Review Panel member)Allergan (Advisor or Review Panel member)Astellas (Advisor or Review Panel member)MedImmune (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)NeuMedicine (Advisor or Review Panel member)Qpex (Advisor or Review Panel member)Roche (Advisor or Review Panel member)Sanofi-Pasteur (Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi (Advisor or Review Panel member)T2 Biosystems (Advisor or Review Panel member)Tetraphase (Advisor or Review Panel member)

scholarly journals 235. In outpatient clinics serving Veterans, antibiotic prescriptions precede a minority of antibiotic-associated adverse events

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S118-S118
Author(s):  
Brigid Wilson ◽  
Taissa A Bej ◽  
Richard Banks ◽  
Janet Briggs ◽  
Sunah Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background An estimated 30% of antibiotic prescriptions in outpatient settings may be inappropriate. Antibiotic exposure increases an individual’s risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and acquiring drug-resistant pathogens. To quantify the increased risk of CDI and drug-resistant pathogens posed by antibiotics prescribed in outpatient visits, we examined a two-year cohort of patients seen in primary care clinics at VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOC) associated with a large VA Medical Center. Methods Among patients with an in-person visit at 13 CBOCs in 2018–2019, we examined rates of antibiotic-associated adverse events (AEs), defined as community-onset CDI or acquisition of resistant Gram-negative bacteria (R-GNB), in the 90 days following those visits. For each visit, we used administrative databases to determine if systemic antibiotics were prescribed, if there was an associated infectious diagnosis, and the subsequent occurrence of AEs. We summarized quarterly rates of prescribed antibiotics and AEs, characterized patients with and without AEs, and estimated the risk ratio of AE for an antibiotic prescription. Results Following 236,665 primary care visits, we observed 62 and 225 AEs due to CDI and R-GNB, respectively (0.12% combined rate) among 278 patients (5 with both). Patients who developed CDI or R-GNB had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.6 ± SD 3.0 and 2.68 ± SD 2.7, respectively) compared to those without AEs (0.72 ± SD 1.3; Table). The rate of new antibiotic prescriptions was 4% in visits without and 10% in visits with a subsequent AE, yielding a risk ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.7–3.7). The rates of both antibiotic prescribing and AE were steady over the examined two-year period (Figure). Table Figure Conclusion Among all patients with a CBOC visit between 2018–2019, an AE, defined as CDI or R-GNB acquisition, was observed following only 0.1% of primary care visits. Among patients who experienced an AE, only 10% of primary care visits preceding those events included a new antibiotic prescription. While this analysis does not address antibiotics during inpatient stays or prescribed by specialty clinics, these findings suggest that among Veterans, outpatient antibiotic exposure may have only a modest contribution to the risk of AE. Disclosures Robin Jump, MD, PhD, Accelerate (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Roche (Advisor or Review Panel member) Federico Perez, MD, MS, Accelerate (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)

scholarly journals 1285. Outcomes in Patients with Gram-Negative Bacteremia from Phase 2 and Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S658-S658
Author(s):  
David PatersonDavid PatersonMasahiro Kinoshita ◽  
Kiichiro Toyoizumi ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Roger Echols
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Drug Evaluation ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Gram Negative

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC) is the first siderophore cephalosporin approved (US and EU) for a broad range of infections caused by Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (ENT) and non-fermenters (NFs). Bacteremia is a serious manifestation of GN infection and understanding how well an antibiotic works to clear the bacteremia is an important part of drug evaluation. Methods All completed clinical studies for CFDC development were used to identify patients with GN bacteremia. Information collected included the primary infection site, species identification and antibiotic susceptibility, post randomization blood cultures and clinical and bacteremia outcome. In patients with missing data (blood cultures) clinical response of cure was used to impute microbiological eradication. Indeterminate responses resulted from a combination of missing data and clinical failure, including death prior to test of cure (TOC). Results Three clinical studies randomized 900 patients (CFDC 552; comparators 348) of whom 84 (CFDC 52; comparators 32) had GN bacteremia at baseline (Table). Bacteremia rate by study was CREDIBLE-CR 25.3%, APEKS-cUTI 6.2%, APEKS-NP 6.0%. Escherichia coli (29), Klebsiella pneumoniae (23) and Acinetobacter spp (21) were most frequent species. Sources included urinary tract (31), lung (22), unknown (10), IV line (8), intraabdominal (6), or other (7). Persistence of bacteremia at TOC was seen in 2/52 (3.8%) CFDC and 2/32 (6.2%) control patients (Table), usually due to lack of source control. Clinical outcomes varied by study and infection source and were often confounded (indeterminate response). Eradication in patients with ENT at TOC was determined for 27/39 (69%) for CFDC and 16/23 (70%) for controls, and for 9/16 (56%) for CFDC and 10/11 (91%) for controls in patients with NFs, respectively. Table. Clinical and bacteremia microbiological outcomes per patient at TOC. Conclusion Post-treatment negative blood cultures were inconsistently collected, especially in APEKS-NP and -cUTI, however, negative blood cultures on therapy without recurrence was seen in 96% of CFDC patients with sufficient information. A dedicated clinical trial in GN bacteremia (GAME CHANGER; NCT03869437) is ongoing and will better delineate microbiological outcomes. Disclosures David Paterson, Accelerate (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMerieux (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMerieux (Advisor or Review Panel member)Entasis (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)VenatoRx (Advisor or Review Panel member) Masahiro Kinoshita, MPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Kiichiro Toyoizumi, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant)

scholarly journals 1219. Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes with Polymyxins Compared to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S699-S700
Author(s):  
Jessica Howard-Anderson ◽  
Michelle Earley ◽  
Toshimitsu Hamasaki ◽  
Chris W Bower ◽  
Gillian Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Partial Credit ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Credit Scores ◽  
Credit Analysis

Abstract Background Patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) have high in-hospital mortality rates. It is unknown if patients with CRPA treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) have improved clinical outcomes compared to those treated with polymyxins. Methods The CDC-funded, Georgia Emerging Infections Program performed active population- and laboratory-based surveillance for CRPA isolated from sterile sites, urine, lower respiratory tract and wounds in metropolitan Atlanta, GA from 8/1/2016–7/31/2018. We reviewed charts of adults without cystic fibrosis who were hospitalized within 1 week of CRPA culture. Using a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysis which incorporates both benefits and risks into a single outcome, we estimated the probability that a patient treated first with C/T would have a more desirable clinical outcome at 30-days than a patient treated with polymyxins (polymyxin B or colistin). We adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on culture source and need for dialysis at baseline. A partial credit analysis allowed for variable weighting of DOOR ranks and calculation of differences in mean partial credit scores. Results Among 710 cases from 18 different hospitals, we identified 73 patients treated for CRPA infections with polymyxins (n=31) or C/T (n=42). Most patients were male (64%) and Black (80%), and those receiving polymyxins were more likely to have required dialysis at baseline (35% vs. 14%, p=0.03) (Table 1). At 30 days after culture, 34 (47%) were alive with no adverse events, 21 (29%) were alive with ≥ 1 adverse event, and 18 (25%) had died. Patients first treated with C/T had a lower 30-day mortality rate than those treated with polymyxins (14% vs 39%, p=0.03). Additionally, those receiving C/T had better overall clinical outcomes, with an adjusted DOOR probability of having an improved outcome of 67% (95% CI 53%–80%) compared to those receiving polymyxins (Figure 1). Partial credit analyses indicated consistent results across different patient values of survival with adverse events (Figure 2). Figure 1: Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) distributions by treatment group, accounting for adverse events and survival status that occurred up to 30 days after CRPA culture. 1. Percentages are adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting, controlling for culture source and need for dialysis at baseline 2. Adverse events measured included: acute kidney injury, discharge to higher acuity location than previous residence, or being hospitalized 30 days after culture Figure 2: Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted partial credit analysis. This displays the difference (ceftolozane/tazobactam minus polymyxin) in mean partial credit scores (black line) and associated 95% confidence bands (gray lines) as a function of the partial credit score assigned to an individual having at least one adverse event (range 0 – 100%). A score of 100% is assigned to patients alive with no adverse events and a score of 0% is assigned to patients who die. A difference in mean partial credit scores of approximately zero suggests there was no difference observed between treatment groups. Conclusion These findings support the recent Infectious Diseases Society of America guidance favoring C/T over polymyxins for treatment of CRPA infections. Disclosures David van Duin, MD, PhD, Entasis (Advisor or Review Panel member)genentech (Advisor or Review Panel member)Karius (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Pfizer (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Qpex (Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)Utility (Advisor or Review Panel member) Scott R. Evans, PhD, Abbvie (Consultant)Advantagene (Consultant)Alexion (Consultant)Amgen (Consultant)AstraZeneca (Consultant)Atricure (Consultant)Breast International Group (Consultant)Cardinal Health (Consultant)Clover (Consultant)FHI Clinical (Consultant)Genentech (Consultant)Gilead (Consultant)Horizon (Consultant)International Drug Development Institute (Consultant)Lung Biotech (Consultant)Microbiotix (Consultant)Neovasc (Consultant)Nobel Pharma (Consultant)Novartis (Consultant)Nuvelution (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant)Rakuten (Consultant)Roche (Consultant)Roivant (Consultant)SAB Biopharm (Consultant)Shire (Consultant)Stryker (Consultant)SVB Leerink (Consultant)Takeda (Consultant)Teva (Consultant)Tracon (Consultant)Vir (Consultant)

scholarly journals 1291. PROVE (Retrospective Cefiderocol Chart Review) Study of Real-World Outcomes and Safety in the Treatment of Patients with Gram-negative Bacterial Infections in the US and Europe

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S734-S735
Author(s):  
Stephen Marcella ◽  
Teena Chopra ◽  
Teena Chopra ◽  
Jose A Vazquez ◽  
Steven Smoke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Clinical Resolution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Study Investigator ◽  
Review Study

Abstract Background Gram-negative bacterial resistance is a global health problem. Limited treatment options exist, especially for carbapenem resistant (CR) pathogens containing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and multidrug resistant non-lactose fermenting bacteria. Cefiderocol (CFDC) retains activity against resistant strains. We describe the objectives, design, and early results of PROVE, a real world retrospective study of CFDC use. Methods PROVE is a multi-center, chart review study of CFDC use for resistant Gram-negative infections (GNI). Cases were eligible if they received ≥ 72 hrs of CFDC. Demographics, comorbidity, pathogen, infection site, and treatment course were assessed. Outcomes included all-cause 14-day and inpatient mortality and length of stay (LOS). Clinical resolution was defined by documentation that clinical signs and/or symptoms had resolved or improved without relapse. Results 24 patients who were treated with CFDC at 2 sites were included to date. Median age was 48 years (Range: 19 - 69 years); 33% were female. The most common comorbidity was diabetes (n=7, 29%). Median total ICU LOS was 36 days. Targeted treatment of documented GNI without preceding failure of prior therapy accounted for 71% of CFDC use. Empirical and salvage treatments accounted for 4% and 25% respectively (Table 1). Median time from admission to 1st CFDC dose was 21 days. Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa accounted for > 75% of isolates (Fig.1). 92% of patients had CR isolates; > 50% were respiratory. Sensitivity to CFDC was tested in 58% of which 71% were sensitive. All-cause 14-day post-CFDC mortality was 13% (95% CI: 2, 27) and overall hospital mortality 25% (95% CI: 6, 44). Clinical resolution was reached in 54% (95% CI: 33, 76). Median post-CFDC LOS was 40 days. Outcomes were stratified by key covariates (Table 2). Conclusion We present initial data for real world use of CFDC for resistant GNI. Patients were complex with multiple comorbidities, some hospitalized for long periods before their index GNI. Outcomes largely reflect this patient population. Additional data are needed to determine the optimal role of CFDC. PROVE offers an opportunity to see how CFDC is being utilized in various settings as well as a first look at key, real world outcomes. Disclosures Stephen Marcella, MD, MPH, Shionogi, Inc (Employee) Steven Smoke, PharmD, Karius (Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member) Ryan K. Shields, PharmD, MS, Shionogi (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) David van Duin, MD, PhD, Entasis (Advisor or Review Panel member)genentech (Advisor or Review Panel member)Karius (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Pfizer (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Qpex (Advisor or Review Panel member)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)Utility (Advisor or Review Panel member)

scholarly journals 1316. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analyses of Cefiderocol in Critically Ill Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S669-S670
Author(s):  
Takayuki Katsube ◽  
Nao Kawaguchi ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Mari Ariyasu ◽  
Tsutae Den Nagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant strains. We aimed to evaluate relationships between drug exposure and outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods Sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples at steady state from critically ill patients with pneumonia, bloodstream infection/sepsis, or complicated urinary tract infection receiving CFDC in two Phase 3 studies were analyzed. Percent time of dosing interval of free drug concentration exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) (%fT>MIC and %fT>MIC,ELF, respectively) were determined for 60 (CREDIBLE-CR; NCT02714595) and 97 patients (APEKS-NP; NCT03032380), using a 3-compartment population PK model. The %fT>MIC,ELF was calculated for 125 pneumonia patients based on an intrapulmonary PK model. Relationships between %fT>MIC, %fT>MIC,ELF and clinical and microbiological outcomes at test of cure (TOC), or mortality at Day 28 were assessed. Results The median (90th percentile) MICs of Gram-negative pathogens in the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses were 0.25 (4) µg/mL (CREDIBLE-CR) and 0.25 (2) µg/mL (APEKS-NP), respectively. Individual plasma %fT>MIC was 100% in ≥95% of patients in each study, and estimated %fT>MIC,ELF was 100% in 89.3% (25/28 pneumonia patients; CREDIBLE-CR) and 97.9% (95/97 pneumonia patients; APEKS-NP). Clinical cure rates and survival rates in patients with 100% fT>MIC or %fT>MIC,ELF were similar between the two studies (Table). No PK/PD relationships between %fT>MIC, %fT>MIC,ELF and clinical cure, microbiological eradication, or survival were identified in either study because high %fT>MIC or %fT>MIC,ELF was achieved in all patients. Table. Clinical cure and survival rates in patients with 100% fT>MIC or %fT>MIC,ELF in CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP studies Conclusion PK/PD relationship was not identified between CFDC plasma or ELF exposure and clinical or microbiological outcomes, or mortality as high %fT>MIC and %fT>MIC,ELF were achieved, suggesting the recommended dosing regimen of 2 g q8h or renally adjusted dosage (including augmented renal clearance), infused over 3 hours, provides sufficient exposure to CFDC in critically ill patients. Disclosures Takayuki Katsube, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Nao Kawaguchi, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Mari Ariyasu, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Simon Portsmouth, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) David Paterson, Accelerate (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMerieux (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMerieux (Advisor or Review Panel member)Entasis (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Grant/Research Support)VenatoRx (Advisor or Review Panel member) Michael J. Satlin, MD, MS, Achaogen (Consultant)Allergan (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Toshihiro Wajima, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee)

scholarly journals 1608. Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Multiple Urban Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S798-S799
Author(s):  
Nicolo Cabrera ◽  
Truc T Tran ◽  
Travis J Carlson ◽  
Faris Alnezary ◽  
William R Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Study ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Study Investigator

Abstract Background Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination developed for use against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). C/T is approved for complicated urinary tract and intraabdominal infections as well as hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonias. However, comprehensive clinical characterization of patients treated with C/T in non-FDA-approved indications is limited. Methods Patients ≥18 years who received C/T for ≥48 hours while hospitalized in 9 acute care centers in Houston, TX from January 2016 through September 2018 were included. Demographic, microbiologic, treatment and clinical outcome data were retrospectively collected by chart review. In patients who received multiple inpatient courses of C/T, only the first course with C/T was assessed. Results 210 patients met inclusion criteria: 58% were non-white, 35% were female and 13% were immunocompromised. Median age was 61 years (IQR, 48 to 69). Median Charlson comorbidity index was 5 (IQR, 2 to 6). At the onset of the index episode, a significant proportion of patients required intensive care unit admission (44%), mechanical ventilation (37%) and pressor support (22%). Respiratory sources were the most common (50%) followed by urine (15%). Positive cultures were documented in 93% of the cases and PA was found in 86%. Majority (95%) of PA which were MDR. C/T use was guided by susceptibility testing of the index isolate in ca. 52%. In 5.7% of cases, C/T was used to escalate therapy without any documented C/T-susceptible organism. Half (51%) of the cohort received initial dosing appropriate for renal function while 36% receiving a lower than recommended dose. Clinical success (i.e., recovery from infection-related signs and symptoms) occured in 77%. The in-hospital mortality rate in our cohort was 15% with 26 of 31 deaths deemed infection-related. Conclusion We report a large multicenter observational cohort that received C/T. A 77% clinical success with the use of C/T was documented. These data support the use of C/T in critically ill patients infected with MDR PA. Disclosures William R. Miller, MD, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Shionogi (Advisor or Review Panel member) Laura A. Puzniak, PhD, Merck (Employee) Cesar A. Arias, MD, MSc, PhD, FIDSA, Entasis Therapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)MeMed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Grant/Research Support)

scholarly journals 1012. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected virologically-suppressed older adults in a real-world setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S534-S535
Author(s):  
Charlotte-Paige M Rolle ◽  
Vu Nguyen ◽  
Kiran Patel ◽  
Dan Cruz ◽  
Federico Hinestrosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Study Investigator ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background Approximately 50% of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are ≥50 years old. Efforts are ongoing to identify antiretrovirals associated with fewer drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and long-term side effects in this group. Clinical trials of B/F/TAF demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in older adults, however, data from real-word settings are needed to validate these results. Methods This retrospective analysis evaluated records from PLWH aged ≥ 50 years at the Orlando Immunology Center who were switched to B/F/TAF between 2/7/2018 and 5/31/2019. Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks post-switch. The primary endpoint was maintenance of HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL at week 48. The impact of switching to B/F/TAF on DDIs, adverse events (AEs) and safety parameters were analyzed throughout the study. Results 306 patients met inclusion criteria. 62 (20%) were female, 126 (41%) were non-white, median age was 58 years (range [r] 50-81), median duration of HIV infection was 19.5 years (r 2-40), median number of chronic co-morbid conditions was 5 (r 0-20), and median number of baseline concomitant medications was 4 (r 0-23). 159 (52%) patients were switched from regimens containing ritonavir or cobicistat. The most commonly documented reason for switch was simplification (Table 1). At Week 48, 287 (94%) patients maintained an HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/ml and 19 (6%) had an HIV-1 RNA between 50-200 copies/mL (Figure 1). 1 patient discontinued due to lack of efficacy. A total of 123 potential DDIs were identified in 104 (34%) patients taking a boosting agent or rilpivirine at baseline (Table 2). At Week 48, there was a significant median decline in total cholesterol (15.5 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.5; 21.5), LDL cholesterol (9.5 mg/dL, 95% CI: 4; 15.5) and triglycerides (20 mg/dL, 95% CI: 9.5; 32.5), and median weight increased by 2.5 pounds (95% CI: 1.5; 3.5). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 33 (11%) patients (all Grade 1-2) and led to 7 (2%) discontinuations. Table 1-Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics Table 2-Avoidance of Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) following switch to B/F/TAF Figure 1-Subgroup analysis of virologic outcomes at Week 48 Conclusion In this real-world cohort, switching to B/F/TAF was associated with maintenance of virologic control, improvement in lipid parameters, and avoidance of DDIs in a large proportion of patients. These data support use of B/F/TAF as a treatment option in older PLWH. Disclosures Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Kiran Patel, PharmD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Federico Hinestrosa, MD, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead Sciences (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)Theratechnologies (Speaker’s Bureau) Edwin DeJesus, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)

scholarly journals 1104. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Refractory and/or Resistant Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S582-S583
Author(s):  
Eleni Karantoni ◽  
Yiqi Su ◽  
Anat Stern ◽  
Phaedon D Zavras ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Panel Member ◽  
Multivariable Model ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Material Support ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background The epidemiology of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in the era of preemptive therapy (PET) is defined. In contrast, less data exists on refractory and/or resistant (R/R) CMV. We report on 1) the incidence; 2) risk factors and outcomes of R/R CMV by 1-year post HCT. Methods Retrospective review of 167 CMV seropositive (R+) recipients of first marrow or peripheral blood HCT from 1/2014 - 12/2017 managed by PET. Refractory CMV was defined as failure to achieve >1 log10 decrease in CMV viral load (VL) and having VL >1,000 IU/mL after ≥14 day of PET. Resistant CMV required genotypic confirmation of resistance mutation(s) in UL54 and/or UL97 genes. End organ disease (EOD) was defined by standard criteria. Patients (pts) were followed through 1-year post HCT and were categorized in two mutually exclusive groups as R/R and no R/R. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records and hospital databases. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were used to identify risk factors for R/R CMV. Results Of 167 PET recipients, 91 (54.5%) received ex vivo T cell depleted (TCD) HCT; 40 (24.0%) had mismatched donor; and 26 (15.6%) had multiple myeloma. 66/167 (39.5%) pts developed refractory CMV (6 pts also had resistant CMV). Time from HCT to CMV viremia was shorter in R/R group: median (IQR) 21.5 (17.2-27.8) days compared to no R/R group: 26 (19-32) days (p=0.031). Maximum VL was higher for R/R compared to no R/R: median (IQR) 9,118 (2,849-18,456) and 868 (474-1,908), respectively (p< 0.001). In multivariable model, risk factors for R/R included TCD HCT (p< 0.0001) and higher VL at PET initiation (p=0.0002). In contrast, CMV seropositive donor (p=0.035) was protective (Figure 1). CMV EOD developed in 28.2% of R/R and 16.2% of no R/R groups (p=0.085) (Figure 2). Overall survival at 1 year was 59.1% for R/R compared to 83.1% for no R/R group (p=0.00027) (Figure 3). Figure 1. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from multivariable model evaluating risk factors of refractory/resistant (R/R) CMV. Figure 2. Cumulative incidence curves of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) at 1-year post HCT Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of overall survival (OS) at 1-year post HCT Conclusion 1) Refractory and/or resistant CMV occurred in 39,5% of PET recipients. 2) T-cell depletion and higher CMV VL at PET initiation were risk factors for R/R CMV in multivariable models. 3) R/R CMV was associated with more EOD and worse overall survival. Disclosures Sergio Giralt, MD, Amgen (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Served an advisory board for Amgen, Actinuum, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, JAZZ pharmaceutical, Takeda, Novartis, KITE, and Spectrum pharma and has received research support from Amgen, Actinuum, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Miltenyi, Takeda.) Miguel-Angel Perales, MD, Abbvie (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria from Abbvie, Bellicum, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Nektar Therapeutics, Omeros, and Takeda.)ASTCT (Other Financial or Material Support, Volunteer member of the Board of Directors of American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), Be The Match (National Marrow Donor Program, NMDP), and the CIBMTR Cellular Immunotherapy Data Resource (CIDR) Committee)Cidara Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Serve on DSMBs for Cidara Therapeutics, Servier and Medigene, and the scientific advisory boards of MolMed and NexImmune.)Kite/Gilead (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Received research support for clinical trials from Incyte, Kite/Gilead and Miltenyi Biotec.) Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD, Chimerix (Research Grant or Support)Merck&Co (Research Grant or Support, Investigator and received funding and consulting fees from Merck, Chimerix, Shire and Astellas)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document