Lateral Transpsoas Approach for Lumbar Indirect Lateral Recess Decompression: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-391
Author(s):  
Federico Landriel ◽  
Santiago Hem ◽  
Claudio Yampolsky

Abstract Neurogenic claudication is a common symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis; its pathophysiology is thought to be ischemia of the nerve roots secondary to compression from surrounding structures. The stenosis of the lateral recesses and neuroforamen can cause these symptoms and its surgical treatment is decompression. The placement of interbody cages that restore the disc space height may indirectly decompress the neuroforamen and alleviate the nerve impingement symptoms. In case of concomitant low-grade spondylolisthesis, interbody devices might also reduce the slippage. We present a technical surgical video of a minimally invasive lateral transpsoas fusion, relying on indirect decompression to treat a patient with neurogenic claudication secondary to grade 1 spondylolisthesis. The patient signed a written consent to publish a video, recording, photograph, image, illustration, and/or information about him.

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shearwood McClelland ◽  
Stefan S. Kim

ABSTRACTLumbar stenosis is a common disorder, usually characterized clinically by neurogenic claudication with or without lumbar/sacral radiculopathy corresponding to the level of stenosis. We present a case of lumbar stenosis manifesting as a multilevel radiculopathy inferior to the nerve roots at the level of the stenosis. A 55-year-old gentleman presented with bilateral lower extremity pain with neurogenic claudication in an L5/S1 distribution (posterior thigh, calf, into the foot) concomitant with dorsiflexion and plantarflexion weakness. Imaging revealed grade I spondylolisthesis of L3 on L4 with severe spinal canal stenosis at L3-L4, mild left L4-L5 disc herniation, no stenosis at L5-S1, and no instability. EMG revealed active and chronic L5 and S1 radiculopathy. The patient underwent bilateral L3-L4 hemilaminotomy with left L4-L5 microdiscectomy for treatment of his L3-L4 stenosis. Postoperatively, he exhibited significant improvement in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. The L5-S1 level was not involved in the operative decompression. Patients with radiculopathy and normal imaging at the level corresponding to the radiculopathy should not be ruled out for operative intervention should they have imaging evidence of lumbar stenosis superior to the expected affected level.


Author(s):  
Kosuke Sugiura ◽  
Kazuta Yamashita ◽  
Hiroaki Manabe ◽  
Yoshihiro Ishihama ◽  
Fumitake Tezuka ◽  
...  

AbstractTransforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar diskectomy became established early in the 21st century. It can be performed under local anesthesia and requires only an 8-mm skin incision, making it the least invasive disk surgery method available. The full-endoscopic technique has recently been used to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Here, we describe the outcome of simultaneous bilateral decompression of lumbar lateral recess stenosis via a transforaminal approach under local anesthesia in a 60-year-old man. The patient presented with a complaint of bilateral leg pain that was preventing him from standing and walking, and he had been able to continue his work as a dentist by treating patients while seated. Imaging studies revealed bilateral lumbar lateral recess stenosis with central herniated nucleus pulposus at L4/5. We performed simultaneous bilateral transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) under local anesthesia. Both decompression and diskectomy were successfully completed without complications. Five days after TE-LRD, he was able to return to work, and 3 months after the surgery, he resumed playing golf. Full-endoscopic surgery under local anesthesia can be very effective in patients who need to return to work as soon as possible after surgery.


2017 ◽  
pp. 124-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Mlyavykh ◽  
A. Y. Aleynik ◽  
A. E. Bokov ◽  
M. V. Rasteryaeva ◽  
M. A. Kutlaeva

Сomputed tomography (CT) is widely used in the diagnosis of  degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine, but the relationship  between clinical manifestations of lumbar stenosis and its anatomical prerequisites has not been sufficiently studied to date.The objective: to determine the significance of the morphometric  parameters of lumbar stenosis according to CT scans and to  establish their relationship with the prevailing symptoms of the disease.Material and methods. Seventy-five consecutive patients with  clinically significant lumbar stenosis who underwent CT scan before  surgery were enrolled in this study. The average values of thirteen  different morphometric parameters were calculated at LIII–SI levels of the intervertebral discs and of the pedicels in the axial and sagittal views. The possibility of classification of clinical observations and the correlation of morphometric parameters with the clinical forms of lumbar stenosis were investigated using discriminant and logistic regression analysis. Results. CT scan with high probability allocates patients with  predominant symptoms of neurogenic claudication or bilateral  radiculopathy. The most significant morphometric predictors of this  clinical group are the depth of the lateral recesses and the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal.Conclusion. CT scan significantly expands the informative value of  magnetic resonance imaging and can be used in planning the  decompressive stage of the surgery intervention in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 782-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonor Garbin Savarese ◽  
Geraldo Dias Ferreira-Neto ◽  
Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva Herrero ◽  
Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino ◽  
Marcello H. Nogueira-Barbosa

To evaluate the association of redundant nerve roots of cauda equina (RNRCE) with the degree of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and with spondylolisthesis. Method After Institutional Board approval, 171 consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled, 105 LSS patients and 66 patients without stenosis. The dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured on T2w axial MRI at the level of L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 intervertebral discs. Two blinded radiologists classified cases as exhibiting or not RNRCE in MRI. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed. Results RNRCE were associated with LSS. RRNCE was more frequent when maximum stenosis<55 mm2. Substantial intra- observer agreement and moderate inter-observer agreement were obtained in the classification of RNRCE. Spondylolisthesis was identified in 27 patients and represented increased risk for RRNCE. Conclusion LSS is a risk factor for RNRCE, especially for dural sac CSA<55 mm2. LSS and spondylolisthesis are independent risk factors for RNRCE.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 630-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Arslan ◽  
Ayhan Cömert ◽  
Halil İbrahim Açar ◽  
Mevci Özdemir ◽  
Alaittin Elhan ◽  
...  

Object Although infrequent, injury to adjacent neurovascular structures during posterior approaches to lumbar intervertebral discs can occur. A detailed anatomical knowledge of relationships may decrease surgical complications. Methods Ten formalin-fixed male cadavers were used for this study. Posterior exposure of the lumbar thecal sac, nerve roots, pedicles, and intervertebral discs was performed. To identify retroperitoneal structures at risk during posterior lumbar discectomy, a transabdominal retroperitoneal approach was performed, and observations were made. The distances between the posterior and anterior edges of the lumbar intervertebral discs were measured, and the relationships between the disc space, pedicle, and nerve root were evaluated. Results For right and left sides, the mean distance from the inferior pedicle to the disc gradually increased from L1–2 to L4–5 (range 2.7–3.8 mm and 2.9–4.5 mm for right and left side, respectively) and slightly decreased at L5–S1. For right and left sides, the mean distance from the superior pedicle to the disc was more or less the same for all disc spaces (range 9.3–11.6 mm and 8.2–10.5 mm for right and left, respectively). The right and left mean disc-to-root distance for the L3–4 to L5–S1 levels ranged from 8.3 to 22.1 mm and 7.2 to 20.6 mm, respectively. The root origin gradually increased from L-1 to L-5. The right and left nerve root–to-disc angle gradually decreased from L-3 to S-1 (range 105°–110.6° and 99°–108°). Disc heights gradually increased from L1–2 to L5–S1 (range 11.3–17.4 mm). The mean distance between the anterior and posterior borders of the intervertebral discs ranged from 39 to 46 mm for all levels. Conclusions To avoid neighboring neurovascular structures, instrumentation should not be inserted into the lumbar disc spaces more than 3 cm from their posterior edge. Accurate anatomical knowledge of the relationships of intervertebral discs to nerve roots is needed for spine surgeons.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. E12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Hardenbrook ◽  
Sergio Lombardo ◽  
Miles C. Wilson ◽  
Albert E. Telfeian

OBJECTIVE The authors describe a cadaveric analysis to determine the ideal dimensions and trajectory for considering endoscopic transforaminal interbody implantation. METHODS The soft tissues of 8 human cadavers were removed from L-1 to the sacrum, exposing the posterior bony elements. Facetectomies were performed bilaterally at each lumbar level with resection of the pars interarticularis, revealing the pedicles, nerve roots, and interbody disc space. Each level was digitally photographed with a marker for scale and evaluated with digital analysis software. The traversing and exiting nerve roots and pedicle margins were identified, and the distances between these structures and their relationships to the surrounding structures were documented. RESULTS The dimensions of 2 areas were measured: the working triangle and safe zone. The working triangle is the triangle between the exiting and traversing nerve roots above the superior margin of the inferior pedicle. The safe zone is the trapezoid bounded by the widths of the superior and inferior pedicles between the exiting and traversing nerve roots. The mean surface area for the working triangle was 1.83 cm2, with L5–S1 having the largest area at 2.19 cm2. The mean surface area of the safe zone was 1.19 cm2, with L5–S1 having the largest area at 1.26 cm2. At the medial border of the pedicle extending superiorly, there were no nerve structures within 1.19 cm at any level. On the lateral border of the pedicle, the exiting nerve root was closer superiorly, with the closest being 0.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS The working triangle is a relatively large area. The safe zone, just superior to the pedicle, is free of nerve structures. By utilizing the superior border of the pedicle, the disc space can be accessed within this safe zone without risk of injury to the nerves. A thorough understanding of foraminal anatomy is fundamental for considering how to safely access the disc space, thereby utilizing less invasive endoscopic techniques, and is an important first step in considering what shapes and sizes of interbody implants and retractors are feasible for use in the foramen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document